If I forget you, Jerusalem

The times of Haggai and Zechariah were times of spiritual rebirth for the children of Israel. They were times of renewing of faith, and rededication to the work of God. Times had not always been so favorable for God’s people.

Many alive at this time could recall the great destructions which Nebuchadnezzar’s armies had accomplished upon the city of Jerusalem and its glorious Temple. And everyone could remember the degradation and misery (or perhaps, for some, the temporary prosperity and consequent distraction from God’s Way) which had been their fortune while in captivity in Babylon. Sadly they had asked themselves the question — “How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?” (Psa 137:4).

But the Jews had not been plagued and distressed in the same way as another nation might have been. The treatment and the purpose were different, for they were — and are still today — God’s chosen people. God Himself told them (Jer 30:11): “Though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee: But I will correct thee IN MEASURE and will not leave thee altogether unpunished.”

Why does God trouble His people? Why does He bring trials upon those who profess to serve Him?

Job has answered this question. In Job 23:10, this man — burdened with poverty, sorrow and disease, is able to say — “But He (God) knoweth the way that I take: when He hath tried me, I shall come forth as gold.

Paul, in his letter to the Hebrews, presents a clear statement of God’s purpose with His children (Heb 12:5): “My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou are rebuked of Him. For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth. If you endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.”

And in v 11 he concludes:

“Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them that are exercised thereby.”

And God did exercise His people by trials in the land of the enemy. Jeremiah foresaw this in his Lamentation at the fall of Judah, and he asked: “Wherefore doth a living man complain — a man for the punishment of his sins?”

Israel was this “living man”. Every other nation that God ever punished had remained a dead man. God was to make a full end of every nation except Israel.

Jeremiah understood this, and he thanked God for the special position of himself and his fellow Jews. Therefore he cried to everyone who would listen (including us, spiritual Israel):

“Let us search and try our ways, and turn again to the Lord. Let us lift up our hearts with our hands unto God in the heavens” (Lam 3:40,41).

And thus, by the controlling hand of their Father, the children of God were sent into a far nation for 70 years — years of slavery and hardship in the main part.

But they emerged from Babylon (as they had from the wilderness many years before) as a stronger people — more ready to listen to God because of their sufferings. The weaker elements had been purged from the people, just as the dross is separated from the pure metals, by the fire-the fire of God’s furnace.

The Israel of the kings had constantly rebelled and sought after idols, but the Israel of Zechariah’s time now realized very soberly the meaning of the one God, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. And they learned the lesson exemplified in Psa 137:

“If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning! If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth, if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy!”

***

Zec 6:9-15 concerns Joshua, the son of Josedec, the High Priest of Israel’s return. The prophet Zechariah was commanded to take crowns of silver and gold, and to place them upon the head of Joshua.

This act was to commemorate something of great importance. Our duty and our privilege, is to determine what is signified here. And if we will study these verses in the light of God’s Word, we shall find an inspiring and uplifting picture of Jesus Christ and his work — past, present, and future.

Verse 10 tells us of three men — Heldai, Tobijah and Jedaiah — who came to Jerusalem from Babylon, bringing precious gifts. (In the Septuagint, these three names are translated by the common words which their names signify. Thus we read, in this version, that “chief men, useful men, and men of understanding” came from Babylon, bringing gifts.)

It is easy to see that this verse expresses, for our instruction, the true character of the true Israel. Each of us must leave the darkness and ignorance and wickedness of spiritual “Babylon”, and each of us must come to God in understanding, ready to sacrifice our wealth and time in His service: “Ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God” (1Th 1:10).

And this must be a continuing renewal of purpose. It must not merely be a single decision made at baptism which can be nullified by later actions. As Paul implies, idolatry is a far wider evil than the simple worship of graven images. And we might add, “Babylon” has far more followers than we might first be willing to admit.

One of the most difficult trials was one which drew very little if any complaint from God’s people. This was the temptation of ease and plenty, and many Jews succumbed to this even when others had no effect.

But a few were able to overcome this as well. They had achieved comfort and respect in the land of their sojourning — in Babylon, the wealthiest and grandest city ever seen in the world, but they gave up their positions there as of no comparison with the things of God. They left behind them friends, and possibly even families, and they came to a devastated land to face the open hostility of the Samaritans, who hindered their work on the Lord’s Temple.

These are the same kind of choices which we must make: choices between Babylon and Jerusalem; choices between a life of ease and pleasure-seeking, and a life of patience and faith. Let us pray to God that we may make the right choices and that we may be given the strength to continue in them.

***

The pilgrims to Israel had brought with them silver and gold which they had gained in the land of their captivity.

Cyrus, the Persian king who had been God’s instrument to overthrow Babylon, had issued some decrees concerning the Jews, about 20 years before this time. He had given the Jews permission to return to their land and to rebuild their Temple.

And to aid them in this, he had authorized them to receive gifts of silver and gold, with other goods and beasts, as offerings from their neighbors — much as Israel had done when leaving Egypt under Moses. This is the means whereby such men as those of v 10 were able also to bring riches for God’s temple. But the credit was not be theirs for bringing the gold and silver. God says:

“The silver is Mine, and the gold is Mine, saith the Lord of hosts” (Hag 2:8).

God gave them the gold and the silver: but it was to be used in honoring Him. These precious metals are also representative of other gifts which we receive from God, with which we must also honor Him.

The gold represents a pure faith which is pleasing to Him. It is His desire:

“That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ” (1Pe 1:7).

For this loving attention, we must — as was Paul — be thankful to God (2Co 12:10): “Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, reproaches, necessities, persecutions, distress, for Christ’s sake: For when I am weak, then am I strong!”

How is it possible to find pleasure in every kind of discomfort and unpleasantness? Only when we learn to see the hand of God in all our affairs, preparing and shaping us:

“We glory in tribulations also, knowing that tribulation worketh patience; and patience, experience; and experience, hope; and hope maketh not ashamed” (Rom 5:3,4).

The silver was offered at times by the Jews as a type of sacrifice — as atonement. In the beginning, under Moses, they were commanded to pay a portion of silver to redeem each one of themselves individually.

But the fact remained as before, that the money was God’s in the first place. In other words, God was providing them with the means of redemption. The redemption of their lives was a gift of God, and not gained by their own labors.

Is it not easy to see in this God’s provision of a Son through whom He might righteously forgive our sins?

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3.16).

***

This silver and this gold were constituents of the crown which Zechariah placed upon Joshua. Joshua is a representative of Jesus Christ, and the events concerning him as recorded by Zechariah are prophetic of our Saviour. Joshua was a priest who succeeded in his work of leading the people of God in building God’s temple. Therefore he received a crown — but a crown reserved only to be worn by kings. We can see in this transaction a preview of the time when Jesus, our High Priest, will become King as well.

And at this time, we are assured, we shall have the opportunity to become “kings and priests” also (Rev 5:9). Our promotion to such an estate will be upon the principles which this silver and gold represent: the silver being the redemption which is in Christ Jesus by the mercy of God, and the gold the proving of our professed faith by our character and actions (1Pe 1:7).

In the New Testament, different crowns figure very prominently; but they are all in truth the same crown. In the consideration of these crowns we can see the hand of God working through His Son to help us in attaining to His Kingdom. The victory of Christ over sin has opened for us the way of life:

“Be though faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of Life” (Rev 2:10).

“Blessed is the man that endureth temptation, for when he is tried he shall receive the crown of Life which the Lord hath promised to them that love Him” (James 1:12).

In Jesus Christ we have an Advocate with the Father, a man who can be touched with the feelings of our infirmities, and an intercessor through whom we may pray to our Father. It is because of this that we may be accounted righteous before God-

“Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, shall give me at that day. And not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing” (2Ti 4:8).

Thus, only through Christ can we attain to a glorious immortality:

“And when the Chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away” (1Pe 5:4)

A Crown of Life, a Crown of Righteousness and a Crown of Glory — here is the reward set before us: an immortal life based upon righteous principles, and the privilege of serving with Christ as kings and priests in the kingdom which he will establish upon the earth — a Kingdom that will break in pieces and consume all the Babylons and Persias and Russias and Americas of this present time.

Zechariah has now placed this symbolic crown upon the head of the priest-king. Now he recites words which can apply in the fullest sense to only one person, Christ:

“Behold the man whose name is the Branch. And he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the Temple of the Lord. Even he shall build the Temple of the Lord; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne” (Zec 6:12,13).

In v 14 we see that this crown was to be placed in the new Temple (which at this time was still under construction) for a memorial. This was evidently done as God had commanded. But there still remains a greater fulfillment of this instruction, which will be realized in the near future. When the people in that time saw the small and insignificant Temple of the Jews as it was being built, many wept and felt discouraged that it was so meager in comparison to the grandeur of Solomon’s destroyed Temple. But God does not look upon the outward appearance: He rejoices in an inward frame of mind which is directed toward Him.

Thus He blessed the efforts of the faithful and He spoke reassuringly of another Temple in the distant future:

“And I will shake the nations, and the desire of all nations shall come; and I will fill this House [that is, the future Temple] with glory, saith the Lord of Hosts. The glory of this latter House shall be greater than of the former, saith the Lord of Hosts, and in this place will I give peace” (Hag 2:7).

This is the Temple and the Age to which Zechariah’s thoughts are pointing. It is the one to which Christ referred —

“My Father’s House… a House of Prayer for all nations.”

In this Temple will be placed the true crowns — Christ and the Saints — a righteous, immortal body of the redeemed ones who have come faithfully through trials to bear the glory of their Father. We live in a time when little can be done on behalf of the Truth. But we are told not be “despise the day of small things.” We must always work to the limit of our opportunities, undeterred by present difficulties — even with no immediate return on our labors — in anticipation of this glorious Kingdom Age.

“They that are far off shall come and build in the Temple of the Lord” (v 15).

This is the promise of all the prophets, and of Christ himself: a world of peace; its people enjoying the blessings of God’s Kingdom, and following the way of Truth, as taught by the Saints. Then they will say to one another —

“Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord, and to seek the Lord of Hosts. Yea, many people and strong nations shall come to seek the Lord of Hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before the Lord” (Zec 8:21,22).

Brethren and sisters, this is certainly a glorious picture that we find in God’s Word. At times it seems almost beyond belief that it can happen. But we have God’s guarantee that it will happen, as Zechariah says:

“And this shall come to pass if ye will diligently obey the voice of the Lord.”

God’s promises will come to pass. They are as certain as the sun and the moon in their courses. But the question for us to consider especially is whether or not they will come to pass for us. Look at the alternative:

“Depart from me, ye workers of iniquity…”

“Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom.”

The choice is ours. Shall we remain in a comfortable but wicked “Babylon”, OR shall we make the hard and perilous journey and bring our gifts to the Lord in Jerusalem? Let us — “Diligently obey the voice of the Lord our God.”

If… (Kipling)

“If you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs and blaming it on you, If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, But make allowances for their doubting too; If you can wait and not be tired of waiting, Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies; Or being hated, don’t give way to hating, And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise;

“If you can dream — and not make dreams your master; If you can think, and not make thoughts your aim; If you can meet with triumph and disaster And treat those two impostors just the same; If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build them up with worn-out tools…

“If you can talk with crowds, and keep your virtue, Or walk with kings, nor lose the common touch, If neither foe nor loving friends can hurt you, If all men count with you, but not too much; If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run, Yours is the hearth and everything that’s in it, And — more than this — you’ll be a man, my son!”

(Rudyard Kipling)

Image and likeness of God

The world was bright and new, and our ancestors Adam and Eve walked with a light and confident step through God’s lovely garden. They had the right, for they were made in the image (form, appearance) and likeness (capacity, authority) of the “Elohim” — the mighty ones, or angels, who executed the commands of the Almighty from His heavenly throne (Gen 1:26). To them, and them alone, had been given the wonderful assurance of dominion over all God’s creation. And so, placed in a special class, with heavenly tutors, they were instructed how best to fulfill their mandate — to subdue the earth (v 28) and live upon it to the ultimate glory of the Creator.

Why was “Adam”, as the first man, the crowning glory of God’s creation? Undoubtedly because he alone had the intelligence to reflect the glory of God. God, being the Source of all knowledge and all love, necessarily desires to see His characteristics reflected in His creation. It is true in the abstract that the heavens themselves mutely “declare” the glory of God (Psa 19:1). It is also true that the lion, the peacock, the cedar of Lebanon, and even the “wee beasties” in the test tube all “sing” together of the Divine Hand that formed them. But, if there were no man, who but God would “hear” their song? Who would appreciate such wonders and reciprocate the intelligent love of such a Creator?

It is apparent that, above all else, God desires knowledgeable and loving obedience from those creatures made in His image and likeness. He could easily have had a sort of “obedience” by simply making man a robot. Then He could have pushed the right button and, for ever and a day, the dutiful robot would have cried out, “Great is Yahweh!” But could there be any real pleasure in that? Such a robot would have been only one more variety of animal that, by instinct or “programming”, did only what it was supposed to do.

But how to create love? That was the question. Love must be a conscious choice of will in the mind of a being who has the capacity also to refrain from loving. God has the choice to do what He pleases — He chooses to love us. A creature, to be made truly in His likeness, must have that same capability of choice. And so, in an act of great daring, God made a being one giant step above his fellow creatures, a being capable of choosing right and wrong, good and evil. I say, an act of daring, because something was now loose in the universe over which the Almighty no longer had absolute control: a brain capable of grasping the eternal, yet capable also of repudiating it. In order to receive the greatest pleasure from His work, God was forced to allow the possibility of the greatest disappointment.

God put into the hands of Adam, and thence into our hands as well, an awesome power — a power far surpassing that of any other creature — the power to distress and sadden our Creator. No ravening beast, no rampaging river, can cause God hurt — but a flimsy little fabrication of bone and flesh can bring tears to His eyes.

And yet, though our power to hurt God is so great, our ability also to please Him infinitely surpasses that of any other creature. There is a wonder in this beyond description. The Omnipotent, Omniscient Lord of all creation, to whom the mighty stars are so many grains of dust, condescends to hold our hands, His little children.

“Like as a father pitieth his children, so the Lord pitieth them that fear Him” (Psa 103:13).

And the smallest faltering step of one of those children along the road that leads to life brings Him boundless joy — the joy multiplied a hundredfold of the human father who watches over his child’s first steps.

Such power there is in the grasp of each one of us, and such glorious privilege! How can we ever neglect it?

“Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God” (1Jo 3:1).

Immortal emergence

The BASF lists these beliefs as “Doctrines to be Rejected”:

15. That the tribunal of Christ, when he comes, is not for the judgment of saints, but merely to divide among them different degrees of reward. 16. That the resurrection is confined to the faithful. 17. That the dead rise in an immortal state.

Based on the study of what constitutes “first principles” (see Lesson, Apostolic statement of faith), the clearly essential doctrines concerning this subject include:

  1. When Christ returns, he will first raise the dead, faithful and unfaithful (Act 24:15,21; 26:8).

  2. Then these will be brought to his Great Judgment along with the living responsible, faithful and unfaithful, where all will be judged together (Act 10:42; cp also Rom 14:10-12; 2Co 5:10).

The “Doctrines to be Rejected”, above, are plainly the negative restatements of these positive “first principles”.

One Scripture passage presents a significant problem. The Bible teaching that the dead do not rise in an immortal state seems to be contradicted by the words of Paul to the Corinthians: “The trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality” (1Co 15:52,53).

However, in 1Co 15, Paul is equating “resurrection” with the whole process (resurrection, judgment, and glorification) culminating in the Kingdom of God. That is (letting v 53 interpret v 52), ‘the dead shall be raised… to put on incorruption’! Paul’s own words elsewhere (ie, Rom 2:6-8; 1Co 4:5; 2Co 5:10; 1Th 4:14-17; 2Ti 4:1) give the step-by-step details of this process, and should be studied alongside 1Co 15.

There are other examples of the Bible speaking of “resurrection” as a finished work, with no indication of any judgment whatsoever or any rejection of the unworthy: Luk 20:33,35; Joh 5:29; Phi 3:8-11; Heb 11:35; and prob Rev 20:6.

It is possible that a “statement of faith” may quote 1Co 15:53,54 without teaching false doctrine. (How can the direct quoting of Scripture ever be false?) But, to be consistent with other plainly essential teachings, the words “raised incorruptible” (1Co 15:52) would have to mean something like: ‘raised, then judged, and then glorified’ — even if such process were almost instantaneous after the literal coming forth from the grave.

It should be said, moreover, that there is no real Bible proof for the length of time (no matter how long or how short) involved in the process of resurrection, judgment, and reward. But any theory which denies that a literal resurrection will be followed by a literal judgment is — by the earlier tests — plainly a false doctrine.

Finally, it must be noted that there is no conclusive Bible proof for any specific procedure of judgment; it cannot be proven as a first principle, for example, that every responsible person has, one by one, his or her own individual “trial”. Certain “judgment” verses indeed might be interpreted this way (Rom 14:10; 2Co 5:10), but other “judgment” verses imply very much otherwise (Mat 13:48,49; 24:40,41; 25:32; Luk 17:34-36). But, once again, the true “first principles” passages require a literal judgment — no matter how the details are arranged by Christ and his angels.

Immortal soul?

One of the most comforting promises made by ministers and preachers — the immortality of the soul — is the same lie told by the serpent in the Garden of Eden. God told our ancestors that if they partook of the fruit of one particular tree, they would “surely die” (Gen 3:3). However, the serpent, when told of God’s firm instruction, rejected that instruction and confidently told the woman, “You shall NOT surely die” (Gen 3:4). The serpent was wrong and God was right. But millions of people believe the lie, because it is preached by respected preachers and philosophers.

The first lie

The first lie was introduced into the world and, because the woman believed the lie instead of the word of the One who had created her, sin entered the world. And this sin would have consequences: “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground… for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return” (Gen 3:19). That the further promise of God regarding the certain death of Adam, was fulfilled, we are left in no doubt, for the chronology of Gen 5 reveals to us that Adam lived for 930 years then died (vv 3-5). Before Adam and Eve sinned there had NOT been any certainty of death other than by reason of disobedience, but now that very disobedience became the cause of their death AND the death of all humans, who are descended from them. The Apostle Paul assures us this was so, for he wrote, “Death reigned from Adam to Moses” (Rom 5:14).

What is the form of the lie?

Each day, throughout the world, many people die and are buried or cremated. At the interment, many officiating ministers or priests solemnly declare that the ‘immortal soul’ of the deceased has gone to heaven to ‘ever be with the Lord’. That such language is not to be found in the Bible does not seem to deter people from using it. The phrase ‘immortal soul’ does NOT appear in the Bible, but rather the Scripture tells us in no uncertain language that ‘souls’ are NOT IMMORTAL, ie, that they can die. The prophet Ezekiel writes by inspiration of God, “The soul that sinneth, it shall die” (Eze 18:4). The word used for ‘soul’ in this passage is the Hebrew word “nephesh”, which means beast, body, creature, or man. Nowhere in the Bible is the word used in a sense of immortality.

How did the idea enter Christianity?

History tells us that the ancient Assyrians and the Egyptians were among the first to claim that at death there was a part of man that left the body and journeyed to another realm. Food and drink and slaves were all buried with the rich dead in Egypt. Thousands of years later, when the tombs were excavated, the food was still there, uneaten. Greek philosophers such as Socrates continued to teach the lie of the serpent, claiming there was a part of man that never died. This lie spread through all nations and people of the world. The new Church of Rome soon put aside the simple teachings of the Lord Jesus and the disciples, and embraced the apostate teachings of the pagan people of the world. The Lateran Council, under Pope Leo X, asserted the immortality of the soul, on the authority of Pope Clement V. Again the truth of Bible teaching was giving way to the ‘first lie’.

Has there been any protest?

There certainly has! Whilst many leading teachers and preachers continued and still continue to teach the ‘first lie’, down through the ages there has always been the voice of protest against the change of a simple Bible truth.

  • In 1525 William Tyndale wrote of his understanding of salvation, claiming that such salvation from eternal death depends on resurrection from the dead when the Lord Jesus returns to the earth. His reward for standing up for truth was to be strangled and burnt at the instigation of ‘the church’.
  • In 1901 a prominent Methodist, JA Beet, wrote a spirited protest against the pagan doctrine of the ‘immortality of the soul’, tracing its origins to Greek and Egyptian philosophy and superstition’. He showed quite plainly that the Bible contradicts the pagan concepts of the ‘immortality of the soul’.
  • In 1943 the Church of England formed a commission to investigate the beliefs of the Church. This commission published the following statement: “The idea of the inherent indestructibility of the human soul (or consciousness) owes its origin to Greek, not Bible sources. The central theme of the New Testament is eternal life, NOT for everybody and anybody, but for believers in Christ as risen from the dead” (From “Towards the Conversion of England”). Notwithstanding such a declaration at the top level, the same Church continues to teach the pagan idea which the commission condemned.

What does the Bible say?

All those who teach the pagan doctrine of the ‘immortality of the soul’ claim that the teaching comes from the Bible. But is this true? The following passages of Scripture prove otherwise:

  1. Gen 3:19: “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till return to the ground; for out of it was thou taken; for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.”
  2. Ecc 3:19-20: “For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts: even one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man has no preeminence over the beast: for all is vanity. All go to one place; all are of the dust and all turn to dust again.
  3. Ecc 9:4-6,10: “For to him that is joined to all the living there is hope; for a living dog is better than a dead lion. For the living know that they shall die; but the dead know not anything; also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished… Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.”
  4. John 11:11-14: “These things said he (Jesus): and after that he said unto them (the disciples), Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I might awaken him out of sleep. Then said his disciples, Lord, if he sleep, he shall do well. Howbeit Jesus spoke of his death; but they thought he had spoken of taking of rest in sleep. The said Jesus unto them plainly, Lazarus is dead.
  5. Job 3:17: “There (the grave) the wicked cease from troubling; and there the weary be at rest.”
  6. Psa 6:5: “For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?”

All of these passages of Scripture show that death results in man going to the grave and NOT to heaven. Nor are there any references of any part of the person going to heaven except the breath of life (Heb “ruach” = breath, air, life), which is given to man at birth. It ‘goes back to God who gave it’ (Ecc 12:7).

Can man gain immortality?

The simple answer comes from the Bible:

  1. Rom 6:23: “The gift of God is eternal life though Jesus Christ our Lord.”
  2. 1Co 15:52-54. “The dead shall be raised… this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal shall put on immortality.”

Surely any reasonable Bible student must accept from this last definite and positive passage that no man or woman has immortality now, and cannot gain it until the resurrection, at Christ’s return.

The Apostle Paul, writing to Timothy, in 2Ti 1:10, shows clearly that the Lord Jesus made immortality available to all mankind, through the Gospel. “…our Saviour Jesus Christ… hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel.” Immortality is a promise for the future… the Bible does NOT teach present immortality.

Imprecatory psalms

Certain psalms are commonly called “imprecatory psalms” because they invoke the judgments of God against His enemies. The psalms most generally placed in this category are 7, 35, 58, 59, 69, 83, 109, 137, and 139. A number of other psalms, as well as other parts of Scripture, contain brief imprecations; but these nine have imprecation as their chief element.

The basic problem with these psalms, as many Interpreters see it, is an ethical question: How can it be right to wish or pray for the destruction of others when the Bible teaches elsewhere and often that one should love his enemies, and pray for those who persecute him (Mat 5:44)?

To this question, generally stated, there have been numerous answers:

The imprecations were by David’s enemies:

It has been suggested that the imprecation in Psa 109:6-20, as one example, is not the utterance of David against his enemies, but is the cursing of those enemies against David himself (cp 2Sa 16:5-13). This solution requires the insertion of the word “saying” at the end of v 5 (WEnj 205,206). Some would go so far as to consider the suggestion of an insertion as “adding unto the word” (Deu 4:2; Pro 30:6; Rev 22:18) [CC Walker, “The Vindictive Psalm”, Xd 65, No. 770 (August, 1928), p 354]. However, justification for this sort of approach may be found in the italicized word “saying” in Psa 2:2 (AV) to explain the quotation in 2:3 which must obviously be attributed to David’s enemies.

This proposal has merit in the single case, and could perhaps apply to some others; but a similar approach to all eight imprecatory psalms proves very strained indeed.

The imprecations expressed David’s own sentiments only:

This suggestion is that David is, in such psalms, speaking the sentiments of his own heart and not those of the Holy Spirit. According to this view, the inspiration of David’s curses does not mean that God approved of the anger in David’s heart when he wrote those curse (GT 195).

This view, however, overlooks or perhaps does not give sufficient weight to the scriptural record of David as a man who did not indulge in a spirit of personal revenge (1Sa 24:1-7; 26:5). And furthermore, this view could lead down the treacherous path by which we are faced continually with the quandary: “Is this verse, or that, inspired and meaningful as an example to me — or is it merely David (or Isaiah, or Moses, or Paul) the man expressing his own sentiments rather than God’s?”

The imprecations demonstrate the inferior principle of spiritual life in the Old Testament:

This view is the favorite of many “orthodox” scholars, being founded on the doctrine of “progressive revelation”. By this is meant that the Old Testament worthies could not have been expected to show any of the gentler and more “Christian virtues of character, since they had no Inkling in their day that such qualities were even desirable!

This approach is, as it should be, totally unacceptable to Christadelphians, who rightly take Old and New Testaments to be equally inspired and infallible. Also, such passages as Lev 19:17,18; Pro 20:22; 24:17,18; 25:21,22; and Job 31:29,30 show that, in the matter of personal vengeance, the Old Testament is every but up to the standard of the New.

The imprecations are prophetic:

According to this view, David was not only a poet but also a prophet declaring what would happen to the ungodly. His statements, then, were not private and personal at all, but instead the judgments of God [GH Denney, ” ‘Cursing’ Psalms”, The Berean Christadelphian, Vol 38, No 5 (May, 1950), back cover]. It is pointed out, in defense of this view, that some of the imprecatory psalms are quoted in the New Testament as being fulfilled then (Psa 69:25; 109:8 in Acts 1:20; Psa 69:22,23 in Rom 11:9,10).

But, linguistically speaking, in both English and Hebrew, the “imprecations” are not simple declarations of what will happen, but rather wishes or prayers for what may happen (J. Carl Laney, “A Fresh Look at the Imprecatory Psalms” Bibliotheca Sacra, January-March 1981, p 40). Thus, what appears at first sight to be a very satisfactory solution may be seen as going only half the way to answering the question: “How could David pray as he did?”

Finally, the imprecations are calls to God to remember His covenant:

The fundamental ground of justification for the presence of the imprecatory psalms is the Abrahamic covenant, specifically Gen 12:1-3: “Now the Lord had said unto Abram, ‘Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.'”

On the basis of this covenant, David, the seed of Abraham, the divinely-selected representative of the nation, had every right to pray that God would do what He had promised — that is, curse those who cursed Abraham’s “seed”!

What is crucial to appreciating the imprecatory psalms is this: David never prayed that he might be permitted to avenge himself, but always that God would rise up to avenge His Anointed (Psa 7:6; 35:1; 58:6; 59:5). Like Jesus later, David was capable of generosity and “turning the other cheek” when under personal attack (2Sa 16:11; 19:16-23). Yet, like Jesus again, he loved righteousness and hated iniquity which flaunted itself against the honor of God, and he could be ruthless in suppressing such iniquity when he knew the time was right!

Finally, God’s judgments are essential if the righteous are ever to be established and glorified on the earth. To pray “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth” is, therefore, no different than to pray “Let them (Thy enemies) be confounded… troubled… put to shame… perish…” — once it is understood that there is no personal vindictiveness involved. Therefore, the imprecations of the Bible are not mere human cries for vengeance, nor the expression of some inferior Old Testament “righteousness”, nor only prophecies. They are righteous, heartfelt calls upon God to remember His covenant, and to perform it, come what may. For David and the other “imprecators” recognized that only then, when God’s enemies are finally and completely cursed, will He be able to get on with the business of glorifying His Name in the earth:

“So let all Thine enemies perish, O Lord: but let them that love Thee be as the sun when he goeth forth in his might.”