“Let these men alone”

“Any attempt to systematically wipe out the bad guys leaves the group out of balance and desperately in need of a new villain. This may sound silly, but it does happen. Take for instance a small group of committed Christians. They desire to have a pure fellowship — to root out any evil within their midst. The only blight on their horizon is that one member feels comfortable with [pick your favorite ‘error’ here]…

“After failing to dissuade him, the group expels him from their midst as one who is too loose. In essence they’ve pulled in the lines of moral behavior, but now no one is certain how far. Believe it or not, a new deviant will soon emerge from the hitherto ‘good’ people. His or her OK behavior is now on the fringe and is the subject of condemnation…

“This splintering is typical of groups that want to purify their number. The group gets smaller and tighter but is doomed to always being dissatisfied as long as they insist on allowing no dissent…

“Try to heed the sage advice of Gamaliel. When the Sanhedrin was confronted by the disruptive behavior of the disciples he counseled, ‘My advice to you now is to let these men alone; leave them to themselves. For if this teaching or movement is merely human it will collapse of its own accord. But if it should be from God you cannot defeat them, and you might actually find yourself to be fighting against God!’ Benign neglect was what he suggested. But since the Jewish leaders thought they had a corner on all wisdom, they couldn’t tolerate deviance. And they ended up doing the very thing that Gamaliel warned against — opposing God…

“The alternative to deviance is not attractive either. Who wants to head up a mindless conformity? Sameness has a chilling effect on progress… As hard as this is, we have the comfort of knowing that our Lord lived — and died — with this approach to deviance. He was unable to see a crowd; every person was special. He knew them each by name. If he could put up with a political fanatic (Simon the Zealot), a pair of emotional hotheads nicknamed the Sons of Thunder (James and John), a man who openly questioned his resurrection (Thomas), a corrupt tax collector (Matthew) and a money grabber who betrayed him (Judas), how can we do less? In the long run, it turned out to be a pretty good group” (Em Griffin, “Getting Together”).

Luke’s genealogy

Luke’s genealogy is given after the record of the baptism of Jesus, and not as part of the record of his birth, because it reveals the reason for his baptism: his descent, shared with all men, from Adam. Jesus’ baptism was the initial step of obedience by which he would deliver himself and others from the condemnation of Adam. It was necessary that the Savior be himself subject to the same weaknesses and infirmity of the flesh as those whom he sought to save (Heb 2:14,15; 4:15; 5:7,8).

Jesus is shown to be the son of Adam, and the last “Adam” because he was the beginning of a new creation. The first Adam brought only death, but in the last Adam all who believe will have life (1Co 15:22,23).

As with Matthew’s list, the numbers are again important. Counting God (Luk 3:38) and Jesus (Luk 3:23), Luke’s genealogy contains 77 names, and 77 is the number of times we must forgive those who sin against us (Mat 18:22; ct Gen 4:24). All those who have sinned against God and His Son may have forgiveness of sins through Christ. Beginning the genealogy with Adam, there are actually 75 generations. Seventy-five is the number of Jacob’s family that went down into Egypt, and died there (Act 7:14,15); they sig all men, who are “dead in their sins” until Christ their passover is sacrificed that they might be set free.

Women are nearly always excluded from genealogies. [To substantiate: Case of Jair, father of Judah (1Ch 2:22). But his grandfather had married the daughter of Machir, tribe of Manasseh (1Ch 2:21; 7:14). And Jair is called the SON of Manasseh (Num 32:41).]

Lev, overview

Author: Moses (date of writing: c 1440-1400 BC).

Period: c 1440-1400 BC.

Title: “Leviticus” is the Latin form of the Greek word meaning “pertaining to the Levites”. The Hebrew title is taken from the first word of the book: “vayyiqra’ ” (“And he [the LORD] called…”).

Having brought His people out of bondage in Egypt, God gave them laws which had two functions: (1) to provide a code of behavior which would enable them to worship Him, and indeed, be His holy people (Lev 20:26), and (2) to enable them to have a practical law to assist in their daily living.

The Hebrew title (“and He called”) may be said to apply to the whole of Israel: as a nation called by God for a special purpose (Exo 19:6). The words also apply to the specific priests, the sons of Levi, whose task it was to oversee the spiritual (and secular) life of the people.

Summary: The third book of the Pentateuch takes its name from one of the twelve sons of Jacob, Levi, whose family was ordained by God to minister to Him as priests. The book covers the laws of the Israelites regarding worship and religious activities, both personal and national, including the Day of Atonement and sacrificial offerings. It contains laws regarding cleanliness, morality, ethics and hygiene that pertained to the people of Israel on a day-to-day basis. Animal sacrifice was introduced as an atonement for the individual and national sins of the people.

In modern terms Leviticus is significant in that it shows the way in which followers of Christ should endeavor to live their lives. Leviticus contains details of the sacrifices and offerings, required to be made by the people in recognizing their complete dependence on God and the necessity always to honor Him. Lev describes sacrifices and offerings to be made for a wide variety of reasons: some as a recognition of sin; some as “free- will” offerings, of voluntary devotion.

The most important offering was made to honor the day of Atonement (Lev 16:1-34), when a lamb without any blemish was offered as a sacrifice to “atone” for the sins of the nation. This pointed forward to Jesus who, as the lamb without blemish, offered himself as a sacrifice once and for all, an atonement for the sins of many (Heb 9:28). Through identifying with Jesus we can obtain the forgiveness which is promised (Mat 26:28).

We are not required, under the new covenant, to offer sacrifices in the way the children of Israel were required. We do need to offer ourselves as a “living sacrifice” (Rom 12:1) to the service of God. Our whole life should the of continual service to Him.

Outline

Lev 1:1 – 7:38 Sacrifices and offerings

  • Lev 1:1-17 Burnt offering
  • Lev 2:1-16 Meal and fruit offerings
  • Lev 3:1-17 Peace offering
  • Lev 4:1-35 Sin offering
  • Lev 5:1-19 Trespass offering

  • Lev 6:1 – 7:38 Further explanations of the law concerning offerings.

Lev 8:1 — 10:20 Consecration of priests Lev 11:1 — 15:33 Laws discerning cleanness and uncleanness

Lev 16:1-34 The Day of Atonement Lev 17:1 — 20:27 Miscellaneous laws Lev 21:1 — 22:33 Responsibilities of the priests Lev 23:1-44 The Feasts

  • Lev 23:4-8 Passover and Feast of Unleavened Bread

  • Lev 23:9-14 The Firstfruits
  • Lev 23:15-22 The Feast of Pentecost
  • Lev 23:23-32 The Feast of Trumpets
  • Lev 23:33-44 The Feast of Tabernacles

Lev 24:1 — 27:34 Further miscellaneous laws including reference to: Lev 25:1-55 The year of the Sabbath and the year of Jubilee

Lev 26:1-13 Promise of blessing Lev 26:14-46 Promise of punishment Lev 27:1-34 Vows and tithes

Luke, overview

Luke has the most universal outlook of all the gospels; he portrays Jesus as the perfect man with compassion for all peoples.

Whereas Matthew traces Jesus’ genealogy back to Abraham, the father of the Jews (Mat 1:2), Luke traces it back to Adam the father of the human race (Luk 3:38).

Luke is written for the Greeks. He substitutes Greek expressions for nearly all the Jewish expressions (“Amen” is one of the few exceptions), and he seldom refers to OT prophecy.   Luke was a skilled writer, and the literary quality of the Gospel of Luke is thought to be the highest of all four gospels. The literary structure of the Gospel of Luke is constructed primarily around Jesus’ ministry in Galilee and in Jerusalem.   Main Themes

* When He was in the synagogue at Nazareth, Jesus gave the keynote of His ministry by reading from Isaiah:

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, Because He has anointed Me to preach the gospel to the poor. He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To preach deliverance to the captives And recovery of sight to the blind, To set at liberty those who are oppressed, To preach the acceptable year of the Lord” (Isa 61:1- 2).

In Luke, Jesus’ life is presented as a commentary on this passage of Scripture:

  1. He blesses the poor, the hungry, those who weep, and the excluded (Luk 6:20-23).

  2. In one parable He takes the side of a beggar who sits outside the gate of a rich man (Luk 16:19-31); and in another parable He celebrates a tax collector who shies away from the Temple because of his sinfulness (Luk 18:9-14).

  3. Jesus reaches out to a widowed mother who had lost her only son (Luk 7:11-17) and to a sinful woman (Luk 7:36-50).

  4. In another parable the hero of mercy is a despised Samaritan (Luk 10:25-37); and after a healing, a Samaritan is praised for his gratitude (Luk 17:11-19).

  5. The open arms of the Father, as in the parable of the Prodigal Son (Luk 15:11-32), await all who return to Him. Jesus’ identification with sinners leads Him to open His arms to them on the cross, where “He was numbered with the transgressors” (Luk 22:37).

* The Return of Christ is one of this Gospel’s main points and makes this gospel one of joy.

* Luke is a gospel of prayer.

  • The multitude prays as Zacharias serves at the altar (Luk 1:10)…

  • Mary prays at the news of salvation (Luk 1:46-55)…

  • Jesus prays at His baptism (Luk 3:21)…

  • When He chooses His disciples (Luk 6:12)…

  • At Peter’s confession (Luk 9:18)…

  • At His transfiguration (Luk 9:29)…

  • In the solitude of prayer Jesus takes the first steps of ministry (Luk 5:16)…

  • On the Mount of Olives (Luk 22:39-46)…

  • He gives His final breath back to God, “Father, into Your hands I commend My spirit” (Luk 23:46).

* There are 10 parables recorded by Luke which are not recorded by the other gospel writers: (1) the good Samaritan (Luk 10:30-37); (2) a friend at midnight (Luk 11:5-13); (3) the barren fig tree (Luk 13:6-9); (4) the lowest room (Luk 14:7-14); (5) counting the cost (Luk 14:28-33); (6) the lost coin (Luk 15:8-10); (7) the prodigal son (Luk 15:11-22); (8) the unjust steward (Luk 16:1-13); (9) the importunate widow (Luk 18:1-8); and (10) the pounds (Luk 19:11-28).

Outline

Luke 1:1-4: Introduction
Luk 1:5 – 2:52: The birth and childhood of Jesus
Luk 3:1 – 4:13: Preparation for the ministry — John the Baptist; Jesus’ baptism; Jesus’ temptation
Luk 4:14 – 9:50: The ministry in Galilee — Teaching through parables; teaching through healing
Luk 9:51 – 19:40: The ministry continues on the way to Jerusalem
Luk 19:41 – 21:38: The ministry in Jerusalem — prophecy
Luk 22:1 – 24:53: The crucifixion, resurrection and ascension

Leviathan

Among the ancient civilizations there are myths about dragons. The Babylonian creation myth contains a battle between Merodach and a dragon (Tiamet). The destruction of this dragon turns into the creation of the earth and the ascendancy of Merodach.

Another of these myths is about a seven-headed dragon named Lotan or Leviathan. During excavations at a site called Ugarit (modern day Ras-Shamra) there was a tablet found bearing a story concerning “Baal and Anat” which dates back to 1400 BC. In the text there is found this ref to the Leviathan: “Didst thou not smite Leviathan, the swift serpent, even the crooked serpent? Didst thou not break in pieces his seven heads?” (Marston, The Bible Comes Alive, 54).

This creature is probably to be associated with the Canaanite god, Yamm, who is the god of seas and rivers. He does battle with Baal and is destroyed. This battle is thought to be represented by winter storms that subside in the spring time.

This passage is cited — almost verbatim — in Isa 27:1,2. Isaiah must have been familiar with this text and here he is using it for God’s own purpose. Taken in context with Isa 26:21, Yahweh is planning the punishment of the people of the earth, the nations. That leviathan sig the nations (or a nation) is to be deduced from Psa 74:14. Here again the knowledge of the seven-headed dragon myth is revealed because of the mention of leviathan’s heads (plural!). This passage is talking about Egypt. The Psalmist is referring to the greatest political power at that time, Egypt, and likening it to this mythological dragon. God is the true king (v 12) and the One to bring judgments upon the Egyptians. “Leviathan” is given for “food for the creatures” (RSV, NIV) — ref the dead bodies of the Egyptians washed up on the shore as being meat for the animals. This is a common idea in the latter day prophecies which speak about the bodies of the destroyed nations (ie Gog in Eze 39).

“Very remarkably, identical language to Isaiah’s has been found in one of the Ugarit religious tablets: ‘Didst thou not smite Leviathan the swift serpent, even the crooked serpent? Didst thou not break in pieces his seven heads?’ This inscription dates back to 1400 BC; so there is the remarkable phenomenon of an inspired prophet of Jehovah quoting from what was evidently familiar literature of an earlier pagan religion. Presumably in the first instance some Ugaritic priest wrote the words to celebrate an earlier period of Assyrian expansion… which suffered a serious reverse. Now Isaiah picks up the familiar words, rightly attributing this latest mighty Assyrian disaster to the angel of the Lord (Isa 37:36)… One is sorely tempted to read these serpent allusions as a sidelong reference to the brazen serpent, made by Bezaleel and smashed up in the fervor of Hezekiah’s reformation (2Ki 18:4). If Ahaz had encouraged his people to associate that image with the power of the Assyrian overlord, its destruction would be an open flouting by Hezekiah of the authority of the bully of Nineveh, and then it is understandable why Sennacherib made such a vicious onslaught on the tiny state of Judah… Sennacherib was not amused!” (WIsa 279).

There can be no denying the political nature of this symbol in the OT. Is it any wonder that the book of Rev also picks it up as a symbol of paganism (Rev 12:3)? God is using this common idea among the nations to show His superiority over these “no-gods”. Instead of denouncing the concept of “Leviathan” outright he develops it for his own purposes and symbology. There can be no credence given to a literal dragon with seven heads, yet the symbology can be used for the nations.

Even outside of the canon of Scripture this dragon was used to represent political powers: “Of particular interest is the ancient Babylonian myth of a combat between the divine Creator and a great sea monster. This myth finds echoes in a number of passages in the OT where the monster is variously described as the Dragon, Leviathan, Rahab or the Serpent. In Babylonian and Hebrew forms alike it symbolizes the chaotic deep or cosmic ocean (Heb “tehom”, Babylonian “tiamat”) which is regarded as a place of mystery and evil. Elsewhere it is identified with Egypt (cf Psa 87:4) which in several places is described under the figure of a great sea monster (cf Psa 74:13…; Eze 29:3; 32:2). This same monster reappears in apocalyptic form in several writings of various dates. In the Testament of Asher, for example, the writer tells of the coming of the Most High to earth and of his ‘breaking the head of the dragon in the water’ (cf Psa 74:13). There is a tradition that this dragon, described as Behemoth and Leviathan, is to be devoured at the Messianic Banquet by those who remain in the Messianic Age (2 Esdras 6:52; 2 Baruch 29:4). In the Zadokite Fragments the same figure is used to describe ‘the kings of the Gentiles’ (9:19-20), whilst in the Psalms of Solomon the ref is to the Roman general Pompey (2:29), no doubt under the influence of Jer 51:34, where Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon is referred to in similar terms” (DS Russell, Between the Testaments 98,99).

In the OT there are a number of references to Yahweh’s conflict with the dragon and the sea, the dragon sometimes being named as Leviathan or Rahab. The theme is also seen in the NT in the book of Rev. The imagery is sometimes associated with the creation of the world. Sometimes it is historicized, so that the dragon symbolizes a foreign nation such as Egypt, and sometimes the divine conflict is projected into the future as the final, Last Days battle. The background of this mythological imagery was previously believed to be Babylonian, but since the discovery of the Ugaritic texts it has become apparent that the more immediate source of the Biblical allusions is Canaanite mythology (ABD).

A. Creation

A number of poetic OT passages describe a conflict at the creation of the world which pit Yahweh against the dragon and the sea. The clearest instances are in Psa 65:6,7; 74:12-17; 89:9-14; 104:1-9; Job 9:5-14; 26:5-14; 38:8-11. This conflict also seems to form the background of Psa 93:3-4; Job 7:12; 40:15-41:34, while Job 3:8 seems to allude to the reversal of the process of creation.

It has been long assumed that these OT allusions constituted an Israelite appropriation of the Babylonian myth of Marduk’s defeat of the sea monster Tiamat recounted in Enuma Elish, the so-called Babylonian creation epic. This view continues to find support, but the discovery of the Ugaritic mythological texts has shed new light on the question. In addition to a detailed account of Baal’s defeat of the sea-god Yamm, there are allusions to another conflict between Baal or Anat and the sea monster Leviathan (also known as the twisting serpent, the crooked serpent, and/or the dragon, in addition to other monsters). These indicate a Canaanite background for the allusions to Leviathan (Psa 74:14; Job 3:8; 40:25-41:34; Isa 27:1) and the twisting or crooked serpent (Isa 27:1; cf Job 26:13). Since Rahab seems to be another name for Leviathan, this too was presumably a Canaanite dragon name, though it has not yet appeared in any extra-biblical text (See Lesson, Rahab (Egypt)).

It seems likely that the theme of Yahweh’s conflict with the dragon and the sea was a motif in the celebration of Yahweh’s kingship at the Feast of Tabernacles. Just as the kingship of Marduk was associated with his defeat of the sea monster Tiamat in Babylon, and Baal’s kingship was connected with his defeat of the sea-god Yamm at Ugarit, so perhaps Yahweh’s kingship was associated with his victory over the sea. This is explicitly the case in Psa 29; 74; 93. In Babylon the imagery was associated with the Akitu festival, the Babylonian spring New Year festival, and it appears that in Israel this imagery had its setting at the turn of the year — at the feast of Tabernacles. Such a setting is in keeping with the creation context of the theme — the obvious connection between creation and the New Year. Moreover, Psa 65, which has the chaos conflict theme, not only has the creation context (vv 6-7), but is also a harvest hymn (vv 9-13), and the Feast of Tabernacles was a harvest festival. There is strong evidence that Yahweh’s kingship, which was associated with the conflict with the chaos waters, was an important theme at the Feast of Tabernacles (cp Zec 14:16-17; later Jewish tradition associating Yahweh’s kingship and the New Year; the LXX heading associating Psa 29 with Tabernacles; etc).

There are several allusions to Yahweh’s conflict with the dragon and the sea in the book of Job (Job 3:8; 7:12; 9:8,13; 26:12-13; 38:8-11; and 40:15-41:34). There are also references to Rahab (including the helpers of Rahab), Leviathan, Behemoth, the twisting serpent, the dragon, and the sea. In some of the passages the creation context is clear (cf Job 9:8, 13; 26:12-13; 38:8-11) and, in the absence of more plausible settings, the creation context is reasonably assumed in the others. In Job 3:8, when Job laments the day of his birth, he cries, “Let those curse it who curse the day, who are skilled in rousing up Leviathan.” This appears to involve the reversal of the process of creation. Two reasons may be suggested to explain why this imagery is so frequent in Job. First, Wisdom theology is preeminently creation theology, and the dragon/sea conflict passages in Job have a creation context. Secondly, the conflict between the dragon and God provides an appropriate parallel to the theme of Job’s conflict with God (Job 7:12; 9:13-14; 40:15-41:34).

A number of passages in the OT speak of Yahweh controlling the waters at the creation of the world rather than in conflict with them (most importantly Gen 1:2,6-10; but also Psa 33:7-8; Pro 8:24,27-29; Jer 5:22; 31:35). Perhaps these are a demythologization of the conflict myth. It has often been thought that Gen 1 is intended as an argument against the so-called Babylonian creation epic Enuma Elish. The Heb word translated “deep” (tehom) in Gen 1:2 is a cognate with Akkadian Tiamat, the name of the chaos monster overcome by Marduk in connection with the creation in Enuma Elish. However, though cognate, there is no reason to believe that the word “tehom” is actually derived from Akkadian Tiamat. Also, although there are some points in common in the order of creation in Gen 1 and Enuma Elish, these are not compelling enough to demand the dependence of one upon the other. Instead, it appears that the same chaos conflict myth ultimately lies behind the account in Gen 1 as well as the poetic passages elsewhere in the OT discussed in this article — ie, that the myth is ultimately Canaanite, not Babylonian. More immediately, it seems likely that Psa 104 is one of the sources behind Genesis 1. The order of creation in Genesis 1 corresponds very closely with the order cited in Psa 104; the psalm even has the word “tehom” in the context of Yahweh’s battle with the sea (v 6), as well as other parallels.

Finally, it should be noted that Psa 29:3,10 and Nah 1:4 seem to speak of Yahweh’s victory over the sea as part of his present lordship over the world of nature.

B. Conflict in Nature

In Job 40-41 Yahweh asks Job if he is able to capture the beasts Behemoth and Leviathan. The most common view is that Behemoth and Leviathan denote respectively the hippopotamus and the crocodile. However, they are probably instead chaos monsters. The description of neither Behemoth nor Leviathan corresponds to any known creature, and certainly not the hippopotamus and crocodile. It seems fundamental to the argument in Job 40-41 that the beasts in question can be captured by God alone; otherwise, Job might have replied that he could have captured them, and then God would lose the argument! The hippopotamus and crocodile were, however, captured in the ANE. Leviathan, moreover, is said to breathe out fire and smoke (Job 40:18-21), strongly suggesting a mythological creature, and Leviathan is elsewhere a mythological sea serpent or dragon in both the Ugaritic texts and the OT, including the book of Job (Job 3:8). Apparently Yahweh’s subduing of Leviathan and Behemoth at creation forms the presupposition of His speech. Job is, in effect, asked if he can play the role of God. Thus God asks Job (Job 41:5), “Will you play with him as with a bird…?”, which must reflect Psa 104:26, which may be read, “There go the ships, and Leviathan whom you (ie Yahweh) formed to play with”, or alternatively, “There go the ships, and Leviathan whom you formed to play in it (ie, the sea).” Leviathan in Psa 104:26 has often been thought to be some creature such as the whale, but it may be a mythical monster.

Similarly, Behemoth is no hippopotamus, for its tail is high and lifted up (Job 40:17), not short and curly, and Behemoth clearly cannot be captured by man (Job 40:24). It is most likely another chaos monster, oxlike in view of its name (lit “great ox”), and also capable of living in the water (Job 40:23). Twice in the Ugaritic Baal myth there is a mythological beast, “El’s calf”, answering to this description, and on both occasions it is mentioned alongside Leviathan (dragon). This is likely to be the prototype of Behemoth.

The point of Yahweh’s speech about Behemoth and Leviathan seems to be that since Job cannot overcome the chaos monsters whom Yahweh has overcome, how much less can he hope to overcome Yahweh in argument. It is therefore appropriate that following this speech Job humbles himself before God.

C. OT History

The dragon imagery in the OT is also used metaphorically to denote earthly powers hostile to Yahweh. In particular, it is applied to Egypt (so Rahab, Isa 30:7; and quite possibly Isa 51:9, cf v 10; Psa 87:4) or Pharaoh (Eze 29:3-5; 32:2-8; reading tannin or “dragon” for MsTx tannim or “jackals”). Since Egypt oppressed the Hebrews prior to the Exodus, and the heart of the Exodus was the deliverance at the Reed Sea, it is understandable how Egypt would be singled out for special designation as this mythical sea monster. The imagery seems to apply to Egypt in connection with the Exodus deliverance in Isa 51:9 (cf v 10), and Psa 77:16-20 likewise uses Exodus imagery, but with no reference to the dragon. The same imagery is also employed in the so-called Song of Moses in Exo 15:1-18 in a transformed sense, namely that the battle is no longer with the sea but at the sea.

The imagery of the chaos waters is also applied to the Assyrians (Isa 17:12-14; cf Isa 8:5-8; Psa 46), and the waters and the dragon are both used to denote the oppressive Babylonians (Hab 3; Jer 51:34,44). See also Psa 46; 48; Joel 3; Zec 12; 14. It seems probable that the motif of nations coming to attack Zion who are then miraculously defeated by Yahweh constitutes a development of the divine conflict with the dragon and the sea.

In Psa 44:19 the MsTx tannim or “jackals” possibly should be emended to tannin or “dragon”, though it is unclear which political entity is meant. It is also unlikely that Psa 68:29 refers to a chaos monster in its allusion to “the beast of the reeds, the herd of bulls with the calves of the peoples.” It more probably uses animal names to denote leaders and warriors (eg, 1 Sam 21:8; Job 24:22; 34:20; Lam 1:15).

D. Last Days

The original conflict with chaos at the creation of the world is also associated with the Last Days, in which a “new creation” is being born. The so-called Isaiah apocalypse reads: “In that day the Lord with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the twisting serpent, Leviathan the crooked serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea” (Isa 27:1). This passage depicts Leviathan in terms similar to the Ugaritic Baal myth almost a thousand years earlier: “Because you smote Leviathan the twisting serpent [and] made an end of the crooked serpent…”).

One of the most interesting instances of the influence of the myth of the divine conflict with the dragon and the sea appears in Daniel 7, the chapter about the “one like a son of man.” Not everything in this chapter can be explained from the Canaanite myth, but only the Canaanite myth can adequately explain the combination of the following three factors: (1) in Dan 7:9, God is called “the Ancient of Days” and he has white hair, which is reminiscent of the Canaanite supreme god El, whose stock epithet was “Father of Years” and whose position as an aged deity is also indicated by his gray beard; (2) the “one like the son of man,” who comes with the clouds of heaven and is exalted to kingship by the Ancient of Days (Dan 7:13,14), may be compared with the Canaanite god Baal, who is often called “Rider of the clouds”, and whose rule ultimately depended on El’s authority; and (3) the “one like the son of man” rules after overthrowing the beasts of the sea — which may be compared with Baal, whose kingship resulted from his victory over Yam, the god of the sea. Thus the chaos monster imagery is unique in Dan 7 in that it reflects the underlying Canaanite myth, in which a distinction is still made between the supreme God and the one who is exalted over the sea.

In the present form of the text the “one like a son of man” may denote the angel Michael (cf Dan 12:1). One may compare Rev 12, where Michael defeats the seven-headed dragon. Interestingly, the next chapter, Rev 13 (cf Rev 17:3) presents another creature derived from Leviathan, the seven-headed beast, symbolizing Rome (Rev 13:1-10) as well as another beast, symbolizing the false prophet, who appears to derive from Behemoth (Rev 13:11-18).

Listen up!

“Listen up!”

If God doesn’t exist, there’s no problem. If God does exist, then He either somehow communicated to and revealed Himself to men, or He didn’t. If He didn’t, there’s no problem. If, however, God HAS spoken to mankind, then we had better listen up!

This short, colloquial argument gets right to the heart of the matter. If God has spoken, men and women — for their own sakes — ought to listen to what He has said, and respond accordingly.

The Bible purports to be God’s message to mankind. Of the many lines of evidence brought forward to support that claim, consider those portions of the Book that are regarded as prophecy. There are four things that set Bible prophecy entirely apart from other writings:

  • First, the Bible unequivocally declares “Thus says the LORD”, the only God (eg, Nah 1:12; 2:13; 3:5; etc). It claims absolute and infallible divine authority. Very few others make such a claim — for the very good reason that such a claim would require a perfect track record to be credible.

  • Second, Bible prophecy presents moral imperatives. It says you MUST change your behavior as a result of what is revealed — man dare not ignore the message of his Creator (eg, Joel 2:11-17; Amos 4:1 — 5:8). Others who claim to be prophets gain fame and sometimes wealth, and in general put no demands upon their listeners. Again, there is good reason for this difference. The Bible prophets who took a stand for their God and preached His message were often killed for what they said (cf Mat 23:37).

  • Third, there is a sensible reason given for what is going to take place. It is not a matter of gazing into the future to see what will be. Rather, it is a declaration of what the God of heaven will CAUSE to be. He gives His reasons, and offers in most cases to alter the outcome based on how people respond (eg, Isa 46:10-11; 55:10,11; Jer 25:3-6; 38:17-23).

  • Fourth, Bible prophecy is specific. It names people, places, events and sometimes even elapsed time (eg, Dan 2:36-40; 4:19-27; 5:24-28; 7:23-27; Jer 25:8-26; Isa 7:1-8; Eze 24:15-18). Therefore, it is measurable and capable of being disproved. But Bible prophecy has proven to be so completely accurate in its details that people who refuse to believe it have had to resort to the argument that Scriptures predictions were written after the fact.

Three purposes are served by the words of the prophets. First, they encourage the faithful to keep the faith, not to lose heart (eg, Hag 2:1-9; Zec 8:9-13; Zep 3:18-20). The prophetic message itself is encouraging in this regard, and faith is also strengthened by seeing predictions accurately fulfilled. This purpose is applicable to people of all nations and all ages (cf Luke 21:28).

Second, the prophets warned the wayward that they need to get right with God before it is too late (eg, Joel 1:2-15; Amos 2:4-8; 3:1-12; Hos 14:1-3). There are specifics involved in many of these warnings: specific to the time of the prophets, and specific to the time often referred to as “the last days” — the time many people now call “the end of the world”. However, the general warning applies to men and women of all eras (cf Acts 17:30,31).

Finally, prophecies were given to vindicate the one true God. They were intended to show that His word is truth, and that what He utters COMES TO PASS (eg, Isa 45:18-25; Eze 38:14-23; 39:7,8). Thus Bible prophecy is powerful testimony that there is indeed a God, that He is involved with mankind, and that He cares about how we respond to Him (eg, Amos 5:4-6, 14,15; Hos 11:1-9; Eze 18:25-32). This third purpose — the vindication of a righteous, caring God — sets Bible prophecy apart from all others who claim to foretell the future.

Because God’s Book makes demands upon those who read it, or who hear its words, the temptation is very great just to dismiss the whole thing. That is a dangerous course. Scripture was given to help us be prepared when God sends His Son to earth again. We have a choice: it is up to us whether we will listen or not. Tragically, most people will not listen. The apparent silence and inaction of God during their lifetime has made a prediction of the apostle Peter come true:

“First of all you must understand this, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own passions and saying, ‘Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things have continued as they were from the beginning of creation’ ” (2Pe 3:3,4).

In other words, “I’m tired of waiting. I’ve never seen any divine intervention, and I never will. Every generation has been predicting the Second Coming! It’s all a bunch of myths from the ancient past.”

Peter goes on to say that this attitude is fostered by a deliberate refusal to acknowledge that God HAS intervened in human affairs in the past. Because He is forbearing, God is now deferring His intervention in order to allow as many as possible to repent, but the time will come when he WILL step in (vv 5-10). Peter’s conclusion is a serious warning and a very pointed question:

“What sort of persons ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness, waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God?” (vv 11,12).

Believers, listen up! The Coming of Jesus the Christ back to earth is soon.

Little boy climbs a hill, a

A little boy climbs a hill outside the village. With each step his horizons grow wider, and in joy and wonder he soaks up the scenes. Now he has reached the top.

What a view it is! To the north there is snow-topped Hermon, dramatic symbol of God’s stored-up blessings. One day those blessings will be lavished upon His people. To the east is the sea of Galilee, a translucent “sea of glass”. One day he will walk by its shores and call simple, humble fishermen to follow him. To the south, beyond the hills, lies Jerusalem the city of David. There, one day, crowds will shout his name, some in hatred, but others in love. To the west there is the Great Sea, and beyond — other lands where men have never heard of the God of Israel — but one day they will.

So much to do; but for now, he is only a little boy, a special little boy, obedient and intelligent, thoughtful and kind. He observes the clouds as they sweep like chariots across the sky, the flowers of the field in massed formation, and the birds as they fly overhead. He feels the wind upon his face.

Patiently he waits, a silent prayer in his heart:

“Speak, Father, for Thy Son heareth.”

“O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments, and His paths beyond tracing out! Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor?… For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be the glory forever! Amen” (Rom 11:33,34,36).

“Little child” in Isa

There is obvious connection among Isa 7:14; Isa 9:6,7; and Isa 11:6-9.

The first two prophecies were, firstly and in a limited sense, about the child Hezekiah. in Isa 7, Isaiah is commanded to bring his message of hope to king Ahaz. The original “virgin” in the context would have been his bride-to-be. Ahaz seems to scoff at Isaiah’s offer of an encouraging message — he wants nothing to do with the God of Israel. But the child which his young wife would bear to him would be Hezekiah; this special child of promise was destined to deliver his people from the Assyrian threat.

Isa 9:6,7 — in the immediate historical context — carries forward the promises of Isaiah. The new child would become king, would be specially strengthened by Yahweh (as his symbolic name implied: “Immanuel” — “God is with us!”), and would be bring peace to a war-torn and broken land!

In these first two passages also, the connections with the coming Messiah are obvious and powerful — so much so that sometimes the original history and Old Testament connections are not given the full weight they deserve. But it is worth recognizing their primary — if only partial — fulfillment in the days of Hezekiah and Sennacherib. And seeing the “big picture” of Isaiah helps in this respect.

This brings us to the third “child” prophecy, in Isa 11. The words of Isaiah describe a scene of complete tranquility, when all the savagery of the beasts of the field has been removed:

“The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them. The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox. The infant will play near the hole of the cobra, and the young child put his hand into the viper’s nest. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa 11:6-9).

It is certainly a picture, in broad and general terms, of man’s reclamation of dominion over the earth, and his subjugation of the animal kingdom (Gen 1:28).

But it is more than that; it is a picture, in specific terms, of Christ’s victory over sin and death. (And this is precisely what a failure to link together the Scriptures — and look for the larger context, the “forest” and not just the “trees” — may cause us to miss.) In the final and complete fulfillment, Christ is the son born of the virgin in Isa 7:14; he is also the child born “unto us” in Isa 9:6. Then, considering this context, he is just as surely the “little child” in Isa 11:6, and the “infant” (“sucking child”: AV) and finally the “young child” (“weaned child”: AV) in Isa 11:8. So the beautiful vision of these verses is not impersonal. It is not just about ANY young child — or even ALL young children; it is about Christ!

Isa 11:6 shows Christ as the “little child” because of his perfect trust in God (cp Mat 19:13,14); he is the “babe” ordained in strength to still the enemy and to have dominion over all creation (Psa 8:2,6-8).

Isa 11:8 shows Christ as the “sucking child” and then the “weaned child” — feeding first on the “milk” and then on the “meat” of the word, growing in spirit and wisdom and grace (Luke 2:40). Both “cobra” and “viper” belong to the “seed of the serpent” (Gen 3:15; Mat 3:7; 23:33). Jesus, under the nurture and admonition of his Heavenly Father, steadily grew in spiritual strength, and steadily faced one by one the trials of the “adversary” in his flesh. He had nothing to fear from the power of the serpent, for he faced it and overcame it with a greater power — faith in God’s word and promises. And, finally, in the kingdom age, the “den” of the serpent will hold no fear whatsoever for Christ, or for those who like him have become “little children” in faith!


Note: Here is another question: is the description of the great predators lying down at peace with their prey, in Isa 11, to be taken literally, or only symbolically? While not ruling out some sort of more literal fulfillment, the context surely points toward a symbolic fulfillment:

  • If the “little child” in Isa 7 and Isa 9 is, ultimately, Jesus Christ, then what is the real point of HIS proximity to the den of the poisonous serpent, without danger to himself… if it be not Gen 3:15? In other words, Jesus — the child born of the virgin (the “seed of the woman”: Gen 3:15!) — is the one who will bring true peace (Isa 9:6,7) by crushing the head of the “serpent” of sin. And if the “child” and the “serpent” are to be best understood figuratively, then what about the “wolf” and the “leopard” and the “lion” and the “calf” and the “yearling”?

  • The whole of the immediate context — Isa 7-12 — pictures an imminent threat from the Assyrian invaders, and a people living in fear of their depredations: in effect, a flock of helpless sheep in dread of the wild beasts that will attack and devour them. Against this threat the LORD will raise up a “prince of peace” (Isa 9:6) — through whom these “wild beasts” will be themselves destroyed. Consider how closely these verses mirror the prophecy of Micah (a contemporary of Isaiah):

“But you, Bethlehem… out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times [cp Isa 9:6: ‘everlasting Father’]. Therefore Israel will be abandoned until the time when she who is in labor gives birth [cp Isa 7:14: ‘a virgin shall conceive’; also cp with Mic 4:9,10]… He will stand and shepherd his flock [as a shepherd protects his flock from wild beasts like the wolf or leopard or lion!] in the strength of the LORD, in the majesty of the name of the LORD his God… And he will be their peace [cp Isa 9:6: ‘prince of peace’]. When the Assyrian invades our land and marches through our fortresses, we will raise against him seven shepherds, even eight leaders of men. They will rule [or ‘crush’ — like Gen 3:15 again!] the land of Assyria with the sword… He will deliver us from the Assyrian when he invades our land and marches into our borders… The remnant of Jacob will be among the nations, in the midst of many peoples, like a lion among the beasts of the forest, like a young lion among flocks of sheep [cp the language of Isa 11:6-9], which mauls and mangles as it goes, and no one can rescue… I will take vengeance in anger and wrath upon the nations that have not obeyed me” (Mic 5:2-15).

Little horn

Bible teaching about the “little horn”:

  1. It arises after the ten horns…
  2. …but out of their midst;
  3. it uproots three of the ten; and

  4. it has eyes like a man, and a mouth speaking boastfully (Dan 7:8), against God (Dan 7:25).

  5. It is a king, but different from the other kings (Dan 7:24).

  6. It fights against the “saints” (God’s people, or Israel in this case) and defeats them (Dan 7:21).

  7. It rules over them (Israel) until Christ comes (Dan 7:22).

  8. it continues for “time, times, and half a time”, or 3 1/2 years (Dan 7:25).

Consider the Arab nations in prophecy:

  1. the ten nations of Psalm 83, avowed enemies of God and His nation in Bible times;

  2. their modern-day Arab counterparts; and
  3. ten Arab nations surrounding Israel: These nations were “born” in the same generation as was Israel — from 26 years before 1948 to 23 years after: Egypt (1922), Jordan (1949), Syria (1946), Lebanon (1943), Iraq (1932), Saudi Arabia (1932), Kuwait (16963), Bahrain (1971), Qatar (1971), and UAE (1971). They are “all the trees” in the Middle East, to which Jesus referred when he prophesied of the Last Days: Luk 21:29-31.

Along with these, there is also a possible eleventh “horn” that may arise considerably after the other ten. This may well be the “little horn” of Palestine, newly struggling to independence in 1993, whereas the other ten “horns” have been independent since 1922 (the earliest) through 1971 (the latest). Now, more than 20 years later, there comes on the Middle Eastern scene an eleventh independent (or almost independent!) Arab nation. Does Palestine fit the Bible description of the “little horn”?

  1. It does arise after the other 10.
  2. It does arise out of their very midst.

  3. Will it uproot three others? There are presently sizeable contingents of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. In Jordan, in fact, the Palestinians pose a serious threat to the stability of King Hussein’s government. In many ways, Lebanon has already been consumed, by the 1982 war and the subsequent takeover by Syria.

  4. The leader of the Palestinians — at this time Yasser Arafat — has made a career of speaking “boastful” threats against Israel (and, by implication, against the God of Israel) — just as did Goliath, the Philistine (or “Palestinian”) enemy of Israel in David’s day. If Arafat and the PLO were displaced as the leadership of an independent Palestine by even more radical leaders out of Hamas or other Muslim fundamentalist groups, such “boastful”, threatening, blasphemous verbal attacks against Israel would escalate.

  5. This “little horn” is different in the way it is established: it has been legitimatized by Israel, and it is not initially an official state.

  6. This “little horn”, by its threats and bluster, will bring about the last great “holy war” against the Jewish infidels!

  7. The war against, and victory over, Israel…

  8. and a brutal oppression of 3 1/2 years… are, of course, yet future events. But who better than the Palestinians to trigger such a final Arab “holy war” against Israel?

The Beast of Rev 13: The “little horn” shares characteristics with the Beast of Rev 13:

The little horn (Dan 7) The beast (Rev 13)
“Different” from the others (Dan 7:24) “Different” from the others (Rev 13:8)
“A mouth speaking boastfully” (Dan 7:8)… “A mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies” (Rev 13:5)…
“…against the Most High” (Dan 7:25) “…to blaspheme God and to slander his name” (Rev 13:6)
“To wage war against the saints and defeat them” (Dan 7:21) “To make war against the saints and conquer them” (Rev 13:7)

This leads to one of two conclusions: Either…

  1. The “little horn” becomes the whole Beast — ie, assumes headship of the whole Arab confederation; or

  2. The “little horn” works so closely with the Beast that their objectives and actions are interchangeable.

The characteristics and activities of the “latter day” “horn” described in Dan 8:9-12,23-25 reinforce this conclusion.

At the very least, the “little horn” takes precedence over the other horns and acts as a catalyst for the last great defeat of God’s people Israel.

The “Fatal Wound”

The Beast of Revelation will suffer a “fatal wound”, but will be healed “miraculously” (Rev 13:3,12). If the Beast and the “little horn” are equivalent, then what “fatal wound” has Palestine suffered? Possibly, the seemingly insurmountable defeats suffered by the PLO in the 1970s and 1980s should be considered the “fatal wound”, from which the “phoenix” Arafat has recovered (even literally rising out of a plane crash to resume leadership of the PLO). Some thought the PLO had been effectively destroyed by the Israelis’ 1982 invasion. Perhaps the “fatal wound” was the doldrums in which the whole of the Palestinian nation had fallen, with no real hope of statehood, until quite recently.

Or is the final “fatal wound” yet in the future for Palestine — one tremendous defeat from which the nation, with a special leader, rises up again, still speaking great and blasphemous words against Israel and Israel’s God?

Conclusion

It is obviously too early in the process for anyone to fully identify and explain all the details. Certainly no one has “all the answers”. However, it is possible that the PLO will be the primary candidate for the “little horn” of Daniel. By implication, the PLO is also a major factor in the interpretation of the Revelation beast.

Some questions to be considered in the upcoming months and years:

  1. Will Arafat survive the challenges to his authority, or even the threats on his life?

  2. Will Hamas supplant the PLO as the “legitimate” political arm of the Palestinian people?

  3. Will the rich Arab gulf states support the “new order” financially?

  4. Will the Palestinians continue to grow in power in Jordan?

  5. Will the “peace treaty” inspire a militant Jewish backlash?
  6. How will ongoing discussions about the fate of Jerusalem affect the total picture?

  7. Will the U.S. continue to provide economic and military support to Israel?

Some areas to watch:

  1. The Middle East in general, and Israel in particular.
  2. Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, where the conflicting claims of Muslims and Jews will never be reconciled.

  3. Arafat, the PLO, Hamas, and the Palestinian peoples in Gaza and West Bank!

Little things in John, the

Today, since we have been reading the gospel of John, I’d like to concentrate on a few of what I call “the little things of John”. These are simple statements — almost deceptively simple — scattered like so many bright jewels upon the fabric of John’s gospel. Statements that are so very simple on one level, scarcely noticeable except on a second glance. But when we pause and look a bit more closely, then these “little things” take on different meanings, having what we might call “heavenly insights”. And depths of meaning are gradually revealed in what seem at first to be the most unlikely places.

The second meaning, the almost hidden meaning is there also — and, almost invariably, it lifts the passage out of time and into eternity. Lights go on, trumpets sound, and we realize that God’s word reaches across the expanses of time, from a little land in Roman-occupied Palestine, in the first century… to you and me sitting here today, in the twenty-first century, and to multitudes besides — in every age. And we are invited — no, we are commanded — to take these words personally!


John 2:5: Jesus and his disciples have been invited to a wedding in Cana, and it transpires that there is not enough wine. Mary approaches Jesus, as if to say, ‘Now is the time!’ At first he seems unsure, but then he seems to understand that, Yes, now IS the time to perform the first of the miracles by which he will be made known to Israel.

“His mother said to the servants, ‘Do whatever he tells you’ ” (John 2:5).

Here we have a statement that is true enough in the quite limited parameters of the wedding feast itself. But it is also a statement that echoes down the corridors of history. The essence of obedience; condensed into five little words: “Do whatever he tells you!” Not what you choose to do, not what you would like to do, not a little of ‘this’, but leaving ‘that’ undone. “Do WHATEVER he tells you!”

And, the implication is surely there also… “Do it NOW!” Not tomorrow, not next week, not when you get around to it, or feel like it. Do it… NOW! Do not question the reasonableness of it. Do not say, “Maybe later — when my affairs are in better order… or the children are in school… or I have retired… or I have graduated.” Do not say, “Let George do it!” As if Moses were to have said, “Here I am, LORD. Now, please send Aaron instead!”

“Do whatever he tells you.” And if it seems too hard, remind yourself that a life of faith is not for the faint in heart. And he that questions what Jesus says is unstable, of two minds, and halting between two opinions — he is like a wave of the sea, being pushed first one way and then another. Don’t wait to see which way the wind is blowing, don’t stop to check the weather, don’t say to yourself, “There may be a lion in the streets!” Just… DO IT.

These are the last recorded words of Mary the mother of Jesus. And we realize that she is speaking them to us!


The next words are written by John the narrator; they were not spoken by Jesus. But they surely express the will of Jesus:

“The Lord… left Judea and went back once more to Galilee. Now he had to go through Samaria” (John 4:3,4).

Notice this: he “HAD TO” go through Samaria. Not… he “chose” to go through Samaria; but he “HAD TO” go through Samaria.

And why was this so? On one level, as we study a map, we might think, “Well, of course he would go through Samaria — it was the most direct route!” But it was apparently not as simple as that. We are told that many Judeans circled through Perea, east of the Jordan River (taking the long way around), rather than simply travel through Samaria. Why did they take a detour? Because their hatred of the Samaritans was so great. This hatred is expressed time and time again in the teachings and writings of the rabbis; one common prayer was: “May I never set eyes on a Samaritan… May I never be thrown into company with one.” Other rabbis said that to partake of the bread of a Samaritan was like “eating swine’s flesh” (Edersheim 1:401).

So, if anything, we might think that a devout Jew like Jesus would not only not “HAVE TO” go through Samaria, but that he would “HAVE TO” go some other way!

But not Jesus! He takes his disciples and journeys directly into the heart of Samaritan territory, deliberately defying Jewish social conventions. Why does he do this? Is it for typical reasons — that is, to foreshadow the preaching of the gospel to the Gentiles? That would certainly be a good reason.

But it is, I think, more personal, more immediate than that. He MUST go through Samaria because he MUST meet that woman at the well. It is God’s will that, at this time and in this place, he will meet this woman. Never mind that she is a Gentile, a despised Samaritan — never mind that she has been married five times and is currently living with a man who is not her husband. He is going to tell her that he, Jesus, is the Messiah, and to invite her to learn more of him, and to drink of the living waters that flow from him.

He is going to tell her that “I who speak to you am he [the Messiah]” (John 4:26). The first time Jesus directly proclaimed his Messiahship was to a woman, a Samaritan and a sinner! The devout Pharisee traditionally prayed, “I thank thee that thou didst not make me a Gentile, but a Jew… not a woman, but a man.” But Paul proclaimed that in Jesus there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither male nor female (Gal 3:28)! All, whatever their social status or race or gender, whatever their past sins, may share equally in the blessings of the Messiahship of Jesus.

Do we believe this? We should.


“Study diligently the Scriptures because you think that by them you possess eternal life” (John 5:39).

Here is an interesting verse; it is often read (or misread): “Study diligently the Scriptures because by them you possess eternal life.” In other words, it is treated as a ringing endorsement of the Bible, as the only source of eternal life. And that’s the thing: such a statement is so close to being true that we readily accept it. “Yes, that’s right. Read the Bible. That’s all you need!”

But here it’s important to read every word of this verse. “YOU THINK that by these Scriptures you shall have eternal life!” Remember that Jesus was speaking directly to his enemies, those who were persecuting him, even seeking his life. It was not going to be enough for them to “search their Scriptures” — they were doing this already, more diligently than were any other people. But all they were doing was combing through their scrolls looking for ammunition to use against Jesus! All they were doing was looking for “proof texts” to show this Galilean preacher-upstart how wrong he was… and thus the Scriptures were going to be their downfall and not their salvation… UNLESS they did one other thing! And this is explained in the last part of v 39: “These are the Scriptures that testify about me.”

In other words, the Pharisees were avid Bible students, but with their self-righteous attitudes and Bible trivia mentality, they had overlooked the most important point of all — their need for redemption through the coming Messiah. Here in plain view of these Bible students, before their very eyes, was the personal culmination of scores of Bible prophecies, and yet this escaped the attention of their hardened hearts. “Yet you refuse to come to me to have life” (v 40).

It is never enough to be knowledgeable in the Scriptures in a theoretical sense. The study of God’s Word must lead us to embrace Christ, with our whole heart and mind. We must see… HIM… in every book of the Bible — for surely he is there. Knowledge by itself is sterile; it may even puff us up in pride (1Co 8:1). But intimate, personal experience of Christ brings about deep and lasting changes in our lives, and leads on to the eternal life that may be possessed only through him.

That is the message of John 5:39!


After the miraculous feeding of the 5,000, Jesus told his disciples, “Gather the pieces that are left over. Let nothing be wasted” (John 6:12).

Here is the evidence that, in ministering to others, Christ’s followers lost nothing themselves. (In the sacrifice of Christ, there is ample provision for all to be filled. God’s grace is a stream whose blessings never fail, a sea without a shore, a pot of oil that is continually replenished.)

This he says more plainly later in the chapter, when he prays to his Father: “That I shall lose none of all that he has given me” (Joh 6:39). Here, in this enacted parable of the miraculous multiplying of the loaves, the “bread” (which represents the body of Christ) will not be broken up and scattered — no parts will be lost. At the last day, all the “fragments” will be gathered together into one! And again, later in this same gospel, John recalls the conversation between the High Priest and the Sanhedrin, in which (inadvertently) the High Priest “prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation, and not only for that nation but also for the scattered children of God, to bring them together and make them one” (John 11:51,52).

We should recognize that the words of Jesus here, then, were not just for the disciples who went about through the crowd, gathering up all the fragments of the miraculously created bread. His words are for us too: an exhortation: remember to “gather up the fragments” of the body of Christ, that might otherwise be lost. Seek out the lost sheep, and bring it back to the shepherd’s fold. Leave no one behind. Remember that we are all in this together, and each of us — even those who seemingly are most insignificant — are a part of the One Body.


“The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life” (John 6:63).

Here is perhaps the simplest answer to all the Holy Spirit “difficulties” and “questions” that occasionally arise. God’s Word, preached and believed, and acted upon, is the only real source of spirit-power and eternal life — and that of course, only if it leads us to Christ, and keeps us in the care of Christ.

But there is more to it than this. God’s spirit-word has the power to remake lives, to open the eyes of the blind, to open the ears of the deaf, and to raise the dead! Jesus performed no greater miracles, with the lepers, or Bartimaeus, or Lazarus at the tomb, than his “word” does every day, even today. There IS no greater “miracle” than a life recreated, and turned around, and lifted up from the natural to the spiritual realm — and this happens every time another person accepts Christ in baptism.

We come nothing short of the believers in the first century. True, we do not see the dead literally brought back to life — not quite yet, anyway! But we do see those who were dead in their sins raised up to walk in newness of life. Can we ever praise God enough for this most wonderful of all miracles? God’s Word — and God’s Spirit, through that Word — is just as powerful today as it ever was.


The next “little thing” in John is the simple combination of two verses, one following the other. Why don’t we notice this as we should? Because the two verses are artificially separated by a chapter division:

“Then each went to his own home (John 7:53)… but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives” (8:1)!

In contrast to all the others, Jesus had no home to go to! “Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head” (Mark 8:20; Luk 9:58).

If we find our lives a complex of tensions and pressures, and a source of distress and uncertainty, let us learn this lesson of living with God. Let us see Him in every aspect of our lives, in every part of our day. This was the case with Jesus who, though he had no permanent abode, no established residence, was more surely grounded than any man who ever lived. He always dwelt with God, and God with him. Here, at the end of one of his long days, we catch a glimpse of the meeting between Father and Son, as the Son retires to the mount of Olives to spend the night with his Father. Even though he had no “home” in the accepted sense, not any more, even though he was a stranger and a pilgrim in the earth — yet he made the Almighty God his home, and pitched his tent under the sheltering wings of the cherubim. The words of the psalmist are his words: “LORD, YOU have been our dwelling place throughout all generations” (Psa 90:1).


At the time of the last Passover, there came Greeks up to Jerusalem to worship. And while the Jewish leaders plotted and schemed as to how they might arrest Jesus, and kill him, these Greeks sought out Philip: “Sir,” they said, “we would like to see Jesus” (Joh 12:21).

What examples for us! While the Jews were rejecting their own Messiah, these Gentiles were humbly and diligently seeking him. Nothing else would do. They would not be put off.

Do WE desire to see Jesus… in every part of our Bibles?

Do WE desire to see Jesus… in every aspect of our lives?

Do WE desire to see Jesus… on Saturday night as well as Sunday morning?


The Passover meal was ending; the lessons, and the warnings, had been given by Jesus. But Judas left early; his “cover story” was that he had some legitimate errand to accomplish; the other disciples supposed that — because he was the treasurer — he had business to attend to. But little did they know what that “business” was!

Now, “as soon as Judas had taken the bread, he went out” (John 13:30).

Judas “went out” — there is such a finality in that simple declarative statement. In this he was like Cain leaving the presence of God (Gen 4:16). In this he was like the unforgiving debtor — like Judas, also obsessed with money — who went out to acquire more (Mat 18:28). And in this “going out” he demonstrated irrevocably that he did not belong with the others — all this John saw. And he recalled this very incident when, years later, he spoke of those who abandoned their faith, and the family of believers: “They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us” (1Jo 2:19).

And then John adds the powerful “And it was night!” (John 13:30).

It was an utterly self-evident statement, for only the Passover — of all the Jewish feasts — was always celebrated at night. Why did John bother with such a statement?

As at the very first Passover, when some Jews did not abide in their blood-sprinkled houses, Judas went out into the Egyptian “darkness” of death. Inside the upper room, there was truth and love and joy and light. Outside, there was only error and hatred and sorrow and despair and darkness and, at last, death. Judas abandoned the only true Light, and went out to the place where the darkness of night evoked the darkness of death. The shadows in the streets were the shadow in his soul. “He went out, and it was night.”

John hears the door close on that night with an absolute and tragic finality — like a prison gate slamming shut, or a great stone rolling across the entrance of a tomb. And he wants us to hear it too — and never to forget how awful it sounds.


“I tell you the truth, you will weep and mourn while the world rejoices. You will grieve, but your grief will turn to joy. A woman giving birth to a child has pain because her time has come; but when her baby is born she forgets the anguish because of her joy that a child is born into the world. So with you: Now is your time of grief, but I will see you again and you will rejoice, and no one will take away your joy. In that day you will no longer ask me anything. I tell you the truth, my Father will give you whatever you ask in my name” (John 16:20-23).

It was true: “In that day you will no longer ask me anything” (v 23). When the glorified Christ revealed himself to his disciples, their joy was such that all previous doubts and misapprehensions faded away, and they basked contentedly in the radiance of his love. Well enough, that’s easy to understand, we think to ourselves.

But is there something more? Is Jesus speaking, down through the ages, to us as well? John seemed to think so, for he added his postscript to the book: “These things are written, that YE (the readers) might believe… and have life” (John 20:31).

Have we not all had the pestering little thoughts, of the right or wrong of some complex moral tangle, or perhaps of some puzzling verse that seems to defy exposition? Or perhaps spent countless hours with some of those favorite Christadelphian time-killers: as, for example, who were the angels that sinned? is Elijah dead, or alive? or who, if anyone, was the tempter in the wilderness? Then we tell ourselves, “Someday, when Christ comes, we’ll know all those things!”

But what does Jesus say? “In that day (when the glorified Jesus reveals himself to his disciples)… your hearts shall rejoice… and ye shall ask me nothing.” There is a profound reassurance in his words: not so much that our perplexing questions will all be answered, but that they will disappear! Nothing else will matter when that day comes. At that time we might have anything we desire from the Father, but no matter! We will already have everything we need: we will have Christ!


Even a man like Pilate could, from John’s perspective, contribute “little things” which convey something of value to John’s readers. For the cynical, worldly Pilate could ask the most profound of all questions, when he asked Jesus, “What is truth?” (John 18:38). And then, in John’s narrative, he could answer his own question, when first he presented Jesus to the crowds: “Pilate said to them, ‘Here is the man’ ” (Joh 19:5)… and yet a second time, when he said to the Jews, “Here is your king” (Joh 19:14).

John wants us to see that the man who is king of the Jews IS also the “truth” — and that there is no other. “Truth” in Greek, and as used by John in his gospel, means “that which is real, in contrast to that which is but a shadow or a pattern”. There is no other reality but Christ — he is “the real thing”! When gems and monuments and, yes, even royal crowns are all decayed into dust, Christ will remain. When all the accomplishments, all the buildings, and all the great projects of mankind are practically forgotten — a dim memory in the collective consciousness of a world that has been redeemed — Christ will remain. When sin and death are no more, and every tear has been wiped from every eye, and when God’s glory will fill the earth, Christ, and nothing else, will remain.

What is true? What is real? What is enduring? What will never fail?

The man who is King of the Jews.


“Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written” (Joh 21:25).

At first glance this is a bit hard to swallow, and one good-naturedly dismisses it as a well-meant but extreme exaggeration.

But perhaps our failure to appreciate the greatness of Jesus’ work arises from our subconscious insistence on placing limits on this man. And here is THE ONE MAN who cannot be limited by time and space. His work continues to this very day, in all those who believe. Here we have the plausible explanation of what first seemed to be John’s rather silly attempt at exaggeration.

It is a real jolt to realize that WE are the “books” that are being written, every one of us who has chosen to follow Christ. There are so many of us, in fact, that the “world” could scarcely contain all of us; but nevertheless it will on the day of the saints’ glorification!

God has spoken and, miraculously, His word has been made flesh and dwelt among men, and does so still by the added force of the written word, in which are recorded the words and works of Christ. This incarnation of the Word of God, the man Christ, has worked within us, impressing upon the fleshly tablets of our hearts the principles of godliness. At the judgment seat Christ will open up each one of us and read us like “books”, to see if the word of God has indeed been imprinted in our lives.

If it has, then each one of us will become an individual, unique “gospel” of the Son of God, bound and stamped with the seal of immortality: “Herein is the word of God, which lives forever! Herein are the further works of Jesus!” “The Gospel according to Glenn… or Margaret… or Robert… or Ellen.”

And the “books” that have been “written” will then fill the earth with the living glory of God.