1 Kings Overview

Author: Unknown; as 1 and 2 Kings continue the account started in 1 and 2 Samuel, it is possible that these books were produced by contemporary prophets.

Period: c 970-586 BC.

Name: In the original Heb text 1Ki and 2Ki are counted as one book called “Kings.” The book was divided into two in the LXX. There, the books of Samuel and Kings are called the First, Second, Third and Fourth Books of Kingdoms. In the Latin Vulgate, these same books are referred to as First, Second, Third and Fourth Kings.

Summary: 1Ki and 2Ki contain the history of the Jewish monarchy from the death of David (around 970 BC) to the Babylonian exile (587/6 BC). They trace the division of the Israelite nation into the Kingdom of Judah in the south and the Kingdom of Israel in the north. 1Ki and 2Ki record Israel’s history from a religious, rather than a civil, viewpoint. As such, it records the religious progress of the nation and sets forth the various steps in the moral growth and decay of the Kingdom. 1Ki opens with Israel in its glory and 2Ki closes with Israel in ruins. The purpose of the Books of Kings is to record the lives and characters of the nation’s leaders as a warning and exhortation to all subsequent generations of covenant bearers.

Key verses

“Be strong, show yourself a man, and obverse what the Lord your God requires: Walk in his ways, and keep his decrees and commands, his laws and requirements… so that you may prosper in all you do and wherever you go” (1Ki 2:2-3).

“The Lord rejected all the people of Israel; he afflicted them and gave them into the hands of plunderers, until he thrust them from his presence” (2Ki 17:20).

SAMUEL / KINGS / CHRONICLES DIFFERENCE

“Samuel-Kings was written just after the fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC. The author, whether it was Jeremiah or someone else from the ‘school of the prophets,’ had access to the royal records of both the northern Kingdom of Israel and the southern Kingdom of Judah, as well as records that antedated the Divided Kingdom period. It is truly a story about the history of the kings of Israel, beginning with the desire to have a king because of the wickedness of first Eli’s sons and then Samuel’s, down to the wickedness of the last kings of Judah before it became time to ‘overturn, overturn, overturn… until he come whose right it is’ (Ezek 21:27). Samuel-Kings then documents much of the reasons for judgment.

“Chronicles, on the other hand, was written more to encourage the returning exiles. From the opening words citing Cyrus’ decree, down through the selection of material showing God’s continuing grace even during times of judgment, the writer of Chronicles (Ezra?) concentrates on God’s plan to return the exiles back to the land, living righteously under God’s rulership. The Chronicles record differs from that of Samuel-Kings with regard to Abijah’s reign and also Manasseh’s… the differing treatments of David’s reign are also instructive. If one only reads Chronicles, one would never know about the seven-and-a-half years of Ishbosheth’s reign, about David’s sin regarding Bathsheba and Uriah, or about any of the fallout from that sin — namely what happened with Amnon and Tamar, and about all that involved Absalom’s rebellion.

“In short, Samuel-Kings serves to document why God was right to judge both Israel and Judah, while Chronicles was focusing more on God’s mercy” (DB).

1Ki / 2Ki, OUTLINE

1. The united kingdom: From Solomon to Rehoboam: 1Ki 1:1 – 11:43

  1. Solomon’s ascension to the throne: 1Ki 1:1 – 2:46
  2. The wisdom and wealth of Solomon: 1Ki 3:1 – 4:34
  3. Solomon’s building activity: 1Ki 5:1 – 9:28
  4. Solomon’s golden age: 1Ki 10:1-29
  5. Solomon’s apostasy, decline and death: 1Ki 11:1-43

2. The divided kingdom: From Rehoboam to the fall of the northern kingdom of Israel: 1Ki 12:1 – 2Ki 17:41

* Antagonism between Israel and Judah, Jeroboam to Omri: 1Ki 12:1 – 16:28

a) Jeroboam I of Israel: 1Ki 12:15 – 14:20 b) Rehoboam of Judah: 1Ki 14:21-31 c) Abijah of Judah: 1Ki 15:1-8 d) Asa of Judah: 1Ki 15:9-24 e) Nadab of Israel: 1Ki 15:25-32 f) Baasha of Israel: 1Ki 15:33-16:7 g) Elah of Israel: 1Ki 16:8-14 h) Zimri of Israel: 1Ki 16:15-20 i) Omri of Israel: 1Ki 16:21-28

* From Ahab to the ascension of Jehu: 1Ki 16:29 – 2Ki 8:29

a) Ahab of Israel: 1Ki 16:29-34 b) Elijah in the reign of Ahab: 1Ki 17:1-22:40 c) Jehoshaphat of Judah: 1Ki 22:41-50 d) Ahaziah of Israel; Elijah’s last prophecy: 1Ki 22:51 – 2Ki 1:18 e) Elijah’s translation; Elisha’s inauguration: 2Ki 2:1-18 f) Elisha in the reign of Joram: 2Ki 2:19-8:15 g) Jehoram of Judah: 2Ki 8:16-24 h) Ahaziah of Judah: 2Ki 8:25-29

* From Jehu to the destruction of Israel: 2Ki 9:1 – 17:41

a) Jehu’s revolt and reign: 2Ki 9:1-10:36 b) Athaliah and Joash of Judah; repair of temple: 2Ki 11:1-12:21 c) Jehoahaz of Israel: 2Ki 13:1-9 d) Jehoash of Israel; Elisha’s last prophecy: 2Ki 13:10-25 e) Amaziah of Judah: 2Ki 14:1-22 f) Jeroboam II of Israel: 2Ki 14:23-29 g) Azariah of Judah: 2Ki 15:1-7 h) Zechariah of Israel: 2Ki 15:8-12 i) Shallum of Israel: 2Ki 15:13-16 j) Menahem of Israel: 2Ki 15:17-22 k) Pekahiah of Israel: 2Ki 15:23-26 l) Pekah of Israel: 2Ki 15:27-31 m) Jotham of Judah: 2Ki 15:32-38 n) Ahaz of Judah: 2Ki 16:1-20 o) Hoshea of Israel: 2Ki 17:1-6 p) Exile of Israel; resettlement of land: 2Ki 17:7-41

* Judah from Hezekiah to Babylonian exile: 2Ki 18:1 – 25:30

a) Hezekiah: 2Ki 18:1 – 20:21 b) Manasseh: 2Ki 21:1-18 c) Amon: 2Ki 21:19-26 d) Josiah: 2Ki 22:1-23:30 e) Jehoahaz exiled to Egypt: 2Ki 23:31-35 f) Jehoiakim: first Babylonian invasion: 2Ki 23:36-24:7 g) Jehoiachin: second Babylonian invasion: 2Ki 24:8-17 h) Zedekiah: 2Ki 24:18-20 i) Babylonian exile of Judah: 2Ki 25:1-26 j) Jehoiachin in Babylon: 2Ki 25:27-30

1 Kings 1

1Ki 1:1

See Lesson, 1Ki / 2Ki, overview.

When David is old and becomes unable to rule effectively, he delays in designating and installing Solomon as his successor. Adonijah seeks to take advantage of David’s delay, setting out to beat Solomon to the punch by proclaiming himself to be king (1Ki 1:5). He is a very handsome man, born after Absalom, and apparently never is told “No” by David (1Ki 1:6). Joab and Abiathar, the priest, join with Adonijah in his conspiracy. David is finally persuaded by Bathsheba and Nathan the prophet to publicly appoint Solomon as his successor to the throne. When Solomon takes the throne of his father, he allows Adonijah to live (for a time), but he is finally put to death when he seeks once again to oust Solomon and assume the throne over Israel (by asking to be given Abishag, David’s concubine).

KEEP WARM: Heb “yacham” = to be hot, fig to conceive (cp sw Gen 30:38,39,41; 31:10; Psa 51:5).

1Ki 1:6

HE… WAS BORN NEXT AFTER ABSALOM: See 2Sa 3:3,4; 1Ch 3:2. Adonijah was 4th in age of David’s 19 sons, and 2 (and poss 3) of his older brothers had died. He prob presumed the kingdom was his by right of age.

1Ki 1:21

I AND MY SON SOLOMON WILL BE TREATED AS CRIMINALS: Because of adultery and murder of Uriah.

1Ki 1:34

Zadok the priest // Melchizedek priesthood of Christ (Heb 7:11,12).

1Ki 1:38

THE KERETHITES AND THE PELETHITES: A bodyguard — prob of Philistines. Benaiah was over them (2Sa 20:23).

1Ki 1:47

AND THE KING BOWED IN WORSHIP ON HIS BED: As did Jacob, when in faith he spoke of his burial, not in Egypt, and blessed the 2 sons of Joseph (Heb 11:21).

1Ki 1:50

ADONIJAH… WENT AND TOOK HOLD OF THE HORNS OF THE ALTAR: Cp Exo 29:37: whatever touches the altar shall be holy.

1 Kings 2

1Ki 2:19

RIGHT HAND: Strength (Exo 15:6; Psa 20:6; 63:8; 118:15,16); righteousness (Psa 48:10); authority (Isa 62:8); honor (Gen 48:13-18; 1Ki 2:19); salvation (Psa 17:7; 60:5); and fellowship (Psa 16:11).

1Ki 2:23

MAY GOD DEAL WITH ME, BE IT EVER SO SEVERELY, IF…: See Lesson, Covenant-victim, the.

1Ki 2:28

WHEN THE NEWS REACHED JOAB… HE FLED TO THE TENT OF THE LORD AND TOOK HOLD OF THE HORNS OF THE ALTAR: Joab must have thought that, as Adonijah had done this successfully before, he — that is, Joab — might repeat it, and have some hope of being spared. Joab was an old man by now, who had about thirty years earlier committed two atrocious murders, and now those “chickens” have finally come home to roost.

And so he retreated to the horns of the altar in the LORD’s house, which — so far as we can tell — he had very seldom approached before. He seems to have had little respect for religion during his lifetime. He was a coarse man of war, and had taken little or no time to think of God, or the tabernacle, or the priests, or the altar… until he was in danger. But then, he fled to that which he had avoided, and sought to take refuge in that which he had neglected.

Joab is not the only man to seek for help in such a way. But it was of no use: it was too little, and too late. God will not be mocked, and a man will reap what he has sown (Gal 6:7).

1 Kings 3

1Ki 3:3

THE STATUTES OF HIS FATHER: The heritage of a good example: not just the statutes of his God, but of his father also!

1Ki 3:7

IN PLACE OF MY FATHER DAVID: Solomon asks Hiram to deal with him just as he had done with David his father (1Ki 5:2-7; and cp 1Ki 5:1 with 2Sa 5:11). The number of times these phrases occur in the records is so large that we simply have to recognize that God is pointing something out to us about the relationship between Solomon and David: 1Ki 2:24,26,32,44; 3:6,7,14; 5:3,5; 6:12; 8:15,17,18,20,24-26; 9:4; 11:33; 2Ch 1:8,9; 2:3,7,14; 6:4,7,8,10,15,16; 7:17. David, for example, had weaknesses for horses (2Sa 8:4) as well as many wives, and Solomon followed in these steps too. Does he have a psychological need to “one-up” his father? And does this lead him into greater dangers and problems?

HOW TO CARRY OUT MY DUTIES: Lit, “how to go out or come in” (as AV).

1Ki 3:9

Sympathy for others.

1Ki 3:16

Here is an example of the way Christ will exercise wisdom (cp Heb 4:12,13). “The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him — the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the Spirit of counsel and of power, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD — and he will delight in the fear of the LORD. He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or decide by what he hears with his ears; but with righteousness he will judge the needy, with justice he will give decisions for the poor of the earth. He will strike the earth with the rod of his mouth; with the breath of his lips he will slay the wicked” (Isa 11:1-4).

See Lesson, Cutting up the “baby”.

PROSTITUTES: Would Solomon be reminded of the “character” of his mother Bathsheba, who “played the harlot” with his father David? (Cp Christ, called to “judge” the woman taken in the act of adultery — as it impacts himself and HIS mother: John 8.)

2 Samuel 22

2Sa 22:2

2Sa 22 // Psa 18. The superscription of Psa 18 reads: “OF DAVID THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. HE SANG TO THE LORD THE WORDS OF THIS SONG WHEN THE LORD DELIVERED HIM FROM THE HAND OF ALL HIS ENEMIES AND FROM THE HAND OF SAUL. HE SAID…”: Places the psa somewhere between 2Sa 6 and 2Sa 11 — for it is inconceivable that vv 22-24 were written after the time of David’s great lapse, and the allusions in the second half of the psa to the northern tribes and Gentile enemies require that David be king in Jerusalem when writing these words.

Consider allusions to Deu 32; 1Sa 2 (song of Hannah); and Gen 49.

ROCK: “Sela” = strength or refuge. Hence no further need for “Selah” in Psa 18!

FORTRESS: Heb “metsudah” is a mighty fortress from which military campaigns might be launched. It is applied to Zion in 2Sa 5:7,9,17 and 1Ch 11:5,7,16. Translated “bulwark” (Ecc 9:14; Deu 20:20), “munition” (Isa 29:7; 33:16; Nah 2:1), “stronghold” (2Sa 5:7), and “castle” (1Ch 11:5,7). Thus God is both the place of defense (Sela), and the place from which a victorious attack may be launched. In Pss, “metsudah” occurs in Psa 31:3; 66:11; 71:3; 91:2; 144:2.

2Sa 22:3

ROCK: Heb “tsur”, ref to altar rock on threshing floor of Ornan: 2Sa 24:18-25. The title “Tsur” is used of God in vv 31,46; Psa 28:1; 62:2,7; 78:35; etc.

IN WHOM I TAKE REFUGE: Quoted conc Messiah in Heb 2:13. This particular Heb word comes 24 times in Pss, an indication of Christ’s need to lean on God.

THE HORN OF MY SALVATION: Psa 132:17. Those in danger of death at the hand of an avenger fled for mercy to the horns of the altar: 1Ki 1:50; 2:28; Exo 21:14.

STRONGHOLD: Heb “misgab”.

REFUGE: Heb “menuch”.

2Sa 22:4

Christ’s prayer on the mount.

2Sa 22:5

Vv 5-7: Not easy to connect to David’s reign, but easy regarding the Lord Jesus. God is the “rock” (Psa 18:1,2,46) upon which man builds his “house” of faith, so as to survive the “floods” (Psa 18:15 also). The source of Christ’s parable in Mat 7:24-27.

WAVES OF DEATH: Explained in Psa 118:27 as a figure for sacrifice: esp the sacrifice of Christ (cp LXX and Act 2:24: “the pains of death”).

THE WAVES OF DEATH ENTANGLED ME: Prob another hunting metaphor: a circle of nets (cp Psa 17:9-13).

THE TORRENTS OF DESTRUCTION: A different figure of speech, as in the “many waters” of Psa 18:16. Another Messianic psa applies it very powerfully to the death of Christ: Psa 69:1,2,14,15.

DESTRUCTION: “Belial”, one meaning of which may be “the Lord of night” (cp 2Sa 23:6).

2Sa 22:7

Vv 7-15: In answer to the desperate prayer God manifested Himself in a marvelous “theophany”: vivid brightness, intense darkness, and a mighty voice, as at Sinai.

IN MY DISTRESS I CALLED TO THE LORD: True of both Gethsemane (Heb 5:7) and Golgotha, but the context here requires the second of these.

I CRIED OUT TO MY GOD: “Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani” (Psa 22:1).

FROM HIS TEMPLE HE HEARD MY VOICE: Hence the rending of the veil of the temple — from top to bottom, that is, by divine and not human or “natural” agency (Mat 27:51; Mar 15:38; Luk 23:45).

HIS TEMPLE: Some time after 2Sa 6, when tabernacle was set up in Zion. Heaven is the temple, or dwelling place, of Jehovah; but He dwells also in the most holy place, to which David is turning his attention: Psa 11:4. In the sanctuary, God is surrounded by the thick darkness (v 11). In Psa 20:2,6; 2Ch 7:1; and Lev 9:24, “heaven” is parallel to God’s “sanctuary”. The “door in heaven” (Rev 4:1) is // to the “heavenly places” (Eph 1:3) — ie an insight into the fortunes of God’s saints, whom He protects and tries (Psa 11:4,5).

2Sa 22:8

(NT) Vv 8-16: An impressive manifestation of God; belongs to the time of the Crucifixion. Esp important is the paradox of contrasting phrases: there is both (a) darkness, and (b) vivid brightness. This is reminiscent of Sinai but esp of Israel’s deliverance from Egypt (Exo 14:20), and also of God’s covenant with Abraham (Gen 15:7). The Shekinah Glory of God was darkness to the Egyptians, but brightness and light to the Hebrews. Now, similarly, at the crucifixion: “darkness over all the land from the sixth to the ninth hour” (Mat 27:45), expressing God’s anger with His enemies. But there was brightness and light for Jesus. JT (Phan 57) applies this paragraph to the Second Coming. It is true, of course, that then Jesus will come “in the glory of his Father” (Mat 16:27). But the context here (esp vv 4-6) calls for a different ref.

A great earthquake is also coupled with the cherubim and the salvation of God in Psa 68:7,8; 77:14-20; 114:6,7. This section bears a great resemblance to Hab 3, in which the Holy One is pictured as coming in clouds. The Psalmist (as Habakkuk also) sees a re-creation of God’s glory in the march of the avenging cherubim. Many other LD prophecies mention the cloud, poss the dark cloud to obscure the Shekinah Glory of Jehovah: Joe 2:2; Zep 1:15; Eze 30:3; Isa 19:1; 25:5; Rev 1:7. The revelation of God in His glory is shown against the background of an awesome storm.

THE EARTH TREMBLED AND QUAKED… BECAUSE HE WAS ANGRY: “Trembled”/”quaked” = Heb “wayyigash/wayyirash”. Earthquake is an expression of the wrath of God: Job 9:5,6; Isa 2:19,21; Eze 38:18-20; Hag 2:6,21; Heb 12:26; Act 16:25,26. There was no greater wrath than at the crucifixion of God’s Son: Mat 27:51.

2Sa 22:9

SMOKE: Shekinah cloud in Gen 15:17; Isa 6:4; Joe 2:30.

CONSUMING FIRE CAME FROM HIS MOUTH: A further expression of divine anger: Deu 32:22; cp also Rev 19:15. But not so for Jesus, for whom it was the comforting presence of his Father.

BURNING COALS: Kindled a rededication in the crucified malefactor, as with Isaiah the prophet: Isa 6:6,7 (and perhaps Rom 12:20).

2Sa 22:10

HE PARTED THE HEAVENS AND CAME DOWN: The thick rolling clouds of the approaching storm would seem lit to bring heaven down to the earth. So this is poss equivalent to “a door opened in heaven” (Rev 4:1). Certainly it is the language of “theophany”: a divine manifestation, as in Gen 11:5; 18:21; Exo 3:7,8; 19:11,18,20; Isa 64:1.

2Sa 22:11

HE MOUNTED THE CHERUBIM: “He rode” (AV): cp 1Ch 28:18: “the chariot of the cherubim”. See Lesson, Cherubim.

HE SOARED: On eagles’ wings: Eze 1:6-9.

THE WINGS OF THE WIND: But in Heb “wind” is also “Spirit”. Cp Deu 33:26; Psa 68:33; 104:3; Nah 1:3.

2Sa 22:12

CANOPY: Protection for Joshua/Jesus: Psa 91:1,4. Heb succoth, tabernacle, booth, “canopy” (RSV, NEB, NIV) — from the Feast of Tabernacles: Lev 23:34,42,43; Deu 16:13,16; Psa 31:20,21; Isa 4:6; Amo 9:11; Zec 14:16.

DARK RAIN CLOUDS: To obscure the Shekinah Glory of the Most Holy: cp Dan 7:13; Rev 1:7; 1Th 4:17; esp Deu 4:11; Job 22:14; Psa 27:5; 1Ki 8:8,12.

2Sa 22:13

THE BRIGHTNESS OF HIS PRESENCE: Heb “nogah” always ref the Shekinah Glory (Isa 4:5; 60:3,19; Eze 1:4,13, 27,28; 10:4; Hab 3:4,11). LXX has a word for “far-shining, conspicuous from a distance”. The only NT occurrence is in Mar 8:25. But here the special force of the word is of sacrifice accepted (Psa 80:1). What better assurance could Jesus have as he hung on the cross? At the crucifixion Jesus was not really deserted by his Father. Even the words which seem to point this way (Psa 22:1) are immediately set in true perspective in Psa 22:24. Under the Law the evidence of the sacrifice was always to be brought before the Lord — blood poured out at the base of the altar of burnt-offering, blood on the horns of the altar of incense, blood before the veil, blood on the mercy-seat itself. In the death of Jesus, this supreme sacrifice could not be brought into the temple, so instead the veil was rent and the Glory of the Lord came to Jesus!

2Sa 22:14

THE LORD THUNDERED: As in Joh 12:29, the Father spoke reassuringly to His Son on the cross.

2Sa 22:15

Note the parallelism: arrows with lightnings (cp Psa 77:17). Jehovah is the God of war and the God of storm. The same word for lightning occurs in other visions of the Shekinah Glory: Exo 19:16; Deu 32:41 (“glittering”); Hab 3:4.

2Sa 22:16

VALLEYS: Heb “aphikim”, watercourses, constrained by rocky channels. Similar to the Heb wadis, dry creek beds, which flow only spasmodically, after great rains: Psa 42:1; Job 6:15; Isa 8:7. The rage of the great storm spends itself in the flood torrents.

THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE EARTH (WERE) LAID BARE: This is the earthquake of Mat 27:51,52. And by the resurrection of these saints on the third day it was demonstrated that the merits of the Lord’s sacrifice and the power of his resurrection are not only prospective in their force (to apply even to believers today), but also are retrospective, right back to Adam the “foundation” of mankind (Rom 3:25; Heb 9:15; consider the sym of Jos 3:14-17).

THE BLAST OF BREATH FROM HIS NOSTRILS: Cp Exo 15:8, the song of Moses, where God with the blast of His nostrils parted the Red Sea. Remarkably, this LXX word comes only in Act 9:1. What a ct! But Saul of Tarsus certainly thought himself to be the righteous anger of God at work.

2Sa 22:17

Vv 17-20 speak very clearly of an extraordinary deliverance. But it is difficult to identify which. Perhaps the singular and plural in v 18 ref Saul and the later Gentile adversaries described in 2Sa 8.

NT: These vv, as describing the deliverance of Christ, require no commentary. In v 18 the singular and plural are the power of Sin (Heb 2:14; Rom 7:17,20) and of Sin’s disciples, the Jewish rulers (Joh 15:25).

HE REACHED… TOOK HOLD… DREW OUT: Key words same as in Exo 2:5,10: “Drew out” is “mashah”/Moses: deliverance of the Deliverer, so that he might then deliver others!

2Sa 22:20

A SPACIOUS PLACE: David is commemorating his deliverance from the dens and caves of the rocks (Psa 18:36; Psa 31:8).

HE RESCUED ME BECAUSE HE DELIGHTED IN ME: This is the Divine answer to the derisive statement of Mat 27:43: “Let [God] deliver him, now, if he will have him.” He did! Cp also Psa 22:8.

2Sa 22:21

Vv 21-25 (NT): Re Jesus, the refs to righteousness are strictly and lit true: Joh 4:34; 6:38; 8:46; 1Pe 2:22; Heb 4:15; 7:26; 2Co 5:21; 1Jo 3:5; Isa 53:9,11. But so also are the words: “I kept myself from mine iniquity” (AV), for there was in him the legacy of a propensity to sin which is the lot of all who are in Adam. For the strange paradox of righteousness and “sin” in the suffering Messiah, see Psa 25:11,15; 38:1,3,5,20; 40:8,10,12; 41:4,12; 86:2,5,11.

OT: Apt commentary on such passages as 1Sa 24:19. These vv (21-25) describe the righteousness of David relative to his adversaries. But there is that sinister phrase in v 24: “I kept myself from sin” — it was only through the effort of Abigail, in a desperate attempt to avert David’s hostility from her husband Nabal (1Sa 25:23), that even the righteous David was spared from such guilt.

2Sa 22:26

A principle developed in the Lord’s prayer: “For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: but if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses” (Mat 6:14,15; cp also Mat 18:33-35; Jam 2:13). And, conversely, God’s ways do not appear right to those who themselves are not upright: cp Mat 25:24; 27:5.

2Sa 22:27

In this section of the psa there are several indirect allusions to certain of the tribes of Israel. These refs are appropriate to the gathering of all 12 tribes in loyalty to David: 2Sa 5:1-3.

TO THE CROOKED: Lev 26:23,24,27,28. Also, Pro 3:34.

YOU SHOW YOURSELF SHREWD: “Will wrestle” — an allusion to Gen 32:24, the only other OT occurrence, to which Eph 6:12 also refers. Consider Jesus’ rebukes of Peter.

2Sa 22:28

Vv 28-32: Vindication! David’s own personal experiences are traceable somewhat more readily.

NT: The vindication of God’s Messiah leads on to a sustained picture of triumph over his enemies.

2Sa 22:29

Light/darkness symbolize prosperity/affliction or death. See the usage in Job 21:17; 29:3; Pro 13:9; 20:20. The judgment of the wicked is pictured as being cast into “outer darkness” (Mat 8:12; 22:13).

LAMP: David is called the “light (or candle: AV) of Israel” in 2Sa 21:17 (cp 1Ki 11:36; 15:4). Psa 132:17 speaks of “a lamp for mine anointed”, in a psa which repeats David’s resolve to see a worthy sanctuary of the Lord in Zion. Cp Mic 7:8; Rev 21:23 (ct Rev 18:23).

2Sa 22:30

Vv 30-41: Numerous comparisons in this section with the prophecy of Jacob: troop (Psa 18:29; Gen 49:19); wall (Psa 18:29; Gen 49:22); deer (Psa 18:33; Gen 49:21); bow (Psa 18:34; Gen 49:24); neck of enemies (Psa 18:40; Gen 49:8).

V 30: A vivid description of the shock-tactics, the sudden assaults, used by General David against the Philistines. Cp also the exploits of David’s “mighty men” in 2Sa 23.

I CAN ADVANCE AGAINST A TROOP: Links with David’s victory over the marauding Amalekites in 1Sa 30:15,17. (As in v 33, David and his men are seen to be fighting on foot, while from the time of Solomon onward the kings of Israel resorted most often to chariots for war: 1Ki 22:34; 2Ki 9:21.)

NT: The angel of God striking down the soldiers assigned to guard the tomb of Jesus, so that he might escape the “prison” of death (Mat 28:2,4).

WITH MY GOD I CAN SCALE A WALL: Is this the taking of the Jebusite stronghold (2Sa 5)? NT: Firstly, the “wall” of armed guards at the tomb. Then, Eph 2:14 and context impart a splendid meaning to this enigmatic phrase: the wall of legalistic separation between Jews and Gentiles, and of course the wall of division between God and man.

2Sa 22:32

ROCK… GOD: The altar of burnt-offering: 2Sa 24:18-25.

2Sa 22:33

Vv 33-46: The historical background to this section is, on the whole, 2Sa 8: when David’s new kingdom was in danger of being overwhelmed by a host of enemies (see Psa 60 and comments). But here and there David seems to look back to the evil days of Saul’s hostility.

Vv 33-36, along with Isaiah’s words (Isa 59:16,17), appear to be the OT origin of Paul’s exposition of the “armor of righteousness” (Eph 6:13-17).

2Sa 22:34

HE MAKES MY FEET LIKE THE FEET OF A DEER: To tread down the wicked: Rev 1:15; Psa 58:10,11; Mic 4:1-3,11-13; Eze 1:7; Song 2:8; Eur 1:175,176.

DEER: A beautiful wild creature. Its sureness of foot and speed form the basis of this oft-used Scriptural figure. Moses, in Deu 32:13, speaks of God as “He (that) made him (Israel) to ride on the high places of the earth.” “Naphtali is a hind let loose” (Gen 49:21), or sent forth, to preach the gospel (Rom 10:15; Isa 52:7). “How beautiful are his feet!”

2Sa 22:35

MY ARMS CAN BEND A BOW OF BRONZE: Actual metal bows (most likely, wooden bows strengthened with strips of metal) were often used in Bible times (as in Job 20:24). // Gen 49:24, where it is said of ‘Joseph’ that God makes his arms strong. More specifically, this is a description of Christ, like Joseph the son favored over all his brethren, the son of man whom God made strong for Himself (Psa 80:1,15,17).

2Sa 22:36

YOU STOOP DOWN TO MAKE ME GREAT: “Thy gentleness hath made me strong” (AV). Jacob, made lame by the angel, then made spiritually strong again through prayer, lifted up to go forth with “enlarged” steps to meet Esau: Gen 32.

Psa 18 (and 2Sa 22) is majestic and warlike throughout; its theme is vengeance and victory. All the destructive elements of nature are marshaled on the side of Omnipotence, but right in the midst of it we read of the “gentleness”, the “meekness”, the “condescension” of the Almighty. What better way to remind us that the awesome destructive power is but the outer fringe of the garments of the Lord. The Lord is not really in the wind, the earthquake, nor the fire (1Ki 19:11,12). They are but the passing manifestations of His fury — they endure only for the moment, but the still small voice of gentle strength remains forever. Whirlwind and earthquake and flame — those great evidences of His might — can pull down and purify and consume, but His gentleness alone can build up and make great (see also Psa 113:4-6).

2Sa 22:38

Note the progression of the battle (or better, the rout!): pursue… overtake… destroy… crush (v 39)… But in the antitype again, David’s 30 mighty men of war (2Sa 23) are destined to give way to Christ’s “double portion” of 60 mighty men (Song 3:7,8), the symbolic Cherubim.

2Sa 22:39

FELL BENEATH MY FEET: Psa 8:6; Mat 28:18; 1Co 15:27; Gen 3:15!

2Sa 22:40

YOU ARMED ME WITH STRENGTH: Rev 1:13; 15:6. First we must be girded with righteousness, as was Christ (Isa 11:5; Psa 132:9; Job 29:14; 1Pe 5:5; Eph 6 — the whole armor of God). Then we may expect to be girded with the strength of eternal life and Spirit.

2Sa 22:42

This can only refer to David’s enemies among his own people — Saul, for example: 1Sa 28:6. Cp “the strivings of the people”: LXX: contentions, railings; and here the word for people is the word which normally describes Israel.

NT: How bitterly this was fulfilled in AD 70, and many times since. Ct v 6.

2Sa 22:45

FOREIGNERS COME CRINGING TO ME: Lit “shall yield feigned obedience”, or “come cringing” (NEB) — which is precisely the situation in Psa 2:2,3 when Messiah is already king on Mount Zion. Cp the figure of speech in Psa 81:15; 66:3; Deu 33:29 mg.

2Sa 22:48

God as the Avenger of David: “May the LORD judge between you and me. And may the LORD avenge the wrongs you have done to me, but my hand will not touch you” (1Sa 24:12).

NT: Here is an anticipation of the Son’s ultimate subjection to the Father: 1Co 15:28.

2Sa 22:49

Jerusalem the holy city, under both David and Christ, is lifted up above all surrounding nations and cities (Isa 2:2,3; Zec 14:4,5,10,16). The holy city is exalted above the man of violence, or the “man of sin” (2Th 2).

2Sa 22:50

Paul quotes this v in Rom 15:9 (along with Deu 30:43; Psa 117:1; Isa 11:10) as proof that Gentiles are to have a share in the gospel. The implicit argument is this: If Gentiles are to take part willingly and gladly in the great Messianic thanksgiving in the Kingdom, must not their thanksgiving look back joyfully to their earlier redemption from ignorance and sin? The theme is continued in Psa 19:4,6.

I WILL SING PRAISES TO YOUR NAME: Lit “To thy name will I sweep the strings.”

2Sa 22:51

GREAT VICTORIES: “Salvations”. An intensive plural anticipating the name of Jesus, just as “Anointed” (here also) is the same as Christ! Same combination in Psa 28:8.

HE SHOWS UNFAILING KINDNESS TO HIS ANOINTED, TO DAVID AND TO HIS DESCENDANTS FOREVER: An allusion to the great promise made to David in 2Sa 7:13. There can be but one true “Seed” of David (cp Gal 3:16).

2 Samuel 21

2Sa 21:1

THERE WAS: Lit, “it came to pass”. Always sig a time of trouble, which ends in blessing: Gen 14:1; Rth 1:1; Isa 7:1; Jer 1:3; Est 1:1.

THREE SUCCESSIVE YEARS: See 2Sa 24:13n.

2Sa 21:6

KILLED AND EXPOSED BEFORE THE LORD: “Seven of Saul’s descendants are treated thus (vv 9,13; Num 25:4). The Heb verb designates ‘a solemn ritual act of execution imposed for breach of covenant’, prob involving the cutting up or dismembering [of] a treaty violator as a punishment for treaty violation… As Agag was put to death ‘before the LORD’ (1Sa 15:33), so also Saul’s descendants are to be killed and exposed before the LORD, perhaps so that His blessing might be sought” (EBC).

2Sa 21:7

MEPHIBOSHETH: The treatment of the name “Baal” is probably an example of deliberate change, for theological reasons, by the scribes who copied out the scriptures. With personal names that included the word “Baal” (which could simply mean “master” or “lord”), the scribes deliberately replaced “Baal” with “Bosheth” (which means “shame”). To them the idol “Baal”, in all his many forms, was a “shameful thing”, and any passing allusion to him was to be avoided if possible. Hence, it is likely that Jonathan’s son was actually named “Meribbaal”, but later scribes made sure that the (by then) hated name of “Baal” was replaced — yielding “Mephibosheth” (cp 1Ch 8:34; 9:40 and 2Sa 9:6; 19:24; 21:7).

2Sa 21:8

MERAB: KJV has “Michal”, wrongly: Michal had no child (2Sa 6:23). Merab was the wife of Adriel (1Sa 18:19).

2Sa 21:10

RIZPAH… TOOK SACKCLOTH AND SPREAD IT OUT FOR HERSELF ON A ROCK. FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE HARVEST TILL THE RAIN POURED DOWN FROM THE HEAVENS ON THE BODIES…: If the love of a woman for her slain sons could make her prolong her mournful vigil for so long, how can we grow weary of considering the sufferings of our Lord?. These her children were slain by other hands than hers, and yet she wept and watched: what ought we to do who have by our sins crucified our Lord (Isa 53:5,6)? Our obligations are boundless, and so our love should be fervent and our repentance thorough. To watch with Jesus should be our business; to protect his honor should be our occupation. To remain beside him, come what may, should be our life’s work.

SHE DID NOT LET THE BIRDS OF THE AIR TOUCH THEM BY DAY: Compare Abraham’s protection of the sacrifices in Gen 15:11. Shall we not chase from our meditations those worldly and sinful preoccupations which defile both our minds and the sacred themes upon which we are occupied? “Go away, evil thoughts. Leave the sacrifice alone!”

…OR THE WILD ANIMALS BY NIGHT: She chased away even the wild beasts, with courage unusual for a woman. Will not we be ready to encounter every foe for Jesus’ sake?

2Sa 21:14

AFTER THAT: The faithful woman Rizpah remedied a very bad situation.

2Sa 21:15

David reestablishes himself on the battlefield.

2Sa 21:17

BUT ABISHAI SON OF ZERUIAH CAME TO DAVID’S RESCUE: Sometimes we win great spiritual victories or reach a seemingly unattainable goal without the help of a friend or companion. This was true of David when as a shepherd lad he killed Goliath with nothing but a sling and faith in God. In later years, however, he would have been slain by a giant named Ishbibenob if his nephew Abishai had not come to his aid. Now, are we to conclude that God was with David when he met Goliath, but not when he confronted the second giant? I don’t think so! The Lord simply used a different means to take care of His servant. The first time, He used David’s skill with the sling; the second time, He used Abishai’s strength and military prowess.

2Sa 21:19

LIKE A WEAVER’S ROD: Not size but appearance and shape. A spear with a leash or cord, increasing leverage, and thus enabling the soldier to throw it a greater distance. Refd in 1Sa 17:7; 2Sa 21:19; 1Ch 20:5; 11:23.

2 Samuel 18

2Sa 18:3

TO GIVE US SUPPORT FROM THE CITY: To be of assistance (with a share of the army) to any who were forced to flee from the battle.

2Sa 18:5

Notice David has no doubt about the outcome of the battle.

2Sa 18:8

FOREST: Heb “yaar”: rocky, rough land with prickly oaks, thorns (LB 306).

THE FOREST CLAIMED MORE LIVES THAT DAY THAN THE SWORD: More were killed in flight than in actual combat, because the dense forest prevented their successfully getting away.

2Sa 18:9

ABSALOM’S HEAD GOT CAUGHT: His hair, long and flowing, was snared in the branches. His natural glory was his downfall.

2Sa 18:10

HE TOLD JOAB: Joab esp hated Absalom, since it had been Joab who worked for Absalom to bring him back into favor with King David.

2Sa 18:11

Joab would have gladly let someone else slay Absalom, and bear the king’s anger.

2Sa 18:16

With Absalom’s death, the war had effectively ended (cp 2Sa 17:3).

2Sa 18:18

Even Absalom’s burial plans were thwarted.

I HAVE NO SON TO CARRY ON THE MEMORY OF MY NAME: His three sons (2Sa 14:27) must have already been dead — or perhaps not yet born when he erected the pillar.

2Sa 18:20

Joab commands Ahimaaz not to tell king of the death of his son (cp v 29).

2Sa 18:21

A CUSHITE: Poss Joab’s slave.

2Sa 18:24

A MAN RUNNING ALONE: Only one man would not be a fugitive. If many were returning together, it could signify either victory or defeat. But one man must be a messenger.

2Sa 18:28

ALL IS WELL: Heb “shalom”: peace… for the nation.

2Sa 18:29

IS THE YOUNG MAN ABSALOM SAFE?: ‘Is there “shalom” (peace) for Absalom?’ David’s only concern.

“Is the young man… safe?” This question has often been asked by loving fathers about their sons. And sometimes the answer must be, “No, he is in great danger.” The young man is not “safe”, firstly, if he is at enmity with his father — for, if a man love not his own parents on earth, how can he love his Father who is in heaven?

And, again, the answer may be, “We have seen him lately in bad company. He has associated with other young men who are of loose morals. No, the young man is not safe there.”

Neither is he “safe” if he has taken to indulging in expensive habits. “Absalom provided himself with a chariot and horses and with fifty men to run ahead of him” (2Sa 15:1). This extravagance was a sign of evil. A youth who lavishes money upon needless luxuries is not safe.

And once again, the young man is not safe if he is especially concerned about his personal appearance. “In all Israel there was not a man so highly praised for his handsome appearance as Absalom. From the top of his head to the sole of his foot there was no blemish in him” (2Sa 14:25). When young people are taken up with their own persons, and are vain about their hair, their looks, and their clothes, then may we be sure that they are not safe, for the proud are always in danger.

BUT I DON’T KNOW WHAT IT WAS: He knows, but he doesn’t want to say. (Why would a messenger run, with no message?) Do we hurry to reach a destination, only to find that we have no message to deliver when we arrive?

2Sa 18:31

FROM ALL WHO ROSE UP AGAINST YOU: “How many rise up against me!” (Psa 3:1).

2Sa 18:32

Even the Cushite fears to tell of Absalom’s death in plain language.

2Sa 18:33

“In your anger do not sin; when you are on your beds, search your hearts and be silent” (Psa 4:4). See in this deliverance God’s providential hand, and “Be still!”

2 Samuel 19

2Sa 19:1

2Sa 19: “As we look back, David seems to stand out apart from all others in the history of Israel. Moses truly is a far more majestic and awe-inspiring figure; Abraham exemplifies the nobility of a patient, enduring faith through a long and weary pilgrimage; but it is into the heart of David that we enter most closely. His life seems crowded with every variety of experience, and ranges from the purest God-fearing courage of his youthful encounter with Goliath to the ugly depths of adultery and murder. His life was a battle between the highest and most intimate spiritual conceptions of God on the one hand, and all the strong currents of human nature on the other. That he repeatedly failed is true, but what is far more important is that he freely and humbly recognized his failures and continued to press on, accepting every form of tribulation with unresentful resignation.

His life, on the whole, was a broken and frustrated one. A long period he spent as a hunted fugitive — a wanderer away from his country and kindred, attended by a motley following whose company must have been on the whole small comfort and a constant burden. Then, after his wanderings end and he finally becomes king and has subdued all his enemies, he stumbles into a grievous sin which plagues him without respite for the rest of his life.

“Had Jonathan lived, much may have been different in David’s life, but such was not the purpose of God. The affection between them was of the most exceptional character, calling for the strongest terms of description. In the friendship of Jonathan, David could have found satisfaction and guidance for the restless desires that led him into pitfalls. But it was God’s will that he should learn alone.

“After Jonathan’s death, David seems to have found affinity with no one, and such comfort as he could get in the course of a life of disappointment and turmoil he must get by a direct and lonely approach to God by himself which, while infinitely more difficult, was perhaps in the ultimate for the best.

“The Psalms could never have been written by a man who could find satisfaction and comfort in anything short of a direct and individual communion with God. And therefore, in the wisdom of God, it was Joab and not Jonathan who became David’s lifelong companion, though such would never have been David’s choice.

“God’s purpose with David was very high, and David had much to learn. Therefore considerations of his present comfort must give way to those which through long and bitter tribulation would develop in him the peaceable fruits of purity and righteousness.

“The wisdom of God chose a vessel ideally suited to His purpose, and no small part of that purpose was the recording of the Psalms. The strong light of the inspiring Spirit, shining through every facet of David’s character and experiences, threw as on a screen each detail of hope and despair, of failure and triumph.

“Moses’ character is made before we meet him as he comes on a divine mission from the wilderness to deliver Israel from bondage. But in the Psalms every aspect of David’s development is laid bare before us. Christ alone combined the exalted and prophetic majesty of Moses with the keen humanity of David. Tried and tempted in all points like his brethren, he alone as the representative of mankind fulfilled all the experiences portrayed through David in the Psalms and emerged triumphant and unspotted from them.

“David typifies the body of Christ, those whom Christ came to redeem, the chosen generation, the spirit willing and eager but the flesh weak, a man after God’s own heart, who through much tribulation must learn the way to the kingdom.

“But David, as the writer of the Psalms, was permitted to be the instrument by which Christ was encouraged and strengthened. And each of the members, too, can in some small way share in this honor. For it was for the joy that was set before him that he was enabled to endure, and that joy consisted in the love and affection of those who gratefully accept the benefits he procured.

“Our participation in the victory is measured, therefore, by our affection for him, and the value of that vice-royalty is increased by each one that lays hold upon it.

“Between Joab and David there was no affinity. David was a man of God. Joab was not. No greater gulf could separate two men than that. They lived in different worlds. David repeatedly struggled and fell, but from beginning to end he was a man of God, intensely loyal and devoted.

“Joab was a man of the world. Wiser at times than David, and strangely enough, sometimes his perception rose higher than David’s, but to the deeper currents of divine communion which were the basis of David’s life, Joab was a stranger.

“In his reaction to David’s grief for Absalom, Joab is practical and wise. But David could see many things to which Joab was utterly blind. David could see that day many years earlier when the prophet Nathan had stood before him and had solemnly spoken of the great anger of God and the consequences he would have to suffer. David could now see the humiliation of Tamar and the murder of Amnon, his firstborn. He could see that now another wayward son had been taken, leaving behind an ignoble memory of treachery and dishonor, all the consequences of his own folly and sin. And he would wonder where and when the next blow would fall.

“But Joab’s rough counsel would sharply remind him that his pilgrimage was not yet ended. Those terrible words would always be before his mind — ‘Now, therefore, the sword shall never depart from thine house,’ and he would see dimly, stretching into the future, a continuation of that trail of wickedness and bloodshed which he had set in motion. And so, aroused once again by Joab’s brusque prodding, he concealed his grief that no one would understand, and carried on” (GVG).

2Sa 19:13

MAY GOD DEAL WITH ME, BE IF EVER SO SEVERELY, IF…: See Lesson, Covenant-victim, the.

2Sa 19:20

I HAVE SINNED: There is a radical distinction between natural regret and God-given repentance. The flesh can feel remorse, acknowledge its evil deeds, and be ashamed of itself. However, this sort of disgust with past actions can be quickly shrugged off, and the individual can soon go back to his old wicked ways. None of the marks of true repentance described in 2Co 7:11 are found in his behavior. Out of a list of 11 men in the Bible who said, “I have sinned,” poss only five actually repented. They were David (2Sa 12:13; 24:10; 1Ch 21:8; Psa 41:4), Nehemiah (Neh 1:6), Job (Job 42:5,6), Micah (Mic 7:9), and the prodigal son (Luk 15:18). The other (poss less sincere) instances? Pharaoh in Exo 9:27; 10:16; Balaam in Num 22:34; Achan in Jos 7:20; Saul in 1Sa 15:24,30; 26:21; Shimei in 2Sa 19:20; Judas in Mat 27:4.

2Sa 19:24

MEPHIBOSHETH: The treatment of the name “Baal” is probably an example of deliberate change, for theological reasons, by the scribes who copied out the scriptures. With personal names that included the word “Baal” (which could simply mean “master” or “lord”), the scribes deliberately replaced “Baal” with “Bosheth” (which means “shame”). To them the idol “Baal”, in all his many forms, was a “shameful thing”, and any passing allusion to him was to be avoided if possible. Hence, it is likely that Jonathan’s son was actually named “Meribbaal”, but later scribes made sure that the (by then) hated name of “Baal” was replaced — yielding “Mephibosheth” (cp 1Ch 8:34; 9:40 and 2Sa 9:6; 19:24; 21:7).

HE HAD NOT TAKEN CARE OF HIS FEET OR TRIMMED HIS MUSTACHE OR WASHED HIS CLOTHES…: Signs of mourning. A dangerous course to follow in the city while Absalom was in authority.

2Sa 19:29

I ORDER YOU AND ZIBA TO DIVIDE THE FIELDS: David hereby cancels the concessions given previously to Ziba (2Sa 16:4). and restores Mephibosheth to half-share in income from property (2Sa 9).

2Sa 19:35

Figures of speech: cp Ecc 12:1-7, the song of the aged one.

2 Samuel 20

2Sa 20:1

2Sa 20: The spirit of revolt, rebellion, schism. “Civil war sweeps Israel. David realises that his own failure in regard to Bathsheba had continued to affect his circumstances. The internecine controversy between the tribes gave opportunity for any turbulent spirit to attempt to renew the rebellion of Absalom and multitudes flooded to the standard of revolt. The meanest man may pull down a wall, set fire to a palace, or whisper slander about the King. The remarkable thing is that whilst society realises this, it is ready to lend an ear to every wicked speaker who arises, insisting upon the old and detestable sophism that although the report may not be wholly and literally true, there must be some foundation in it. So the record sets out: [1] Sheba raises the standard of revolt: vv 1,2. [2] David commissions Amasa to crush the rebellion: vv 3-5. [3] Amasa is murdered: vv 8-13. [4] Sheba besieged in Abel: vv 14,15. [5] Fear in the city: vv 16-22. [6] David’s standing restored: vv 23-25. The king’s position was now established beyond doubt. And there is little doubt that, but for Joab, Sheba’s revolt may have been successful. David’s hands were tied in regard to any retaliation against Joab by his own folly in the matter of Uriah” (GEM).

2Sa 20:3

WIDOWS: In this case, “widows” of a living man!

2Sa 20:8

AS HE STEPPED FORWARD, IT DROPPED OUT OF ITS SHEATH: Such a sword, held by girdle in a near-horizontal position (IBD).

2 Samuel 12

2Sa 12:1

2Sa 12: God condemns sinners out of own mouths: Deu 32:6; Job 15:6; Luk 19:22; Rom 3:4; cp 1Ki 20:39-42. “And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah” (Mat 1:16, RSV). Bathsheba should never have been the wife of David. At the resurrection, David will have to face Uriah and acknowledge this.

When I was growing up, “adultery” was a word one whispered. Today the word is “affair”, and it is a subtle yet revealing change. “Affair” has an air of mystery about it, and romance, and excitement. Radio, television, movies, books — all of the media — assume or encourage the affair. It is easy to fall into the trap: everyone is doing it, so it must be okay. Unless, of course, you believe in keeping the laws of God.

For whatever reason, keeping the seventh commandment is becoming more difficult for more and more Christians. In fact, Allan Petersen begins his new book, “The Myth of the Greener Grass”, with a question: “Is Anyone Faithful Anymore?” And it’s a good question. He writes that in his 38 years of traveling ministry he has counseled pastors, pastors’ wives, missionaries, Sunday school teachers, Christian counselors, and church members who reflect the increasing incidence of extramarital affairs among professing Christian people. There is a “tendency to find reasons to support this behavior, even though those reasons might be contrary to the moral and Biblical convictions we have long held.”

Today we want to talk about relationships, not sin. Peterson points out the relationship of David and Bathsheba, and the results of their affair. The lessons we can learn from the story of David, a man of God who fell into sin, apply to all of us, men and women alike. Here are some of the, pointed out by Petersen: (1) No one, however chosen, blessed, and used of God, is immune to an extramarital affair. (2) Anyone, regardless of how many victories he has won, can fall disastrously. (3) The act of infidelity is the result of uncontrolled desires, thoughts, and fantasies. (4) Your body is your servant or it becomes your master. (5) A Christian who falls will excuse, rationalize, and conceal, the same as anyone else. (6) Sin can be enjoyable but it can never be successfully covered. (7) One night of passion can spark years of family pain. (8) Failure is neither fatal nor final.

THE LORD SENT NATHAN TO DAVID: “While we were yet sinners…” (Rom 5:8).

2Sa 12:3

ONE LITTLE EWE LAMB: Young, innocent — while David was older, powerful, charismatic, and idolized. As to the respective guilt of each, we notice that the little ewe lamb did not eat the man! (BS 9:30).

LIKE A DAUGHTER TO HIM: Literally true? Uriah now an older man, who previously had wife and children. Then his wife died, and he married the much younger Bathsheba, who had grown up as a child in his house.

2Sa 12:5

Vv 5,13,14: “Die… not die… will die”, reminiscent of Gen 3.

2Sa 12:6

FOUR TIMES OVER: David lost 4 sons: unnamed child, Amnon, Absalom, Adonijah.

2Sa 12:7

“It was the story of the slaughter of a lamb which exposed the immensity of David’s sin. It is the story of the slaughter of the Lamb of God which exposes the immensity of our sins. Isn’t it amazing that David was so blinded by his own sin that he could not see it? It was by means of the story of the slaughter of a poor man’s pet lamb that David was gripped with the immensity of the sin which was his own. David could see his own sin when he heard the story of what appeared to be the sin of another.

“That is precisely what the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ does for us. We were dead in our trespasses and sins (Eph 2:1-3). We were blinded to the immensity of our sins (2Co 4:4). The coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, his perfect life, his innocent and sacrificial death, his literal and physical resurrection are all historical events.

“But the gospel is also a story, a true story. When we read the New Testament, we read a story that is even more dramatic, more amazing, more disturbing than the story Nathan told David. When we see the way unbelieving men treated our Lord, we should be shocked, horrified, and angered. We should cry out, ‘They deserve to die!’ And that they do. But the Gospel is not written only to show us their sins — those who actually heard Jesus and cried, ‘Crucify him, crucify him” — it is written so that the Spirit of God can cry out in our hearts, ‘Thou art the man!’ When we see the way men treated Jesus, we see the way we would have treated him, if we were there. We see how we treat him today. And that, my friend, reveals the immensity of our sin, and the immensity of our need for repentance and forgiveness” (Deff).

2Sa 12:9

WHY DID YOU DESPISE THE WORD OF THE LORD?: “A man will sometimes say to himself — indeed we have heard it openly suggested — that as David was forgiven his sin, and it is evident that God makes much allowance for human weakness, surely we in these days shall be excused for doing such and such things. These fleshly reasoners fail to perceive that by the very fact of their indulging such reflections they move the transgression of fleshly weakness into the category of deliberate despising of God’s law. If David, previous to his transgression, had deliberately reasoned the matter out and concluded that since God had shown mercy in other cases, it might be worth while to undertake the risk of sinning, we should never have heard of him as an example of rectitude. In all probability he would have been treated with the severity shown to other despisers and wilful transgressors of the law” (ConCon 79).

2Sa 12:13

THEN DAVID SAID TO NATHAN: Quite poss, a gap of time between confrontation/rebuke and repentance. Written immediately after this time: Psa 32; 51.

I HAVE SINNED: “Humble yourselves, therefore, under God’s mighty hand, that he may lift you up in due time” (1Pe 5:6). No excuses, no “passing the buck”, no “playing the blame game”.

There is a radical distinction between natural regret and God-given repentance. The flesh can feel remorse, acknowledge its evil deeds, and be ashamed of itself. However, this sort of disgust with past actions can be quickly shrugged off, and the individual can soon go back to his old wicked ways. None of the marks of true repentance described in 2Co 7:11 are found in his behavior. Out of a list of 11 men in the Bible who said, “I have sinned,” poss only five actually repented. They were David (2Sa 12:13; 24:10; 1Ch 21:8; Psa 41:4), Nehemiah (Neh 1:6), Job (Job 42:5,6), Micah (Mic 7:9), and the prodigal son (Luk 15:18). The other (poss less sincere) instances? Pharaoh in Exo 9:27; 10:16; Balaam in Num 22:34; Achan in Jos 7:20; Saul in 1Sa 15:24,30; 26:21; Shimei in 2Sa 19:20; Judas in Mat 27:4.

NATHAN REPLIED: Perhaps after going to the LORD and receiving a message in reply.

2Sa 12:14

THE SON BORN TO YOU WILL DIE: “When David slept with the woman and created new life, the woman did not belong to him but to Uriah. The child cannot belong to David. He cannot enrich himself through his sin, and in a sense, justice is done to Uriah” (EBC). It appears that Solomon was at least the fourth son born to David and Bathsheba (1Ch 3:5). Which would mean that the first (unnamed) child (poss Shammua?) might well have been 4 or 5 years old when stricken. This might explain even better the sorrow of David at his death. It would certainly demonstrate that true repentance is not a frivolous, simple, “quick and easy” thing — as it might appear to be by a brief, straightforward reading of 2Sa 12.

2Sa 12:16

David sat as a worshiper (2Sa 7:18), lay as a penitent (2Sa 12:16), and stood as a servant (1Ch 28:2).

2Sa 12:18

THE SEVENTH DAY: The 7th day since the birth of the child, or the 7th day since the coming of Nathan? In view of v 14n, surely the second. And the child is simply unnamed in the narrative (for obvious emphasis), and not because it was not yet circumcised.

2Sa 12:23

Vv 23-25: “In an echo of the Day of Atonement [also cp the fasting of vv 16-22] we see two babies, one unnamed, destined to die, and the other, named ‘Peace’, and ‘the delight of the LORD’ [destined] to live. These babies surely represent [both aspects of] David: the old man of the flesh and the new redeemed child of the spirit” (TCN). For the renewal of David’s spirit, see Psa 51:10-12.

2Sa 12:24

HIS WIFE BATHSHEBA: No longer Uriah’s wife; now, David’s wife.

2Sa 12:25

JEDIDIAH: “Beloved of Yahweh”. By this name, typ Christ: cp Psa 45, title. Ref Song of Songs; Deu 33:12; Psa 60:5; 127:2; Jer 11:15 — Christ is the true ‘beloved’ of God, the greater than Solomon (Mat 12:42).

2Sa 12:26

MEANWHILE: This prob happened earlier. “Of his being sent against it, and of his besieging it, we read in 2Sa 11:1; but it can hardly be thought that he had been so long besieging it, as that David had two [or more!: 1Ch 3:5] children by Bathsheba; but the account of the finishing of it is placed here, that the story concerning Bathsheba might lie together without any interruption” (Gill).

2Sa 12:27

Joab knows David’s sin, and his consequent weakness, and he begins now to exploit it.

2Sa 12:31

Not torture, as implied in KJV, but slave labor. Note 1Ki 9:20,21: they did not perish.