Numbers 6

Num 6:1

See Lesson, Nazirite (poem).

The law of the Nazirite gives one the opportunity to emulate the High Priest of Israel for a period of one’s own choosing. Israel was to be a kingdom of priests, a holy nation (Exo 19:6). Typ us (1Pe 2:5,9). So Nazirite vow looked toward future, when the ordinary man could be a priest with God!

Num 6:2

IF A MAN OR WOMAN WANTS TO MAKE A SPECIAL VOW…: The law of The Nazarite is an occasion when either man or woman could dedicate himself or herself to the Lord. This marks an almost unique feature of the Law of Moses. Tabernacle service was a male preserve — at the ordinance of the Lord. However, the Nazarite vow provided women as well as men the opportunity to lead a life of dedication.

Num 6:3

Typ of High Priest, to put difference between holy and unholy (Lev 10:8-11). To think soberly (Phi 1:9,10). Example of Rechabites: Jer 35:5. Poor examples: Isa 28:7; 29:4,13; Amo 2:11,12. God is to be worshiped in spirit and truth (Joh 4:24), not in overwrought emotions.

Num 6:4

…NOT EVEN THE SEEDS OR SKINS: “Nazarites had taken, among other vows, one which debarred them from the use of wine. In order that they might not violate the obligation, they were forbidden to drink the vinegar of wine or strong liquors, and to make the rule still more clear, they were not to touch the unfermented juice of grapes, nor even to eat the fruit either fresh or dried. In order, altogether, to secure the integrity of the vow, they were not even allowed anything that had to do with the vine; they were, in fact, to avoid the appearance of evil.

“Surely this is a lesson to the Lord’s separated ones, teaching them to come away from sin in every form, to avoid not merely its grosser shapes, but even its spirit and similitude. Strict walking is much despised in these days, but… it is both the safest and the happiest. He who yields a point or two to the world is in fearful peril; he who eats the grapes of Sodom will soon drink the wine of Gomorrah. A little crevice in the sea-bank in Holland lets in the sea, and the gap speedily swells till a province is drowned. Worldly conformity, in any degree, is a snare to the soul, and makes it more and more liable to presumptuous sins.

“Moreover, as the Nazarite who drank grape juice could not be quite sure whether it might not have endured a degree of fermentation, and consequently could not be clear in heart that his vow was intact, so the yielding, temporizing Christian cannot wear a conscience void of offence, but must feel that the inward monitor is in doubt of him. Things doubtful we need not doubt about; they are wrong to us. Things tempting we must not dally with, but flee from them with speed. Better be sneered at as a Puritan than be despised as a hypocrite. Careful walking may involve much self-denial, but it has pleasures of its own which are more than a sufficient recompense” (CHS).

Num 6:5

For priests, long hair sym holiness (Lev 21:5,6).

Num 6:6

The High Priest could have no contact with the dead (Lev 21:10). Christ to the young man: “Let dead bury dead” (Mat 8:22). Do not come near “dead works” (Heb 9:14).

Num 6:19

The Nazirite receives the portion ordinarily belonging to the High Priest!

Num 6:24

Vv 24-26: All the “you’s” are singular: The priest blesses individuals, not just the community!

Numbers 7

Num 7:1

Num 7: “When the tabernacle had been constructed and fully set up according to the pattern shown to Moses in the Mount, and when it had been anointed and sanctified with all its instruments and vessels for the service, a circumstance happened that added much grace to the dedication ceremonies of the day.

“The twelve princes of the tribes — heads of the congregation — brought to Moses a present of six covered wagons and twelve strong oxen, to be used in the service of the tabernacle. A more useful present could not in the circumstances be imagined.

“The tabernacle had to be shifted from place to place with the changes of camp while the host was on the march. Though it was a portable structure — capable of being taken to pieces — many of its parts were heavy, such as the sockets for the pillars of the courts, which would weigh about a hundredweight each. The pillars themselves would be heavy pieces of timber, and so also would be the boards of the tabernacle. The golden candlestick also would be heavy, and the table of shewbread with its golden crown and cherubim. The business of carrying them on the journeys would be very laborious.

“The princes had evidently consulted together on the matter, and had agreed jointly to make a present of the wagons to lighten the work.

“But would the present be accepted in connection with a work wholly divine? The princes may have had their doubts on this, and Moses himself may not have been clear. Whatever uncertainty may have existed was dispelled by the direction that Moses received when the princes brought their offering before the tabernacle. We read (v 89) that ‘when Moses was gone into the tabernacle of the congregation, he heard the voice of one speaking unto him from off the mercy seat that was upon the ark of the testimony from between the two cherubim.’ The message as to the wagons was this: ‘Take the offering of the princes, that they may be to do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation.’ [Num 7:5] Not only so, but Moses was told exactly what disposal to make of them. ‘Give them unto the Levites, to every man according to his service.’ It will be remembered that to the Levites, under the superintendence of Aaron, was assigned the work of packing up and carrying the various parts of the tabernacle while on the march and to each particular family was allotted particular parts: to the sons of Kohath, the holy vessels and furniture of the tabernacle; to the sons of Gershon, all the curtains and hangings and pins and cords; to the sons of Merari, all the boards, bars, pillars, and sockets. The distribution of the wagons was according to these services: four wagons and eight oxen were given to the sons of Merari, who had to see after all the heavy parts: two wagons and four oxen were given to the sons of Gershon, who had to carry the curtains and hangings, which must have been of some bulk to enclose a court 150 feet by 75. To the sons of Kohath, none were given, ‘because the service of the sanctuary belonging to them was that they should bear on their shoulders’ — that is, the ark, the incense altar, the table of shewbread, etc.

“Two things strike us in connection with the whole episode. God accepts co-operation in forms He has not prescribed if they are in subservient harmony with His requirements. The twelve princes were in submission to Moses and in subjection to the tabernacle and the whole law connected with it. The object of their voluntary gift was to help and further a divine work appointed. Had they brought the materials for a second tabernacle, or a second camp, we cannot but suppose that the offering would not only not have been accepted, but would have been spurned as an act of presumption, like Nadab’s and Abihu’s offering of strange fire. But being in no rivalry to the divine work, but conceived in the spirit of helpfulness and being a wise measure, God approved and accepted it.

“We see the same feature in the case of Jethro’s recommendation to Moses that he should delegate his authority in small matters to subordinate officers. God approved of the suggestion of Jethro, and it became a commandment to Moses to do as Jethro had suggested (Exo 18:13-26; De. 1:9-18). From this we may draw the useful conclusion that the arrangements we are obliged to make in this latter day in the absence of divine direction, will receive the divine sanction and favour provided they are made in the sincere spirit of desiring to help the Lord’s work, and are in harmony with the requirements of that work as specified in the word of Jesus and the apostles. The use of the printing press and the holding of meetings for lectures are of this nature. We may hope presently to hear that the Lord approves of them as a doing of our best in an age when His purpose requires that He should be silent” (LM 307-309).

Num 7:12

The order of service: V 12: 1st day: Judah V 18: 2nd day: Issachar V 24: 3rd day: Zebulun V 30: 4th day: Reuben V 36: 5th day: Simeon V 42: 6th day: Gad V 48: 7th day: Ephraim V 54: 8th day: Manasseh V 60: 9th day: Benjamin V 66: 10th day: Dan V 72: 11th day: Asher V 78: 12th day: Napthali

Leviticus 26

Lev 26:10

Such great blessings that one’s barns are still half full of previous year’s crop while current year is being harvested. Cp Mat 13:52: spiritual blessings both old and new!

Lev 26:11

Vv 11,12: There is a way for God not only to overlook our sinfulness, but also to dwell amongst us. This He can and will do in Jesus: all of the Law brings us to Jesus in some way (Gal 3:24). Jesus is the “place” where God has chosen to put His name [Deu 14:23; 16:2; 26:2). In Jesus, we also share this honor, and God, as he has promised right through scripture, will dwell with us.

Lev 26:41

Vv 41,42: “Lev 26 comprises the Levitical covenant. It sets forth the terms by which tenancy of the Land might be retained (vv 3,4,6,9), warns of the consequences of disobedience, and concludes by promising a full restoration of the people and nation to the Land on the basis of the covenant made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

“This statement of the Law, this Levitical covenant, forms the basis of all the prophecies of the Old Testament relating to the restoration of the people and nation of Israel. Yahweh’s promise to the repentant (vv 41,42) implies that they are not pardoned merely on the ground of their repentance, though it is set forth as the condition of their acceptance. The basis of the promise of restoration is the covenant made to Abraham. The Mosaic covenant still indicts Israelites today (Gal 3:10), but the Abrahamic covenant will rescue them and restore them (Gal 3:5-7; Jer 31:31-34” (Expos).

Leviticus 27

Lev 27:10

HE MUST NOT EXCHANGE IT OR SUBSTITUTE A GOOD ONE FOR A BAD ONE, OR A BAD ONE FOR A GOOD ONE: That the vow should not be altered is caught in the language of Ecc 5:4,5: “When you make a vow to God, do not delay in fulfilling it. He has no pleasure in fools; fulfill your vow. It is better not to vow than to make a vow and not fulfill it.” The vows of the field and its increase is a very practical way in which the Israelite could give to his God. The priests had no “inheritance”, except the service of God. They lived upon the service the others gave the tabernacle and temple. The extent to which Israel were not willing to make vows affected the wellbeing of the priesthood. This has its counterpart in our lives today. We can dedicate ourselves to our God in service to our brethren and sisters. The extent to which we do this affects the wellbeing of our brethren and sisters.

Lev 27:30

A TITHE OF EVERYTHING FROM THE LAND… BELONGS TO THE LORD; IT IS HOLY TO THE LORD: Originally, the fathers gave tithes voluntarily (Gen 14:20; Heb 7:4). Under the Law of Moses, tithing was compulsory, but in Christ it should be treated as it was by Abraham and Jacob (Gen 14:20; 28:22), and probably by others. Using an analogy from the Law — about not muzzling the ox who treads out the grain — Paul encourages giving to support and aid preachers of the gospel in their work (1Co 9). And again he writes, “Anyone who receives instruction in the word must share all good things with his instructor” (Gal 6:6). But nowhere in the NT is tithing commanded.

Numbers Overview

Author: Moses (date of writing: c 1440-1400 BC).

Period: c 1440-1400 BC.

Title: The English title is taken from the Latin translation (Numeri) of the Greek word Arithmoi, the title given to this book in the Septuagint. The traditional Hebrew title, “be-midbar” (“In the wilderness…”), is taken from the opening phrase of the book.

Summary: Numbers is the fourth book of the Pentateuch. It is a historical book, and its Greek and Latin names reflect the fact that two censuses of the Israelites are recorded in Numbers. The Hebrew title more closely reflects the contents of the book, which primarily tells of the rebellion of the Israelites in the wilderness after the exodus from their bondage in Egypt. Because of this rebellion, only two of the adults leaving Egypt were to enter into the promised land of Canaan. The book covers a thirty-eight-year period.

If the book were considered only as a historical record of the wanderings, then much of its message would be missed. One major theme throughout: God’s character is demonstrated in His dealings with His people — for example, His complete holiness in the incident of Moses smiting of the Rock to produce water (Num 20:7-13), and His righteous jealousy in Num 25:1-13. His justice can be seen in the establishment of the covenant of peace with Phinehas. His faithfulness is shown in Num 23:19. He established a covenant with Israel, and the events of this book show His faithfulness to that covenant even in the face of adversity from His people.

Numbers has the first of many instances when God’s people choose to ignore Him and to worship other “gods”. This reveals that God will punish wrongdoing but be merciful to those who seek to follow His laws. In Num 16:1-50, God punished the rebellion of Korah, Dathan and Abiram, but accepted Moses’ atoning intervention.

Numbers shows that God has established high standards, and He expects His people to maintain them. At the same time He is just and merciful, and He is faithful to His covenant. He continually dwelt with His people during their wilderness wanderings. The declaration made in Exo 29:45-46 is repeated in Num 35:34 — God dwells with His people. He leads them (Num 9:15-23) and He delivers them from adversity (Num 21:1-54). It is only proper that He expects faithfulness in return.

Num 1:1 — 10:10 Practical instructions for the wilderness journey. * 1:1-54 The census * 2:1-34 Positions of tribes during the journey * 3:1 — 4:49 Duties of the priests * 5:1 — 7:89 Various offerings * 8:1-26 Consecration of the Levites * 9:1 — 10:10 The Passover and God’s guidance

Num 10:11 — 12:16 From Sinai to Paran * 10:11-36 Moving camp * 11:1-35 The people complain * 12:1-16 Miriam and Aaron

Num 13:1 — 20:13 At Kadesh * 13:1-33 Spying out the land of Canaan * 14:1-45 God’s displeasure * 15:1-41 Various laws * 16:1-50 Korah, Dathan and Abiram * 17:1-13 Aaron’s rod * 18:1 — 19:22 Duties of the priests, and various laws * 20:1-13 Moses’ error

Num 20:14 — 22:1 From Kadesh to Moab * 20:14-21 King of Edom * 20:22-29 Death of Aaron * 21:1 — 22:1 Opposition to Israel

Num 22:2 — 32:42 The Plains of Moab * 22:2 — 24:25 Balak and Balaam * 25:1-18 Punishment for sin * 26:1-65 Another census * 27:1-11 Further laws * 27:12-23 Joshua — Moses’ successor * 28:1 — 30:16 Further laws * 31:1-54 War against the Midianites * 32:1-42 Some settlement

Num 33:1 — 36:13 Sundry Matters * 33:1-56 Summary of journeys * 34:1-29 Settlement in the land * 35:1-24 Cities of refuge * 36:1-13 Concerning inheritance within the tribes of Israel

Leviticus 23

Lev 23:1

Lev 23: “The walk of fellowship… relates to the essential festivals that the Israelites were called upon to observe… The festivals are defined as ‘set times’ appointed by Yahweh. At those times Israel ‘met’ with God in the various particulars in which He was revealed to the people.

“In addition, the festivals of Lev 23 set forth the purpose of Yahweh as a prophecy foreshadowing developments to be revealed at the ‘set times’ as He appoints, as follows: (1) The Sabbath [v 3] — with its typical week — emphasizes the purpose of Yahweh to be consummated at the millennium, the seventh from creation (see Exo 20:11). (2) The Passover [vv 5-8; Exo 12:16] speaks of separation, deliverance, and redemption: the means whereby the millennium can be attained. It is fulfilled in ‘Christ our Passover’. (3) The Feast of weeks [Num 28:26] commemorates the giving of the Law (Exo 19:1). The antitype of this was the preaching at Pentecost. (4) The Day of Atonement [v 27; Num 29:7] provides the means of forgiveness when the law was broken, suggesting the Judgment Seat of Christ. (5) The Feast of Tabernacles [vv 35,36] introduces the harvest rejoicing, as typical of the ingathering of all the redeemed in the future.

“It is important to notice that the festivals foreshadow the divinely directed steps towards salvation. First there is separation, then acknowledgment of the requirements of law, and obedience, the covering provided on the national day of judgment, and finally rejoicing at the ingathering of the harvest, anticipating the final joy of the future” (Expos).

Lev 23:2

SACRED ASSEMBLIES: The AV has, most expressively, “holy convocations”. These were meetings of a religious character as distinguished from “congregations”, which were more general, dealing with political and legal matters.

Lev 23:11

THE DAY AFTER THE SABBATH: Not the day following the weekly sabbath of the Passover week, but the day following the great feast day, no matter what day of week it fell on. Thus the day after sabbath = 16th Nisan (Temple 257). Cp vv 24,32,39. 16th Abib = day of Christ’s resurrection (John 20:17).

This is fitting, in that Jesus was the “firstfruits” (cp 1Co 15:23), and through him, we also are to be “a kind of firstfruits” (Jam 1:18).

Lev 23:15

Vv 15-22: 3rd Holy convocation. Called “feast of weeks” (Exo 34:22), “feast of harvest” (Exo 23:16), day of firstfruits (Num 28:26), and Pentecost (in NT).

Lev 23:17

TWO LOAVES: Jews and Gentiles, both to be finally admitted to the covenant — through the preaching of the gospel.

YEAST: Corruption; sin: a humble recognition of sinfulness. Also, Lev 7:13. Christ came in flesh of sin.

Lev 23:23

Vv 23-25: Fourth holy convocation: Feast of trumpets.

Lev 23:24

SEVENTH MONTH… TRUMPET BLASTS: Cp the 7th trumpet of Rev: “the finishing of the mystery of God” (Rev 10:7). “The dead shall be raised” (1Co 15:52; 1Th 4:13-17).

Lev 23:26

Vv 26-32: 5th holy convocation: Day of atonement; 10th day of 7th month. The day of judgment, when each man afflicts his own soul: Rom 14:10; Heb 9:24-28.

Lev 23:27

THE TENTH DAY OF THIS SEVENTH MONTH: This, the only day of the year when regular daily temple sacrifices were suspended (Ber 66:207; Lev 16:17). The High Priest alone went about his special duties in the Holy Place.

“A strict fast was commanded, a solemn affliction of soul in which all have to take part. Even strangers who happen to be in Israel at the time are required to conform… Could there be anything else akin to this experience? Men often feel a nervous tension when they have to enter the presence of a human king. At such a time they would not forget any of the instruction they have received from courtiers. Yet with amazing perverseness they may be free from all such strain when they approach God. They are quite at ease so long as there is nothing seen or heard to arouse fear. They may address the Creator with thoughts only half in attendance and with a ready forgetfulness of heaven’s etiquette. They even resent and resist the most reasonable claim that God will be honoured and sanctified in those who approach Him. It seems that only drastic judgements can teach men this elementary lesson. Aaron had suffered in this matter, through the death of his sons [Lev 10], and he will not forget” (IC, Tes 73:11,12).

Lev 23:29

See Zec 12:10.

Lev 23:30

Vv 30-43: 6th and 7th of 7 holy convocations: 1st day of Feast of Tabernacles (15th day of 7th month) and 1st day after end of Feast (22nd day).

Lev 23:32

A SABBATH OF REST: “Sabbath of sabbath”, a great sabbath.

Lev 23:34

See Zec 8:20-23; 14:16.

Lev 23:36

THE CLOSING ASSEMBLY: The final day of the cycle. On the very last “final day” Jesus stood up at said: “If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink” (Joh 7:37). A true new beginning!

Leviticus 24

Lev 24:4

TENDED CONTINUALLY: As “priests” of God, we tend our “lamps” by daily study and meditation on the word of God, which is OUR lamp and light: “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light for my path” (Psa 119:105).

“Is it not the essential condition of even human friendship that enlightenment should be a thing of normal habit? But enlightenment is not native: darkness is. Enlightenment to be attained or retained must be kindled by external appliance, and there must be renewal. Light the lamp and leave it, and it will become dark again. It is so on all subjects, especially the knowledge of God, for which the mind has the least affinity. Dress the lamps every morning. Read the Bible every day. This will keep you supplied with oil that will cause light. ‘Thy word is light’: it is the light. ‘Thy word is truth’: it is the truth. Any other truth is darkness for the highest purpose of life, as all men will feel when suddenly confronted with the glory of God at the coming of Christ. Knowledge of mines: knowledge of metals: knowledge of countries: knowledge of languages or of physical elements — is all very well in its place: it is the knowledge of God and His ways and His intentions and His will that constitutes the true light of life” (LM 192).

In Christ’s parable, the foolish virgins did not tend their individual lamps as they should, so that they ran out of oil. When the Bridegroom arrived, they were not prepared to go forth and meet him; sadly, they found the door shut in their faces (Mat 25:3,8,9).

Lev 24:5

CAKES: From Heb “kawlan” = puncture, wound. Cp Isa 53:5-7. Christ is the “bread” (Joh 6:33,48-51), punctured/wounded!

Lev 24:7

ALONG EACH ROW PUT SOME PURE INCENSE: The memorial bread is associated, not for the first time (cp Lev 2:2) with frankincense — the symbol of Jesus’ priesthood — for he is our high priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.

Lev 24:8

THIS BREAD IS TO BE SET OUT BEFORE THE LORD REGULARLY: Setting “in order” is a significant thing in the service of God: Gen 22:9; Exo 26:17; 39:37; 40:4,23; Lev 1:7,8,12; 6:12; 24:8; 1Ki 18:33; 2Ki 20:1; 2Ch 13:11; 29:35; Eze 41:6; Acts 18:23; 1Co 11:34; 14:40; Tit 1:5.

SABBATH AFTER SABBATH… AS A LASTING COVENANT: Thus there was to be continual remembrance every Sabbath — this was an everlasting covenant. The bread, fresh each week, and the incense of the High Priest, point to the great High Priest who took bread and said, “This is my body”, and who then laid down his life to fulfill the everlasting covenant. We remember this every first day, each week, with bread!

Lev 24:10

Vv 10,11: This event seems to be out of place and unrelated to the details of the purity of the Law, but it is not. It shows an example of how purity and holiness were not manifest in the daily lives of the people of Israel. The son was born of two “unequally yoked”. The tension between the origins of the two men is clearly seen, and results in physical violence. This led to his blasphemy of the Most Holy God.

Lev 24:12

THEY PUT HIM IN CUSTODY UNTIL THE WILL OF THE LORD SHOULD BE MADE CLEAR TO THEM: This demonstrates that the Law of Moses did not have an immediate answer to every situation.

Lev 24:14

Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven (Mat 12:31).

See Lesson, Laying on of hands.

Leviticus 25

Lev 25:5

No pruning in the 7th yr. No trials in 7th period of 1,000 years? A vine, separated and left to itself, not pruned by human hands, brings forth fruit to the glory of God!

Lev 25:9

National day of atonement marks the beginning of the Jubilee year. Christ is our “atonement” by which we are declared free.

HAVE THE TRUMPET SOUNDED: The year of jubilee and release are typical of the day of the resurrection: “For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed” (1Co 15:52).

Lev 25:10

PROCLAIM LIBERTY THROUGHOUT THE LAND TO ALL ITS INHABITANTS: Inscribed on the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia. Will Israel return to her land in a Jubilee year?

Jesus proclaims himself as the means of achieving liberty for his people (Isa 61:1); this work will have its completion at the resurrection — cp 1Pe 3:19.

Lev 25:23

Vv 23-27: The Land belongs to God, and individual Israelites never really owned it, though God Himself gave them the exclusive right to it so long as they kept the law. If a man fell into debt, and had to mortgage the land which he had inherited, it became the duty of the nearest of kin to purchase it, so as to retain possession of it in the family. On the year of Jubilee, however, the land which had passed out of the hands of the inheritor was, by divine decree, caused to revert back to him. In that sense the property was treated as being redeemed by God Himself (Lev 25:9,10). In the interim, it was the responsibility of the kinsman (Heb “gaal”) to act on behalf of God.

How will this portion of the Law of Moses be fulfilled? In the broadest sense, the Land of Promise may be seen to have passed into the hands of strangers when Israel was taken into captivity. But this same Land will be redeemed by Christ the true “Gaal” (near-kinsman and redeemer) — the Son in whom the Father has been manifested (Psa 74:2; Isa 52:9) — when he returns to this earth to claim his inheritance.

Lev 25:47

Vv 47-53: If an Israelite, through poverty or any other reason, were sold into slavery to a stranger, it was the duty of the Gaal to redeem him, and thus restore him to freedom (Lev 25:47-53).

(NT) Through sin, man finds himself in bondage to the law of sin and death (Rom 7:3; 8:2), and utterly unable to redeem himself (Psa 49:7,8). But God, the Gaal of Israel, having manifested Himself in flesh in the person of the Lord Jesus Christ, assumes the position of near kinsman, and so the price of redemption is paid (1Pe 1:18,19; 1Co 6:20; 7:23).

Leviticus 16

Lev 16:1

Lev 16: Outline of events on the Day of Atonement: The day would seem to begin as usual with the offering of the morning sacrifice, the burnt offering of a one-year-old lamb (Exo 29:38-42; Num 28:3-6). After these duties were performed, the High Priest would commence the ceremonies of the Day of Atonement, as prescribed in Lev 16:

  • Aaron was to take off his normal priestly garments, wash, and then put on the special garments which were prescribed for the sacrifices which took him into the holy of holies (v 4; cf Exo 28; 39).
  • Aaron secured the necessary sacrificial animals: a bull for his own sin offering and two male goats for the people’s sin offering; two rams, one for Aaron’s and the other for the people’s burnt offering (vv 3,5).
  • Aaron slaughtered the bull for his own sin offering (vv 6,11).
  • Before entering into the Holy of Holies with the blood of the bull, Aaron had to create a “cloud” of incense in the Holy of Holies, covering the mercy seat, to “veil” the glory of God so that he could enter in (vv 12,13). In the case of Aaron, he was to offer only the prescribed incense so as to create an obscuring veil of smoke, thus dimming the glory of God’s presence and sparing his life.
  • Aaron then took some of the blood of the bull and sprinkled it on the mercy seat seven times (v 14).
  • Lots were then cast for the two goats, to determine which would be slaughtered and which would be driven away (vv 7,8).
  • The goat for slaughter, the goat of the people’s sin offering, was sacrificed, and its blood was taken into the Holy of Holies and applied to the mercy seat, as the bull’s blood had been (v 15).
  • Cleansing was then made for the holy place (v 16), seemingly by the sprinkling of the blood of both the bull and the goat. The atonement of the holy place is done alone, without anyone present to help, or to watch (v 17).
  • Next, outside the tent, Aaron was to make atonement for the altar of burnt offering, using, it would seem, the blood of both the bull and the goat (vv 18,19).
  • Now the second goat, the one which was kept alive, had the sins of the nation symbolically laid on its head, and was driven from the camp to a desolate place, from which it must never return (vv 20-22).
  • Aaron then came out of the tent of meeting, removed his linen garments, washed, and put on his normal priestly garments (vv 23,24).
  • The burnt offerings of rams, one for Aaron and his family and the other for the people, was now offered (v 24).
  • The earlier sacrifices of the bull and the goat were completed. The fat of the sin offering was burned on the altar (v 25), and the remains of the bull and the goat were taken outside the camp, where they were burned (v 27).
  • Those who had been rendered unclean by handling the animals on which the sins of Aaron or the people were laid were to wash themselves and then return to camp (vv 26,28).

Historical basis for Day of Atonement: Commemoration of Adam’s rejection from Garden.

  • Man sins, is thrust out (into wilderness) = scapegoat;
  • An offering made for sin (Gen 3:21) = sacrificial goat;
  • Cherubim guard way to tree of life (Gen 3:24) = cherubim on curtains, and surrounding altar of Most Holy;
  • High Priest Adam is thrust out of Eden = Temple; then the High Priest returns into Most Holy;
  • Gen 4: Abel offers a proper (blood) sacrifice, but Cain offers of his crops — Day of Atonement is in 7th month; thus crops would be ripe (BS 10:139).

Lev 16:2

TELL YOUR BROTHER AARON NOT TO COME WHENEVER HE CHOOSES INTO THE MOST HOLY PLACE…: “It can be assumed by the phrase ‘at all times’ [KJV] that up until the time of Nadab and Abihu’s sin of offering strange fire, the high priest would have had access continually to the Most Holy Place. In place of this continual access, the Day of Atonement was instituted where the priests only had access one day per year to the Holiest of Holies.

“It appears from Lev 9; 10… that this consuming fire came on the VERY FIRST DAY of Nadab and Abihu’s ministration before the Lord… Their very first day on the job, so to speak, found them terminated in the most literal and tragic way thus barring this priestly order from continual Most Holy access.

“It is highly symbolic that the Aaronic priesthood was not originally barred from continual access to the Most Holy. It was on account of sin that this way was thwarted. For a system whose primary objective was to demonstrate the sinfulness and inevitability of sin, there could not be a more fitting start. The flesh and its results are clearly and dramatically demonstrated… The writer to the Hebrews makes several points which are even more poignant with this bit of additional information: (1) The priesthood of Christ was not limited by sin. ‘For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin. Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need’ [Heb 4:15,16]. Jesus, in living a sinless life, reopened the way that had been closed by sin. The barrier erected by man’s sin in the Garden to their God was confirmed in the fleshly priesthood of Aaron, but opened by the blood of Jesus Christ. Aaron’s sons died because of sin thus barring access to God while Jesus died without sin thus opening the way to God.

“While the sin of Nadab and Abihu closed off access to the Most Holy Place except once a year on the Day of Atonement, Jesus entered once and stayed forever. ‘For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us’ (Heb 9:24). We need not wait to approach unto God as did the men of Israel, but can access God through our High Priest whenever we pray in his name” (KT).

BECAUSE I APPEAR IN THE CLOUD: God dwelt in the cloud, as He did in Christ: Col 2:9.

Lev 16:8

SCAPEGOAT: Heb “azazel”. “The meaning of the Heb term (which occurs four times in the OT, all of them in this chapter: vv 8,10,10,26) is much debated. There are three major views: (1) Some derive the term from a combination of the Heb words ‘goat’ and ‘go away’ meaning ‘the goat that departs’ or ‘scapegoat’. This meaning suits the ritual practice of sending the so-called scapegoat away into the wilderness (vv 10, 21,22, 26). Similarly, some derive the term from an Arabic word meaning ‘remove’ (BDB 736). (2) Some see the term as a description of the wilderness area to which the goat was dispatched. (3) The most common view among scholars today [which is plainly false, but interesting nonetheless as an indication of how false ideas develop and proliferate: GB] is that it is the proper name of a particular demon (perhaps even the Devil himself) associated with the wilderness desert regions. Levine has proposed that it may mean ‘mighty goat’. He suggests that a possible connection with the ‘goat-demons’ of the desert in Lev 17:7 (cf Isa 13:21, etc), should not be ignored in the derivation of Azazel, although the term ultimately became the name of ‘the demonic ruler of the wilderness’… Perhaps a play on words between the proper name and the term for ‘goat’ has occurred so that the etymology has become obscure” (NET notes).

Lev 16:11

Vv 11,12: “As God instituted the ceremony associated with the Day of Atonement based on this tragic event, it would be impossible every year as Aaron performed it not to recall the awful scene of that first day. Imagine a holy festival consecrated as a result of your children’s death. Much of the ceremony itself would be a painful reminder of the death of his two sons as well as the sin which brought it about on that fateful day.

“As the Law required… Aaron would have to take into his hand a censer exactly like (or possibly the same one!) as his two sons had in their hands when they were struck dead by God for offering ‘strange fire’. Aaron would probably have little difficulty summoning up the humility required to first offer a sin offering for himself as required on that day knowing that he was about to carry fire before the Lord. He definitely would not enter in casually. There is a tremendous lesson for us in this.

“As he laid his hands upon the bull, would he recall the Golden Calf that he had so foolishly produced in the wilderness of Sinai? Would he recall his failings as a father — to produce two sons who more than likely were drunk of this first day of their priesthood (Lev 10:9)? As they lead the scapegoat out of the camp, would he be reminded of the bodies of his sons who were carried outside of the camp (Lev 10:5)?

“How would God react to this event? Here was a man appearing before him grieving for the loss of his sons as a result of sin. Surely God would want to tell Aaron, ‘You know, Aaron, I have killed your sons because of their sin. But one day in the distant future your sons are going to kill my son. The big difference is going to be that he won’t deserve to die.’

“So we have two fathers grieving over sin, the loss of their sons as the blood flowed freely and plentifully.

“The only incident more dramatic than this scene was when the shadow became reality several thousand years later on a hill outside of Jerusalem called Golgotha” (KT).

TO MAKE ATONEMENT FOR HIMSELF: High Priest first offers for self, then for sins of people: v 15. “This is why he has to offer sacrifices for his own sins, as well as for the sins of the people” (Heb 5:3). “He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal redemption” (Heb 9:12).

Lev 16:12

The censer would be suspended on his wrist.

Lev 16:13

SO THAT HE WILL NOT DIE: The cloud formed by the incense protects the High Priest from God’s holy presence. Acceptable preparation and prayer are our only protection when we venture into God’s presence. “I have blotted out, as a thick cloud, thy transgressions” (Isa 44:22).

Lev 16:17

NO ONE…: The High Priest (repr Christ) is the only mediator.

Lev 16:21

IN THE CARE OF A MAN APPOINTED FOR THE TASK: Cp Simon from Cyrene, with the cross (Luk 23:26).

Lev 16:31

SABBATH OF REST: Lit, “sabbath of sabbaths”, or great sabbath.

Lev 16:33

AND ALL THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMUNITY: The congregation awaited the High Priest’s reappearance from the Most Holy: Heb 9:28; Col 3:1-4.

Leviticus 17

Lev 17:7

GOAT IDOLS: “Seirim” = he goats (Egyptian idols — cp “Pan”); hence the “idols” of Act 15:29. (Translated “devils” in KJV; “demons” in NIV mg.) Cp mythical devil with tail, horns, and cloven hooves. (Tes 54:305).

Lev 17:8

ANY ALIEN LIVING AMONG THEM: These laws (Lev 17,18) were esp for “strangers” (Lev 17:8,10; 18:26). To these laws the Jerusalem elders referred concerning Gentile converts: the 4 things prohibited (Act 15:29).

Lev 17:10

WHO EATS ANY BLOOD: Flesh = mortality, to be eaten under Law. But blood = life, only through new covenant in Christ.

Also, the eating of blood was part of the worship of various idols or “demons” (cp v 7).

Lev 17:11

THE LIFE… IS IN THE BLOOD: See Blood, Blood. Cp Lev 3:17; 7:26,27; 17:14; Deu 12:23.

Everything about this blood — ie, the blood of the sacrifices — is positive: (a) it represented the life of the flesh; (b) it was given by God; (c) it went upon the altar; and (d) it made atonement. By contrast, the blood from non-sacrificial animals is spoken of altogether negatively (vv 13,14): (a) it was the life of ALL flesh (as opposed to life of THE flesh); (b) it was hunted or caught, as opposed to being “given” by God; and (c) it was to be covered with dust (not put on the altar).

This blood (vv 13,14) represented the will of man, obtained by his own cunning, and thus it was useless in God’s sight. The blood of the sacrificial animal, though, pointed forward to the ultimate provision by God, of blood that would reconcile.

Lev 17:12

If the sacrificial blood was positively presented (v 11), as opposed to the blood of non-sacrificial animals (vv 13,14), then WHY couldn’t it be eaten? Because God was teaching that it is not possible for the blood of bulls and of goats to take away sins (Heb 10:4). BUT there would come a time when a sacrifice would be provided which could take away sins. It would be the “Word made flesh”; it would be “given” by God; it would provide atonement; and when it came, ALL flesh would be invited to drink of that blood.

The children of Israel were not to eat even the sacrificial blood in anticipation of the blood that one day would be provided, which they would be able to eat. And so the Lord stood up, and proclaimed: “Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life… For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him” (John 6:54-56).

And the Jews’ response was: “No! Everyone knows the Law says we can’t drink blood!” But the whole point of Lev 17 was: “No, you shouldn’t NOW… but one day you will be able!” They missed the opportunity. An example of the Jews missing the point of their own law.

Lev 17:15

DEAD OR TORN BY WILD ANIMALS: “Such flesh could not prefigure the sinless lamb of God laying down his own life in obedience to the Father” (LM 270).