Neh, overview

Author: Nehemiah.

Time: 445 – 432 BC.

Summary: The book begins with Nehemiah returning from Babylon as Governor of Jerusalem. He plans and oversees the rebuilding of the city wall despite discouraging opposition and disunity within the Jewish population. The wall is completed and more exiles are returned and registered as Jewish citizens. Nehemiah’s dedication to God drives him to make several religious reforms including a public reading of the Law and arrangements for worship.

Time of writing: The mention of Darius the Persian (Neh 12:22) probably refers to Darius II, the successor of Artaxerxes I (Longimanus). Darius ruled from 423-404 BC. Therefore Nehemiah must have written the book sometime after that reign began. Since there are no references to Nehemiah’s age in the text, it is hard to estimate how long he may have lived. When the book opens, he was second in command under King Artaxerxes. If he was 40 years old then and 41 when he reached Jerusalem in 444 BC, he would have been 62 years old in 423 BC when Darius replaced Artaxerxes. Consequently he probably wrote the book not long after 423 BC, most likely before 400 BC.

Key verse: “So we rebuilt the wall till all of it reached half its height, for the people worked with all their heart” (Neh 4:6).

Outline

1. Nehemiah’s arrival in Jerusalem: Neh 1:1 – 2:20
a) Tragic news from Jerusalem, and Nehemiah’s prayer: Neh 1:1-11
b) The granting of Nehemiah’s request: Neh 2:1-8
c) Nehemiah’s survey of the walls, and his report: Neh 2:9-20
2. The building of the wall: Neh 3:1 – 7:4
a) The workmen and their tasks: Neh 3:1-32
b) The opposition of enemies: Neh 4:1-23
c) Reforms of Nehemiah as governor: Neh 5:1-19
d) The wall finished despite opposition: Neh 6:1-7:3
3. List of exiles: Neh 7:4-73a
4. Ezra’s preaching and reforms: Neh 7:73b — 10:39
a) The reading and observance of God’s Law: Neh 7:73b – 8:18
b) A public confession and covenant: Neh 9:1-10:39
5. Lists of inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem: Neh 11:1-12:26
a) New residents of Jerusalem: Neh 11:1-24
b) New residents of Judah: Neh 11:25-36
c) List of priests and Levites: Neh 12:1-26
6. Dedication of walls and organization of temple services: Neh 12:27-47
7. Nehemiah’s second administration: Neh 13:1-31
a) Abuses during his absence: Neh 13:1-5
b) Nehemiah’s return to Jerusalem: Neh 13:6-9
c) Reorganization and reforms: Neh 13:10-31

Neh: “Rise up and build”

Many lessons of a very practical nature might be gleaned from the inspired diary of “the king’s cupbearer” (Neh 1:11). For the present purposes, however, we shall concentrate on the qualities of character that constituted Nehemiah “a wise masterbuilder” (1Co 3:10) and give us guidelines to do likewise.

Having learned from his brother Hanani (Neh 1:2) that the wall of Jerusalem was broken down and the gates burned (v 3), Nehemiah pleaded with Artaxerxes for permission to travel to the land of his fathers to promote a reconstruction program (Neh 2:1-8). After a long and rigorous journey he finally arrived at Jerusalem; within only three days, ever the tireless worker, he was up and about on an inspection tour of the city and its fortifications. Nehemiah found many adversaries ready to hinder the work (v 10), while very few were willing to help in the building.

After viewing the desolations, he called the nobles and the priests together and explained his purpose, and how the king had supported him. They were so impressed that their response was immediate, concerted, and sincere — “Let us rise up and build” (Neh 2:18). The work was well-organized by Nehemiah, and construction began without delay.

But it did not go perfectly; the characters of Nehemiah and his brethren, like ours, must be tempered by adversity and hardship. There was opposition from the neighboring Samaritans and Gentiles, who used both guile and physical threats in an attempt to intimidate Nehemiah and impede his work. Most troublesome yet, there were internal dissensions: the Tekoite nobles would not “put their necks to the work” (Neh 3:5), and the men of Judah were prophets of pessimism (Neh 4:10). But Nehemiah did not despair, or lose hope; he maintained his impressive example and cheerful disposition at all times. It was characteristic of this man (and typical of Christ!) that he prayed for the forgiveness of the sins of the people as though they were his sins too! “We have sinned”, said he, and he was willing to share in the guilt of his nation, his “ecclesia” (Neh 1:6,7). The knowledge of the sins of his brethren did not discourage him, nor impel him to disassociate himself from the work, but only to redouble his efforts to bring the nation to repentance and finish their task. His enthusiasm was infectious, and the great work of repairing the wall was completed in only 52 days (Neh 6:15), “for the people had a mind to work” (Neh 4:6).

” ‘The people had a mind to work.’ When that is condensed into one word, it spells cooperation. The same idea was expressed by the apostles in such terms as ‘one mind’, ‘like-minded’, and ‘with one accord’. This thought should impress us deeply, because it is the only way possible for an ecclesia to succeed.

“If we do not work together, our love will grow cold; bitterness and evil speaking will be generated, and if this is augmented by the continual agitation of some crotchet which has been developed by our desire to have our own way, the foundations of our ecclesia will disintegrate and the whole structure will collapse. We must be on our guard at all times, and examine our purpose and motives….” (GAG, “The People Had a Mind to Work”, Ber 59:354).

Neh 3 enumerates 44 teams who begin work on the wall. Each team is assigned its own portion to build. Did some complain about the quality of their brethren’s work at other stations? Did others grumble because they could not be everywhere and do everything and supervise? Did some sit down and refuse to help?: ‘We just are not sure that we can approve of all the details of this operation.’ In the divine retrospect on the work of Nehemiah, all such petty hindrances and worries are put to one side. “Let us rise up and build” was the mandate; this call to the men of the city did not admit of any paltry quibbles. The work was too great to let personalities and prejudices and pride stand in the way.

It is the same with us as we strive to fortify God’s “city” today. There may be fears without, fightings within; but each brother, each individual ecclesia has pressing responsibilities near to home. Each of us has his portion of the “wall” to build, and no matter what we think of our neighbor’s building, or that “shoddy bit of work” way across on the other side, when the True Masterbuilder comes to inspect the work, each of us will be judged on his own portion!

“Every unit of the body must do its part by — ‘…. speaking the Truth in love,… growing up into him in all things, who is the head, even Christ: from whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto edifying of itself in love’ (Eph 4:15,16).

This is the only formula of a true ecclesia. What we do for our brethren and sisters, is what we do to God. If what we do is dominated by love, all will be well, but if we are not truly motivated by love and kindness in all we say and do, there will be no edification, and no bodily growth, and we will be brought into condemnation, and will never enter the kingdom of God. For, said Jesus, ‘Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me’ (Mat 25:40).

“Nephesh”, soul

Hebrew “nephesh” (soul) applied to animals: Gen 2:19; 9:10,15,16; Num 31:28; Lev 11:46. And to men: Gen 2:7 (cp 1Co 15:40,45); 12:5; Pro 19:10; Act 2:41; Rom 13:1.

“Immortal” and “soul” never appear together (note 2Ti 1:10).

Usage Of “Soul” In Scripture

“Soul” (“nephesh” in Hebrew, 754 times; “psuche” in Greek, 106 times):

  • 326 times in OT (45 times in NT) is subject to death.
  • 203 times in OT (29 times in NT) is in danger of death.
  • 123 times in OT (16 times in NT) is delivered from death, implying liability to death.

See Eur 2:234-241.

Representative References

  • Soul – animal: Gen 1:20,30; 2:19; 9:9,10; Num 31:28; Job 12:10.
  • Souls die, are destroyed: Jos 10:28; Jdg 16:16; Job 7:15; Psa 33:19; 78:50; Isa 53:12; Eze 13:19; 18:4,27; Mat 26:38; Jam 5:20; Rev 16:3.
  • Souls are destructible: Psa 35:17; 63:9; Act 3:23.
  • Soul as life: Exo 4:19; Mat 2:20; Mar 3:4; Rev 8:9; 12:11.
  • Soul with pit or grave: Job 33:18; Psa 16:10; 30:3; 49:15; 89:48; Isa 38:17; Act 2:31.

New creation

Passages using “ktisis” (“creation”): Col 1:16,17; Gal 6:15; 2Co 5:17; Jam 1:18; Eph 2:10,14,15; 4:24.

Other similar passages: 2Co 4:4-6; Isa 51:6,16; 45:7,11,12,13; 42:5,6; Psa 102:18,25-28.

Newton (Isaac) on prophecy

Isaac Newton was born about 350 years ago, in 1643. Though he possessed probably the greatest scientific mind of all time, Newton believed that his expositions in the spiritual realm far outweighed in importance his scientific discoveries of the physical world. Yet his religious writings have been permitted to languish in obscurity and neglect. Today, the greatest part of his historical-theological manuscripts are hidden away in the Jewish National Library and University Library in Jerusalem. Newton believed firmly in the literal Second Coming of Christ and the return of the Jews to their Land. He refuted the “orthodox” opinion that the Judgment is to be accompanied by the literal burning up of the earth. His determination to reconstruct the ancient teaching of the first century church caused him to reject many commonly received church teachings: for example, he saw the “devil” as a term expressing the lusts of the flesh as manifested in various forms.

On the Importance and Significance of Prophecy

Giving ear to the prophets is a fundamental character of the true Church. The authority of councils, synods, bishops, and presbyters is human. The authority of the prophets is divine and comprehends the sum of religion, reckoning Moses and the Apostles amongst the prophets. And if an angel from heaven preach any other Gospel than what they have delivered, let him be accursed.

Daniel was in greatest credit among the Jews, and to reject his prophecies is to reject the Christian religion. For this religion is founded upon his prophecy concerning the Messiah.

For Daniel’s prophecies reach unto the end of the world; and there is scarce a prophecy in the Old Testament concerning Christ which doth not in something or other relate to his second coming.

God gave the Apocalypse [Revelation] and the prophecies of the Old Testament not to gratify men’s curiosities by enabling them to foreknow things, but that after they were fulfilled they might be interpreted by the event, and His own providence, and not the interpreters’, be then manifested to the world.

Search the Scriptures thyself. By frequent reading, constant meditation, and earnest prayer, enlighten thine understanding if thou desirest to find the Truth — to which, if thou shalt at length attain, thou wilt value above all other treasures in the world by reason of the assurance and vigour it will add to thy faith, and steady satisfaction to thy mind which he only can know who shall experience it.

On the Return of the Jews to their Land

It may perhaps come about not from the Jews themselves but from some other kingdom friendly to them.

The return from captivity and coming of the Messiah and his Kingdom are described in Dan 7; Rev 19; Act 1; Mat 24; Joel 3; Eze 36; 37; Isa 60,62,63,65, 66, and many other places of Scripture. The manner of the return I know not. [This was written 300 years ago!] Let time be the interpreter.

On the Millennium as the Fulfillment of the Promises to Abraham

The Kingdom of God on earth involves the coexistence, during that period of one thousand years, of mortals and immortals, the latter in glory as the children of the resurrection. Seeing then this Kingdom outlasts the Millennium in so vast a disproportion of time and its end after that is nowhere predicted, we may well conclude with Jeremiah that it shall last as long as the ordinances of the sun and moon and stars; with Daniel, John and the other prophets that it shall stand for ever and ever, and with Luke that it shall have no end.

This was God’s covenant with Abraham when He promised that his seed should inherit the land of Canaan for ever; and on this covenant was founded the Jewish religion as well as the Christian; and therefore this point is of so great moment that it ought to be considered and understood by all men who pretend to [ie, profess] the name of Christians.

Appendix:

“The temporal distance of Newton’s conception of the Jewish Restoration from his own time is startling. While Finch thought the conversion of the Jews would begin in 1650, Mede at a date no later than 1715, William Lloyd by 1736, and his own erstwhile protégé Whiston by 1766, Newton saw it as centuries away. There can be no doubt that his vision of the return of the Jews was strong. Few intellectuals of Newton’s day could match the vigour of his faith in this prophetic event. Nevertheless, there is no sense of apocalyptic urgency. While the otherwise similarly-minded Whiston preached the nearness of the end, the imminence of the Jewish Restoration and toured the English resort towns with a model of the Millennial Temple, Newton stayed at his desk, communed with his books and worked and reworked prophetic treatises that few in his own lifetime would read. However, while he did not think apocalyptically about his present, he did see an intensely apocalyptic period focused at the end of time. Implicit in this eschatological profile one can also see Newton’s inherent religious radicalism. By contending that the true Gospel would not be widely preached until the end, he marginalizes the Reformation and distances himself from the mainstream Protestantism of his day. This belief even leads Newton to read Rom 11 differently: the time when “all Israel shall be saved” was not the time when the converted Jews would be added to already believing Gentiles. Rather, for Newton this referred to the moment at the end when all Israel — Jew and Gentile alike — would convert together to true Christianity. Unlike many other Christians, Newton refused to place Jewish faithlessness over Gentile Christian unbelief. Moreover, Newton’s prophetic world was a very private one. Unlike so many others of his age, there is no direct political context for his belief in the return of the Jews, no discussion of mercantile interests and no evidence of involvement in efforts to convert the Jews in his time.

“It is difficult to estimate the impact of Newton’s published writing on the return of the Jews. While it would be wrong to argue that his influence was great, conservative Protestants nevertheless saw him as an important prophetic authority and recent scholarship has demonstrated that his published Observations — which includes a detailed section on the return of the Jews — was a chief source for fundamentalist exegetes of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. And, while it is not overly lengthy, the section on the return of the Jews in the Observations is one of the fullest and most detailed articulations of his views on this subject. Nor must we overlook the secondary albeit likely more important influence he exerted through theological disciples such as Whiston, who published several works that deal with the Jewish Restoration. In both cases Newton’s exegesis merged with a prophetic tradition that helped create during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries the religious and political climates that paved the way for the resettlement of Jews in Palestine — the longed-for vision of the Restoration. Newton would have approved.” (Stephen Snobelen, “Isaac Newton on the Return of the Jews”)

“About the time of the End, a body of men will be raised up who will turn their attention to the prophecies, and insist on their literal interpretation in the midst of much clamor and opposition” (Sir Isaac Newton, 1643-1727).

(From Caribbean Pioneer)

New Year’s exhortation

Years pass and men die, but the purpose of God goes on. We look back on the year that has passed. Most of those who began the year with us are with us still, but some have fallen asleep. More and more as the troubles of the world thicken, times grow more difficult, and the clouds of coming danger become more threatening, do we realize the truth of the saying that “the righteous are taken away from the evil to come.”

Yet there is a thrill in the thought that we are living in the last days, and that the salvation of the world is nearer than when we first believed. We have been warned against these days, and against being overmuch cast down, and told rather to lift up our heads before the prospect of coming troubles, because they are heralds of better things. Perils have been passed in the year that is gone, and others are rising in the distance now, yet though the mountains be removed and cast into the depths of the sea, we need not be hopelessly afraid. “Well roar the storm to those who hear a deeper voice across the storm.”

Storms are occasional and passing things; calm is the normal condition of creation. To God, who has contemplated the world of men since the beginning, this reign of sin is but an episode. It will pass like a watch in the night.

We pass our years as a tale that is told, and are actors in but a short chapter of the long story. But it has its happy conclusion. The order of the history of mankind, and God’s dealing with them from the beginning to the establishment of His purpose in the Kingdom of His Son, is Peace — War — Peace. There was peace in the Garden of Eden; there will be peace when the earth is again “the Garden of the Lord”, but between these Gardens of Peace stretches the Wilderness of Sin, with its wanderings and its wickedness, its serpents, its idolatry, its murmurings and its thirst, its fighting and its fears; a wilderness march of thousands of years.

Yet there are other things in the desert: springs and palm trees, and quails and manna, healing and providential care, love and companionship; and for those who will take it, the ever-refreshing service of God — a service the rewards of which are not all future. There is even now the peace of God passing merely human understanding that compasses the hearts of men in the midst of battle.

The peace of Eden was broken by the intrusion of human willfulness and sin. It was the snake in the green pastures whose evil counsel ruffled the still waters and turned them to a bitterness that nothing but the healing Branch can ever sweeten. The Lord was their Shepherd in the Garden of Eden, but the sheep went astray and ever since have wandered on the dark mountains.

Light and peace have not left the earth, and will not be lacking while the true Israel have light in their dwellings, and keep in their hearts the peace that Christ left behind him. The light must be tended and the peace must be sought. The children of Israel had this lesson taught them in the lighting of the Holy Place; and the Feast of Tabernacles was instituted for the cultivation of this inward peace that comes to those who keep God’s law, and who are beyond the reach of petty offence; nothing shall them offend.

In quiet communion with God and His Word there is fulfillment of the Psalmist’s saying, “Great peace have they that love thy law.” But in the world outside there is no peace. The broken peace of Eden remains broken, and the sound of war grows more and more insistent as the years pass. The sound of drums and trumpets of war is never wholly absent. The prophetic word is being fulfilled and intensified. “Wake up the mighty men. Let all the men of war draw near. Let the weak say, I am strong. Beat your ploughshares into swords, and your pruning hooks into spears.”

We are witnesses of, and unwilling actors in, these days of the breaking of God’s peace, but let it not break our peace. We have the assurance that at last the earth shall be delivered from “unreasonable and wicked men”. Unreason and wickedness are in power in the politics of the world, ever counteracting and defeating the efforts of those who are working for peace. There are those in power who will have their own willful way, or they will have war. In war they boast and delight, but the fate of those who delight in war has long been written. “Scatter thou the people who delight in war” (Psa 68:30).

If we grow sick at heart in the contemplation of these things and weary of the defeat that so often waits upon our best effort, there is the quiet voice that says, “Be not weary in well doing.” If there are those who weary not in ill doing, shall we be the less strong and enduring in the cause of righteousness?

Paul invoked the blessing of inward peace upon the brethren: “Now the Lord of peace himself give you peace, always and by all means. The Lord be with you all.” And Jesus said, “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.”

Each one must have his own peace center; just as in a storm a barrel of oil dribbled into the water over the bows of the boat makes a tiny calm in which the waves do not break, so should be the peace of the followers of Christ — however fierce the outward storm may be.

The peace in the heart of the believer should spring from the same source that supplied the peace that filled Christ’s life, and gave him peace in the tempest: the peace of knowledge and perfect trust. We must not have peace because our ears are deaf and our eyes blind, but rather because we hear and see the purpose of God being worked out in storm and tempest. These have their temporary place, and help forward God’s purpose.

There may be a stagnant peace and unwholesome peace. There is peace in the standing pool, and also weeds, corruption, and slimy life. God’s peace flows like a river, never ceasing, always flowing away in blessing, but always fed from the fountain as the river is fed again by the clouds that dissolve upon the mountains where it has its source.

We ourselves may be disturbers of our inward peace by looking too much on the warring elements around us, and forgetting the springs of inward strength. “Let not your heart be troubled,” says Jesus. When the heart is filled with peace, the outward storm adds to the sense of security.

A realization of strength of our position is a great element of peace. If we fear to examine the foundations of our faith, there can never be perfect peace. It is a constant misery to mark how much peace is broken and lost in the disputing for truth; and so much of it brought about by a mistaken sense of what is basic and what is not; and more still because of misunderstanding of terms, and personal temperamental lack of sympathy.

The New Year has begun. It will end whether we are here in life or not. But that thought need have no disturbing effect upon the peace of those to whom the this body of mortality is but a tabernacle, which, as Paul says, may be destroyed, but also may be made an abiding place of God, indestructible for ever, a house from heaven.

The old year has passed. The new has begun. It holds prospects of trouble, but that need not daunt the believer who does not go forth in his own strength. “The joy of the Lord is thy strength,” and our joy is in the strength of the Lord. Before such an association, what can the future hold to daunt those who are endeavoring to work with God?

We are told to seek peace, and pursue it, but we may also find it and possess it, and hold and guard it proof against all that would ruffle it. We must maintain this inward peace. One who is not at peace with God, cannot be at peace with himself in any but a false and delusive peace. Let us keep the peace unbroken, helped by that example that is before us in our remembrance of Christ whose blood was poured out and his body broken, but not his trust in God that gave him peace in the storm of suffering that swept over him. Let us know now, and cleave to the things that belong unto our peace.

CAL

Man of sin

Who is the “man of sin”, or “lawlessness”, referred to in 2Th 2:3? The pope? Garner Ted Armstrong? Jerry Falwell? Some Middle East demagogue yet to appear on the scene? The Bible text does not give a name. But there is much information given for us to consider.

Immediate context

The context concerns “the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our assembling to meet him” (v 1), a subject also discussed in 1Th 4:13 — 5:11. Paul tells the brethren “not to be quickly shaken in mind or excited, either by spirit or by word, or by letter purporting to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come” (2Th 2:2), a warning previously given by Jesus himself (Mat 24:4,5,10,11,23-27). Apparently, there was false and hurtful information being rumored in Thessalonica. So Paul was putting things straight, saying: “So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word or mouth or by letter” (2Th 2:15), and Paul seems to have begun specially marking his letters so as to establish their authenticity (2Th 3:17).

Paul’s message was obviously immediately applicable to his readers (else why would he write it?); however, the subject matter also clearly refers to the Second Coming of Christ (2Th 2:8; 1:7,10). Therefore, both present and future situations were being discussed. For example, Paul writes that God “deems it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you” (a present happening to the Thessalonians: 2Th 1:4), “when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels” (still a future event: 2Th 1:10). So when the verb tenses in 2Th 2 are found to be both present and future (thus allowing both a first century and a Last Days interpretation), it is not surprising.

We should expect, therefore, that “the man of lawlessness” (1) refers to some wickedness in Paul’s day, and (2) also points forward to something similar in our own day.

Key Clue and Overall Context

“For that day [of the Lord’s coming] will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of perdition” (v 3). Since Judas is also called “the son of perdition” (Joh 17:12), we are given a key Bible clue as to the character of this man of lawlessness. Like Judas, he is outwardly a disciple, but in reality he is a betrayer, a thief, a “devil” (ie, liar), a false apostle, a “satan” (ie, adversary) against the truth (Joh 6:70; Luk 22:3). “The coming of the lawless one by the activity of Satan will be with all power and with pretended signs and wonders, and with all wicked deception for those who are to perish….” (2Th 2:9,10). 2Co 12:12 describes the work of a true apostle in terms almost identical with this verse, indicating that Paul is here exposing the work of a false apostle. This reinforces the idea that this “man of lawlessness” appears at first to be a powerful believer, but who is instead revealed to be a traitor.

This description is also a remarkable likeness to Jesus’ prediction in Mat 24:24 about false prophets arising and showing great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray even the elect. Jesus’ warning also emphasizes how important it is for us to understand these scriptures, lest we be led astray. At this point, what Paul wrote to the Corinthians is very relevant:

“And what I do I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do… Such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ… No wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light” (2Co 11:12-14). These words confirm that Paul was warning against a group of undermining brethren (not an individual) who were labeled “satan” (cp 1Th 2:18,16; 3:5). These deceivers are comparable to John’s “antichrist”, a group, not an individual (cp 1Jo 4:1,3; 2:18,19; 2Jo 1:7). Like Jesus and John, Paul is keen to warn the brethren and expose this false movement.

Further confirmation is found in Gal 2:4, where Paul laments the treacherous work of false brethren “secretly brought in, who slipped in to spy out our freedom in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage”. He did not yield for a moment, but strongly resisted the intrusion of these “Judaizers”, members of the “circumcision party” (Gal 2:12; cp Acts 11:2; 15:1,5), who were preaching a different gospel (Gal 1:6-9; cp 2Co 11:4,5). Paul was contending for the loyalty of the Galatians and against the circumcision party “that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you” (Gal 2:5,14). He was now doing the same with the Thessalonians, declaring that “God chose you from the beginning to be saved through sanctification of the Spirit and belief in the truth. To this he called you through our gospel….” (2Th 2:13,14).

Summarizing so far, we started with the “son of perdition” clue, and have established an overall context of Paul’s writing, namely, his struggles against the false-brethren Judaizers. This provides a very helpful background to understand the terms and ideas next encountered in the 2Th 2 passage.

First-Century Application

“[He] opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God” (2Th 2:4). Understanding a few terms will help here. The “temple of God” often refers to the household of believers, and not necessarily to a physical building (Eph 2:21; Joh 2:19, 1Co 3:16). “Proclaiming himself to be God” is merely claiming divine authority, not divinity itself (this is the sense of the Greek text). Therefore this verse is confirming what was found to be characteristic of the Judaizing brethren: they proclaimed to know and teach the way to salvation (through circumcision) and openly opposed Paul on the matter (Acts 15:1-5), claiming they were also “apostles” (2Co 11:5; 12:11,12).

“Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you this? And you know what is restraining him now so that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains it will do so until he is out of the way” (2Th 2:5-7). Little is recorded in Acts 17:1-9 concerning what Paul said to the Thessalonians, but we do have his first letter to them. We can glean some clues from his words in 1Th 2:3-6,18, and especially 1Th 3:2-5. Timothy was Paul’s fellow servant sent to establish them in their faith and to exhort them to resist the Judaizing tempters (cp 2Co 11:3-5). The “mystery” or “secret” is now understandable in light of the foregoing. Men from within the ranks of believers were already assaulting the truth of the gospel. Paul was one of the few who perceived the treachery of these false apostles and was steadfastly restraining their pernicious work. When he died, however, their evil work would go unchecked.

This interpretation is verified by reference to Acts 20:29-31, where Paul warns the Ephesian elders: “I know that after my departure fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves will arise men speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them. Therefore be alert….”

Last Days Application

“And then the lawless one will be revealed, and the Lord Jesus will slay him with the breath of his mouth and destroy him by his appearing and his coming” (2Th 2:8). Verse 8 really comes in thought immediately after v 3, for it speaks of when the lawless one will be revealed, and that exposure/destruction occurs with the Coming of Jesus. V 4 is just a descriptive elaboration upon the man of lawlessness, while vv 5-7 are actually an aside or parenthetical remark. Here in 2Th 2:8 the destruction of the man of lawlessness is the same as that mentioned earlier in 2Th 1:8-10: “Inflicting vengeance upon those who… do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They shall suffer the punishment of eternal destruction and exclusion from the presence of the Lord… when he comes on that day to be glorified in his saints…” The plural “they” illustrates that the “man of lawlessness” represents a group, not a single individual. Christ’s coming was obviously a future event, even in Paul’s time, although he would not guess that another 2,000 years would pass.

The “appearing and coming of the Lord” is a phrase similar to that in 2Ti 4:1, and entails the judgment of the living and the dead (cp 1Th 4:14,15), which means the reward of the faithful and the condemnation of the faithless (2Ti 4:8). “And with all wicked deception for those who are to perish, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. Therefore God sends upon them a strong delusion, to make them believe what is false, so that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness” (2Th 2:10-12). These are very sobering words. Thinking about Judas, it underscores how terrible it was to be a “son of perdition”. Clearly Judas chose to be a thief, a betrayer, and ultimately a man who could see no way for repentance; and so he hanged himself. Judas refused to “love the truth” (ie accept Jesus and his instruction); therefore, he could not be saved (Acts 4:12). Judas was a child of the devil, a man of sin, a man of lawlessness (1Jo 2:4-10) who “did not believe the truth” (Joh 8:44; Rom 1:25), and therefore placed himself outside, making his condemnation inevitable (Joh 13:30; Rev 22:15).

Think about people like Judas. They are those within the circle of disciples who “had pleasure in unrighteousness” (2Ti 3:1-5, a reference to the ecclesial world!). In 1Ti 6:3-10, it speaks of those within the church whose incessant controversial activity and base suspicions and slander label them as men “bereft of the truth”, and whose seeking to be rich (in status too?) caused them to “wander from the faith”. This is a “Last Days” sign (2Ti 4:1).

Who are candidates for the Last Days “man of sin”? Men who fit the description given in Scripture! That means looking within Christendom. It means whole organizations or sects could be involved. It suggests that no denomination is excluded. So the various accusations over the years — “it’s the Jesuits”, “it’s the World Council of Churches”, “it’s the Southern Baptist Conference liberals”, etc — may all be correct! But Scripture does not name anyone explicitly (how could it?). As Judas was not revealed until the last moment by Jesus, so the modern “men of sin” will not be revealed until Christ’s coming. Until then, wheat and tares (weeds) will be allowed to “grow together until the harvest”, and then Christ will have his reaper angels gather and burn the evildoers, leaving the righteous to shine in the kingdom (Mat 13:28-30,40-43).

Personal Application

2Ti 3:8-13 describes men “of corrupt mind and counterfeit faith, men who also oppose the truth” ; these “impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceivers and deceived….”. And 2Ti 4:3,4 describes people who “will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears will accumulate to themselves teachers to suit their own liking, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths”. So “men of sin” inevitably and successfully attract a following, who are convinced in the “rightness” of their leader. How can a disciple not be deceived? By using the truth of Scripture (2Ti 3:14-16; 1Ti 4:1-5). The warning to us is plain: Understand and live God’s truth for yourself:

“Take heed to yourself and to your teaching; hold to that, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers” (1Ti 4:16). Recognize those in your midst who are manifesting the Judaizing beliefs and behavior, and resist/oppose them, with meekness and love, as did Paul and Timothy (2Ti 2:22-26; 4:5). The Lord will rescue such disciples from every evil and save them for his heavenly kingdom (2Ti 4:18).

Man of sin = Beast of Revelation

It is evident also that the “Man of Sin” closely resembles the “Beast” of Revelation:

2Th 2 Rev 13; 17
2Th 2:3. The falling away must come first. Rev 17:13,11. A harlot will be seated on the Beast, who goes into perdition.
2Th 2:4. He exalts himself against God. Rev 13:4,5,8,12. The world worships the Beast, who speaks blasphemies. All the dwell on the earth except the faithful shall worship it. The false prophet ensures this.
2Th 2:4. He sits in the temple of God, claiming to be God. Rev 13:6. It blasphemes God’s name, His tabernacle, and those who dwell in heaven.
2Th 2:7. The mystery of iniquity is already at work. Rev 17:5. The harlot is called mystery, the mother of the abominations of the earth.
2Th 2:8. The Lord Jesus shall destroy him with the breath of His mouth, and bring him to naught by the manifestation of His coming. Rev 17:14; 19:15. The Lamb shall overcome the Beast with the ten kings. Out of his mouth proceeds a sharp sword.
2Th 2:9. His coming is according to the working of Satan, with all powers and signs and lying wonders. Rev 13:13. He doeth great signs, that he should even make fire come down from heaven: it was given to him to give breath to the image of the Beast, that it should speak.
2Th 2:10. With all deceit and unrighteousness in them that are perishing, because they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved. For this cause God sends them a working of error, that they should believe a lie. Rev 13:14. He deceives them that dwell on the earth by reason of the signs.

This comparison leaves little doubt that the Man of Sin and the Beast refer to the same power.

Man of sin, first century

When the leaders of the Jews sought to contain the new movement led by Jesus of Nazareth, they used every subtle form of attack they were capable of. When these failed, they had to fall back on crude methods which involved using all the organized powers of religion and state to get him crucified.

With Jesus himself out of the way they next found that the hard facts of his resurrection, and of the transformation it wrought in his apostles, showed their problem to be still unsolved.

Now open persecution only seemed to make the movement prosper more than ever. But the old resources of craft and cunning were not used up completely. And so a deliberate attempt was made to wreck the new “sect” from within. Nowhere is this stated categorically in the New Testament, but the implication of numerous passages is very persuasive:

Galatia: To the Galatians Paul speaks of “false brethren” who had secretly infiltrated the churches, so as to enslave again (to the Law) those who had been made free by Paul’s own preaching (Gal 2:4,5). These agents had apparently been planted in the brotherhood, so as to work slowly and steadily either to draw believers back to the Law or, failing that, at least to create internal dissensions that would weaken the whole community and thus its appeal to others. Even Peter was practically won over to this philosophy (vv 11-14).

It soon became obvious that Paul — intelligent and resolute — posed the greatest single obstacle to their “satanic” objectives. And so the person and the claims and the worth of this great apostle to the Gentiles must be attacked also, as part of the overall plan of these subversives.

Corinth: In Corinth these enemies had some considerable success, in characterizing Paul as weak and contemptible as to his physical qualities (2Co 10:9,10; 11:6). By contrast, the leader of the subversives, called “Satan” by Paul himself, continues to present himself as polished and personable and wise and authoritative — the natural candidate to replace Paul as the leader of the ecclesias (2Co 11:22,23)! Such a sustained campaign of character assassination called forth from Paul the unusual expedient of a prolonged self-defense (2Co 11:13 to 12:12).

Jerusalem: Even in Jerusalem lies were being systematically spread about Paul, that he was teaching all Jews to forsake Moses and all the customs (Acts 21:20,21). While not true as to particulars, it had just enough plausibility to be accepted by gullible new converts. The faceless men who sought to pervert Paul’s work and keep the first-century ecclesia in bondage to the Temple and the priests had evidently been diligently at work in Jerusalem practically from the beginning. (It could not have been Paul’s open enemies among the Pharisees and Sadducees who told such lies, since their stories would have had no chance of being believed. This campaign was plainly carried on secretly, by whisper and innuendo, in the midst of the ecclesias.)

Rome: From Rome Paul wrote to the Philippians (Phi 1:15-17) of those who preached out of envy and strife, trying to add additional affliction to the bondage Paul was already suffering. It is clear that certain “believers” were finding malicious pleasure in preaching the gospel with some special emphasis, probably — because their work would only be another source of worry and vexation to Paul. Such were fulfilling the serpent’s role, by good words and fair speeches deceiving the simple (Rom 16:17,18).

Other hints of the same organized subversion are to be found in:

Eph 4:14: “the sleight of men” (a phrase used for deliberate cheating at games), “and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive”;

Col 2:4: “lest any man should beguile you with enticing words” — another plain allusion to the serpent in the garden.

Titus 1:14: Titus was warned not to give “heed to Jewish fables… that turn from the truth”, preached by the deceivers of the “circumcision” group (see also vv 4,9,10).

1Ti 4:1,2: Timothy was likewise warned of false teachers (“seducing spirits”, Paul called them), speaking hypocritical lies, and fostering undue concern for dietary matters.

Hebrews: The entire letter is a learned and reasoned attempt to forestall drift back to the Mosaic institutions and the synagogue system, a drift encouraged by this organized call of opposition in the very brotherhood.

It is plain, then, that there was a subversive, “Satanic” element at work in the ecclesia of Paul’s day: a group (with perhaps a formidable leader) who professed faith in Christ, but whose hidden agenda called for a “return to Moses.” This group (and its leader?) claimed apostolic authority that was rightly the province of Paul and the twelve, and they worked within the ecclesia, or the spiritual “temple of God” (2Th 2:4), being accepted as believers in good standing. It might be assumed that either some of their number actually had Holy Spirit gifts (“all power and signs and lying wonders” — v 9), or else deceived the simple-hearted into thinking they did. They systematically and subtly taught the “lie”, that men could be justified only by keeping the law of Moses.

It is reasonable to suppose that Paul actually had his eye on some apostasy current in his own time, and which had already shown its hostile attitude toward him in very effective fashion (v 7). Otherwise, it becomes very difficult to explain the immediacy and seriousness with which he describes the “man of sin.” These Jewish pseudo-Christians, along with their leader “Satan” (Paul’s “thorn in the flesh?”), were imposters; while professing the gospel, they had not really “received the love of the truth” but instead “had pleasure in (promoting) unrighteousness” (vv 10,12). Paul was using every ounce of his faith and energy to hinder this destructive work (v 6), but Paul would not always be with them: when he would at last pass from the scene, the Judaizers might be expected to flourish almost without restraint (v 7).

Therefore the same Paul who hoped and prayed for the return of Christ in his own lifetime (consider 1Th 4:15, for example) could also expect that the Lord when he appeared would overthrow and destroy this wicked pretender (2Th 2:8; cp 1:6-10). That Christ did not return during Paul’s day or even during the final years of the first century is no reflection on Paul’s faith or understanding: what else should he have done except look for his Lord’s coming? And the fact is, that the first-century “man of sin” (and his adherents) will be destroyed by Christ at his coming — being raised from the dead to stand before the judgment seat.

Appendix

There have been many forerunners, or advance messengers of the Anti-Christ:

  1. Cain, the originator of religious war, who slew his righteous brother (Gen 4:4-8), when Cain’s religious deception had been uncovered.

  2. Lamech, who boasted himself even against God — so great was his power, or so he thought (Gen 4:23)!

  3. Nimrod, the first great “world-ruler”, who began the history of Babylonian power (Gen 10:8-10).

  4. Balaam, the false prophet who for material gain seduced God’s people into immorality; the “anti-Moses”, so to speak (Num 31:17; 2Pe 2:15; Rev 2:14).

  5. Goliath — the “man of sin”, closely associated with the number six, the representative terrorist, the “anti-David”, who opposed God’s Anointed (1Sa 17).

  6. Antiochus Epiphanes, the devastator of the Sanctuary of God.

  7. Nero, the great first-century persecutor of the Christians, certainly regarded as “anti-Christ” by those who suffered under his rule.

  8. Mohammed, the “false prophet”, a deceiver and “Satan-adversary” in his own right, even though hostile toward the Catholic Church.