Contentment

We have all heard genie stories about a man finding the magic lamp and getting three wishes.

Here is my version:

An old man finds a lamp on a beach. While rubbing the lamp, a magic genie pops out and grants him three wishes. The old man wishes for health, wealth and a beautiful wife. Immediately the wishes are granted. The man has the body of a twenty-year-old body-builder. His fortune puts him in the class of the weathiest people in the world. He has a gorgeous, young wife.

For many months, the man is elated at his new-found wealth. He enjoys his lovely bride and his new body. He buys things he never dreamed of owning and sees places he never dreamed of seeing. Everywhere he goes he is envied and admired. Men covet his life.

And now, as Paul Harvey says, you get “the rest of the story.” As times wears on, little by little he starts to question his wishes. Should he have asked for extremely high intelligence rather than wealth? He could then have used his intelligence to make a lot of money, but he would still have the high intelligence. Should he have asked for things that were not so self-centered? If he had asked for a cure for cancer, he could have become wealthy and also made a tremendous contribution to mankind. He would not only be envied, but beloved. Should he have asked for a soulmate rather than the outward beauty of a wife? He loved his beautiful wife, but sometimes she wasn’t very easy to talk with about what he was thinking and feeling. If he had thought about it a little more before answering, he would have asked for it differently. Thoughts such as this plagued the man for the rest of his life. He was very glad that he had met the genie and was thankful for what he had been given, but always, in the back of his mind, he thought he could have done better in making his wishes.

The point of the story is this: most of us are in some way, shape or form that old man. We have been given blessing upon blessing in our lives that we appreciate, but yet we are not content. We are always thinking that we could have done better. We are always looking for the next genie to come along so that we can make things right. We second-guess where we are in life. Do we have the right job, friends, spouse, neighborhood, faith and so on? Open and honest self-examination is healthy. Yet, if we cannot balance the need for self-examination and self-improvement with the idea of being content, perhaps we have something more to learn on the subject.

It may appear that to be content is the same thing as being complacent. Complacency is never a good thing. One can be both complacent and content, but one does not have to be complacent in order to be content. One can be content and still have a burning desire to improve. I would suggest that you can be diligent in self-examination and self-improvement while at the same time being content. We can learn Paul’s secret when he said “I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content” (Phi 4:11).

We will focus on Paul’s comment to see if we can learn the most published, but least understood “secret” to having a contented life.


There is a scene in the book “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone”, by J.K. Rowling, where Harry finds a mirror. In this mirror, he sees his dead parents and himself together. He spends hours looking into this mirror. Only later does he find out that the secret to the mirror is that it shows you whatever it is you desire. People waste their entire lives looking at this mirror because in it they see their deepest unfulfilled desires.

The modern media bombardment — TV, movies, advertising, etc — is a lot like that mirror. We blame Hollywood for all kinds of ills from materialism to teenage pregnancy. I am not defending the entertainment and advertising industry at all, but if you understand that the media is just like that mirror, you have an insight that many people do not possess.

I am pretty sure that the media moguls don’t have an annual meeting and say, “How can we destroy the fabric of morality in the world this year?” These guys have companies. Like most companies, they are motivated by profits. If they could make a lot of money on wholesome, family-oriented programming, they would. I believe they don’t care much at all about what is on the TV as long as you and I will watch it and buy the products or services of the advertisers. Day in and day out, the average American spends 6 hours a day staring into this mirror.

Contentment doesn’t move much product. If you are happy and content, you are less likely to buy the next big thing. If they can make you feel a little less content and provide you with the magic solution, you are just the chump — I mean consumer — they are looking for. The real shame is that the majority buys into it. If we just buy the next big thing, we can be younger, healthier, more attractive, happier, more admired by our family and friends, wealthier and all-around better off. Why wouldn’t you plunk down $39.95 for that set of knives with all of those accrued benefits? You would be crazy not to!

This plays right into human nature. Starving people want food. People who have food want it to taste good. People who have good-tasting food want it presented pleasantly and someone else to cook it. This same principle of discontent applies to clothing, housing, recreation and so on. We are always looking for something better unless we are content.

The Bible says in 1Ti 6:6-12 that “Godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. And having food and raiment let us be therewith content. But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness. Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses.”

Contentment is great gain. We think of riches as great gain and are convinced by the media that buying whatever they are selling is great gain, but think of how many miserable people there are who have all of the trappings of wealth.

We have to learn that even with all of this against us, we have an opportunity to be content. God has provided us the answer to this secret.


The first principle of contentment is: “Seek first the Kingdom of God.”

Imbedded in this advice from Matthew is belief in the King. If we seek for the Kingdom of God and along with it the King who rules that Kingdom, we have the essential element of contentment. If we honestly and sincerely believe in the King — not an academic concept or abstraction — but truly believe in a living Jesus Christ, we will not be easily swayed by the garbage that the world would have us believe brings contentment. The more we believe in him, the more we will seek him. The more we seek him, the less we will seek what the world wants us to seek. Fame, fortune and all of the cares of the world shrink in proportion the more we know the son of the living God.

Imagine yourself with a bloodied back from a severe beating with a whip. But that is not all, you are locked in a dark, stinking dungeon with your feet locked in between two blocks of wood. Now I want you to imagine, if it is possible to do so, that in these terrible circumstances, you are content enough to break forth into song praising God and to offer prayers of thanksgiving. This might seem too unusual even to imagine, but that is exactly what happened to Paul and Silas (see Acts 16). What could possibly possess two people to have such a profoundly unusual disposition in the most horrible of conditions? They knew the King. They knew the Kingdom. Nothing could take that contentment away from them. The King and the Kingdom were not abstractions or academic exercises to Paul and Silas but a strong relationship with a living Christ.

By God’s grace, few of us will have to undergo such horrible treatment. Most of us have not had to develop characters that would allow us to be content under torture. We only have to develop characters that allow us to be content under the most benign circumstances. We need to learn to be content in our jobs, in our families, in with our homes, with our clothing and so forth. While Paul was content while in jail, we need to be content when that person cuts us off in traffic or our friends do not treat us well.

I would suggest that part of our problem is that we treat seeking the Kingdom of God like it was finished business rather than a relationship with a living being. For example, if we see our marriages as completed when we say “I do”, we are really missing the point, aren’t we? A marriage is an ever-changing and evolving relationship. We must constantly work at that relationship and build upon it day by day. While we can view the Kingdom of God as an event yet future or even a place we secured when we believed (both of which are true), we miss the point that behind these facts is a living relationship with the King. To seek the Kingdom is to seek the King in day-to-day living. It is an act of transformation from the things of this world to the things from above. If our focus is intent upon that relationship and seeking to enhance that relationship, all of the things that the world seeks after do not enhance our ability to improve that relationship — rather, they detract from it. Hence, if we sincerely seek for the Kingdom of God, we become content by virtue of things that cannot be bought at a store. We find that the greater the relationship with the King, the greater our contentment regardless of other circumstances.

The ultimate irony is we fret so much about those who we perceive as in control of our contentment. The government takes too much of our precious money. Our boss didn’t give us that well-deserved promotion. Our children don’t appreciate us enough. We fret and fume because if “they” would just do the right thing, we could be content. It is ironic because the only person that stands in the way of our contentment is the one that we view when we look into the mirror. The only “they” that stands in our way is, in fact, “us.”

There are a few more “secrets” concerning contentment other than seeking first the Kingdom of God.


The next principle of contentment is simple to say, but hard to do: “Trust God.”

One of my favorite sayings is: “A fanatic is defined as someone who does what God would do if He had all of the facts.” Another one of my favorite sayings is: “Worry is the illusion of control.” Both worry and fanaticism stem from the same problem — not trusting God.

It is impossible to be content if you are constantly concerned about things that are out of your control or fighting battles that are not yours to fight in the first place. Contentment comes from having a good idea of what your job is and what God’s job is. The fact of the matter is that one of those two parties — you and God — has a high probability of royally messing up his job. (Hint: It’s not God!) So if this is true, we should focus on things that are our job. God will do just fine of His responsibilities without our help.

Yet another of my favorite sayings is: “Do your best and leave the rest to God.” God knows what we are made of and understands that we will fail. At the same time God knows we will fail, God expects us to make the effort to succeed. The key is for us to know — despite all the malarkey of the self-help, motivational gurus — that success is completely out of our control. We may do all the right things, push all the right buttons, know all the right people and make all the right moves only to find that God has made the decision that we will not succeed. Failure may come in one of a million packages — a brain tumor, corporate downsizing, an unfaithful spouse, a lost letter, a fall down the steps. These examples are reasons for failure that are beyond our control. We could certainly add to it a longer list of reasons for failure that are directly of our doing. Whatever the package of failure, the contented know that their job is to do their best despite the pitfalls of life, and remain content knowing that God is in control. We can surely minimize the pitfalls of life by doing the right thing. Eating right, getting a good education, staying away from illicit sex and drugs, flossing regularly, working hard and being honest can all minimize our risk of trouble, but, in the end, we are all left helplessly dependent upon the mercy and wisdom of God. What better place is there to be left dependent on mercy and wisdom that with our loving Father in heaven?

Here is where we need to define the difference between contentment and apathy. Both words carry the connotation that we are satisfied with things as they are. However, apathy implies that we have no motivation or desire to change. Contentment, on the other hands, has no implication on our desire to change; it just means that we are happy regardless.

Let’s take an example of a person who is seriously overweight. The apathetic person doesn’t care. They have no desire to change and are not taking any steps to change. The contented person may also be apathetic, but not necessarily. The contented person may see a real need to change. He may change his diet or exercise in an effort to reduce his weight. However, in the process, the spiritually contented person is happy regardless of the state of her progress or the way the new diet and exercise regime makes her feel. Neither is the contented person in a constant state of worry until she achieves her goal. She simply do her best and trusts God.

Once again, it bears mentioning that trusting God is not easy. We are people who want results. When we have pain whether physical or emotional, we want it taken away. When we see something that needs to change, we want it done sooner rather than later. The point is that being discontented by worrying, fretting, or fuming doesn’t help achieve the goal any sooner, it just makes us miserable in the process.

So we see that trusting God is not just a sound theological principle, but a key to leading a contented, God-centered life.


The state of being content is defined by what you desire. If all you desire is to please God and help your fellowman (think about the two greatest commandments — love God and love your neighbor), contentment is readily obtainable. If we understand this, verses like 1Ti 6:8 make sense: “And having food and raiment let us be therewith content.” If we read this verse in context of what the world would have us believe, 1Ti 6:8 seems ludicrous. The world wants us to read it this way: “And having food and raiment (by the right designer) and a new car and a large home and the perfect body and the perfect spouse and a great job and a fat retirement account and a good golf swing and smart, athletic children, let us be therewith content (until our neighbor gets something as good or better and then we need to outdo them).” Following the world’s prescription will never bring contentment. Never. No matter how successful you are in this world’s terms, there is always something more to attain, and the contentment is fleeting at best.

There is a soon-to-be-released WCF video about a Bible school in Russia. In this video, there is a clip of a sister in Christ who has nothing that this world has to offer. She is homeless. She is old. She has no living relatives. She lives on $30 a month. She lives day to day and hand to mouth. When the interviewer, Steve Johnson, asked her what the brethren could do to help her, this was her response:

“I’m happy that I’m living a new life with Jesus, that I’ve started my sad life over and that I have Jesus with me. I realize now that I can’t complain about what God hasn’t given me because He’s given us sunshine, He’s given us the earth, He’s given us the stars above. I actually have no house at all, I have nowhere to live. In the winter months, because I literally have nowhere to live, an old people’s home that is run by the government allows me to live there. It’s a hostel for homeless people but the conditions there are absolutely terrible. In the summer months when I’m not allowed to live there I go around to people and I offer to do housework for people. I offer to work in their gardens. I offer to work on their farms if they let me sleep on their farm. So that’s how I survive in the summer months. But in the winter I have to stay in this hotel for homeless people. But also I consider myself so happy because I have found spiritual fellowship with you. I’m an optimist.”

“It’s totally awkward for me. I can’t even entertain such thought. All my life until this happened, until we got chased away, I’ve all my life worked and I’ve helped other people, not the other way around. When my brother-in-law died I spent a lot of time and effort helping my sister raise her three children. I’ve never been in such a position where I’ve had to ask other people for help. It’s such a terrible thing for me. The concrete help you already gave me. You gave me the Bible. You gave me the Truth. That’s the material help. You already gave it.”

“Let your life be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee” (Heb 13:5).

(KT)

Courtship

Corinth was a very wicked city. This is both specifically stated and implied in the Corinthian letters:

“I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with immoral men; not at all meaning the immoral of this world…since then you would need to go out of the world” (1Co 5:10).

This letter which Paul wrote to these converts needs rereading today. It sets out seven reasons why believers should shun, or flee from, immorality (1Co 6:18):

(1) The immoral will be excluded from the Kingdom of God: “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral… nor adulterers will inherit the kingdom of God” (1Co 6:9,10; cp Gal 5:19-21).

(2) You were separated from immorality at baptism: “You have been washed… separated… and justified” (1Co 6:11).

(3) Your body belongs to the Lord: Therefore you are not free to do as you wish with your body: “The body is not for fornication, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body” (1Co 6:13).

(4) The body will be the subject of a future resurrection: “God who raised Christ by His power will raise your body by the same power” (1Co 6:14).

(5) Your body is a member of Christ: “Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ?” (1Co 6:15).

Immoral unions violate the oneness with Christ. The believer is one spirit with his Savior. The “one spirit” is a oneness in thinking and attitude (Joh 17). You cannot be of “one spirit” with the Savior and of “one flesh” by union with an immoral person (1Co 6:16).

(6) Fornication is a sin against one’s own body (1Co 6:18).

(7) You are not your own: “You have been purchased with a price; therefore glorify God in your body” (1Co 6:20).

Of course, the world around us thinks nothing of premarital relations. Indeed, how can it when it tolerates or encourages intercourse between those who have no intention to marry? But it should not be so among us. Intercourse is intended only for marriage and is an expression of heart and mind by one person for one person. Premarital relations destroy the proper joy of marriage. Indiscriminate intimacy, apart from being wholly unChristian and loose, makes nonsense of the sanctity of the marriage bond and encourages unfaithfulness after marriage. Right behavior begins in the mind. Christian behavior follows the precepts of Christ.

The Call of God

There is little harm in making friendships outside the Faith, if two things are thoroughly clear and firm in one’s mind. First, that God has “called you out of darkness into his marvellous light”. The spectrum of this light includes the knowledge of God and of Jesus, the awareness of His kindness and severity, and the revelation of His truth. God called us to this light and we obeyed His call. This is the important factor. Paul wrote that upon those who “do not obey the truth” would come “indignation and wrath”.

This call of God must be kept firmly in mind, for upon faithfulness to it depends one’s eternal future. Thus everything must yield to one’s loyalty to God and to Jesus, even an affair of the heart — that is if the Faith is a reality. Jesus was clear and uncompromising about this: “He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.”

Obviously each will love his own close relatives — and each will love his (or her) sweetheart — but make sure that neither is elevated above Jesus. Otherwise why wait for his coming and for all the great things that are promised us?

The second fact that needs to be clear is that whoever has not obeyed the truth is still in darkness in God’s sight. This is His judgment, not ours. So however charming, tender, kind and gentle a person may be, he (or she) is in darkness until the truth has been obeyed. God wants all these attributes in a person, but they must be the qualities of a person obedient to Him.

If one meets and is attracted to someone who is not of the Faith, what is one to do? First remember that mutual attraction is not only physical, it is also intellectual. There will be similar interests in books, art, music, games and hobbies. And in a world of hate and violence, racial discrimination and political struggles, when so many young people dread the future with its threat of nuclear warfare, one has a fine opportunity reasonably and tactfully to reveal one’s supreme interest in and loyalty to a Father who, through Jesus, is to sweep these things away. Here is the place to start a relationship.

This introduction of one’s spiritual interest in the Faith should be made at the start of a friendship, and its overwhelming importance for you should be emphasized. If your friend can be persuaded to join you at your meetings and to meet the brothers and sisters, so much the better.

The danger of friendships outside the Faith is that one’s hope of the coming Kingdom may not be revealed until one is emotionally and deeply involved — when, frightened by the thought of the possible consequences of marriage out of the Faith, one makes every effort to persuade the friend of the merits of the Truth. How can he (or she) be expected to understand at such a late date? The response is likely to be: “What is all the fuss about?” Or “Why wasn’t I told before?” Thus one’s last minute efforts may have an adverse effect on the friend, rather than otherwise, and one has done a disservice to God and His Truth.

Covenant with Israel (Heb 8)

Paul’s primary reason in writing this letter was to convince Jewish Christians not to return to Judaism — toward which some were wavering. He is showing that in every respect the believers in Christ had a high-priest and a law far superior to the old. We have a high priest.

Christ was a “minister of the true Tabernacle, which the Lord pitched and not man.” The word “true” signifies real, in contrast to the typical or the shadow of v 5. There, “example” may be more faithfully translated as “representation, outline, copy.”

And the “shadow” of v 5 implies something of no substance which depends on something else for its very being. The Law of Moses depended for even its existence upon the great Law in Christ.

The Law of Moses was merely the pattern, or the type, of the true system. God instructed Moses concerning His first Tabernacle: “See that thou make all things according to the pattern (Greek- “type”) showed thee in the mount” (Heb 8:5).

In God’s mind there was already the plan for the building of a greater Tabernacle — of which Moses’ Tabernacle was just a feeble representation.

In contrast to the old, Christ was the true Tabernacle where God might commune with men. The old Tabernacle was a place where God might meet with man, and where man might worship God. But both of these things could be done only very imperfectly in Moses’ Tabernacle.

God’s glory was in the Most Holy Place, hidden except for once a year, and then only seen by the high priest. Common Jews could not approach there. And all of man’s offerings and sacrifices only emphasized his own sin, and their inability to take it away.

Everything under the Law of Moses pointed forward to something better to come. To the eye of faith, every item of the Law truly cried out for a more perfect way — the way of Christ. Of him John said:

“The Word was made flesh, and dwelt (‘tabernacled’) among us, and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).

Christ spoke of his own body as “this Temple” — and in Mat 12:6 he called himself “One which is greater than the Temple”. Man must serve God in and through Christ, the true Tabernacle. Here in Christ, we find true worship and the means of fellowship with God.

***

“For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer” (Heb 8:3).

On our behalf, Christ offers sacrifices to God, of which we shall consider these aspects:

The High-Priest of the Old Covenant brought blood into the inner sanctuary once a year. But Christ entered there by his own blood once for all time, for himself and for our benefit (Heb 7:27)-

“By his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption” (Heb 9:12).

Even now, Christ acts as our High-Priest — by which we approach the Father. Christ offers our prayers to Him-so that we might come, with confidence, to the throne of grace, and obtain mercy (Heb 4:16).

And finally, a third aspect of the offerings of our High-Priest is this: Our good deeds, our righteous actions, are a sacrifice (Heb 13:16): all of our activities are “living sacrifices” to God (Rom 12:1-2).

Through Christ, these offerings have meaning and serve to present us to God as acceptable sacrifices. Only in Christ can our works be worthwhile. Only in him can they have any value.

Christ was the true Tabernacle or dwelling-place of God, by himself. But believers, upon being baptized, come into Christ-thus becoming a part of the true Tabernacle, pitched by the Lord:

“The House of God, the Ecclesia of the living God” (1Ti 3:15).

“Living stones, built up a spiritual house” (1Pe 2:5).

What a glorious promise is presented here, as we read in Eph 2:19-22:

“Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow-citizens with the saints and of the Household of God. And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief Corner Stone; In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.”

Heb 8:7-13 present the crisis of Paul’s whole argument. He proves that the Old Covenant, the national covenant with Israel, was not final; and he proves this from the Jews’ own Scriptures:

“For it that first, covenant had been faultless…” (v 7)

It was faultless in morality, in its own commandments — for it came from God. Paul himself calls it, in another place, “holy, just and good” (Rom 7:12).

But the Law could not save men; it could only condemn them, because all have sinned. There must be a more perfect way, a more powerful way, to which it pointed, in Christ:

“For what the Law could not do, in that it was weak through flesh, God sending His own Son, in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh” (Rom 8:3).

***

“For finding fault with them, He saith, ‘Behold, the days come,’ saith the Lord, ‘when I will make a New Covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah’ ” (Heb 8:8).

God found fault, not with the Law, but with Israel and Judah who could not keep it.

In referring to the “New Covenant”, Paul is quoting from Jer 31: “I will complete a New Covenant” (Diag). He had promised the New Covenant even before the old one began — with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. But its effects are eternal; it will not be concluded until Christ returns to reign from David’s throne and to give the inheritance to all the true seed of Abraham.

***

“For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts; and I will be to them a God and they shall be to me a people” (v 10).

In v 8, both Israel and Judah are mentioned. But here, Israel alone is mentioned. The two houses are now one house — as Ezekiel saw in his vision. They will be united:

“I will make them one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king to them all. They shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all” (Eze 37:22).

The future Kingdom, with Israel as one nation, will be the culmination of that New Covenant which had its beginning in Christ, the beginnings of which the Hebrews had been invited to share.

(Never from the time of Solomon until Paul’s day, had the two houses been one. So therefore, never had this New Covenant been realized for them. It must come in the future, with Jesus Christ as its mediator.)

“I will put my laws into their minds” (that is, into their inward parts)…” and “write them in their hearts.” The Jews’ former heart of stone will then become “fleshly tablets of the heart” (2Co 3:3), ready and able to receive the engraving of God’s Word, in the spirit. (This is also what happens for us when we enter the New Covenant).

“They shall be to Me a people”: God told Hosea of the nation, “they are not My people”; but Paul promises them here, “They shall be My people”.

The New Covenant did not come simply to destroy the old, but to improve it. It offers what the Old Covenant could not: recognition as God’s people.

***

“And they (the Levitical priests) shall not teach every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord; for they shall all know me from the least to the greatest” (Heb 8:11).

At the culmination of the New Covenant, Christ will reveal himself to his brethren, the Jews, who mourn that their forefathers have crucified the true Messiah, and that they themselves have long ignored his teachings.

And God will give teachers to Israel, to bring them into obedience to the New Covenant:

“And I will give you pastors according to Mine heart which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding” (Jer 3:15).

“And thine ears shall hear a word behind thee, saying, This is the way, walk ye in it, when ye turn to the right hand and when ye turn to the left” (Isa 30:21).

***

“In that He saith, a new covenant, He hath made the first old” (Heb 8:13).

He hath pronounced it old, even as early as the time of Jeremiah.

***

“Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away” (Heb 8:13).

What God had promised 600 years before Paul’s writing was then (63 AD) about to occur. At that time, the Mosaic system had indeed grown old, and it was ready to vanish away — as it did in the fall of Jerusalem, 70 AD.

Paul’s warning undoubtedly saved many Jews from returning to the old Law. Those who listened to him fled from the onslaught of the Romans and were saved from death in the horrible siege of Jerusalem.

All of this is strikingly typical of us today, and Paul’s words are therefore important to us: We have all left the old system of so-called Christianity, which can offer us nothing.

We have come “outside the camp” to Christ. Let us not return in any sense, to the ways of the old man — nor to the systems of the world, which will soon be completely destroyed.

Covenant-victim, the

The sacrifice of the covenant victim is described in Jer 34:18-20: “The men who have violated my covenant and have not fulfilled the terms of the covenant they made before me, I will treat like the calf they cut in two and then walked between its pieces. The leaders of Judah and Jerusalem, the court officials, the priests and all the people of the land who walked between the pieces of the calf, I will hand over to their enemies who seek their lives. Their dead bodies will become food for the birds of the air and the beasts of the earth.”

It was first referred to in Gen 15:9,10,17:

“So the LORD said to him, ‘Bring me a heifer, a goat and a ram, each three years old, along with a dove and a young pigeon.’ Abram brought all these to him, cut them in two and arranged the halves opposite each other; the birds, however, he did not cut in half… When the sun had set and darkness had fallen, a smoking firepot with a blazing torch appeared and passed between the pieces.”

In this ritual, an animal is sacrificed, and separated into parts: all parties to the covenant must pass between the separated pieces of the sacrifice. Such a practice was common in the Middle East — evidence of such a practice has been found among other peoples of the area, and not just Jews. Two individuals, or two groups, would decide to make a solemn covenant, or contract, with one another; it might be a purely secular matter, having to do with property rights or business arrangements. To confirm the agreement, they would sacrifice an animal, cut the animal in pieces, separate the pieces, and then pass between the parts, or meet in their midst. They would also participate in a common meal of fellowship, each partaking of the animal which they had sacrificed and separated. Thereby they would confirm, by a gesture of great solemnity, their mutual understanding of the terms of their agreement.

They were saying something else as well, something very profound and sobering: if anyone violated the terms of that covenant, then he was deserving of the same fate that had befallen the covenant-victim; he was deserving of death. In fact, he would have already eaten his own condemnation, in the meal itself!

  1. Quite possibly, this is the basis, too, for the oft-repeated and rather enigmatic vow: “The LORD — or God — do so to me, and more also, if…”: Rth 1:17; 1Sa 3:17; 14:44; 20:13; 25:22; 2Sa 19:13; 1Ki 2:23; 2Ki 6:31; etc. May God do WHAT, exactly? The same thing that was done to the covenant-victim!

  2. Likewise, it explains the Hebraism, where “to make a covenant” — as we might put it — is, literally, “to CUT a covenant”!

  3. Also, it may account for the rather gruesome procedure adopted by the Levite, when he cut up his dead concubine into twelve pieces and sent the pieces around to the various tribes (Jdg 19:29).

  4. …As well as what Saul did, similarly, with two oxen (1Sa 11:7), and what Samuel did with Agag (1Sa 15:33).

  5. …And the words of Jesus in Mat 24:51, where the fate of the unfaithful servant was to be “cut in pieces” or “cut asunder”!

  6. Notice also how Isaac and Abimelech (Gen 26:28-31), and Jacob and Laban (Gen 31:44-54) confirm their agreements by a “sacrifice” and a meal.

Creation

God the Creator

The Bible opens with God describing His creation of the heaven and the earth, and throughout the rest of the Scriptures His supreme position as the Creator and Sustainer of the universe is set before us. God is from everlasting to everlasting, all-powerful and all-wise, a living God Who takes care of, and delights in, all that He has made:

  • “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (Gen 1:1)
  • “When I consider Thy heavens, the work of Thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which Thou hast ordained…” (Psa 8:3)
  • “He hath made the earth by His power, He hath established the world by His wisdom, and hath stretched out the heavens by His discretion” (Jer 10:12)
  • “Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them” (Mat 6:26)
  • “Thou hast created all things, and for Thy pleasure they are and were created” (Rev 4:11).

Jesus and the apostles endorse the Genesis Creation account

Every major detail of the Genesis Creation is confirmed by the preaching of Jesus and the apostles in the New Testament. We cannot believe some things in Genesis but reject others. We must take our stand with Jesus and accept the Creation account given to us in Genesis.

  1. The seven days of Creation (Heb 4:4)
  2. The creation of Adam and Eve (Mat 19:4; Mar 10:6; Luk 3:38; 1Co 15:45; Jud 1:14)
  3. Adam made in the Creator’s image (1Co 11:7; Jam 3:9)
  4. Adam made from the dust of the earth (1Co 15:47)
  5. Adam first formed, then Eve (1Co 11:8,9; 1Ti 2:13).

Adam was created about 6,000 years ago

A study of the Bible records of the ages of the men living before and after the Flood (Gen 5; 11), the 430 years of Exo 12:40, the 480 years of 1Ki 6:1, and the lengths of the reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah, enables us to calculate how long ago Adam and Eve were created. Such a study leads to the conclusion that today (AD 1999) we are living approximately 6,000 years after.

Other studies lead to the same conclusion. Genealogies are given in Genesis, 1 Chronicles 1 and Luke 3. These enable us to trace the descendants of Adam, and in particular give us the pedigree of the Lord Jesus Christ. The unbroken line of descent from Adam to Christ places a limit on how far back Creation can be dated. The number of generations is compatible with Adam being created 6,000 years ago.

Thirdly, there is evidence that God’s overall plan and purpose with the earth spans 7,000 years, with 6,000 years of spiritual creation and development followed by 1,000 years of completion and rest in the Kingdom (Heb 4:4,9; Rev 20:2-7).

How old is the universe?

Scripture gives no clear answer to this question. Some believe the heaven and earth to be ancient, already in existence when the six days of Creation began. In this view the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters 6,000 years ago to fit the earth for living organisms to live in. Others believe that the entire universe was created in the six days, and that the universe, including the earth, is therefore young, only 6,000 years old.

Both views have fervent adherents who can set forth evidence to support their respective standpoints. In the absence of clear Scripture teaching there is liberty for difference of opinion, much as there was in the first century over keeping or not keeping special days, or eating meats or not. We must be prepared to be open-minded about the age of the heaven and earth, and have respect for those whose views differ from our own.

Creation, not evolution

Science can be rightly used to give glory to the Creator. Great scientists such as Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday and Ernst Chain believed the Genesis account and worshipped the Creator. The theory of evolution, however, introduces a denial of God as the Creator of life. The theory is plainly contrary to Bible teaching, and we must reject evolution on Scriptural grounds. But there are also several scientific objections to evolution.

The powerful witness of the creation to its Maker

Throughout Scripture we are encouraged to see the greatness and complexity of creation as a witness to the power and wisdom of God, in contrast to the puniness of man:

  1. “Where wast thou [Job] when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding” (Job 38:4; see also the whole of this chapter)
  2. “I will praise Thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are Thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well” (Psa 139:14)
  3. “For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead” (Rom 1:20).

Even in its present cursed condition creation silently witnesses to God’s power and wisdom, His love of variety and His great generosity. The evidence is there for all to see, particularly today when, by means of powerful microscopes, telescopes and other techniques, we are privileged to know more of the Creator’s handiwork than in any previous age.

The spiritual creation

The natural creation foreshadows God’s spiritual creation which takes place over a period of 7,000 years. The millennial Kingdom is described as a sabbath rest in Heb 4:9 (mg), which lasts for the final thousand years of this 7,000-year period (Rev 20:2-7). It is termed by Isaiah and Peter “new heavens and a new earth” (Isa 65:17,18; 2Pe 3:13). God’s faithful servants undergo renewal (Psa 51:10; 2Co 5:17; Gal 6:15) after the pattern of the man Jesus Christ, who is called the first-born of this new creation (Col 1:15,16). This new creation will ultimately bring pleasure and glory to the great Creator.

May we remember our Creator and obey His Word, so that we become part of that blessed and glorious creation which the Almighty will once again pronounce “very good”.

Cutting up the “baby”

An old proverb warns against “throwing out the baby with the bathwater”. (In societies where almost everyone has a bathtub and running water, and where the bathwater drains out of the tub at the flip of a switch, the reader may have to reflect on this proverb just a bit!) The point, of course, is to distinguish between primary and secondary matters, and to treat each accordingly.

A well-known Bible story deals with a baby also. Once the wise king Solomon was called upon to judge a case involving two women and one baby (1Ki 3:16-28). It seems that one mother had accidentally smothered her baby, and, discovering this, had switched her dead baby with the living baby of her neighbor. Now both mothers stood before the king, each claiming that the remaining live baby was hers.

“Then said the king, ‘The one saith, This is my son that liveth, and thy son is the dead: and the other saith, Nay; but thy son is the dead, and my son is the living… Bring me a sword.’ And they brought a sword before the king. And the king said, ‘Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one, and half to the other.’ Then spake the woman whose the living child was unto the king, for she yearned upon her son, and she said, ‘O my lord, give her the living child, and in no wise slay it.’ But the other said, ‘Let it be neither mine nor thine, but divide it.’ Then the king answered and said, ‘Give her the living child, and in no wise slay it: she is the mother thereof.’ And all Israel heard of the judgment which the king had judged; and they feared the king: for they saw that the wisdom of God was in him, to do judgment” (1Ki 3:23-28).

The wise king understood clearly that the true mother would desire more than anything that her baby live, even if it were in the hands of another woman. Its life was infinitely more precious than anyone else’s “property rights”! But the impostor (to satisfy her pride, or her injured feelings, or out of sheer spite?) said, “Divide it!”

Sometimes (almost always!) “dividing the baby” will have disastrous results, for everyone concerned. New and young converts to the truth are characterized in Scriptures as “babes” (Mat 1:25; Luk 10:21; Rom 2:20; 1Co 3:1; Heb 5:13; 1Pe 2:2), easily influenced and even manipulated by their elders — their fathers and “mothers”.

Ecclesial controversies may have (or may seem to have) an invigorating effect on some “elders” and “parents”. It can be exhilarating to “stand firm for the truth”, regardless of the circumstances, to fight for purity, to defend one’s fellowship stand, to attack the faith of others, etc, etc. But the same controversies can be very damaging, even perhaps fatal, to the “babes” in the truth who (not really by their own choice) become a party to them.

So this exhortation is especially to the older, experienced brother and sister: Be careful how you “fight” for the truth. Be careful that any “charges” you bring against others are true, and fair, and fairly stated — not colored by prejudice or pride or anger. Be careful how you treat others who may be part on the One Body as well as you.

And be very careful before you do anything that could be construed by the wise King and Judge as “cutting up the baby”! Because… the “baby” belongs to him!

Chalcedon Creed

The decree resulting from the 4th Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD.

We then, following the holy Father, all with one consent, teach men to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable soul and body; consubstantial with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the manhood, in all things like unto us, without sin; begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the manhood; one the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only begotten, in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably, the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one person and one subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son and Only-begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ; as the prophets form the beginning have declared concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us.

Cherubim

What is the derivation of the Heb word “cherub”? One possibility: “cherub” = ke-rab: the conjunction of two Heb words: (a) ke: the likeness of; and (b) rab: greatness, or a great number (cp “Rabbi”). Thus cherubim (the plural) sig a great and mighty multitude, in whom God is manifested. This might refer to an angelic company or the company of the redeemed. All of the places of worship have cherubim associated with them (Gen 3:24; Exo 25:13-22; 26:31,33; 1Ki 6:23-35) — suggesting that the great cherubic multitude will be finally revealed through their true worship of the Almighty.

The cherubim were associated with chariots (1Ch 28:18) — the ancient vehicles of war, suggesting that their manifestation will be accompanied by a great battle. (JT suggests the word cherub is related to the Heb word “rekab”, or “chariot”.)

Therefore, the cherubim speak of the sureness of God’s purpose, covenants, and provisions, and His promise to fill the earth eventually with His glory, in the persons of many resurrected Spirit-beings. This salvation is the hope of all creation, and the cherubim in Eze 1 are pictured with four heads:

  1. The lion: the head of all wild creatures;
  2. The ox: the head of all tame creatures;

  3. The eagle: the head of all birds; and,
  4. Man: the supreme head of all God’s creation (Gen 1:26,28), who has been promised dominion over the earth.

Christ in Psa 51:5

Does Psa 51:5 apply to David or to all of us? Does it apply to Christ?

“Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me” (KJV).

“Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me” (RSV).

“Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me” (NIV).

I believe the first phrase refers to David’s birth, and the last phrase refers to his conception. But was it David’s mother who was “in sin”, as KJV and RSV imply, or was it David himself who was “sinful”, as NIV implies? Surely the latter.

The title of Psa 51 testifies that it has to do with the sin of David with Bathsheba; like Psalms 6, 32, 38, 102, 130, and 143, it is a psalm of profound penitence.

Is David making an excuse in verse 5 — ie, “I can’t help myself; I was conceived and born in sin!” In view of the abject admissions of sin elsewhere in the psalm, this doesn’t seem reasonable.

Is David blaming his mother for his own sin — ie, “I was conceived out of wedlock; therefore it is my mother’s fault that I am a sinner!” Again, this doesn’t make sense in view of his other admissions of his own sin.

Or… is David simply describing the legacy of “sin” in his own human nature, not as an irresistible impulse to do evil, as something which he was powerless to resist, but as an inclination toward evil which he failed to resist? (I would think this must be the case.)

In the same sense we are all “sinful at birth, sinful from the time [our] mothers conceived [us]”.

Was this also true of Jesus? Of course. “Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? There is not one” (Job 14:4).

“How then can man be righteous before God? How can he who is born of woman be clean? Behold, even the moon is not bright and the stars are not clean in his sight; how much less man, who is a maggot, and the son of man, who is a worm!” (Job 25:4-6). Can such words properly be applied to Jesus? He applies similar words to himself, if we understand Psa 22 as his words prophetically: “But I am a worm, and no man; scorned by men, and despised by the people” (v 6).

“Now Joshua (surely a type of Jesus?) was standing before the angel, clothed with filthy garments. And the angel said to those who were standing before him, ‘Remove the filthy garments from him.’ And to him he said, ‘Behold, I have taken your iniquity away from you, and I will clothe you with rich apparel’ ” (Zech 3:3,4). Jesus as the true high priest was clothed in, symbolically, “filthy garments”, which are equated with “iniquity”; when were these “filthy garments” taken away? At his resurrection, both literally and figuratively.

Was Jesus, like all of us, conceived in “sin”, and born in “sin”? Of course. How else explain the offerings for cleansing from childbirth? Or the ceremonial “uncleanness” of menstruation — unless it be connected with childbirth? Or the need for circumcision, along with another offering, even for the baby Jesus? Or, for that matter, the need for baptism: “Thus it becometh us to fulfill all righteousness…”? Or, again, the need for the high priest to offer for himself as well as the sins of the people whom he represents?

But how could Jesus be connected with the confessions of sin committed which we find in Psa 51 (eg, vv 2,3,5,7,9)? He can, in the sense that he shared the weaknesses and temptations of human nature (‘tempted in all points like we are…compassed with infirmity…learned obedience…”: Heb 4:15; 5:2,3; etc.), and in the sense that such words were prophecies of his bearing the burden of human sin (cp John 1:29; 2Co 5:21; 1Pe 2:22,24; Rom 8:3; Heb 2:14,15). From this point of view, all the verses in Psa 51 listed above are truly Messianic.

Of course, the verses of confession in Psa 51 need to be read regarding Jesus with a different slant from what David meant when writing about himself, or from what we mean when praying about ourselves. But this is a normal characteristic of Messianic prophecy. For example, the “leprosy” expressions of Isa 53 have an obvious figurative meaning with reference to Jesus and the sin-disease, but they fit Hezekiah, the prototype, in a strictly literal fashion.

There are, in fact, quite a number of psalms with Scripturally-attested Messianic application, in which “sin” and “iniquity” are associated with the subject. Some examples:

  1. Psa 40: Vv 6-8 are cited as prophetic of Christ in Heb 10:7-9. But v 12 reads: “Mine iniquities have taken hold of me.”

  2. Psa 41: V 9 is applied to Christ in Mark 14:18 and John 13:18. But v 4 reads: “I have sinned against thee.”

  3. Psa 69: Vv 4,8,9,21,22, and 25 all have NT Messianic citations. Yet v 5 speaks of “my foolishness… my sins.”

Here are three undeniably Messianic psalms. Yet each contains phrases that seem at first glance inappropriate to a sinless Messiah. How should we deal with such “problems”? Some might argue, for example, that Psa 69:1-4 and Psa 69:6-36 are all Messianic (surely they are!), but that Psa 69:5 alone out of the whole psalm applies only to David. But is this really a satisfactory or satisfying way of handling Scripture? Does it not in fact create more problems than it solves?

This approach (ie, of applying the terms “sin” and “iniquity” in such passages to the nature Christ bore) was regularly followed by the earliest Christadelphian expositors. John Thomas, as an example, wrote the following:

“Sin, I say, is a synonym for human nature. Hence, the flesh is invariably regarded as unclean. It is therefore written… [here JT quotes Job 25:4; 14:4; 15:14-16; 2Co 5:21; Rom 8:3]… Sin could not have been condemned in the body of Jesus, if it had not existed there. His body was as unclean as the bodies of those for whom he died; for he was born of a woman, and ‘not one’ can bring a clean body out of a defiled body; for ‘that,’ says Jesus himself, ‘which is born of the flesh is flesh’ (John 3:6)…

“Speaking of the conception and preparation of the Seed, the prophet as a typical person, says, ‘Behold I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me’ (Psa 51:5). This is nothing more than affirming that he was born of sinful flesh; and not of the pure and incorruptible angelic nature” (“Elpis Israel” 127,128).

Christ in the Psalms

Psalms Patterns

First of all, a look at the patterns in the major divisions of the Psalms.

Book Psalms Closes with…
1 1-41 Benediction; double “Amen” (41:13).
2 42-72 Benediction; double “Amen” (72:18-20).
3 73-89 Benediction; double “Amen” (89:52).
4 90-106 Benediction; “Amen; “Hallelujah” (106:48).
5 107-150 Last 5 psalms, each beginning and ending with “Hallelujah”.
  1. The first 2 “Books” are predominantly by and about David (at least 55 of 72).

  2. But the last 3 “Books” have very few psalms which are definitely by and about David (18 of 78).

  3. Notice, however: The word “of” in the titles (as in “of the sons of Korah” or “of Asaph”, etc) may mean “for”. Thus, a Psalm [composed by David… or by someone else] would be designated as being written for the use of the sons of Korah, or Asaph, etc [the temple musicians, or servants].

The 5 “Books” were probably compiled at different times, and then later joined together in one large volume. With this we might compare the development of a hymnbook by a community (not being written necessarily in order, but composed at different times by different authors, and then at a later date — or dates — being compiled into its final form).

This would explain:

  • Why Psa 72:20 says: “The prayers of David are ended“, when others of his psalms appear later in the Book.

  • Why some psalms are virtually exact duplicates of others (14/53; 57 and 60/108).

  • …And why there are so few of David’s psalms in the last half of the whole Book.

Pro 25:1 suggests that Hezekiah (perhaps along with Isaiah?) supervised much of the compilation of the Proverbs. And Isa 38:9,20 suggests that at least some (and possibly many) of the Psalms are songs of Hezekiah. (Other Talmudic writers refer to traditions to the effect that Hezekiah was also responsible for compiling and editing the books of Isaiah, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes.) This all suggests that, along with David, Hezekiah is a primary subject of the Psalms.


Who are the Psalms about?

Many of the Psalms are cited in the New Testament as being prophetic of the life and work and sacrifice of the Lord Jesus. But many others are not directly quoted in the New Testament. The question is: how do we read those psalms? Do they have any New Testament application?

First of all, a little work with marginal references or the like — with cross-references and parallels between psalms — will suggest that even those psalms not linked by direct quote to Jesus Christ could still be considered, generally, to be about him!

But of course the Psalms were, in the first instance, about the experiences of the individual writers and composers. The writer of many psalms was David, “the sweet psalmist of Israel”; other psalms were probably written by Hezekiah (and others). So we ought to remind ourselves of the basic outlines of the lives of David (and Hezekiah) — especially with regard to their suitability as types of the Messiah.

David as a type of the Messiah

  1. The shepherd boy who laid down his life for his sheep.
  2. The young man anointed king by a great prophet.

  3. The brave warrior who went down into the “valley of death” and slew the great giant who enslaved his people — when all Israel cowered in their tents.

  4. The man who, because of his great deeds and sterling character, was envied and hated by the reigning king.

  5. The “criminal” who was chased and persecuted, and his life threatened, because he was God’s Anointed.

  6. The man who at last emerged in triumph from a cave to be crowned head over all Israel.

  7. The man who gathered many faithful Gentiles, and later gave them positions of great authority in Israel.

  8. The king who expanded his kingdom in all directions, until it won the allegiance of all surrounding nations and became a great empire.

  9. And the king who received the promise of a “Son” [not Solomon!] who would sit on his throne forever.

Hezekiah as a type of the Messiah

(Much of this outline may be derived from a study of the Book of Isaiah. Read in its historical context, the book is first of all a commentary on the life and times of Hezekiah, and his role in the salvation of Judah from the Assyrian invasion. It is in the particulars of his life — the primary fulfillment of Isaiah, if you will — that the pattern is established for understanding the ultimate fulfillment of the Book in Jesus Christ.) {The student who wishes to read more about this theme is directed to Hezekiah the Great or Isaiah, by Harry Whittaker, or The Songs of Degrees, by George Booker.]

  1. A child of promise (“Immanuel”), his great work was prophesied beforehand.

  2. He came to a nation estranged from God.
  3. He cleansed the temple of God, and sanctified the priests for renewed worship.

  4. He called worshipers from the north and from Jerusalem to keep a new Passover.

  5. Even the defiled were accepted through his faith and merits and prayers.

  6. He offered sacrifices for himself and for the people.

  7. He provided living water (“Siloam”, Hezekiah’s Conduit) to a people ready to perish.

  8. He was afflicted with an incurable sickness (possibly leprosy — the “sin-disease”), and was in danger of dying without a “seed”.

  9. But by a mighty manifestation of the Glory of the Lord, he was miraculously healed on the third day.

  10. The great Invading Adversary was destroyed, and Israel was saved, through his faith.

  11. Afterward, the Land was freed from its enemies, the captives and exiles were restored…

  12. …And the king was acknowledged as the Anointed of Yahweh by all nations.

Introduction

The outlines now help us to appreciate a basic point: if a man, in the fundamental outlines of his life, is seen to be a type or pattern of Jesus Christ, then it follows, reasonably, that his writings — about his experiences and feelings, and even his prayers — are part of that overall pattern. So, if David slaying the giant Goliath is interpreted in the New Testament as Christ’s victory over sin (and it is!), then the psalms composed by David commemorating that event must also be prophetic of Christ. Or… if Hezekiah’s being smitten with leprosy and healed the third day is typical of Jesus Christ being raised from the dead on the third day (as it surely is!), then the psalms composed by or about Hezekiah at that time must also be typical of Jesus Christ.

So — when we read history in this way — the last step in Psalms study is surely obvious: The Psalms are not just about David (or Hezekiah)… and certainly not just about you and me. They are ESPECIALLY about Christ.

Indeed, the Psalms are a sort of “fifth gospel”; whereas Matthew, Mark, Luke and John record the external, observable facts of the life of Jesus, the Psalms are his “internal” biography. The first four “gospels” tell us what he did and said, but the fifth “gospel” very often tells what he thought. And this is an indispensable perspective for those who are commanded to develop the mind of Christ (Phil 2:5). The Psalms, being also prophetic, can tell us what Christ will do.

The following outline uses the typical guidelines of the lives of David and Hezekiah in the Psalms, and thereby seek to explain and amplify, on a Biblical basis, the story of our Saviour’s life, death, resurrection, priesthood, and second coming and kingdom.


I SAW THE SON

I heard what they said, So politically correct, so properly right: But I saw not him of whom they spake, And I wondered.

I heard the others who spoke and sang, Deliberately warm and moving, But shallowly repetitious. Of him I saw but little, And I wondered.

I went to the Palace of the Psalms, And there he was! Clearly to be seen, and audible. By the far-seeing eyes of the prophets I saw him as a babe with his mother; And as a young, old Man, I heard the voice of his Father.

I saw the son in obedient beauty. Living and radiant in the glory of his Father. I heard him in prayer, moving, wholly submissive, Even in reproach and consuming sorrow, Yet triumphant. The Amen.

I went to the Tomb Where they buried sin and death And learned that though he slept, He was supremely guarded against corruption. And I wept tears of boundless joy.

I saw him rise, Wonderfully Father-like, And heard him speak to his brethren.

I saw him ascend And arrive at the right hand of Power, In everlasting joy, Regal and priestly.

I saw him return, To reign amongst his enemies Until the earth was filled with his Father’s glory. There was another with him: His Bride, redeemed And with a beauty that was both his and hers. And I wondered.

In the Palace of the Psalms I prayed and worshiped Until there was no longer “I” but only he.

“Titus” (The Christadelphian, Dec, 1998)


BEGINNINGS

Luke 1:26-38: The story of the conception and birth of Christ might be appreciated in the light of Psa 139: “For thou didst form my inward parts, thou didst knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise thee, for thou art fearful and wonderful. Wonderful are thy works! Thou knowest me right well, my frame was not hidden from thee, when I was being made in secret, intricately wrought in the depths of the earth. Thy eyes beheld my unformed substance; in thy book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them. How precious to me are thy thoughts, O God! How vast is the sum of them!” (Psa 139:13-17, RSV).

The phrases” knit together” and “intricately wrought” are the same words used of the woven pattern on the veil of the Tabernacle, and the embroidery of the door hangings, the coat of the High Priest, and the veil of the Most Holy (Exo 26:31,36; 27:16; 28:39; 36:37; 38:18; 39:29; cp Heb 10:20).

Christ is the true tabernacle, or temple of God (Mat 12:6; John 1:14; 2:19; Col 2:9; Heb 8:2; 9:7,8,11). Even as the fabrics were specially selected, and specially worked, until the desired effect was achieved in the curtains and furnishings and priestly garments of tabernacle and temple — so that God Himself might be exalted, and eternal principles taught in figurative language — so out of the “fabric” of human nature, the Master Craftsman skillfully selected and wove together… the perfect “tabernacle”, the perfect “temple” — His Son!

Modern science has begun to penetrate into the mysteries of DNA, the genetic code imprinted on the human chromosome, and to see — as through a glass darkly — the building blocks of human life. Surely we may stand in awe at the amazing complexity, and the supreme design, in such a system. And especially may we be brought to our knees in admiration — for the intricate “design” that became God’s Only-begotten Son. “Fearfully and wonderfully made” indeed!

Other references in Psalms to the Virgin Birth:

  1. Psa 22:9,10: The AV mg has: “kept me safe”. This was fulfilled in Mat 2:13-16.

  2. Psa 69:8: “My brethren” = “my mother’s children”, but not “my father’s children” — implying that Jesus had no human father!

  3. Psa 71:6: “You brought me forth, or upheld me from the womb!”

  4. Psa 86:16 / Psa 116:16: Cp with Luke 1:38,48: Mary is the “handmaiden” of the LORD, and in these words she gives her consent which is necessary for the conception of the unique child in her womb.

  5. Psa 89:26,27: “I will appoint him my firstborn”. Cp Col 1:15,18. The “first Adam” and “last Adam”: referring to the one who is “firstborn” not just by his birth, but by his special selection by his Father, and especially by his overcoming of sin and death.

  6. Psa 110:3: Why does David call him “Lord”? Because, though born after David, Jesus is greater than he — being the son of the Most High. See v 3: “From the womb before the morning I begat thee” (LXX).

  7. Psa 132:11: “From your belly” (AV mg) — ie, not “loins” (as of paternal origin), but “womb” (maternal origin). This is the same word in 2Sa 7:12. Cp with Luke 1:42.

Mat 1:20,21: “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.” With this compare Psa 130:1-8; 131:1-3 (RSV: “as a child quieted at its mother’s breast”). Psa 130:8 is especially apt: “He himself will redeem Israel from all their sins.”


Mat 2:1,2,9-11: A (not necessarily “the”!) fulfillment of Psa 72:9-11,15? Surely the preeminent fulfillment of Psa 72 is in the Kingdom Age. But in the meantime notice how beautifully the coming of the “wise men” fits the psalm: there are kings from the east (from Arab countries), bringing gifts to God’s special King, including gold.


Luke 2:40-49: The boy (or young man) realizes that his place is “in my Father’s house”. Alongside this, consider the passages in the Psalms expressing the cherished desire to dwell in the house of God: Psa 27:4; 48:1-3,12,13; 63:1-3; 84:1-4; 122:1-4,6,7.


Matt 3:13-17; 4:1: Jesus is baptized, and immediately taken by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted. Compare this with Moses’ Psa 90:5-12: his commentary about the generation that was first “baptized” in the Red Sea, and then afterward perished in the wilderness. Secondly, compare this with Joshua’s (this is a guess) Psa 91:1-7: a commentary about the generation that survived the wilderness to enter the Promised Land. Other points of comparison:

  • Compare the 40 years there with the 40 days here.

  • Psa 91:11,12 refers to the temptation of Jesus in the wilderness.

  • Psa 91:13: Cp with Mark 1:13 (Psa 8:6,7; Gen 1:28: Jesus exercises dominion over the wild beasts).

Jesus under the law of condemnation because of his sinful flesh: First of all, generally: Jesus had not committed sin — so why the need to be baptized (as described in the section above)? The answer: because he possessed “sinful nature”. Thus Mat 4 (his wilderness temptation) explains Mat 3:13-17 (his baptism).

Christ’s nature is seen in the accounts of his conception, his birth, his baptism, and his wilderness temptation (1Pe 2:24; 2Co 5:21; Gal 4:4; Rom 8:3; Heb 2:14).

Many of the psalms mention, in passing, the sin and/or weakness of the psalmist. Whereas, on first glance, this would appear to have nothing to do with Jesus (who of course committed no sin), it is quite possible to see such passages — at least some of them — as “roundabout” allusions to the weak, sin-prone human nature which beset Jesus, for which he sought the help of his Heavenly Father to overcome: Psa 6:2,6-8; 18:23; 25:7,11,18 (cp vv 5,15); 38:2-10; 40:12 (cp vv 6-8); 41:4 (cp v 9); 69:5 (cp vv 4,8,9,21,22,25); 51:5 ; 89:50.

(The sin-nature of Christ is dealt with extensively in Psalms Studies, by George Booker, Vol 1, pp 47, 48, 108, 154, 155, 184, 220, 229, 230, 297, 298, 397, and 398; and Vol 2, pp 532 and 598.)


Psa 40:6-8 is quoted in Heb 10:7-9: “Mine ear you have digged” (Exo 21:5,6; Deu 15:16,17) becomes “a body prepared” (Heb 10:5). Why? See Rom 6:6; 7:24; 8:23; Rev 18:13; Jude 9. In Greek, “body” may be a way of describing a “slave”.

Psa 40:8: “I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart.” This leads to a consideration of Jesus as the word of God (Deu 17:18-20)…


JESUS AS “THE WORD OF GOD”

First of all, it should be mentioned that — in the New Testament — the Greek “ktisis” (“creation”) quite often refers to the NEW “creation” in Christ. How is this NEW “creation” brought about? By the spoken, written, or proclaimed “word of God” — even as the original “creation” of Genesis was set in motion by “And God said!”

But especially is the NEW “creation” called into being by the “Word of God” made flesh (John 1:14) — Jesus Christ. Jesus is the greatest “Word of God” (John 1:1,14; 1Jo 1:1,2; Heb 4:12,13; Rev 19:11,13). By him were all things (ie, all things in God’s New Creation) created (John 1:3,4 — see how this is improved by a repunctuation:

“Through him (ie Christ himself) all things were made. Without him (Christ) nothing was made. What has been made was ‘life in him’, and that life was the light of men.”

Read this way, it may be seen that John’s focus is unequivocally on the spiritual creation (‘life in him’) and not the earlier, physical, creation of Genesis.

Other passages where Jesus Christ is the “creator” of God’s new “creation”: Col 1:15-18 (cp 2:12; 3:1,10); 1Co 8:6; Heb 1:1-3.

Certain passages in the Psalms can be read in this light:

  • Psa 33:6,9,10,11: Notice how “a new song” (v 3) is closely connected with the “New Creation” (cp Psa 40:3; 96:1; 98:1; 144:9; 149:1; Isa 42:10; and esp Rev 5:9). Here, cp v 6 (“with the breath of his mouth”) with John 20:22: “And with that he breathed on them and said, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit’.”

  • Psa 107:20: God’s Word, sent to heal men (John 1:9-12). Cp also Luke 7:7: the centurion’s servant. The Son of man can heal with a word only, even at a distance.

  • Psa 147:15,18: The Kingdom Age: “He sends his command to the earth; his word runs swiftly.” Even as the prophets “ran swiftly” to bring the “word of God” to Israel (cp Hab 2:2; Dan 12:4; Gal 2:2; 2Th 3:1; Pro 25:11), so the “word” of command from the greatest “prophet” Jesus (who is himself the “Word of God”) will run swiftly through the earth, proclaiming peace and righteousness in the Kingdom of his Father.

Jesus in Psalm 119:

Psalm 119 is the preeminent psalm extolling “the word of God” — surely, then, it speaks to the mind and character of the man who was preeminently the “word of God” made flesh (John 1:14)!

Probably written (or compiled) by Hezekiah, Psalm 119 runs the gamut of all the Hebrew letters. Each of the 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet is represented by a stanza of 8 verses, in an “acrostic” form in which each of the 8 verses begins with that particular Hebrew letter. Thus, at 176 verses (22 times 8), Psalm 119 is the longest “chapter” in the whole Bible.

Key features of Psalm 119, pointing to Jesus Christ:

  1. The man of Psalm 119 is sorely tried, but in his trials he recognized his Father’s loving discipline for his good (vv 50,67,71,75,107,153).

  2. He has to suffer contempt (vv 22,39,42) and even ill-treatment (vv 121,134) because of his adherence to the law.

  3. He is despised and persecuted by the authorities (vv 23,161).

  4. He is mocked, lied against, and opposed by men of position and power, whom he designates as “the proud” or “the wicked” (vv 51,61,68,78,84,85,86,95,122,150,157).

  5. He is in danger of his life (vv 87,109).

  6. He is confronted by laxity and apostasy (vv 113,126,158), and also by evil example calculated to draw him from his faith into the way of evil (vv 29,37,115), but he resists all such temptations.

  7. The indifference of others to God’s Law arouses in him burning indignation (v 53) and profound sorrow (v 136).

  8. Surrounded by difficulties of many kinds, he seeks refuge in prayer, looking for a fuller understanding of God’s will, for strength to keep the law, and for relief from the distressing circumstances that threaten to destroy him.

MINISTRY

John 2:13-17: Jesus’ early cleansing of the Temple. “Zeal for your house will consume me” is a citation of Psa 69:9. The “for” at the beginning of Psa 69:9 — linking it with v 8 (“I am a stranger to my brothers”) — suggests that this consuming passion for the things of God was the reason for Jesus’ early alienation from his family (Mark 3:21,31-35; Mat 10:36; cp also Psa 27:10).

Compare also Psa 146:9: “He frustrates the ways of the wicked”: “frustrates” signifies “to turn upside down”, and suggests Jesus overturning the tables of the moneychangers.


John 4:14 / 7:37,38 / 19:34: References to “springs” of living waters invokes such passages as Psa 36:9; 46:4; 87:7. Also, Isa 12:1; Zech 13:1; Eze 47:1-5; Rev 22:1. (The latter two Psalms passages probably referred, in the first instance, to Hezekiah’s Conduit, and the Gihon spring.)


Continual plots against the life of Jesus: Saul’s attempts on David’s life — the background of many of the Psalms — provide the pattern for the continual plots against the life of Jesus. These psalms include, among others: Psalms 34, 52-54, 56, 57, 59, and 140.


Sermon on the Mount: Just as the Sermon of the Mount contains the “Beatitudes” (or blessings), so the Psalms contain an extensive list of “Beatitudes” or blessings: Psalms 1:1; 2:12; 32:1,2; 33:12; 34:8; 40:4; 41:1; 65:4; 84:4,5,12; 89:15; 94:12; 106:3; 112:1; 118:26; 119:1,2; 128:1,4.

In addition, the whole of Mat 5-7 proves to be an extended commentary on Psalm 15:

Psalm 15 Matthew 5-7
1. Who shall dwell? 5:3-12. Principles of blessedness
2. Walketh uprightly 5:13-16. Walks in the light
2. Worketh righteousness 5:17-20. Righteousness exceeding that of the Pharisees.
2. Speaketh truth in heart 5:21-6:34. An extended contrast between outward forms and religion practiced in the heart
2. Backbiteth not 7:1-5. Teaching of mote and beam
3. Nor doeth evil 5:43-48. Love your enemies
2. Who condemns the vile person 7:15-23. By their fruits ye shall know them
4. Sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not 5:33-37. Let your communication be ‘Yea, yea; Nay, nay’
1. Putteth not money to usury 5:38-42. Gives without expecting a reward
5. He that doeth these things shall never be removed

7:24-27. Doeth… build on a rock… fall not

Luke 7:36-50: Cp another combination of “tears” and a “bottle” in Psa 56:8. Here is a story to be worked out in some beautiful detail — a story of sin and repentance, tears and remembrance, forgiveness and renewal.


Mark 4:37-41; 5:1-16: First, the storm at sea (Psa 107:23-31); then, the “storm” in the mind of Legion. He who can calm the one can calm the other! The “troubled sea” of Isa 57:20 and Rev 13:1 becomes the “sea of glass” in Rev 4:6; 15:2; 21:18. The Psalms portray a God who can calm the storms, of the nations and of the lives of individual believers — and this is what His Son does in the Gospels: cp Psalms 65:7,8; 89:9; 93:3,4.


The feedings of the multitudes (Mat 14:13-21; 15:32-39; cp John 6:1-15,22-59): Here is Israel, fed once again by “manna” in the “wilderness”. Christ, not Moses, provides the true “bread of life”:

Psalm 78 John 6
7,32 Believe his wondrous works 28,29
9,41,57 Turned back 66
11 Forgot his works / Not because of the miracle 26
17-19 Provoked; “Can God furnish a table in the wilderness?” 30,31
20 Water, bread, flesh 35,52
22 Believed not 36
23 Opened the doors of heaven / Comes down from heaven 33,41,58
24,25 Rained down manna from heaven / Bread of god… comes down from heaven 33,58
31 The wrath of God / Your fathers died 49
36,37 Heart not right / Evermore give us this bread 34
39 Flesh, a wind / Spirit, flesh 63
41 The Holy One of Israel 69 (RV)
56-72 Greatly abhorred Israel, chose David / “Him hath God the Father sealed” 27

John 8:46; 10:32: David’s protests of innocence were only relatively true of him, but they were absolutely true of Jesus. Examples: Psa 7:1-11; 59:3.


Jesus as the Good Shepherd (John 10:1-21): Jesus’ description of himself as the Good Shepherd plainly invokes Psa 23: where Jesus is typically foreshadowed, first as the Lamb; and then, as the Shepherd! Also cp Psa 95:7; 100:3 — and Psa 8: where the Shepherd lays down his life to save his “flock” from that beast of prey, Goliath!


“I and my Father are one” (John 10:30-38): Jesus quotes Psa 82 to prove that mortal men (including the Messiah) may be referred to as Elohim, “God” or “gods” (Psa 82:1,6,7; cp Psa 58:1; 97:7; 138:1).


Luke 10:17-24: The return of the 70:

Luke 10 Psalm 8
17. Subject unto us through thy name 2. How excellent is thy name 6. All things under his feet
18. I saw Satan fall 19. Tread on serpents and scorpions (v. 3: wolves; 9:58: foxes) 6-8. All… beasts of the field… under his feet 2. To still the enemy
20. Your names written in heaven 1. Thy glory upon the heavens
21. Lord of heaven and earth 21. Babes
  1. Heavens… all the earth

2. Babes and sucklings

22. All things are delivered to me 22. The Son 6. All things under his feet 4. Son of man
24. Prophets and kings David: both prophet and king

THE LAST WEEK

John 11:35: The death of Lazarus provokes the tears of Jesus. Jesus’ tears also flow for the prospect of Jerusalem’s sufferings (Luke 19:41), and in the stress of the temptation in Gethsemane (Heb 5:7). The tears of Jesus in the Psalms: Psa 6:6; 39:12; 42:3; 56:8; 69:10; 116:8.

Luke 18:18-24: Jesus talks with the rich young ruler: “One thing you lack!” — that is, Jesus as your Shepherd (Psa 23:1). Thus, “Come, follow me”… as the sheep follows the Shepherd.

Mat 19:28: The apostles sitting upon twelve thrones is the subject of Psa 122:5. (The twelve tribes of Israel are alluded to in Psa 122:4.)

Mat 26:12: “She has anointed me for my burial” – the high priest’s anointing of Psa 133. This psalm also suggests the anointing of the high priest preparatory to his entering the most holy place on the Day of Atonement.

This anointing was also done in anticipation of his resurrection (cp Psa 45:6-8,11).

Mat 21:12-16 / Mark 11:15-19 / Luk 19:45: Here is the second temple cleansing (cp Psa 69:9 again). The other sacrifices are driven away; Christ is soon to become the one true sacrifice… and so “the zeal for your house has consumed me” (as though he were an offering on the altar).

Mark 12:28-37: Jesus uses Psalm 110: “The Lord said to my Lord… ” “And afterward they asked him no more questions.”

Mat 23:38: “Your house is left unto you desolate” (Psa 69:25). The singular fulfillment is that of Judas; the plural fulfillment is that of the whole house of Israel.

Mat 24:2: “Not one stone upon another.” Cp the extended warning of Psa 49 (vv 6,7,11-15). This warning was directed against Egypt in the first place. But now, in the eyes of the Lord, Israel has become the new “Egypt”!

Luke 21:28: “Lift up your heads… your redemption draweth nigh”. Even as David brought the Ark of God’s Glory into Jerusalem, Jesus recreated this scene on “Palm Sunday” — when he entered the city of Jerusalem in the triumphal procession of a conquering king:

Luke 21 Psalm 24
25. The sea and the waves roaring 2. The sea and the floods
36. Stand before the Son of Man 3. Stand in his holy place
13:34. Commanded the porter to watch 7,9. Lift up your heads, O ye gates (ie, gate-keepers).
28. Your redemption draws nigh 5. Righteousness from the God of his salvation
Mat 24;32. He shall send his angels to gather his elect 10. The Lord of hosts.

Other psalms portray this same scene: Psalms 15, 30, 68, 87, and 132.

The Passover in the upper room: The thoughts of Jesus at the Last Supper may be extracted from the Psalms:

  1. Psa 102 in detail: this is a “Passover” psalm (vv 13,15,18-20).
  2. From the “Passover Hallel” (Psa 113-118): consider especially Psa 116:3,12-19; 118:10,14,17,19,22-27.

John 15:18-25: “They hated me without a cause”: Psa 35:11,12,19; Psa 69:4.

Jesus in Gethsemane: David — in his great trial — left Jerusalem and passed over Kedron (and Jordan: 2Sa 17:22), fleeing from Absalom (Psa 42; 43). Fulfilling this pattern, we see Jesus passing over Kedron to Gethsemane (cp Psa 42:5,11; 43:5 with Mat 26:38.

A number of other psalms seem to be based on the “Absalom” experiences of David, and thus point to the same New Testament scenario: Psalms 3; 4; 11; 23; 28; 31; 35; 38; 39; 41; 55; 61; 64; 69; 71; 84; 88; 94; 109; 140; 141.

Consider especially Psa 55:2-7,13,14,21; Psa 88 (all!); Psa 94:16-23.


ARREST AND TRIAL

John 18:2-6: “They [those who came to arrest Jesus] drew back and fell to the ground”: compare Psa 9:3; 27:2.

John 18:12: “Sorrows of death” (Psa 18:4,5) = “cords of death” (AV mg, RV); cp Psa 116:3 (sw) and Psa 118:27 — a figure for sacrifice: “Bind [the sacrifice] with cords… [and carry it] to the horns of the altar…”

The imprecations of Psalm 109: Would David (or Christ!) utter such imprecations (curses; invocations of evil or judgment) even upon his enemies?

Consider one example (Psa 109): Vv 1-5 = “they”; vv 6-19 = “he… him”; and vv 20-29 = “they” again! If the word “saying” is added in v 5, then vv 6-19 may be read as the curses thrown at David by his enemies (“they” = Shimei, Ahithophel, and/or Absalom). But such curses rebounded upon the enemies themselves (cp v 29: “Let them cover themselves with their own confusion”; also cp Psa 7:15,16; 915; 35:8).

Was it the same with David’s “son” Jesus? First, vv 6-19 can be read as the curses upon Christ spoken by his enemies (Caiaphas, the Pharisees, and/or Judas). Then, secondly, as the same curses returning, by God’s providence, upon their own heads. As to Jesus, see esp v 6 (“stand at right hand” suggests a trial!), vv 7,8,13. As to Judas, see esp v 8 (Acts 1:20), vv 16,17,18 (Acts 1:18). Far from wishing the destruction of Judas, Jesus must have felt intense grief for him (cp Psa 35:14 with vv 8,11,12,19) — a detail not readily apparent in the Gospels themselves.

Mark 14:55-57: The false witnesses brought against Jesus are suggested by Psa 27:12; 35:11,12,19; 64:8. (Note: why were the witnesses confused and contradictory of one another? Because, when the key witness — Judas — refused to testify, the whole prosecution strategy fell apart! In the hasty scramble to find and “coach” new witnesses, confusion resulted, and was easily brought out — probably by cross-examination by someone like Nicodemus or Joseph of Arimathea.)

Mark 14:61,62: ‘You will see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power’ – this is Psa 110:1! In the great Day to come, Jesus tells them, our roles will be reversed: I will be the Judge, and YOU will be the JUDGED!

Jews and Gentiles participate together in the trial and death of Jesus: (1) Jews: Annas, Caiaphas, Herod, Judas; (2) Gentiles: Pilate, Roman soldiers. This is the counterpart of Jew (Saul) and Gentile (Doeg) joining forces against David (Psa 52, title; 53:1-3 quoted in Rom 3:10-12; and Psa 10:7 quoted in Rom 3:14). See also Psa 2:1 (quoted in Acts 4:24-28).

Mat 27:26: The scourging of Jesus (cp Isa 50:6; 53:5). See Psa 129:3: notice how Jesus identifies with the very land of Israel — ravaged and plowed under by its enemies.


CRUCIFIXION

Psalm 8: First, David’s victory over Goliath — which in turn prefigured Jesus’ victory over “Sin” — thus explaining the use of Psa 8 in Heb 2:5-15.

What happened to the robe of Jesus (John 19:23-25)? Was it purchased back from the Roman soldiers, washed, and then left for him in the tomb? ‘He will need this later.’ See Psa 30:11 (“you removed my sackcloth and clothed me with joy”); and cp Zech 3:3,5: Joshua the high priest exchanges his filthy clothes for clean.

Also, Psa 133 offers the robes of the High Priest as a symbol of unity, and of the whole body of believers. Why? Because, as the high priest entered the most holy place on the Day of Atonement, he went there as the representative of the whole house of Israel, bearing along with his official garments the stones, or insignias, which symbolized the twelve tribes of Israel. In like fashion, the special robe of Jesus — without seam — signified the whole house of Israel which HE represented. [Compare the words of the soldiers, almost “prophetic” in their significance: “Let’s not tear (Greek “schizo”, ie, make a schism!) it”: v 24.]

“Natural” phenomena at the Crucifixion: Clouds, darkness, earthquake, storm: Psa 18:7-15 (cp vv 4-6,49,50); Psa 29:3-9.

The thoughts (and words) of Christ on the cross (Matt 27:46 / Mark 15:34; John 19:30): From “Eli… Eli” to “It is finished!”. This is Psa 22:1-21 (Christ in darkness: cp Matt 27:45), and Psa 22:22-31 (Christ in light).

Luke 23:46: “Into thine hands I commit my spirit”: Christ’s last words seemingly refer to Psa 31:5.

Putting this together with the previous paragraph, the question is suggested: did Jesus recite all of Psa 22:1 through 31:5 while on the cross?

The reasonableness of this suggestion must be tested by a review of the actual psalms. Consider, for examples, the fitness of these verses to the circumstances of the crucifixion: Psa 23:4; 24:3-5; 26:2,6; 27:2,3,5,6; 29:3-9 (darkness and storm); Psa 30:5,9,11; 31:5.

The AV puts this verse (Psa 31:5) in the past tense: “Thou HAST redeemed me…” In the light of v 5a {“Into your hands I commit my spirit”), these words (along with Psa 30:1-3) may be read as the first words spoken by our Lord when he came to life again in the tomb. (So the first half and the last half of Psa 31:5 were quoted by Christ in order, yet almost three days apart, and on either side of the great gulf of death!)

John 19:31-36: “Not a bone broken” is Passover language, referring to the lamb: Psa 6:2; 22:14; 34:20; 35:10.

But how does this square with Psa 51:8? Possibly, “broken bones” in Psa 51 should be seen not as literal, but as figurative — considered as simply parallel to “broken spirit” and “broken heart” of v 16.

Mat 27:57-61: The burial of Jesus, in the rock-hewn tomb: Psa 57:1 (notice the Passover imagery: vv 1,2,3,6,8) echoes this burial.

Jesus was first of all in a virgin womb; and now, finally, he is in a “virgin” tomb — where no body had ever been laid (John 19:41). With this may be compared Psa 139:13 (“you knit me together in my mother’s womb”), and Psa 139:15 (“I was woven together in the depths of the earth”: the tomb?) — as though Jesus had two “births”: the first from his mother’s virgin womb, and the last from the “virgin” tomb.


RESURRECTION

While many Psalms passages might be cited here — eg, those that speak of victory and blessing and divine care and protection, etc — only a few will be mentioned:

  1. Psa 2:7: This day have I begotten thee.” To which day does this refer? How is this verse used in Heb 1:5 and 5:5? In Heb 5:5 it is connected with Christ being made a High Priest. Thus it is more reasonable to see “this day” as being the day of his resurrection rather than the day of his birth.

  2. Psa 16:8-11: God’s Son is made so as “not to see corruption” (John 19:41). In Psa 16, the “path of life” = “the way to the tree of life” (Gen 3:24; cp John 14:6). And “God’s right hand” = the place of blessing and authority (cp Psa 110:1,4; Heb 12:2,3).

  3. Psa 126:5,6: Those who weep now will rejoice in time of harvest, when the “seed” that has been planted (Jesus, buried) will bring forth new life: cp with John 16:21,22; 12:24.

THE “NEW CREATION” IN CHRIST

Again, as above, many Psalms passages might be cited — specifically those that have to do with:

  1. the blessing of a faithful remnant, through the work of a faithful individual;

  2. God’s saving His people out of bondage in Egypt, into a new life as His nation;

  3. the blessing of children;
  4. a song (or a “new” song) of praise to Yahweh.

Only a few will be highlighted here:

  •         Psa 22:30,31: “A seed shall serve him” (cp Isa 53:10). The man who dies without a generation or descendants will nevertheless have a ‘seed” that will live and serve and worship him.

  •         Psa 87: “Born in Zion”! Those who were born elsewhere will, through their faith, be treated as though they have been “born” (or reborn!) in Zion, or Jerusalem. They will be the “children of Jerusalem” because they are the children of God.

  •         Psa 127:3-5: “Children” are the LORD’s heritage… they speak with the enemies in the “gate”. The “gate” is, generally, the place of meeting and settling legal matters; here, specifically, it may refer to the gate of Christ’s enemy (death!), which would be the great stone rolled away from the door of his tomb (cp Gen 22:17; Rev 1:18).

  •         Psa 128:3,6: “Olive shoots around your table… your children’s children… peace upon Israel. “For example, Peter’s converts at Pentecost and after (Acts 2:41; 5:14; etc.).

Other “New Creation” passages in the Psalms: 102:18; 103:22; 104:30 (see John 20:21,22); Psa 145:9,10.


ASCENSION

Mark 16:19: Cp Psa 16:11; 110:1. Psa 110:1 became the standard Ascension passage of the early church; it is used in Acts 2:34-36; 7:55,56; Rom 8:34; Eph 1:19-22; 2:6. Compare 1Ti 3:16 and 1Pe 3:22 with Mark 16:19.

Also, see Psa 68:18: “You ascended on high.”


PRIESTHOOD

Psa 110 again (and v 4 especially): Verse 1 is cited in Rom 8:34 — where Paul adds: “who also makes intercession for us”, thus alluding to Christ’s role as a Melchizedek high priest (see Psa 110:4): see also Heb 5:6; 7:1-24; 10:12,13.

The “sit down” of Psa 110 emphasizes that the sacrificial work of Jesus Christ was a one-time, once-and-for-all, perfect sacrifice — not the ongoing continual offering of many sacrifices which characterized the Law of Moses. “But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God. Since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool” (Heb 10:12,13). The footstool alluded to here is also mentioned in Psa 99:5; 132:7 — where the glorified and exalted Christ rules over his former enemies.

Psa 65 — a psalm for the Day of Atonement — pictures the congregation waiting outside the Temple for the appearance of the high priest (v 1; cp Heb 9:24-28); cp also v 4: the man who approaches unto God. A similar view is also found in Psa 67:1 and Psa 85:2,8.


SECOND COMING

Psa 2:1-4,9: “Shepherd them” (LXX): cp Rev 2:27. The One who is a Shepherd will also be a King: a “Shepherd-King”. (The “shepherd-king” motif is developed, rather exotically, in the Song of Songs; there, it would seem the young woman falls in love with a shepherd, only to learn — somewhat later — that her beloved is also the king!)

Psa 9 (all): Especially read vv 7-10,17-20.

Psa 29: “Voice” occurs seven times in this psalm (cp seven-fold trumpet blast of Rev 8; 9).

Psa 47 (all): The trumpet points to resurrection!

Where will the Judgment Seat be?

  1. 50:4,5: The saints will be gathered to judgment.
  2. 87:5: Saints “reborn” in Jerusalem: the rebirth of resurrection and glorification.

  3. 133:3: “There (mount Zion) the Lord commands the blessing of life for evermore.” Cp with Gal 4:24-27 — where Sinai is contrasted with Zion!

  4. 1:4; 35:5: The “chaff” is separated from the wheat at the “threshing floor” (Psa 72:16). Where was the threshing floor? At the property of Ornan the Jebusite, on Mount Zion or Mount Moriah: 2Sa 24:18. To carry this figure further, the good grain is gathered into God’s granary of the Kingdom, while the chaff is burned up in “Gehenna” (literally located right next to the Temple Mount).

One of Christ’s first tasks when he returns will be to save the remnant of Israel from the hands of their Arab enemies: Psa 60:8,9/108:9,10; Psa 83 (all).

Revelation 11 echoes Psalm 79:

Psalm 79 Revelation 11
1 The heathen are come into thine inheritance… they have defiled 2
2 The dead bodies of thy servants 8,9
2 The flesh of thy saints… the beasts of the earth 7
3 None to bury them 9
4 A reproach to our neighbors, a scorn and a derision 10
5. How long, O LORD? 11
6 Pour out your wrath upon the heathen 18 (and 16:1)
11 Let the sighings of your prisoners come before you 11
12 Render sevenfold… into their bosom The 7 vials of Rev 16
13 We will give thee thanks for ever 17

THE KINGDOM

All passages in the Psalms that speak of material blessings, of peace and prosperity, and of the nations acknowledging the rule of Yahweh may, of course, be considered Kingdom passages. From those we select:

  •         “THE LORD REIGNETH”: See all of Psalms 93, 97, 99, and 145. The songs of joy, and songs of praise, call to mind the Lamb and the 144,000 on Mount Zion.

  •         “Coronation” hymns such as Psalms 20 and 21 were probably composed on the occasion of David’s ascension to the throne of Israel, and are easily seen as prophetic types of Christ ascending to the throne prepared for him by God.

  •         The last part of Psalm 22 (vv 22-31) is a vision of the King in his Glory. It was this vision that sustained the Lord Jesus on the cross: “For the joy set before him [he] endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God” (Heb 12:2):
Psalm 22 Revelation 19
22. In the midst of the congregation will I praise thee

4. The four and twenty elders
23. Ye that fear the Lord, praise him 5. Praise our God, all ye servants
25. In the great congregation 6. The voice of a great multitude
22. I will declare Thy name unto my brethren 6. Alleluia, for the Lord God Omnipotent reigneth
26. The meek shall eat and be satisfied 7,9. The marriage supper of the Lamb
  •         Psalm 45 is a miniature Song of Songs. Both Scriptures describe the marriage of a great “king” to a special “bride”. The righteous King (vv 2,7), taken from among his fellows (v 7), but now elevated above all them to sit on God’s throne (v 6), celebrates a great marriage (vv 9-11). This is of course “the marriage of the Lamb” (Rev 19:7-9), with his “Bride” taken out of the Gentiles (vv 11,12)! This King is also a great high priest (cp Isa 61: 1,2,10: “as a bridegroom adorns his head like a priest”), for (as also in the Song of Songs) he is described in imagery reminiscent of the temple and its services. It is because of the surpassing sacrifice that the King-Priest has offered that his prospective Bride has been cleansed, and prepared for him (Eph 5:25-27, citing Song 4:7; cp Song 6:8,9).

  •         Psa 46:4: Compare with Eze 47:1-5 (the living waters); Zech 14:8; and Rev 22:1.

  •         Psa 134 pictures the immortalized saints (cp Psa 133) congregating with Christ on mount Zion (cp Rev 14).

  •         Gentiles especially will praise the LORD in that day. This is the theme of all of Psa 117, as well as Psa 57:9; 67:2,4; 72:11,17; 96:3,10; 98:2; 108:3.