“God forbid!”

This phrase occurs in the KJV New Testament 15 times:

  • Once in the Gospels (Luke 20:16);
  • Ten times in Romans (Rom 3:4,6,31; 6:2,15; 7:7,13; 9:14; 11:1,11); and
  • Four times in other letters from Paul (1 Cor 6:15; Gal 2:17; 3:21; 6:14).

In all these instances, there is no mention of God at all; nor is there even an implicit reference to God. The Greek phrase is "me genoito”. The first word is a negative and the second is a form of "ginomai", to become or to come into being. In effect, the phrase is a strongly worded "May it not be!" or "May it never be!"

R.E.O. White writes: "The solemn translators of the King James Authorized Version, with due episcopal decorum, rendered [this phrase] 'God forbid!' " (Interpreting the Bible, pp. 28,29).

Perhaps this unique translation was produced for what those 17th-century Church of England scholars considered decorum, but the result has been 400 years of confusion for ordinary readers. When the KJV is all that one reads, one may easily suppose that the Name of God is actually used in 15 New Testament passages where it does not appear in any form in the Greek manuscripts.

On the other hand, we are told that the translation of "God forbid" in Paul's letters can be traced back to William Tyndale, nearly a century before the KJV. Tyndale was certainly not a member of the upper echelon of the Church of England; in fact, some of them plotted to kill him. Evidently he was simply looking for a vigorous paraphrase that would be intelligible to ordinary English folk of his day.

In keeping with this point of view, other scholars have pointed out that "God forbid" was a common British expression of 16th and 17th century English (Dave Brunn, One Bible, Many Versions: Are All Translations Created Equal?, p. 50).

So the use of "God forbid" here has been offered as an example of the willingness of King James' men, when they felt it necessary and/or useful, to put aside their avowed allegiance to literality in favor of an equally important allegiance to helping their target audience understand the Bible (Leland Ryken, Choosing a Bible: Understanding English Bible Translation, pp. 74,75).

Then again, one might find fault with "God forbid!" on the grounds that it attributes to the apostle Paul a form of oath which he might not have literally used in Greek or any other language for that matter (cp. Matt 5:33-37)!

Modern versions translate "me genoito" by various expressions, usually with an exclamation point for emphasis, and all to the same effect: "By no means!" "Certainly not!" "Never!" "Not at all!" and "Absolutely not!" (See NRSV, NIV, NET and others).

As noted, the apostle Paul uses this phrase 14 out of the 15 times it occurs in the New Testament. "Me genoito" (not "God forbid!") seems to have been a favorite of his.

Picking up on this, Harry Whittaker has suggested (Enjoying the Bible, p. 227) that the one instance of "me genoito" in the Gospels makes it at least possible that, before his conversion, Paul was present at the time Jesus told his parable of the vineyard in Luke 20, and that the cry of absolute rejection for the lesson Jesus taught may have originated with the young Pharisee Saul:

When Jesus told the parable of the vineyard, with its climax: "He shall come and destroy these husbandmen, and shall give the vineyard to others" (Luke 20:16), he spoke a parable which was clearly understood by his adversaries — "they perceived that he had spoken this parable against them." Their reaction to it was the immediate cry "God forbid!" — literally, "May it not be!" The concordance quickly reveals that the other 14 occurrences of this expression all belong to the epistles of Paul. Then is it possible that Saul of Tarsus was one of the men who heard that parable spoken in the temple court?

Paul in Prison

Paul may have spent as much as 25% of his time as a missionary in prison. We know of his brief lock-up in Philippi, two years' imprisonment in Caesarea, and at least another two years in Rome. Paul says he had been "in prison more frequently" (2 Cor 11:23) than his critics. To understand Paul, we need to understand where he spent so much time.

A bloody ordeal

Roman imprisonment was preceded by being stripped naked and then flogged, a humiliating, painful and bloody ordeal. The bleeding wounds went untreated; prisoners sat in painful leg or wrist chains. Mutilated, blood-stained clothing was not replaced, even in the cold of winter. In his final imprisonment, Paul asked for a cloak, presumably because of the cold. (There are other possible reasons for Paul's request: see 2 Timothy 4:13 and notes there.)

Most cells were dark, especially the inner cells of a prison, like the one Paul and Silas inhabited in Philippi. Unbearable cold, lack of water, cramped quarters, and sickening stench from few toilets made sleeping difficult and waking hours miserable.

Male and female prisoners were sometimes held together, which led to sexual immorality and abuse. Prison food, when available, was poor. Most prisoners had to provide their own food from outside sources. When Paul was in prison in Caesarea, the procurator Felix gave orders to the centurion to "permit his friends to take care of his needs" (Acts 24:23).

Because of the miserable conditions, many prisoners begged for a speedy death. Others simply committed suicide.

The privileged few

All of these privations and sufferings could be lessened to some extent if the prisoner was important or paid a bribe, as Governor Felix hoped to receive from Paul in Caesarea: (Acts 24:26).

A prominent individual, or one expected to be released, might be kept under house arrest if he or she could afford the rent. In Rome, where housing prisoners was excessively expensive, Paul was given the privilege of house arrest, and he paid the rent himself (exactly how, we don't know).

In his final imprisonment in Rome, though, Paul's life came to an end in the woeful conditions of a Roman prison.

Note: Some of the above is taken from John McRay, "Paul and His Times" (Christian History, No. 47).

A Brief Outline, by Chapter

  • Men may have a knowledge of God from general revelation, and thus all men are in some sense guilty, since they have rejected this revelation.
  • The Jews are guilty of rejecting God's law as well, and thus are doubly guilty.
  • Since no man can be saved by his own righteousness, justification can only come by faith in the work of Jesus Christ.
  • The chief Old Testament example is Abraham, who was saved by faith.
  • The fruit of this justification is peace with God.
  • Free grace gives no license for sin, but rather provides resurrection power for a new life of righteousness.
  • Nevertheless, our regeneration introduces a struggle, within our own natures, against indwelling sin.
  • Christ works with us in the war against sin, and guarantees us our final victory in the resurrection.
  • Our security in Christ is grounded in God's choice of us, not our choice of Him.
  • God brings His elect people to Himself by means of the preaching of the gospel.
  • God has taken the gospel to the Gentiles now, but there will come a time when Israel will also be gathered back to Him.
  • Paul shifts from theological exposition to practical application. The appropriate response to such a great salvation is to present ourselves as living sacrifices and transformed people in the ecclesia.
  • Believers should live in submission to the civil authorities.
  • Weak and strong believers need to live in harmony, understanding each other.
  • The apostle to the Gentiles hopes to visit Rome soon.
  • Paul sends greetings to the saints, and gives warnings against "wolves".

A More Complete, but Still Brief, Outline

(a) Rom 1:1-17: Introduction (b) Rom 1:18 — 3:20: The unrighteousness of all mankind

  • Rom 1:18-32: Gentiles
  • Rom 2:1 — 3:8: Jews
  • Rom 3:9-20: Summary: all people

(c) Rom 3:21 — 5:21: Righteousness imputed: justification:

  • Rom 3:21-26: Through Christ
  • Rom 3:27 — 4:25: Received by faith
  • Rom 5:1-11: The fruits of righteousness
  • Rom 5:12-21: Summary: man's righteousness contrasted with God's gift

(d) Rom 6-8: Righteousness imparted: sanctification:

  • Rom 6: Freedom from sin's tyranny
  • Rom 7: Freedom from the law's condemnation
  • Rom 8: Life in the power of the Holy Spirit

(e) Rom 9-11: The problem of the rejection of Israel:

  • Rom 9; 10: The justice and cause of the rejection
  • Rom 11: The restoration of Israel

(f) Rom 12:1 — 15:13: The gospel in practice:

  • Rom 12: In the body, the church
  • Rom 13: In the world
  • Rom 14:1 — 15:13: Among weak and strong believers

(g) Rom 15:14 — 16:27: Conclusion and greetings

Note: The three doxologies in Romans serve to conclude each major section of the Letter, while at the same time dividing those sections:

  • Romans 8:31-39 concludes the major theological portion of the Letter (Rom 1-8), in which the fundamentals of the gospel are outlined.
  • Romans 11:31-36 concludes the section (Rom 9-11) which explains how, in the light of His revealed principles of salvation, God will yet show mercy to His people Israel.
  • Romans 16:25-27 concludes the final, exhortational section of the Letter (Rom 12-16), as well as the whole Letter.

Chapter 1

  • Comment on Rom 1:1

PAUL, A SERVANT OF CHRIST JESUS: "Doulos" refers to a bondservant. Some translate "slave", but "the most accurate translation is 'bondservant'… in that it often indicates one who sells himself into slavery to another" (NET Notes). This description emphasizes submission and dependence on the Lord. It is not a technical reference to a specific office, but characterizes one's willing service of Christ, the divine Master. The same designation appears in the letters of James, 2 Peter and Jude.

Man's slave becomes free in Christ, and a freeman (like Paul) becomes Christ's slave (1 Cor 7:22).

The concept of being the Lord's "slave" or "servant" is to be found in the Old Testament. This concept did not suggest drudgery, but honor and privilege. It was used of national Israel at times (Isa 43:10), but was especially associated with great men in the Old Testament, including Moses (Josh 14:7), David (Psa 89:3; cf 2Sam 7:5, 8) and Elijah (2Kings 10:10); all these men were "servants (or slaves) of the Lord."

The use of the term "servant" or "slaves also suggests the "redemptive" work of God in Christ: the Israelites were "slaves" in Egypt, who were "bought" or "redeemed" out of their slavery to become the "purchased possession" of the Father (Exod 15:16). (See Study, Redemption.)

CALLED TO BE AN APOSTLE: More precisely, "a called apostle", that is, one who was selected and commissioned, and then sent with a message. As the twelve were called (Mark 1:17), and apostles (Luke 6:13), so Paul was the same, and could speak of himself as being "sent" by Christ (Acts 26:17).

AND SET APART FOR THE GOSPEL OF GOD: "Set apart" from his mother's womb (Gal 1:15), by conversion (Acts 9:15), and by a specific call (Acts 13:2).

FOR: The gospel is a positive call, not a negative one! He was not set apart from, or away from all that was evil, at least not specifically so. He was set apart for, or unto, that which was positive: the work of the gospel. As a Pharisee he had been set apart to a life of strict observance of Jewish law and custom. Now his life work is to further the gospel, the good news that God has for man.

THE GOSPEL OF GOD: In this case, the "of God" in the Greek could mean either:

  • "the gospel, i.e., good news, which belongs to God, and comes from Him" or
  • "the gospel about God".

It is easy to see that both usages are true, and quite possibly both are intended here.

  • Comment on Rom 1:2

THE GOSPEL HE PROMISED BEFOREHAND THROUGH HIS PROPHETS IN THE HOLY SCRIPTURES: The gospel was not some new thing: it was a renewal and restatement of the Old Testament hope (cp Acts 23:6; 24:15; 26:6,7; 28:20; Rom 15:4).

  • Comment on Rom 1:3

REGARDING HIS SON, WHO AS TO HIS HUMAN NATURE: The KJV is better here: "according to the flesh". Paul considers the meaning of "flesh" (Greek "sarx") in some detail in later chapters of Romans. We may say here that "flesh" doesn't simply mean 'the meat on the bones' or 'the body'; rather, it means a way of living and thinking that is the natural byproduct of a weak mortal body. In fact, the "flesh", Biblically speaking, can actually have a "mind" of its own (see Rom 8:4-9)!

WAS A DESCENDANT OF DAVID: And thus the heir and the fulfillment of God's promises to David: 2Sam 7:12-16; Isa 9:6,7; Acts 2:30,31; 13:22,23; Luke 1:30-34.

  • Comment on Rom 1:4

AND WHO THROUGH THE SPIRIT OF HOLINESS: A unique expression, based in Old Testament usage, that conveys the same concept as "Holy Spirit". Anticipating the next phrase here, this may be a suggestion that Jesus, anointed and sustained by the Holy Spirit in the days of his flesh, was acknowledged by the fact of resurrection to have successfully endured the tests and trials of his earthly life, having been obedient even to death. Thus now, says Paul, his weak "body of flesh" has received a powerful covering of the "Holy Spirit"; in other words, he has been clothed with immortality.

Or, possibly, and more simply, this refers to "a spirit of holiness", i.e., the inner spirit or character of Christ. Compare other usages: i.e., "a spirit of fear" (2 Tim 1:7), "a spirit of meekness" ( 1 Cor 4:21).

WAS DECLARED WITH POWER: "With power" may belong with "declared" — "powerfully declared". Or it may with greater effect be joined to "Son of God", making him the "Son of God WITH power" (as the KJV) — indicating the new quality of life Jesus had after his resurrection (Phil 3:10; Col 1:29).

TO BE THE SON OF GOD BY HIS RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD: By resurrection he has become a life-giving spirit ( 1 Cor 15:45). His rising was indeed "from the dead". But Paul says more, namely, "of the dead", suggesting that Christ is the forerunner of others in this transformation — others who will follow him (cf 1 Cor 15:20,21). In fact, they will not just follow him in being raised from the dead, but the Lord Jesus Christ himself will be the means of their resurrections.

JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD: Appropriately, Jesus Christ is now described as "our Lord". Though the title was proper even during his earthly ministry, it attained more frequent use and greater meaning following the resurrection (Acts 2:36; 10:36).

  • Comment on Rom 1:5

THROUGH HIM AND FOR HIS NAME'S SAKE, WE RECEIVED GRACE AND APOSTLESHIP TO CALL PEOPLE FROM AMONG ALL THE GENTILES: It was the purpose of Yahweh to take out of the nations a people FOR HIS NAME (Acts 15:14-17; Phil 2:9,10). This purpose was manifested in His Son as an individual (2 Cor 5:19; John 17:6, 11, 26), then it will be manifested in the "Body of Christ" (Rev 14:1; 1 Thes 1:1; 2 Cor 6:16), and finally in all the world ( 1 Cor 15:28; Num 14:21).

WE RECEIVED GRACE AND APOSTLESHIP: It was by the grace of God that Paul was called to be an apostle (v 1). Grace was the cause and source of his apostleship. This is a hendiadys — literally, "one by means of two" — a literary device expressing an idea by means of two words linked by 'and', in which one noun may be understood as an adjective modifying the other noun. So it would be proper to translate: "We received the apostles' gift, or the gift of apostleship."

TO CALL PEOPLE FROM AMONG ALL THE GENTILES TO THE OBEDIENCE THAT COMES FROM FAITH: The desired response to the gospel message is "obedience that comes from faith". (For obedience, see Rom 15:18; 16:26. For faith, see Rom 1:16,17; 10:17.) There are several options here also:

  • as already stated, "obedience produced by the faith",
  • "obedience to the faith", or
  • "obedience, which is the faith".

The phrase may even be "deliberately ambiguous" (NET Notes).

  • Comment on Rom 1:6

AND YOU ALSO ARE AMONG THOSE WHO ARE CALLED TO BELONG TO JESUS CHRIST: Paul's readers were not called, as he was, to apostleship (v 1), but they were called "to belong to Jesus Christ" (v 6) and to be "saints" (v 7), the common term designating believers. This term "called to belong to" has almost the same force as the expression Paul uses for himself — "set apart for" (v 1).

  • Comment on Rom 1:7

TO ALL IN ROME WHO ARE LOVED BY GOD AND CALLED TO BE SAINTS: The Greek "hagios" means 'the holy ones'. The word always appears in the plural in the New Testament: no individual is spoken of as a "saint", singular; but all believers are "saints", collectively, in Christ. As God "set apart" or "sanctified" or "made holy" His people in Egypt (Exod 13:2; Lev 11:44), so New Testament believers were "made holy" in Christ.

All believers are "saints" through their spiritual union with Christ, a fact Paul often expressed by the phrase "in Christ Jesus" (Rom 8:1,2; Eph 2:6, 10, 13; 3:6) or "in Christ" (Rom 12:5; 2 Cor 5:17). This use of the term emphasizes not so much personal holiness, though the believer's conduct should correspond increasingly to his standing (2 Cor 7:1; 2 Thes 5:23), but the objective "set apart" status each believer possesses because of the grace conferred upon him or her through Christ.

GRACE: "Charis" — a gift or favor — suggests any and all of God's blessings and gifts to men. "Grace" in some contexts refers to the gifts of the Holy Spirit, but the word means much more than that. Grace is the favorable attention, care, and comfort from God toward us. To know grace is to come within the scope of His glorious light — to be accepted as part of His chosen family, constantly overshadowed by His angelic protection.

his grace is extended without partiality to all who accept the gospel and yield themselves entirely to the Father and His Son. This means placing ourselves in God's hands, allowing His word to work in us. We must allow the teaching of Christ to overshadow and dominate everything in our lives. We must seek to give everything we have to him, holding nothing back, in hope of the day when we will be "filled with the fullness of his grace" (John 1:16).

Simply holding certain beliefs, attending the meetings of believers, and being technically "in the Truth" is not enough to guarantee God's grace. We must be receptive to Him and be moved to activity. Then and only then may we enter into the glory of the grace of God.

PEACE TO YOU: Peace is the basic blessing we all need most. It only comes through the grace and mercy of God. Peace is an impenetrable mental shield against all fear and doubt. Peace is harmony and tranquility of mind. Peace is primarily peace with God:

"Since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ" (Rom 5:1).

To have peace with God makes all other conflict harmless and unimportant. It can only come with complete, undivided dedication to one supreme object of life, for peace is essentially oneness. It is not freedom from external conflict — that is not important. It is freedom from internal conflict. Jesus said, just before the terrible suffering of his crucifixion:

"Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid" (John 14:27).

Paul, chained and in prison because of the gospel which he preached, told the Philippian believers to take everything to God in prayer, and he assures them that in doing so,

"the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus" (Phil 4:7).

FROM GOD OUR FATHER AND FROM THE LORD JESUS CHRIST: The true order from which all blessings flow. All gifts come from God. But the greatest gift of God to man is the hope of eternal life which was first revealed in Christ — "the firstfruits…" ( 1 Cor 15:23) — and then offered to us as well, through Christ, our Saviour, mediator and Lord.

  • Comment on Rom 1:8

FIRST, I THANK MY GOD THROUGH JESUS CHRIST FOR ALL OF YOU, BECAUSE YOUR FAITH IS BEING REPORTED ALL OVER THE WORLD: First of all, Paul must express his thanks to God for his readers. This was customary, and he omitted an expression of thanks only in writing the Galatians. His thanksgiving for the Roman believers is based on their faith (cf Eph 1:15,16; Col 1:3,4; 1 Thes 1:3).

ALL OVER THE WORLD: The "kosmos" = the whole (ecclesial) world (cp 1 Thes 1:8).

  • Comment on Rom 1:9

GOD, WHOM I SERVE WITH MY WHOLE HEART IN PREACHING THE GOSPEL OF HIS SON, IS MY WITNESS: Compare 2 Cor 1:23; Phil 1:8.

SERVE: "Latreuo" = to serve as a worshiper, in joy — not as a slave or bond-servant, under an obligation.

WITH MY WHOLE HEART: "With my spirit ('pneuma)". That is, with the heart and mind, and not just in physical, outward obedience: cp John 4:23; Phil 3:3.

HOW CONSTANTLY I REMEMBER YOU: "In my prayers" (v 10): cp Eph 1:16; Phil 1:3,4; Col 1:9.

  • Comment on Rom 1:10

IN MY PRAYERS AT ALL TIMES; AND I PRAY THAT NOW AT LAST BY GOD'S WILL THE WAY MAY BE OPENED FOR ME TO COME TO YOU: Why should Paul find it necessary to summon God as his witness that he had been faithful in praying for the Roman believers "at all times"? There are two reasons. For one thing, he had been praying "constantly" (v 9). The Greek word denotes "repeatedly", meaning that there is no great length of time between prayers. This seems almost too much to expect of a man who did not know most of these people. Furthermore, as he will tell his readers later (Rom 15:25), he is about to leave for Jerusalem, and this could give the appearance of his not putting the Roman believers first in his plans. Here, as elsewhere, when Paul calls God as his witness (v 9), it is because the thing he is claiming seems difficult to believe.

  • Comment on Rom 1:11

I LONG TO SEE YOU: "Long" is Greek "epipotheo", meaning an earnest desire. The same word in 2 Cor 5:2 expresses his desire for immortality, as though to see the Lord was no more his desire than to see them! Compare the same word in Phil 1:8.

SO THAT I MAY IMPART TO YOU SOME SPIRITUAL GIFT TO MAKE YOU STRONG: By "spiritual gift" we are probably not to understand something charismatic. The purpose given here, "to make you strong", is not favorable to such a view, since Paul does not specify any particular gift and avoids the plural, "gifts" (contrast, for example, 1 Cor 12:1). The word of God, its teaching, exhortation, encouragement (see v 12), and comfort: these are all examples of the sort of spiritual "gift" which the apostle might impart to them. They are all aspects of the same "gift" we may receive from the Bible today.

  • Comment on Rom 1:12

THAT IS, THAT YOU AND I MAY BE MUTUALLY ENCOURAGED BY EACH OTHER'S FAITH: But no sooner has this sentiment (v 11) been expressed than it is halfway recalled, being revised because it seems to suggest that blessing will flow only one way, from Paul to the believers. So he alters his language to make room for mutual encouragement and upbuilding. Faith is basically the same, wherever it be found, but to see it at work in one individual after another, in various ways, adds power, reality, and substance to Christian fellowship. Paul himself needed this, from them, as much as they needed it from him.

  • Comment on Rom 1:13

I DO NOT WANT YOU TO BE UNAWARE: Paul uses this phrase to indicate that he is about to say something very important (cf 1 Cor 10:1; 12:1; 1 Thes 4:13).

BROTHERS: It ought to be needless to point out that "brothers" in such passages means "brothers and sisters".

THAT I PLANNED MANY TIMES TO COME TO YOU: "I have been longing for many years to see you" (Rom 15:23).

BUT HAVE BEEN PREVENTED FROM DOING SO UNTIL NOW: "This is why I have often been hindered from coming to you" (Rom 15:22), because of other preaching work — that is, because Paul went where the Holy Spirit led him (cp Acts 16:7). There is no suggestion here of external opposition as in the case of the Thessalonians (1 Thes 2:18), so we are left with the supposition that his work in the East had involved him so completely that he did not see his way clear to break away for the projected trip to Rome.

IN ORDER THAT I MIGHT HAVE A HARVEST AMONG YOU, JUST AS I HAD AMONG THE OTHER GENTILES: Such a "harvest" or "fruit bearing" might take two forms:

  • new converts to the gospel "among the other Gentiles", and
  • development of spiritual character and qualities among those who already believed (cp Gal 5:22,23; Rom 6:22).
  • Comment on Rom 1:14

I AM OBLIGATED: Paul was urged on in his work by an overwhelming sense of duty and responsibility. This perhaps would first be incited by feelings of guilt from his earlier life, where as a zealous young Pharisee he ignorantly suppressed the Truth, finally persecuting and slaying the Christians. Being forgiven this, Paul knew that he could never repay the Lord for such kindness, and thus saw himself as a permanent debtor to him whose blood he had once helped to spill (Acts 9:14).

BOTH TO GREEKS AND NON-GREEKS: "Non-Greeks" is the Greek word "barbaroi". In classical and even in early Hellenistic times, the Greeks were prone to include the Latins among the "barbarians". But by the time of Paul this was no longer the case. The Romans had become the caretakers of Hellenic civilization. This being so, it is probable that in using "barbarians" Paul had in mind the territory beyond Rome to the West, where he hoped to go. At the same time, when verse 15 is taken into account, he would not have to look beyond Rome itself with its diverse population to find representatives of both groups.

BOTH TO THE WISE AND THE FOOLISH: The "wise" are not being equated with the Greeks, for this would mean that all non-Greeks are being called "foolish". Such an assertion would be unwarranted. The wise, whoever they are, are perishing in the midst of their worldly wisdom ( 1 Cor 1:18-21), and the foolish, whoever they are, are perishing in their simplicity and dullness. Both need the gospel equally.

  • Comment on Rom 1:15

THAT IS WHY I AM SO EAGER TO PREACH THE GOSPEL ALSO TO YOU WHO ARE AT ROME: How heartwarming is the apostle's attitude toward his obligation! Instead of considering it a burden he must bear, a duty he must carry out, he is "eager" to fulfill it. If one has the finest intellectual and formal preparation for preaching but is lacking in zeal, he cannot hope for much success. The call to preach and the need for the message together constitute the preacher's compelling incentive to proclaim the message of salvation.

EAGER: The KJV "ready" is not nearly strong enough. The Greek is "prothumos", which is best translated "eager" or "willing". It appears also in Matt 26:41 and Mark 14:38: "the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak."

  • Comment on Rom 1:16,17

The key to the Letter of Romans…

…is found in Romans 1:16,17:

"I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: 'The righteous will live by faith.' "

Mark Vincent (Testimony 77:158,159) writes that these verses "are the key, for it is programmatic for the whole book. It sets the stage for the whole action of the letter; it sets the agenda for the business Paul is about to transact. All the key vocabulary of the letter is encapsulated in the one carefully crafted sentence" (as illustrated in the adapted table, which follows):

The passage… Key vocabulary appearing elsewhere in the Letter "I am not ashamed… "Ashamed": 1:16; 5:5; 8:21; 9:33; 10:11 …of the gospel… "Gospel": 1:1,9,15,16; 2:16; 10:15,16; 11:28; 15:16,19,20,29; 16:25 …because it is the power of God… "Power": 1:4, 16, 20; 9:17,21,22; 13:1,2,3; 15:13, 19; 16:25 …for the salvation… "Salvation": 1:16; 5:9,10; 8:24; 9:27; 10:1,9,10,13; 11:11,14,26; 13:11 …of everyone who believes… a righteousness… by faith… 'The righteous will live by faith.' "Believes… faith": 1:5,8,12,16,17; 3:2,3,22,25,27,28,30,31; 4:3,5,9,11,12,13,14,16,17,18,19,20,24; 5:1,2; 6:8; 9:30,32,33; 10:4,6,8,10,11,14,16,17; 11:20; 12:3,6; 13:11; 14:1,2,22,23; 15:13; 16:26 …first for the Jew, then for the Gentile… "Jew… Gentile": 1:5,13,14,16; 2:9,10,14,17,24,28,29; 3:1,9,29; 4:17,18; 9:24, 30; 10:12, 19; 11:11,12,13,25; 15:9,10,11,12,15,18,27; 16:4, 26 For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed… a righteousness… by faith… 'The righteous will live by faith.' "Righteous… righteous": 1:17; 2:5, 13, 26; 3:4,5,8,10,21,22,24,25,26,28,30; 4:5,6,9,11,13,22,23,25; 5:1,7,9,16,17,18,19,21; 6:13,16,18,19,20; 7:12; 8:4, 13, 30, 33; 9:28,30,31; 10:3,4,5,6,10; 14:17 …just as it is written: 'The righteous will live by faith.' " "Live": 1:17; 2:7; 5:10,17,18,21; 6:2,4,8,10,22,23; 7:1,2,3,10; 8:2,6,10,12,13,38; 9:26; 10:5; 11:3, 15; 12:1, 18; 14:7,8,9,11; 16:4

  • Comment on Rom 1:16

I AM NOT ASHAMED OF THE GOSPEL: Having confessed his fervent desire to preach the gospel at Rome, Paul goes on to give a reason for his zeal. He feels no reservation as to his mission. He does not in any way consider his task unworthy, or one that will prove to be disappointing. He is ready to challenge the philosophies and religions in Rome which compete for the attention of men, because he knows, on the basis of his experience in Asia Minor and Greece, that God's power working through him to proclaim the good news is able to transform lives.

Generally, compare Paul's exhortations to Timothy (2 Tim 1:6), where he sets himself forth as an example (2 Tim 1:12).

THE GOSPEL: See verse 1, notes.

BECAUSE IT IS THE POWER OF GOD FOR THE SALVATION: The Greek word for "power" ('dynamis') has sometimes drawn the reaction, what might be called a pseudo-exposition, that 'the gospel is dynamite!' This is quite misleading in a way, for the emphasis is not on something explosive — blowing false doctrines out of the way, or blasting a trail of success for the true faith, or even on destroying bad habits of the "old man" or "the devil"! Instead, the "dynamis" of the gospel would be more accurately compared to a steady but ongoing power source — like, perhaps, hydroelectric power — which provides continuing impetus in the right ways, as directed by enlightened faith and reason.

In any case, the emphasis should not fall on the way it operates (for God's Spirit or power works in a multitude of ways), but on the controlled power of its operation, and the awesome effect it produces. The gospel of God offers something not to be found anywhere else, power to develop a true and lasting righteousness, derived from God.

There is a strong link between power and salvation. Devout Jews were inclined to think of the Law of Moses as power, but this is not affirmed in Scripture. The Law was "holy, just, and good" (Rom 7:12), but it was not powerful to save.

As for salvation, the Old Testament is clear in its teaching. Whether "salvation" is conceived of physically as some immediate deliverance from trouble (Exod 14:13) or spiritually as the ultimate deliverance from sin and death (Psa 51:12), that salvation comes from the Lord. This is maintained in the New Testament as well, and is affirmed in Paul's statement that the gospel is "the power of God" for salvation. The apostle says that, if he himself saves anyone ( 1 Cor 9:22), it is only in the sense that he is Christ's representative who is able to point out the way to his fellowmen.

Paul elsewhere writes of those who profess the name of Christ, but deny the "power" of the gospel (2 Tim 3:5), that is, they reject the Bible's transforming power to change lives, merely by its message (Col 3:10; 1 Cor 1:4; Eph 3:6,7,20).

FOR THE SALVATION OF EVERYONE WHO BELIEVES: Salvation is a broad concept. It includes the forgiveness of sins, but involves much more, because its basic meaning is soundness or wholeness — fullness of health. It promises the restoration of all that sin has marred or destroyed. It is the general term that unites in itself the particular aspects of truth suggested by justification, reconciliation, sanctification and redemption. But its efficacy, or power, depends on man's willingness to receive the message. Without man's acceptance, it is nothing but words on paper or breath dissipated in the air.

FIRST FOR THE JEW, THEN FOR THE GENTILE: The gospel came to the Jew first, that is, in point of national precedence and privilege (Rom 3:1,2). God, after having dealt in a special way with the Jews in Old Testament days and having followed this by sending His Son to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, could not pass by this people. To them was given the first opportunity to receive the Lord Jesus, both during his ministry (John 1:11) and in the Christian era (Acts 1:8; 3:26). Paul himself followed this pattern (Acts 13:45,46; 28:25, 28).

The opportunity for salvation came first to the Jew (John 4:22), but tribulation is also to Israel first, because of their rejection of Jehovah's ways (Rom 2:9,10). Israel has turned their back on Him, yet because of the promises He has made to the patriarchs concerning His people, He will never forsake them (1Sam 12:22; Jer 31:37; Hos 14:4). Paul expounds this principle at length in Romans 11.


"To everyone who believes"

The first step along the way of life, then, is belief of the things that God has promised. This is enjoined by Jesus when he gave his last commission to the apostles:

"Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved but he that believeth not shall be condemned" (Mark 16:15,16).

"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world" (Matt 28:18-20).

When men are so "taught" by the word of God, they manifest faith in the things He has promised. Without this faith men are not well pleasing to God (Heb 11:6).

In support of their teaching the apostles turn to the Old Testament to find in Abraham an outstanding illustration of the way to secure God's approval. "Abraham believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness" (Gen 15:6). The whole of the fourth chapter of Romans is devoted to unfolding the implication of this statement; and at the end of the chapter Paul declares that it was "not written for Abraham's sake alone, but for us also, to whom righteousness shall be imputed, if we believe on God" (Rom 4:23,24). "The gospel is the power of God unto salvation", but it is ineffective unless it is believed; so Paul adds "to everyone that believeth" (Rom 1:16).

John Carter, God's Way

"Everyone, including Gentiles"

The word "all" or "every" or "whosoever" (all translations of the Greek word "pas") is perhaps the most important word in the letter; it might also be the most overlooked word. Here is a sample of the phrases in Romans that involve this key word:

  • All believers (1:16; 3:22; 4:11; 9:33; 10:4, 11).
  • Abraham is the father of us all; the promise is sure to all the seed (4:16).
  • All who call upon him (10:12,13).
  • Delivered him up for us all (8:32).
  • Concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all (11:32).
  • All men, every soul of man, all the world, all the earth, etc. (1:18; 2:1,9,10; 3:4,19,20,23; 5:12, 18; 8:22; 9:5, 17; 10:18; 12:3,17,18; 13:1, 7; 14:10,11; 16:19, 24).
  • All Gentiles, all nations (1:5; 15:11; 16:26).

The first phrase in this list, "all believers", is one of the many interactions between "all" and the other key ideas in Romans 1:16,17 [see the table above]. As a second example, "all" is linked to the phrase "to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile/Greek" (1:16; 2:9,10; 3:9), for there is no difference (3:22; 10:12).

Paul's "not only… but also" arguments highlight the meaning behind the word "all":

  • "Is he the God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also" (Rom 3:29).
  • "Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin [Psa 32:1,2]. Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also?" (Rom 4:7-9).
  • "That he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised, that righteousness might be imputed to them also; and the father of the circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised" (Rom 4:11,12).
  • "Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all" (Rom 4:16).
  • "Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him, but for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead" (Rom 4:23,24).
  • "Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles" (Rom 9:24).

Throughout the letter the emphasis is on the inclusion of Gentiles. In this regard "the promises made unto the fathers" (Rom 15:8) are especially those concerning inclusion of Gentiles in God's provision of salvation:

  • To Abraham (Rom 4:3, 22; 4:17; 4:18; cf. Gal 3:8).
  • To Moses (Rom 10:19; 15:10).
  • To David (Rom 4:6-8; 15:9).
  • To the prophets (Rom 1:17; 9:25; 9:26; 10:20; 15:12).

So the word "all" is the catchword of inclusion. Through Jesus Christ Gentiles are now explicitly included in the fulfillment of God's promises. God has faithfully declared His righteousness by sending His Son to confirm His promises to the fathers, especially the promises in the law and the prophets that Gentiles would be included in the family of God. Jesus Christ, a Jew according to the flesh, was faithful to this high calling, so God delivered him up for us all, and then He raised him from the dead. In this way, God has provided salvation to all who believe, to faithful Jews, of course, but now also to faithful Gentiles. So Abraham is the father of all believers, both Jews and Gentiles.

That this would be Paul's focus should not be surprising; after all, he was the Apostle to the Gentiles (Rom 11:13; 15:15,16; Gal 2:7-9; Acts 9:15; 22:21), and his mission was "the faith of all the nations" (Rom 1:5; 15:5-18; 16:25-27).

"Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Wherefore receive ye one another, as Christ also received us to the glory of God" (Rom 15:5-7).

Joe Hill


  • Comment on Rom 1:17

FOR IN THE GOSPEL A RIGHTEOUSNESS FROM GOD IS REVEALED: The gospel "is the power of God for salvation" (v 16) because it discloses "a righteousness from God" (v 17). Paul is dependent here on the Old Testament (Isa 46:12,13; 61:10). God's "righteousness" does not mean simply His own sinless character; that is of course true, but it is beside the point here. The fact that God has a perfectly sinless character would be of no consequence to any of us at all, if He merely remained aloof from man and all his experiences, because such a perfect "righteousness" would have no effect upon us.

In the Hebrew tradition, God's "righteousness" describes not just what He is but especially what He does. It describes the absolute faithfulness with which He remembers and maintains His covenants of promise to man. Such an idea was quite foreign to Greek and Roman philosophy, in which the multitude of gods were thought to be remote and austere, and seemingly not especially interested in anything mere mortals did.

Clearly, God's "righteousness" involves His holy character (Rom 3:26). But just as clearly, the expression "a righteousness from God" must go beyond that character to include God's activities. The gospel would not be the good news if it simply disclosed the righteous character of God. Such a message would scarcely demand faith. In view of man's sinful state, it could well create fear.

But if salvation as God provides it and offers it is fully in keeping with His righteous character, then it has integrity. If it satisfies God, man can be content with it — for it is not only right; it is the only right!

This verse, Romans 1:17, is a prelude to Romans 3:21-25, where Paul, dealing with the sacrifice of Christ, shows that God's righteousness is further revealed, or demonstrated, in setting forth or presenting His Son as a covering, or mercy seat, for sins. Thus God may be seen to be at the same time both righteous and merciful:

  • righteous in His character and promises, and
  • merciful in providing a way for sinful man to find his way back to Him.

In Philippians 3:9, Paul contrasts his pre-conversion condition with his present condition, in Christ. Before his conversion, Paul had had a righteousness (or an appearance of righteousness) based on observance of the Law of Moses. By contrast, in Christ, Paul could rest on a righteousness which was absolutely real, because it came from God, and was based on faith, not works.

In summary, God's righteousness in this context, while it has an implied reference to His own character, stresses more particularly His divine love and provision for man. His "righteousness" is not so much about who He is, as it about what He does — for you and me!

Elsewhere, Paul had already taught that Christ is the medium for the bringing of righteousness from God to sinful man ( 1 Cor 1:30; 2 Cor 5:21). All that is involved in this teaching will be unfolded by Paul in due course, as he continues his letter to the Romans.

A RIGHTEOUSNESS THAT IS BY FAITH FROM FIRST TO LAST: Or, better, as the KJV and the NIV margin put it: "from faith to faith". Considering the Greek words, this righteousness comes "ek" (out of) faith, and goes "eis" (unto, or into) faith. Faith is powerful in itself, when exercised; it has a reinforcing cyclical effect upon the one who receives it and then works at developing it.

To add one more dimension to this, Paul also says that this righteousness is made available "through faith" (Greek "dia pistis") in Jesus Christ (i.e., Rom 3:22).

This suggests a three-part progression:

  • "Ek pistis": Righteousness arises "out of" ("ek") faith in the first place (the faith of the individual in what he has heard).
  • "Dia pistis": For him, the righteousness is continued and replenished through, or by means of ("dia"), an ongoing faith, a stubborn faith which clings to the Truth of the gospel.
  • "Eis pistis": And righteousness has a long-term goal. Its sight is set on the reward of faith, at the return of Christ, and it cannot lose its grasp upon that faith in the meantime, until it ultimately reaches its goal.

Thus is begun, and continued, a life of faith. The initial act of faith, in belief and baptism, is never enough in itself. The faith of the novice must develop by exercising itself, "through" the testing of faith every day, which as time goes by leads "into" an ever-deepening and more enduring faith. As James puts it, "You see that his [Abraham's] faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did" (James 2:22).

JUST AS IT IS WRITTEN: "THE RIGHTEOUS WILL LIVE BY FAITH": The key affirmation of Paul's statement here, Romans 1:17, is taken from the prophet Habakkuk. In the last part of Habakkuk 2:4, the prophet states that "the righteous will live by his faith."

There are three key words in this affirmation: "righteous", "live", and "faith". It is interesting that, in the three places where this verse is quoted in the New Testament, each citation puts emphasis on a different word:

  • In Romans 1:17, the emphasis is on "righteous". Paul's concern in Romans is with the righteousness of God and how people can obtain it.
  • In Galatians 3:11, the emphasis is on "faith". Throughout the letter to the Galatians, Paul highlights the difference between salvation by works alone, and salvation by faith, activated and kept alive through works.
  • Finally, in Hebrews 10:38, the emphasis is on "live". The writer to the Hebrews stressed the importance of faith as a way of life, rather than turning back to Judaism and living by the Law.

This single phrase may be paraphrased, and amplified, as follows: "The righteous (i.e., those who are justified and declared righteous by God, having their sins forgiven) shall live (i.e., now, in their daily lives, and in the future, in the day of resurrection and glory) by their faith (i.e., by acknowledging their utter dependence upon the Lord)."


The most practical prayer

Once there was a man whose son was very ill; he suffered, apparently, from some form of epilepsy. When the father came into the presence of Christ, he pleaded: "If you can do anything, take pity on us and help us." Jesus replied: " 'If you can'? Everything is possible for him who believes ['pisteuo': i.e., who has 'faith'!]."

Immediately the father exclaimed: "I do believe ['pisteuo' again: 'I do have faith']; help me overcome my unbelief ['apistia': lack of faith]" (Mark 9:22-24).

The father's prayer to Jesus is the most practical prayer we can ever utter, to the Father through the Son. It is the prayer that will always find a positive answer if asked in faith. It is a prayer that runs no risk of being selfish, as prayers for 'things' can sometimes be. It does not pray, 'Father, give me something of material value in this life.' Instead, it is a simple prayer that acknowledges the need that we all have, more than anything else in life:

'Father, I have faith in You, and in Your Son. You know I do, or else I would not be here before You. But, O Lord, sometimes my faith falters, and so I ask You, please increase my faith — my faith that all things will work for good to those who love You — my faith that, no matter what trials there are in this life, I will continue to feel Your presence even in the midst of the worst of them — my faith to hold fast to Your precious promises each day and each week and each year, until Your Son returns or I die. Lord, I have faith, but please, before You give me anything else, give me more faith, enough for this day, and enough to sustain me each and every day, until I reach Your kingdom.'


  • Comment on Rom 1:18-32

Instead of plunging at once into an exposition of the gospel, Paul launches into a lengthy exposure of the sinfulness of man. The "good news" must be preceded by the "bad news"; otherwise, who would know how "good" the "good news" was? This is sound procedure, for until men are persuaded of their lost condition they are not likely to be concerned about deliverance. So Paul undertakes to demonstrate that in the human situation there is a grievous lack of the righteousness God requires.

The first and the last verse in this section (i.e., vv 18, 32) are joined together in thought, and they serve to set off in 'parentheses' the verses between (vv. 19-31). In the resulting parenthetical portion, verses 19 and 20 explain and qualify verse 18, while verses 21-31 describe the abominable degradation that followed the rejection of God.

  • Comment on Rom 1:18

THE WRATH OF GOD: "Wrath" = "orge", meaning "a slow development of heat and fire until it consumes everything".

IS BEING REVEALED FROM HEAVEN: "Apokalupto" = to uncover, unveil. In v 17 the "righteousness" of God was revealed, and now here the "wrath" of God is likewise revealed. In the divine scheme of things, there is a place — in fact, there MUST be a place — for both these qualities.

AGAINST ALL THE GODLESSNESS: "Asebeia": the opposite of "eusebeia". The Greek word is related to the mind; it points to a lack of reverence, an impiety that sets man against God, not just by neglect but also in rebellion.

AND WICKEDNESS: "Adikia": unrighteous ACTIONS; injustice, relating to man's conduct toward his fellows. The two together (godlessness and wickedness) indicate the failure of mankind in terms of the requirements of the two tables of the Ten Commandments. The first four of the Ten Commandments describe how man ought to show love toward his God, and the last six how he ought to show love toward his fellowmen, who are made in the image of God (cf Matt 22:37-40). But the failure to obey these commands results in the negation of loving God (thus "ungodliness") and the negation of loving your neighbor (thus "wickedness).

In the wrath of God, there seems to be no distinction between Jews and Gentiles, since "men" is broad enough to include the human race. These are the very areas in which the prophets found fault with Israel. But as the thought unfolds, there is no doubt that godliness and wickedness characterize Gentiles as much as they do Jews.

OF MEN WHO SUPPRESS THE TRUTH BY THEIR WICKEDNESS: The KJV is simply wrong here: "men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness". These are NOT men who "hold the Truth" in the sense of being believers; they are men who "hold down" or "suppress" gospel truth.

Whenever the truth starts to exert itself and makes godless and wicked men feel uneasy in whatever conscience they possess, then they find ways to hold that truth down, or suppress its voice. Some drown its voice by rushing into their immoralities; others strangle the disturbing voice by argument and by denial.

THE TRUTH: Greek "alethia": that which is complete, in contrast to that which is less fully developed. Here it means something like 'the essence of the matter', or the very existence of God Himself.

  • Comment on Rom 1:19

SINCE WHAT MAY BE KNOWN ABOUT GOD IS PLAIN TO THEM, BECAUSE GOD HAS MADE IT PLAIN TO THEM: The word "plain" ("manifest" in the KJV) is the Greek "phaneros", which means to be open to sight.

  • Comment on Rom 1:20

FOR SINCE THE CREATION OF THE WORLD GOD'S INVISIBLE QUALITIES — HIS ETERNAL POWER AND DIVINE NATURE — HAVE BEEN CLEARLY SEEN, BEING UNDERSTOOD FROM WHAT HAS BEEN MADE, SO THAT MEN ARE WITHOUT EXCUSE: "A simple consideration of the activities in which the power of the universe is engaged provides satisfactory witness of the working of God; for we are led to contemplate the wide range of ordered operations, each directed to its own end, and duly controlled within that end. We observe, in spite of human ignorance in so many details, how operations coordinate, and represent one magnificent harmony of purpose for beneficent ends. Every example of design would be pertinent. We shall content ourselves with citing just one obvious case which all can observe and admire. We refer to a common flowering plant. It usually begins from a seed planted in the ground. This sends out roots growing downwards and a shoot growing upwards into the air. From the shoot come leaves and flowers, and these flowers comprise a fascinating combination of contrivances for the production of fertile seeds, with which not only the earth with its supply of nourishment through the roots is associated, but also the sun and rain and air and insects play their part in so marvelous and admirable a manner as to compel an acknowledgment of the working of God. Wisdom must recognize in these ordained processes which produce and preserve each species the compelling evidence of eternal power infallibly guided by God Himself. Eternal power and Godhead are thus seen from things that are made" (W.W., Christadelphian 113:424,425).

"Tell a man that man's most intricate computer 'just happened' by a heap of nuts and bolts falling into a pile yesterday, and he'll say you are mad; and he will be right. Tell a man that a worm's brain (which is infinitely more intricate and wonderful than man's most advanced computer) 'just happened' by a few bits of nothing falling together one hundred billion years or so ago, and he'll say you are an educated modern scientist; and he will be right again. Tell him that, if he can believe that, he is 'safely' over the hump out of rationality and reality into evolutionary fantasy and superstition… 'His eternal power and divinity are clearly seen from the Creation of the world, by the things that are made, so that they are WITHOUT EXCUSE.' That's God's viewpoint, and it's preeminently reasonable" (G.V. Growcott).

See Study, Unknown God.

  • Comment on Rom 1:21

FOR ALTHOUGH THEY KNEW GOD, THEY NEITHER GLORIFIED HIM AS GOD NOR GAVE THANKS TO HIM: "Thanks" is Greek "charis", that which causes joy. Not only had men refused to glorify Yahweh, having had a knowledge of Him, but they were not even thankful for the fact that He had provided a way of approach to Him.

It is extraordinary to recognize, as here, that the vilest of sins and lifestyles (as described, e.g., in vv 23 onward) may begin, quite simply, with being unthankful. For if we are unthankful for what God has blessed us with, then — in less time than we can imagine — we may be completely "in the gutter", having abandoned God, and having been abandoned by Him altogether (v 28)! And it will all have started with the "littlest thing".

BUT THEIR THINKING BECAME FUTILE: Compare the men of Noah's day (Gen 6:5; 8:21). The suggestion is that mythology and idolatry grew out of man's insistent need to recognize some power in the universe greater than himself, coupled with his refusal to give God the place of supremacy. He had to make a substitution. It is highly suggestive that the verb "to become futile" yields a noun form that was used for idols (Acts 14:15). Idols are unreal and unprofitable, and their service can only lead to futility and further estrangement from the true and living God. Compare Daniel's rebuke of Belshazzar (Dan 5:23).

AND THEIR FOOLISH HEARTS WERE DARKENED: Compare Psa 14:1. Darkness is the absence of light, and can only be remedied by an application of light (cp John 1:5, 9; 8:12; 12:36, 46).

  • Comment on Rom 1:22

ALTHOUGH THEY CLAIMED TO BE WISE, THEY BECAME FOOLS: The folly of the pagans, or idolaters, leads them first to proclaim their own wisdom. Then, in the fatal clutches of that "wisdom" which they suppose they possess, they commit the sin described in v 23.

  • Comment on Rom 1:23

AND EXCHANGED THE GLORY OF THE IMMORTAL GOD FOR IMAGES MADE TO LOOK LIKE MORTAL MAN AND BIRDS AND ANIMALS AND REPTILES: Man is constitutionally a worshiper. If he gives up God, then he will take something else. Paul shows the folly of this (Acts 17:29-31). Note the degrading order of objects worshiped: from man, the highest, to reptiles, the lowest. And so mankind stooped so low that eventually "God gave them over" (v 24).

The use of language like "exchanged" here is particularly suited to Jews, contrasting what they were ("wise", v 22, and knowing something of the "glory" of God) with what they have become ("fools", v 22; who "exchanged" the reality for "images").

This abandonment of God in favor of inferior objects of worship is traced in a descending scale. "Mortal man" is the first substitution. The Creator is forsaken in preference for the creature. Scripture shows us the deification of man in the case of Nebuchadnezzar. The colossus that appeared in his dream was interpreted by Daniel as pointing to the king himself so far as the head of gold was concerned (Dan 2:38). Wasting no time, the monarch erected an immense statue of gold and compelled his subjects to prostrate themselves before it (Dan 3:1). In Paul's day the cult of Caesar had spread throughout the empire. Before long, Caesar and Christ would be competing for the homage of society. In modern times the western world has outgrown crass idolatry, but humanism has subtly injected the worship of man without the trappings. God is quietly ruled out and man is placed on the throne.

The next stage is worship of the animal kingdom. Verse 23 owes its wording largely to Psa 106:19,20. The immediate context refers to the sin of Israel in making a calf at Horeb and bowing down to this molten image. Paul makes one change in the text of the psalm, which reads: "They exchanged their Glory for an image of a bull, which eats grass" (v 20). To the psalmist God is the glory of the Israelites. Paul seems to make the glory of God His character and purpose, in contrast to any attempt to express His excellence in physical terms. God's majesty may well be included here. Whereas Paul is dealing with a characteristic sin of paganism, he resorts to Old Testament history for an illustration. God did not and could not condone idolatry in the people He had chosen. His judgment fell heavily when there was no repentance, even to the point of Israel's desolation and banishment from the land He had given them.

According to the prophetic word, the worship of man and beast will merge during the Last Days: "If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number" (Rev 13:18).

  • Comment on Rom 1:24

THEREFORE GOD GAVE THEM OVER IN THE SINFUL DESIRES OF THEIR HEARTS: This becomes a refrain (vv. 24, 26, 28). For a nuance of the term, see 1 Cor 5:5; 1 Tim 1:20. The same expression is used of God's judgment on Israel for idolatry (Acts 7:42). It may also be, in the first instance, an echo of Psa 81:12, describing Israel: "So I gave them over to their stubborn hearts to follow their own devices."

In our passage the reference is principally to Gentiles (Israel was largely purged of this sin by means of the captivity in Babylon). We are not told how this giving over was implemented, but most likely we are to think of it in negative terms — i.e., that God simply took His hands off and let their willful rejection of Him produce its ugly results in human life. There is no suggestion here of direct intervention such as was granted to Israel by sending prophets to plead with God's people concerning their unfaithfulness.

TO SEXUAL IMPURITY: "Uncleanness" in KJV: Greek "akatharsia", a moral condition (Eph 4:18,19; 1 Thes 2:3). Not "simple" sexual immorality, but ritual immorality: a reference to cultic prostitution, as in Corinthian temple/brothels, and elsewhere in the Roman Empire. Also borrowed from the Canaanite peoples in Old Testament times. Why? Because it was part of the process by which "they exchanged the truth of God for a lie" — i.e., false gods (v 25)!

FOR THE DEGRADING OF THEIR BODIES WITH ONE ANOTHER: "Atimazo": disgrace, reproach, insult: cp Mark 12:4; Luke 20:11.

  • Comment on Rom 1:25

THEY EXCHANGED THE TRUTH OF GOD FOR A LIE: Better, "THE lie": a false religion, accepted in place of the worship of the true God.

AND WORSHIPED AND SERVED CREATED THINGS RATHER THAN THE CREATOR — WHO IS FOREVER PRAISED. AMEN: To substitute the worship of a creature for the Creator is the height of perversity and folly, meriting the retribution mentioned (cp 2 Tim 3:4). Today's worldly pleasures are a parallel, as they are designed to serve the creature — hence the term "creature comforts"!

  • Comment on Rom 1:26

BECAUSE OF THIS, GOD GAVE THEM OVER TO SHAMEFUL LUSTS. EVEN THEIR WOMEN EXCHANGED NATURAL RELATIONS FOR UNNATURAL ONES: For vv 26,27, see the Study, Homosexuality.

  • Comment on Rom 1:27

IN THE SAME WAY THE MEN ALSO ABANDONED NATURAL RELATIONS WITH WOMEN AND WERE INFLAMED WITH LUST FOR ONE ANOTHER. MEN COMMITTED INDECENT ACTS WITH OTHER MEN, AND RECEIVED IN THEMSELVES THE DUE PENALTY FOR THEIR PERVERSION: "Indecent" ("unseemly": KJV) is the Greek "aschemosune" (cp 1 Cor 7:36; 12:23; 13:5; Rev 16:15). The "a" signifying "not", this becomes the total negation of "euschemonos" — which denotes "graceful", or "in a seemly or pleasant manner". "Euschemonos" literally means "good [eu] form [schema]", and therefore "aschemosune" means "bad form". The word for "good form" occurs in Rom 13:13 ("decently" in NIV, "honestly" in KJV), where it stands in contrast to the shameful Gentile social life of "orgies and drunkenness… immorality and debauchery… dissension and jealousy".

  • Comment on Rom 1:28

FURTHERMORE, SINCE THEY DID NOT THINK IT WORTHWHILE TO RETAIN THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD, HE GAVE THEM OVER TO A DEPRAVED MIND: "The margin defines a 'reprobate mind' [KJV: 'depraved mind' in NIV] as a 'mind void of judgment', and therefore unable to distinguish between good and evil. Those whom Paul describes as being given over to 'vile affections' were also given over 'to do those things which are not convenient' — the kind of conduct shown by men who condemn others while doing the same thing themselves, 'who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them' (v 32)" (A.H. Nicholls).

In the KJV, the word "adokimos" is translated "reprobate" (Rom 1:28; 2 Cor 13:5-7; 2 Tim 3:8; Titus 1:16), "castaway" ( 1 Cor 9:27), and "rejected" (Heb 6:8). It is used to describe a counterfeit coin, deficient as to weight or quality of metal. It is also used, figuratively, to describe a cowardly soldier who fails the test of battle; a candidate rejected for office; and a stone rejected by the builders. In each case, that which is "reprobate" has promised something by its outward appearance which it cannot deliver! It has, perhaps, a "name to live", but it is dead — like clouds that promise rain, but give none; like stars in the heavens that appear fixed, but prove to be "wandering stars", or meteors.


The question might be asked: "What must a person do so that God will 'give him over to a depraved mind?' "

The answer is: God turns us over to a "depraved mind" because, step by step, we have sinned our way into such a state of mind. He does not judge us by giving us a depraved mind. No, we "judge" ourselves daily, through our actions or inactions, and one day we find ourselves with such a mind, hardened toward sin and against righteousness. How does God give us over to such a mind? By putting in place the laws of human nature, and letting them take their course in our lives — that's all.

None of us knows exactly where the point is that we cross over into the territory of depravity. If we knew that for ourselves, then we might be tempted to go much further down the "slipper slope" of sin than we should — because we would trust ourselves to stop just short of the point of no return and then retrace our steps to God.

That's the problem with sin: "The heart [which is of course a 'sinful' heart of flesh] is deceitful" (Jer 17:9). Sin committed has a searing or cauterizing effect on the mind, or heart. One sin makes the second such sin easier, and the second sin makes the third easier. That's the slippery slope. Somewhere out there on the slope there is the point where we — you or I — can no longer climb back to where we belong. Why take the chance, by inching just a little bit, and then a little bit more, down that slope?

So, for ourselves, we should always stop as soon as we know we are doing wrong. When we are actually on the slippery slope, we don't know if our point of no return is a foot away or a mile away. Even when we do pass that point, we will never know — because by that time our consciences will have been seared beyond the ability to recognize it.

On the other hand, we should never stop trying to recover others who seem to be on that slope, no matter how far away they seem to have gone. This is because we never know if they have actually passed their point of no return — only God can know such a thing. Our business is to try to reclaim them, no matter how far they seem to have gone away. If they have indeed developed a "depraved mind" no longer capable of repentance and change, it still does not hurt us to try to bring them back.


TO DO WHAT OUGHT NOT TO BE DONE: What is "not fitting" (RSV), or "not becoming" (Rotherham). The KJV's "which are not convenient" misses the point: This verse is not discussing what is convenient and what is not convenient — it is discussing what is right and what is wrong!

  • Comment on Rom 1:29

THEY HAVE BECOME FILLED WITH EVERY KIND OF WICKEDNESS, EVIL…: Scholars have found it difficult to detect any satisfactory classification in the long list of offenses included here, which only confirms the fact that sin is irrational in itself and disorderly in its effects.

In fact, there are 22 kinds of wickedness — the same as the letters in the Hebrew alphabet! Sins "from A to Z"!

GREED: "Pleonexia": a desire for more. It can be either a desire for good or evil. Here, of course, it is evil. In 1 Cor 12:31, it is that which is good. Associated with wickedness in Mark 7:22; and compared with idolatry in Col 3:5.

DEPRAVITY: "Maliciousness" (KJV): "kakia", a comprehensive term for all evil, especially immorality (cp 1 Pet 2:1), the vicious disposition and desires, rather than the active exercise of them.

THEY ARE FULL OF ENVY: "Phthonos", jealousy: cp Matt 27:18. This vice is one of the "works of the flesh" which are opposed to the "fruit of the Spirit" in Gal 5:19-24 ("envy" in v 21).

MURDER: "Phonos".

STRIFE: "Eris" = debate, rivalry, contention.

DECEIT: "Dolos".

MALICE: "Kakoetheia".

THEY ARE GOSSIPS: "Psithristes": liars, secret slanderers.

  • Comment on Rom 1:30

SLANDERERS, GOD-HATERS, INSOLENT, ARROGANT AND BOASTFUL; THEY INVENT WAYS OF DOING EVIL; THEY DISOBEY THEIR PARENTS: "Slanderers" is the Greek "katalalos", signifying open slanderers (cp "whisperers" in KJV, v 29).

  • Comment on Rom 1:31

THEY ARE SENSELESS, FAITHLESS, HEARTLESS, RUTHLESS: "Vice lists" like vv 28-32 can be found elsewhere in the New Testament in Matt 15:19; Gal 5:1-21; 1 Tim 1:9,10; and 1 Pet 4:3.

  • Comment on Rom 1:32

ALTHOUGH THEY KNOW GOD'S RIGHTEOUS DECREE THAT THOSE WHO DO SUCH THINGS DESERVE DEATH, THEY NOT ONLY CONTINUE TO DO THESE VERY THINGS BUT ALSO APPROVE OF THOSE WHO PRACTICE THEM: To deliberately pursue a wrong course is bad, but to find delight in others doing the same things is the ultimate in moral corruption.

Chapter 2

The question is asked: How can justification take place without the works of the law, even though James says: 'Faith without works is dead'? In answer, the apostle distinguishes between the law and faith, between the letter and grace. "The 'works of the law' are works done without faith and grace, by the law, which forces them to be done through fear or the enticing promise of temporal advantages. But 'works of faith' are those done in the spirit of liberty, purely out of love to God. And they can be done only by those who are justified by faith… Paul does not say that faith is without its characteristic works, but that it justifies without the works of the law. Therefore justification does not require the works of the law; but it does require a living faith, which performs its works" (Martin Luther).

  • Comment on Rom 2:1

YOU, THEREFORE, HAVE NO EXCUSE: Or, 'You have nothing to say in your own defense' (Twentieth Century New Testament).

YOU WHO PASS JUDGMENT ON SOMEONE ELSE, FOR AT WHATEVER POINT YOU JUDGE THE OTHER, YOU ARE CONDEMNING YOURSELF, BECAUSE YOU WHO PASS JUDGMENT DO THE SAME THINGS: The implication in the opening verse is that a Jewish listener, heartily endorsing the verdict rendered concerning the Gentiles, fails to realize his own plight. True judgment rests on the ability to discern the facts in a given case. If one is able to see the sin and hopelessness of the Gentile, he should logically be able to see himself as being in the same predicament. But he is so taken up with the faults of others that he does not consider his own failures (cf Matt 7:2,3). The charge that he who passes judgment does the same things he sees in others is enlarged upon in Rom 2:17-24.

Passing judgment upon others is contrary to Christ's commandments: Matt 7:1; Luke 6:37; Rom 14:3,10,13; 1 Cor 4:3,5.

Hypocrisy is a real killer. Often it seems not nearly so obvious to the hypocrites themselves, yet others (and especially children and teenagers) can spot it a mile off. Hypocrisy happens when our words and actions don't match. There are two ways we are shown in this chapter that warn us against having mismatched words and actions.

The first is by passing judgment on someone else when we ourselves do the same thing. It is important to look at ourselves critically as we look at other people, because if we do that we will become much more humble and realize that we too, all too often, fall under the same condemnation as we dish out to them.

The second concerns our teaching. Paul put it best: "You then, who teach others, do you not teach yourself? You who preach against stealing, do you steal? You who say that people should not commit adultery, do you commit adultery? You who abhor idols, do you rob temples? You who brag about the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law" [vv 21-23]. Let us always be sure that our words and our actions go hand in hand so that God's name is not blasphemed.

Robert Prins

  • Comment on Rom 2:2

NOW WE KNOW THAT GOD'S JUDGMENT AGAINST THOSE WHO DO SUCH THINGS IS BASED ON TRUTH: "According to truth" (KJV).

  • Comment on Rom 2:3

SO WHEN YOU, A MERE MAN, PASS JUDGMENT ON THEM AND YET DO THE SAME THINGS, DO YOU THINK YOU WILL ESCAPE GOD'S JUDGMENT?: "Judgment" is the Greek "krima" = the great and terrible "day of the Lord", when Christ shall be the righteous judge of the world, on behalf of the Father (Acts 17:31). Compare v 5, notes.

  • Comment on Rom 2:4

OR DO YOU SHOW CONTEMPT: "Kataphroneo": to think lightly of. The KJV has "despisest", but the Jew did not despise His God. Rather, he treated Him lightly, or disesteemed Him.

FOR THE RICHES OF HIS KINDNESS, TOLERANCE AND PATIENCE: Compare "RICHES of his glory" (Rom 9:23), and "the depth of the RICHES of the wisdom and knowledge of God" (Rom 11:33). All the true "riches" of the Bible, in fact all the true and meaningful "riches" to be found anywhere, have their origins in the righteous and loving character of an Almighty God. There are no riches to be found anywhere else.

The kindness, or goodness (KJV), of God is revealed in the Hope of Israel: the gospel of salvation. Isa 63:7 describes His goodness to a rebellious house of Israel.

TOLERANCE: Better than the KJV's old-fashioned "forbearance". Demonstrated in the Old Testament's 400 years, more or less, of tolerance until the sin of the Amorites reached its full measure (Gen 15:16), and the New Testament's 40 further years during which the Lord waited while Israel filled up "the measure of the sin of your forefathers" (Matt 23:32).

But God's tolerance, or forbearance, can actually produce a scornful attitude with His people Israel, as though that tolerance were only a confirmation of their security, or perhaps even a sign of weakness on God's part. "Because sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the heart of the sons of men is fully set to do evil" (Eccl 8:11).

PATIENCE: Again, the NIV is better than the out-of-date "longsuffering". The Greek is "macrothumia", meaning slowness in avenging wrongs. This patience was demonstrated by the Lord in the time of Noah (1 Pet 3:20).

NOT REALIZING THAT GOD'S KINDNESS LEADS YOU TOWARD REPENTANCE?: God desires repentance and not (only) sacrifice (1Sam 15:22). Repentance ("metanoia") signifies a change, a reversal. The sorrow for sins committed is not the most important aspect of true "repentance"; there must be a forsaking of the past way of life.

  • Comment on Rom 2:5

BUT BECAUSE OF YOUR STUBBORNNESS: "Sklerotes": callous, hard. Stubbornness was a natural characteristic of Israel (Isa 30:8,9). See Exod 14:12; Acts 13:44-46.

AND YOUR UNREPENTANT HEART: Greek "ametanoetos": literally, without change (in contrast to v 4).

Hard-heartedness is first seen in Pharaoh (Exod 4:21; 7:3, 13; 8:15, 32; 9:12, 34; 10:1, 20, 27; 11:10; 14:4, 8). So when this description is used of anyone in Israel, it is very pointed: 'You are being like the oppressing Egyptians from whom I have delivered you!' Compare Deut 15:7; 2 Chron 36:13; Psa 95:8; Isa 63:17; Mark 10:5; 16:14; John 12:40; Rom 2:5.

YOU ARE STORING UP WRATH AGAINST YOURSELF FOR THE DAY OF GOD'S WRATH: "Storing up" is "thesaurizo", from a root word meaning "treasure" (hence the KJV translation). There is an intended irony in this: the only "treasure" stubborn and unrepentant men and women will even have is the wrath of God. The faithful, on the other hand, store up treasures of wisdom and spiritual riches (Matt 6:20).

WHEN HIS RIGHTEOUS JUDGMENT WILL BE REVEALED: The theme of condemnation, running through Romans, and especially Rom 1:16 — 3:20, is directed against the Judaizers. This condemnation falls upon all who cling to Law as a means of justification from sin, whether they be Israel after the flesh or Israel after the Spirit.

The judgment promised, or threatened, here is the future day of judgment: 2Pet 3:7, 10.

  • Comment on Rom 2:6

GOD "WILL GIVE TO EACH PERSON ACCORDING TO WHAT HE HAS DONE": Parallel to Matthew 16:24-28; Revelation 22:12. Compare also Psalm 62:12; Proverbs 24:12.

  • Comment on Rom 2:7

TO THOSE WHO BY PERSISTENCE IN DOING GOOD SEEK GLORY, HONOR AND IMMORTALITY: "All progress begins one step at a time. There is no sudden leap to greatness. Good work done little by little becomes a great work. The house of success is built brick by brick.

"You can do what you want to do, achieve what you want to achieve, attain any reasonable objective you may have in mind. Not all of a sudden, nor in one sweeping act of achievement. You will do it gradually, day by day and play by play. If you want to do it, if you work to do it, you will accomplish your goal over a sufficient period of time.

"Your big accomplishments will be a series of little accomplishments. Many strokes overthrow the tallest oak" (Max Steingart).

PERSISTENCE: Greek "hupomone": a remaining under, hence a bearing up under hardship. Note the patience and persistence of Christ: 2 Thes 3:5; 1 Thes 1:3; Heb 12:1,2; Matt 24:13; Heb 10:36; James 5:7-11. Consider also James 5:11 and Heb 6:15.

HE WILL GIVE ETERNAL LIFE: This statement is perfectly true, but they may mislead us, if we are not careful, into thinking that our "doing good" will EARN us eternal life. Can one earn eternal life? No. Then how do we rationalize this verse?

"At the very least, it is safe to say that [Paul] is not contradicting what he says later about the impossibility of having salvation by means of the works of the law (Rom 3:20). Far from teaching a system of salvation by works, the statement of v 7, rightly understood, teaches the opposite. 'The reward of eternal life… is promised to those who do not regard their good works as an end in themselves, but see them as marks not of human achievement but of hope in God. Their trust is not in their good works, but in God, the only source of glory, honor, and incorruption' (Barrett). Paul is simply portraying the motivation and the tenor of the life that will culminate in eternal fellowship with God… The good works the believer performs do not bring him salvation, but they attest the salvation he has received by faith (Rom 6:22), and therefore have an essential function (cf Eph 2:8-10)" (Everett F. Harrison, Expositor's Bible Commentary).

  • Comment on Rom 2:8

BUT FOR THOSE WHO ARE SELF-SEEKING AND WHO REJECT THE TRUTH: "Reject" is "apeitheo": to be disobedient: cp 1 Peter 3:1; 4:17. The opposite is "peitheo", to be persuaded or won over, signifying a habitual course of action. The "rejecter" is one who knows the Truth, but knowingly and willingly refuses to act upon it.

AND FOLLOW EVIL: Compare Rom 1:18.

THERE WILL BE WRATH AND ANGER: "Thumos" and "orge": hot anger of passion, and a settled, lasting emotion amounting to hatred.

  • Comment on Rom 2:9

THERE WILL BE TROUBLE AND DISTRESS FOR EVERY HUMAN BEING WHO DOES EVIL: "Trouble" is "thlipsis": affliction, a pressing or pressure, that which burdens the spirit. Hence the English "depression". Compare 2 Thessalonians 1:6.

DISTRESS: "Stenochoria", literally, narrowness of place. No possibility of escape.

DOES: Greek "prasso", to practice or perform habitually: cp. 1 John 3:4,9; John 3:20,21; 5:29.

EVIL: Greek "kakos", generically bad. It embraces every form of evil whether moral and physical, and denotes that which is useless, incapable or bad.

FIRST FOR THE JEW, THEN FOR THE GENTILE: Compare Romans 1:16.

  • Comment on Rom 2:10

BUT GLORY, HONOR AND PEACE FOR EVERYONE WHO DOES GOOD: "Peace is "eirene": a rest in contrast to a struggle or strife. As influenced by the Hebrew "shalom", signifying a state of health or wellbeing, a peace with God (Phil 4:6-9). Yahweh is the God of peace (Rom 15:33; 16:20; 1 Thes 5:23; Heb 13:20).

FIRST FOR THE JEW, THEN FOR THE GENTILE: Compare Rom 1:16 again.

  • Comment on Rom 2:11

FOR GOD DOES NOT SHOW FAVORITISM: This is the truth which Peter learned in the Cornelius incident (Acts 10:34; see also 1 Pet 1:17; Eph 6:9; Col 3:2; James 2:1). Paul explains this in the following verses.

  • Comment on Rom 2:12

ALL WHO SIN APART FROM THE LAW WILL ALSO PERISH APART FROM THE LAW, AND ALL WHO SIN UNDER THE LAW WILL BE JUDGED BY THE LAW: "As many as have sinned (in disobeying the truth, verse 8) outside covenant relationship, will perish when Christ comes. Their doom is sealed. But as many as have sinned in covenant relationship will be judged, for they have stood related to a possible reception of glory, honor and immortality" (John Carter on Romans, 29).

Note: This is the first occurrence of word "law" (Greek "nomos") in Romans. There can be at least four different senses of the word:

  • figurative, as a "principle";
  • generic, meaning "a law";
  • as a reference to the Old Testament or some part of the Old Testament; and
  • as a reference to the Law of Moses (which probably makes up the majority of Paul's references).

Exactly what Paul means by the word in any single verse will need to be determined by the context.

APART FROM LAW: Or "without law": that is, those outside covenant relationship but possessing a knowledge of the Truth (cp verse 8: these are they who "reject the truth").

UNDER THE LAW: This is better than the KJV "in the law". "Under" here points to those who came within the scope of the privileges as well as the responsibilities and judgments of a Law.

  • Comment on Rom 2:13

Verses 13-15 are parenthetical. Verse 12 may be followed by verse 16 for continuity of argument.

FOR IT IS NOT THOSE WHO HEAR THE LAW WHO ARE RIGHTEOUS IN GOD'S SIGHT, BUT IT IS THOSE WHO OBEY THE LAW WHO WILL BE DECLARED RIGHTEOUS: We have a reminder in James 1:22-24 of the ease with which the Jew could hear the law read and still go away without any effect on his life and conduct. Those who will be "declared righteous" are the doers of the law (v 13). This is the first occurrence in Romans of the important expression "be declared righteous", an expression which Paul will develop and explain in Romans 3.

NOT THOSE WHO HEAR THE LAW: See Matthew 7:15-21; Acts 10:35; 1 John 2:29; 3:7, 10.

THOSE WHO OBEY THE LAW: See James 2:22-24.

  • Comment on Rom 2:14

INDEED, WHEN GENTILES, WHO DO NOT HAVE THE LAW, DO BY NATURE THINGS REQUIRED BY THE LAW: No one is righteous "by nature" (see Rom 1:18-32). This passage relates to CONVERTED Gentiles, whose minds have taken on the teaching of God. Such Gentiles keep God's law, not by any outward show of formalism, but by a new nature which — being "born again" — is begotten by the gospel which enlightened their consciences.

THEY ARE A LAW FOR THEMSELVES, EVEN THOUGH THEY DO NOT HAVE THE LAW: That is, the law is a part of them. They are the embodiment of God's law. Now, when they sin, their consciences can accuse and correct their actions (v 15). A believing Gentile, then, is more "righteous" than a natural Israelite because the former absorbs into his conscience the things which he hears, whereas the Israelite has paid no heed.

  • Comment on Rom 2:15

SINCE THEY SHOW THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW ARE WRITTEN ON THEIR HEARTS, THEIR CONSCIENCES ALSO BEARING WITNESS, AND THEIR THOUGHTS NOW ACCUSING, NOW EVEN DEFENDING THEM: Their IMMEDIATE judge (the enlightened conscience) can inform them as to what their ULTIMATE judge will say about their actions — giving them an opportunity for self-correction before it is too late.

  • Comment on Rom 2:16

THIS WILL TAKE PLACE ON THE DAY WHEN GOD WILL JUDGE MEN'S SECRETS THROUGH JESUS CHRIST, AS MY GOSPEL DECLARES: "We commend to the serious consideration of everyone interested, the sobering fact that there is a day appointed when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, justifying the righteous and condemning the wicked. It is a fact that will encourage, strengthen, and sustain every person who, having been enlightened and joined the brotherhood of Christ, is working with a single eye, as seeing him who is invisible: and it is a fact that, vividly realized, will correct and purify those who, in a similar position, may be suffering themselves to be diverted from the path of truth and duty by considerations of a temporal nature. The record of the judgment seat is written now in the lives of those who will appear there" (Robert Roberts, Christendom Astray, 87).

THE DAY: Psa 75:2; Eccl 12:14; Heb 9:27; 2 Tim 4:1; Matt 12:36; John 12:48; 1 Cor 4:5.

SECRETS: Greek "kruptos" — that which is cryptic, or hidden; i.e., a false identity (see 1 Cor 4:5; Eccl 12;14; Heb 4:13). Many an act which seems entirely praiseworthy to those who observe it may actually be wrongly motivated, and contrariwise some things that seem to men to merit stern disapproval may pass muster in this supreme court because the intention behind the deed was praiseworthy.

  • Comment on Rom 2:17-24

Here Paul begins as though to engage in dialogue with a representative Jew, and his irony is sharp. He proceeds to build up the Jew, citing his various distinctions and appearing to appreciate them (vv. 17-20), only to swing abruptly into a direct assault by exposing the inconsistency between his claims and his conduct (vv. 21-24). The Jew was characterized by his reliance on the Law given by God through Moses (and particularly laid out in the Old Testament books of Exodus through Deuteronomy). This reliance came as the result of a relationship with God enjoyed by no other people. In Paul's time some of the leaders of Judaism were making such extravagant statements about the Law of Moses as to put it virtually in the place of God. Many Jews were trying to keep the Law for its own sake, to honor and worship the Law rather than its Giver. This tendency was even more developed after the fall of Jerusalem, when the Law became the rallying point for a nation that had lost its holy city and its temple.

Paul concedes that the use of the Law will bring knowledge of God's will and a recognition of its superior teaching. But this is not all, for the Jew thinks that this advantage makes him superior to the Gentile. To paraphrase Paul: 'You come to the Gentile and propose yourself as a guide for his blindness (when, as a matter of fact, as I have already shown, he has a light and a law as well as you). You come to the Gentile as though he were dumb and childish, giving you the controlling hand, which in your pride you thoroughly enjoy. To you they are mere infants, knowing next to nothing.'

In effect, Paul has set a rhetorical trap: He first employs terms actually used by the Jews for the Gentiles, one after the other, not once suggesting that the Gentile has anything to his credit. This serves to artificially magnify the Jew and his standing. Thus it becomes easier for Paul to make his ultimate point: that is, the Jew is lost, and even ridiculous, in his misplaced pride and hollow boasting.

  • Comment on Rom 2:17

NOW YOU, IF YOU CALL YOURSELF A JEW: With all the heritage and exclusiveness which that name carried.

IF YOU RELY ON THE LAW: "In the Law the Jew saw the Magna Carta which gave him his assurance of salvation" (Meyer).

AND BRAG ABOUT YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO GOD: As though that gave him an exclusive claim to the Lord's favor. Compare Deut 4:7; Psa 135:4; Isa 48:1; Jer 7:4. Contrast Jer 9:24: " 'But let him who boasts boast about this: that he understands and knows me, that I am the Lord, who exercises kindness, justice and righteousness on earth, for in these I delight,' declares the Lord."

  • Comment on Rom 2:18

IF YOU KNOW HIS WILL AND APPROVE OF WHAT IS SUPERIOR: The KJV margin has "triest the things that differ". Being able to discriminate between good and evil (cp Phil 1:10), they could intelligently reject the vain philosophy of the Greeks.

BECAUSE YOU ARE INSTRUCTED BY THE LAW: "Katecheo", orally instructed, taught by word of mouth. By the constant reading and hearing of the Law in the synagogues (and some homes) the Jew was more familiar with its contents.

BY THE LAW: "Ek", out of the Law.

  • Comment on Rom 2:19

IF YOU ARE CONVINCED THAT YOU ARE A GUIDE FOR THE BLIND: But it was not always so that the non-Jews were blind (Matt 15:14), and of course that is Paul's point!

A LIGHT FOR THOSE WHO ARE IN THE DARK: Psa 119:105; Isa 49:6,9,10.

  • Comment on Rom 2:20

AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER OF INFANTS: Those young in understanding ( 1 Cor 3:1; Heb 5:13; 1 Pet 2:2). But, again, this is ironic — for it is not always true!

BECAUSE YOU HAVE IN THE LAW THE EMBODIMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND TRUTH: But if the Jew failed to see Christ in the words of Scripture, then he would have only the FORM of godliness while denying the POWER (2 Tim 3:5).

  • Comment on Rom 2:21-24

Abruptly the shadow-boxing turns aggressive and the blows become lethal. Now the Jew is confronted by the disparity between what he teaches others as the will of God, on the one hand, and his own way of life on the other. Paul makes this point in a series of questions, encouraging the complacent Jew to back on himself and examine his own conscience.

Paul's indictment is summarized by the general charge of breaking the very Law the Jew boasts of (v 23). In fact, the failure is so notorious that even non-Israelites notice the discrepancy. At this point Paul introduces a quotation from Isaiah 52:5. God has been obliged to chasten His disobedient people by permitting them to go into captivity, where their captors laugh at their God because He is apparently unable to prevent their deportation (cf Ezek 36:20,21). But in fact the fault lay not with God but with His people, who had refused to take His law seriously.

  • Comment on Rom 2:21

YOU, THEN, WHO TEACH OTHERS, DO YOU NOT TEACH YOURSELF?: Thus showing, by your own actions, your hypocrisy: Matt 7:3; 23:3.

YOU WHO PREACH AGAINST STEALING, DO YOU STEAL?: By withholding from God what was rightfully His (Mal 1:8; 3:8; Mark 11:17).

  • Comment on Rom 2:22

YOU WHO SAY THAT PEOPLE SHOULD NOT COMMIT ADULTERY, DO YOU COMMIT ADULTERY?: Some of the Jews were so quick to seek out and condemn the adulterous woman (John 8:3-11), and yet they could secretly (Matt 5:27,28) and hard-heartedly (Matt 19:8) commit with impunity the same offence (Matt 5:31,32).

YOU WHO ABHOR IDOLS, DO YOU ROB TEMPLES?: "A cognate of the same word occurs in Acts 19:37, where it covers sacrilege in the general sense of desecrating sacred things. But in this passage in Romans a precise, strong contrast is intended. The Jew who has been taught to abhor idols is charged with laying hands on them for the sake of profit. This may sound inconceivable, but if the robbery was directed at the offerings brought to the idol, this was [equivalent] to robbing the idol and thereby desecrating the temple. Ancient temples were repositories of treasure and were therefore a source of temptation to the avaricious (cf Josephus Antiquities 4:207)" (Harrison, Expositor's Bible Commentary).

In effect, the man who looks at temples of false religions, abhorring the idols themselves but secretly coveting the riches displayed there, is showing himself to be nothing more than an "idolater" of a slightly different order!

  • Comment on Rom 2:23

YOU WHO BRAG ABOUT THE LAW, DO YOU DISHONOR GOD BY BREAKING THE LAW?: This is a summary of the previous verses. "How can you say, 'We are wise, for we have the law of the Lord', when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? The wise will be put to shame; they will be dismayed and trapped. Since they have rejected the word of the Lord, what kind of wisdom do they have?" (Jer 8:8,9).

  • Comment on Rom 2:24

AS IT IS WRITTEN: "GOD'S NAME IS BLASPHEMED AMONG THE GENTILES BECAUSE OF YOU": Paul quotes from Isaiah 52:5, where, on account of Israel's continual sins against Yahweh's Law, the nations were caused to blaspheme Israel's God. David's sin against Uriah brought the same result: "By doing this you have made the enemies of the Lord show utter contempt — or blaspheme!" (2Sam 12:14).

  • Comment on Rom 2:25

"Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law" (Gal 5:3).

CIRCUMCISION HAS VALUE IF YOU OBSERVE THE LAW: "Circumcision refers to male circumcision as prescribed in the Old Testament, which was given as a covenant to Abraham in Gen 17:10–14. Its importance for Judaism can hardly be overstated: According to J.D.G. Dunn (Word Biblical Commentary) it was the 'single clearest distinguishing feature of the covenant people' " (NET Notes).

BUT IF YOU BREAK THE LAW…: And ALL did (Rom 3:23)!

YOU HAVE BECOME AS THOUGH YOU HAD NOT BEEN CIRCUMCISED: Because you are cursed by the very Law which established circumcision (Gen 17:14).

  • Comment on Rom 2:26

IF THOSE WHO ARE NOT CIRCUMCISED KEEP THE LAW'S REQUIREMENTS, WILL THEY NOT BE REGARDED AS THOUGH THEY WERE CIRCUMCISED?: "Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God's commands is what counts" ( 1 Cor 7:19). "For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any value. The only thing that counts is faith expressing itself through love" (Gal 5:6). "Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is a new creation" (Gal 6:15). "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!" (2 Cor 5:17).

  • Comment on Rom 2:27

THE ONE WHO IS NOT CIRCUMCISED PHYSICALLY AND YET OBEYS THE LAW WILL CONDEMN YOU WHO, EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE THE WRITTEN CODE AND CIRCUMCISION, ARE A LAWBREAKER: The believing Gentile, who is not literally circumcised, but obeys the gospel, will by his mere existence demonstrate the judgment coming upon you unbelieving Jews. You have been literally circumcised, but that ritual does you no good, if you disregard God's requirements. Likewise, your possession of the Jews' ancestral Law of Moses will do you no good, unless you pay heed to what it says.

  • Comment on Rom 2:28

A MAN IS NOT A JEW IF HE IS ONLY ONE OUTWARDLY, NOR IS CIRCUMCISION MERELY OUTWARD AND PHYSICAL: There is a "circumcision", a removal of the flesh, which is far more meaningful than the physical sign. It is explained in the next verse.

  • Comment on Rom 2:29

NO, A MAN IS A JEW IF HE IS ONE INWARDLY: This is exactly what a believer in Christ must become: an "inward" Jew.

AND CIRCUMCISION IS CIRCUMCISION OF THE HEART: Not the cutting away, or removal, from males' bodies of a small piece of flesh, but the removal from the hearts and minds, of all males and females, fleshly (i.e., natural or sinful) thoughts and desires. Thus, a 'spiritual' circumcision (see next phrase).

How do we "circumcise" the heart? Surprisingly, it is the Old Testament which in various places gives a full answer:

  • By confessing our sins (Lev 26:40-42);
  • By no longer being stiff-necked or stubborn (Deut 10:16);
  • By learning to love the Lord our God with all our hearts and all our lives (Deut 30:6);
  • By dedicating ourselves to the Lord (Jer 4:4);
  • By changing the heart inwardly (Jer 9:25,26); and
  • By no longer being a foreigner, or alien, to the people of Israel, but by becoming a Jew in heart and spirit (Ezek 44:9).

BY THE SPIRIT: "In the spirit" (KJV). This is not a reference to the Holy Spirit, but to a spiritual (i.e., not a literal) "circumcision".

NOT BY THE WRITTEN CODE: "Not in the letter" (KJV). Not just a literal cutting off of flesh, as prescribed by the Law of Moses.

SUCH A MAN'S PRAISE IS NOT FROM MEN, BUT FROM GOD: The word Jew, coming from the Hebrew "Judah", signifies "praise" (Gen 49:8). But the natural Jew often loved the praise of men more than the praise of God (John 12:43). To such a Jew, circumcision gave the opportunity to boast in his own flesh (Gal 6:12,13), and thus in who he was and not in the God who made him. Such a presumptuous attitude is in direct contrast to the principle of the gospel of Christ: "so that no one may boast before him" ( 1 Cor 1:29). So his praise came from men only, since he would receive no praise from God.

On the other hand, the man who truly believed, no matter what his ethnicity, would trust in God, not in man. He would place all his confidence in Him, and in His promises. And such men and women will receive God's praise, at the end, not for who they were by birth, but for what they have become — God's dear children in His everlasting covenant.

Chapter 3

  • Comment on Rom 3:1

WHAT ADVANTAGE, THEN, IS THERE IN BEING A JEW, OR WHAT VALUE IS THERE IN CIRCUMCISION?: That is, in light of Romans 2:28,29.

  • Comment on Rom 3:2

MUCH IN EVERY WAY! FIRST OF ALL…: A manifold advantage, made explicit by "first of all". This suggests that there should follow an enumeration of all the ways in which the Jews have the advantage, but Paul proceeds no further than this first point. Eventually a fuller list is provided, but it must wait until Romans 9 (Rom 9:4,5).

THEY HAVE BEEN ENTRUSTED WITH THE VERY WORDS OF GOD: The "logion" has been taken to refer to:

  • God's general promises to the Jews;
  • the Abrahamic and Messianic promises especially; but most commonly to:
  • the entire Old Testament generally.

The Jews have been made the custodians of the Word of God (Deut 4:5-8; Psa 147:19,20). And so salvation is of the Jews (John 4:22); they should have been a "light" to the Gentiles (Rom 2:17-20).

Paul is surely implying here that, while the Jews had a wonderful advantage over the Gentiles when they were given God's Law, it was at the same time a serious responsibility, and their failure to live by all of God's Law would bring their judgment all the more quickly. With greater advantages come greater responsibilities, and possibly greater judgments!

  • Comment on Rom 3:3

WHAT IF SOME DID NOT HAVE FAITH?: To be "entrusted" (v 2) with the divine oracles obviously means more than to be the recipient of them. Actually it means more even than to be the custodian and transmitter of them. What is called for is faith and obedience. And it is just at this point that the Jew failed. Paul has already dealt sufficiently with Jewish failure in terms of the Law of Moses, but here he deals with it in terms of God's revealed purpose.

He is generous in saying only that "SOME did not have faith." In 1 Corinthians 10:1 he says that some became idolaters, some murmured, etc. Actually, only two men of the Exodus generation pleased God and were permitted to enter the promised land. Paul is recognizing the concept of the faithful remnant in Israel.

DID NOT HAVE FAITH: Is the rendering "did not have faith" ("did not believe": KJV) acceptable here, or should one regard the RSV translation, "were unfaithful", as preferable? The problem is to determine which fits better with the contrasting term, "God's faithfulness" (in the next phrase). The revelation of God summons man both to faith (i.e., to believe in His promises) and to faithfulness (i.e., exhorting man to live in a manner worthy of God's children).

WILL THEIR LACK OF FAITH NULLIFY GOD'S FAITHFULNESS?: Because some in Israel failed (actually, only a few did NOT fail!), shall God withdraw His promises and be proved "unfaithful" because of them? Of course not (v 4)!

  • Comment on Rom 3:4

NOT AT ALL!: "God forbid" (KJV). "Let it not be so." The word for "God" is not in the original. See the Appendix, "God forbid!"

LET GOD BE TRUE, AND EVERY MAN A LIAR: That is, 'Even IF every man were shown to be a liar, still God would be proved true.' Compare Psalm 116:11.

EVERY MAN: As we might expect, this phrase is most often used generically, to mean "every person".

AS IT IS WRITTEN: "SO THAT YOU MAY BE PROVED RIGHT WHEN YOU SPEAK AND PREVAIL WHEN YOU JUDGE": Paul now quotes from Psalm 51:4 to draw into the argument a notable experience of David: The psalm is written as a memorial to his penitent acknowledgment of his sin in the matter of Bathsheba and Uriah. After being chastened for his sin and refusal to confess it for a long period, David was ready to admit that God was in the right and he was in the wrong.

PROVED RIGHT: This is the simpler translation of the word "dikaioo" that the KJV usually renders "justified".

  • Comment on Rom 3:5

BUT IF OUR UNRIGHTEOUSNESS BRINGS OUT GOD'S RIGHTEOUSNESS MORE CLEARLY: The sharp contrast between God's righteousness and man's unrighteousness is shown all the more clearly when man fails.

WHAT SHALL WE SAY? THAT GOD IS UNJUST IN BRINGING HIS WRATH ON US?: Is it not possible (so the question might go) that, since human failure can bring out more sharply the righteousness of God, the Almighty ought to be grateful for this service and soften the judgment that would otherwise be due the offender? The question is one a Jew might well resort to in line with his thought that God would go easy on His covenant people. The mention of wrath ties in with Romans 2:8,9.

I AM USING A HUMAN ARGUMENT: Literally, "I speak as a man." The same expression occurs in Galatians 3:15, and similar phrases in Romans 6:19 and 1 Corinthians 9:8.

This phrase "constitutes an apology for a statement which, but for the apology, would be too bold, almost blasphemous" (Daube, cited in EBC). Paul's explanatory statement is due to his having permitted himself to use the word "unjust" about God, even though it is not his own assertion. If that were so, that is, if God were unjust, He would not be qualified to judge the world. There is no attempt to establish His qualifications, since the readers, at least, are not in doubt on a point of this sort about which Scripture is so clear.

  • Comment on Rom 3:6

CERTAINLY NOT!: The same word as in verse 4 (see note there).

IF IT WERE SO, HOW COULD GOD JUDGE THE WORLD?: This would be the natural conclusion to the argument (v 5). But of course, it was a self-evident truth, that "God is judge", and no one else! He is the only Judge of Jew AND Gentile (Gen 18:25; Deut 32:36; Psa 50:1-6; 149:5-9; 1 Pet 3:17,18).

  • Comment on Rom 3:7

SOMEONE MIGHT ARGUE, "IF MY FALSEHOOD ENHANCES GOD'S TRUTHFULNESS AND SO INCREASES HIS GLORY, WHY AM I STILL CONDEMNED AS A SINNER?": The KJV treats this as simply words from Paul, but the NIV repunctuates it as a quote from others. As if to say, 'Then surely God must be more responsible for my "lie" than I am! So why should He condemn me? I am mere clay in His hands.'

  • Comment on Rom 3:8

WHY NOT SAY — AS WE ARE BEING SLANDEROUSLY REPORTED AS SAYING AND AS SOME CLAIM THAT WE SAY — "LET US DO EVIL THAT GOOD MAY RESULT"?: The same basic argument as in Romans 6:1: "Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase?"

THEIR CONDEMNATION IS DESERVED: As if to say, 'This is so obviously ludicrous that it merits no other response!' Paul will not deal with slanderers who refuse to reason on logical principles in the word of God. He simply dismisses them.

  • Comment on Rom 3:9-19

In proving that both Jews and Gentiles are "under sin" (v 9), Paul calls the witness of Old Testament Scriptures. He gathers together a number of passages from the Psalms and Isaiah. None are righteous; all are departed from the way:

  • Verses 10-12 are from Psalm 14:1-3 (= Psalm 53:1-3);
  • Verse 13 from Psalm 5:9; 140:3;
  • Verse 14 from Psalm 10:7;
  • Verses 15-17 from Isaiah 59:7,8; and
  • Verse 18 from Psalm 36:1.

The verses are clearly selected from those that apply to Jews, under the covenant, so that their significance cannot be tossed aside and laid upon the really "wicked" Gentiles only!

Throat (v 13), tongue (v 13), lips (v 13), and mouth (v 14) trace the stages of speech. Finally the feet (v 15) and the eyes (v 18) get into the act also. In short, those who believe in Christ ought to be "circumcised" in their words, their daily lives (i.e., their 'feet'), and their desires or thoughts (the 'eyes').

But serpent-like speech (Gen 3:1) is clearly the foundation and source of all wickedness. From the speech of that subtle creature of Eden has sprung, indirectly, all sin. His throat was an "open sepulcher" (Rom 3:13). His tongue, the "little member" full of boasting, brought on the defilement of the whole bodies of both Adam and Eve (James 3:5,6). The great fire of corruption was kindled by his words, and human nature was changed for the worse. Now it can rightly be said of all mankind that they are, naturally, the seed of the serpent (Gen 3:15): "the poison of asps is under their lips" (Rom 3:13)!

These passages demonstrate that those who were "circumcised" in the flesh, i.e., male Jews, were not necessarily "circumcised" in their minds and hearts and actions. They had undergone a ritual circumcision, but it meant nothing if they did not live their lives differently as a consequence.

  • Comment on Rom 3:9

WHAT SHALL WE CONCLUDE THEN? ARE WE ANY BETTER?: 'Do we, the Jews, have a higher moral excellence than the Gentiles?'

NOT AT ALL! WE HAVE ALREADY MADE THE CHARGE THAT JEWS AND GENTILES ALIKE ARE ALL UNDER SIN: That is, "under (judgment for) sin". To be under sin is to be under its dominion and condemnation. Thus Paul summarizes his argument in Romans 2.

It is noteworthy that in his discussion of sin up to this point Paul does not charge the Jew with the death of Christ as he does in 1 Thessalonians 2:15. He could have included the Gentile also (cf Acts 4:27,28) and made this a clinching factor in the case against mankind, but he did not. Perhaps this is because few Jews and still fewer Gentiles were involved in the actual death of the Lord Jesus. Paul is basing his case on a much wider sampling of human character and conduct. The specific episode of Golgotha is not needed to make the verdict certain.

  • Comment on Rom 3:10-18

Writing to those who are for the most part Gentiles, Paul does not set down Scripture first and then work from that as a base for exposition (which is the method used in Hebrews), but he uses only a minimum of reference to the Old Testament to substantiate what he has established. Leaving Scripture to the conclusion of the argument is calculated to increase the respect of the Gentile for it as being able to depict man's condition accurately and faithfully.

Both Jews and early Christians were in the habit of drawing up collections of Scripture passages relating to various topics in order to use them as proof texts for instruction or argumentation. It is not known whether the present collection, taken mostly from the Psalms, is the work of Paul or whether he is utilizing something previously formulated.

Verses 10-12 cite Psalm 14:1-3, which describes the "fool" who denies God "in his heart".

AS IT IS WRITTEN: "THERE IS NO ONE RIGHTEOUS, NOT EVEN ONE": "Our guilt is great because our sins are exceedingly numerous. It is not merely outward acts of unkindness and dishonesty with which we are chargeable. Our habitual and characteristic state of mind is evil in the sight of God.

"Our pride and indifference to His will and to the welfare of others and our loving the creature more than the Creator are continuous violations of His holy law. We have never been or done what that law requires us to be and to do. We have never had delight in that fixed purpose to do the will and promote the glory of God. We are always sinners; we are at all times and under all circumstances in opposition to God.

"If we have never loved Him supremely, if we have never made it our purpose to do His will, if we have never made His glory the end of our actions, then our lives have been an unbroken series of transgressions. Our sins are not to be numbered by the conscious violations of duty; they are as numerous as the moments of our existence" (Charles Hodge).

  • Comment on Rom 3:11

"THERE IS NO ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS, NO ONE WHO SEEKS GOD": Parallel to Proverbs 2:9,10; Psalm 69:32; Isaiah 8:19; Matthew 13:14,15.

  • Comment on Rom 3:12

"ALL HAVE TURNED AWAY, THEY HAVE TOGETHER BECOME WORTHLESS; THERE IS NO ONE WHO DOES GOOD, NOT EVEN ONE": They had turned away like a stray sheep that had forgotten its master's voice (Psa 119:176; Isa 53:6). Israel had left the Shepherd's path of righteousness (Psa 23:3).

  • Comment on Rom 3:13

Verses 10-12 (Psa 14:1-3) deal with man's inner thoughts, which are wicked altogether. Now Paul begins to work outward: throat, tongue, lips, mouth, feet, etc. Man's entire being is adversely affected by sin. His whole nature is permeated with it.

"THEIR THROATS ARE OPEN GRAVES": Citing Psalm 5:9: men speaking falsehoods (Psa 5:6), thus discharging the stench of flesh through their corrupt mouths. They are "whited sepulchers, full of dead men's bones" (Matt 23:27).

"THEIR TONGUES PRACTICE DECEIT": Compare James 3:5,6; Isaiah 59:3.

"THE POISON OF VIPERS IS ON THEIR LIPS": Citing Psalm 140:3: the metaphor of a serpent's forked tongue under which is a deadly poison. All sin started from the serpent's lie in Eden: that which comes out of a man's heart defiles him (Matt 15:10-20). The tongue is full of deadly poison (James 3:8).

  • Comment on Rom 3:14

"THEIR MOUTHS ARE FULL OF CURSING AND BITTERNESS": Citing Psalm 10:7. The bitterness of deceit, lying and hypocrisy (Matt 23:27; Psa 59:12; James 3:10).

  • Comment on Rom 3:15

"THEIR FEET ARE SWIFT TO SHED BLOOD": This passage (vv. 15-17) cites Isaiah 59:7,8, which describes the wicked nation of Israel. Isaiah seems to be quoting Proverbs 1:11, 16 in turn (cp also Prov 6:17,18).

This is not just about shedding blood, for the next phrase in Isaiah 59:7, not quoted here, is: "Their thoughts are evil thoughts." We can kill with thoughts as well.

  • Comment on Rom 3:16

"RUIN AND MISERY MARK THEIR WAYS": In their wake they leave ruined lives, the abominable manifestation of the evil heart within. In this world of wickedness, human relations suffer, because society can be no better than those who constitute it.

  • Comment on Rom 3:17

"AND THE WAY OF PEACE THEY DO NOT KNOW": In the context of Isaiah 59:8 is Isaiah 57:19-21: " 'Peace, peace, to those far and near,' says the Lord. 'And I will heal them.' But the wicked are like the tossing sea, which cannot rest, whose waves cast up mire and mud. 'There is no peace,' says my God, 'for the wicked.' "

  • Comment on Rom 3:18

"THERE IS NO FEAR OF GOD BEFORE THEIR EYES": Citing Psalm 36:1. These men have no regard or reverence for the character, authority and honor of the Lord.

  • Comment on Rom 3:19

NOW WE KNOW THAT WHATEVER THE LAW SAYS, IT SAYS TO THOSE WHO ARE UNDER THE LAW, SO THAT EVERY MOUTH MAY BE SILENCED: Building on the thought of Psalm 63:11: "The mouths of liars will be silenced" (cp also Ezek 16:60-63; Job 5:15; Psa 107:42).

When human achievement is measured against what God requires, there is no place for pride or boasting, but only for silence that gives consent to the verdict of guilty. In the various Bible scenes of judgment, the silence of those who are being judged is a notable feature (e.g., Rev 20:11-14). Questions may be raised for the sake of clarification of the reason for the verdict (Matt 25:41-46), but when the explanation is given, no appeal is attempted. The Judge of all the earth does right (Gen 18:25).

AND THE WHOLE WORLD HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO GOD: Paul says all the world has been "charged" (v 9) in the court of divine justice. First charged, and now convicted. "Through the commandment sin might become utterly sinful" (Rom 7:13).

How will the condemnation of Israel, as a single people, show the whole world to be accountable to Divine judgment? "Two possibilities come to mind:

  • One is that the Jewish nation is being regarded as a test case for all peoples. If given the same privileges enjoyed by Israel, the rest would likewise have failed. Their human nature is no different from that of the sons of Abraham.
  • Another possibility, which is the more likely explanation, is that the failure of the non-Jews is so patent that it is not a debatable subject; it can be taken for granted as already established (Rom 1:18-32).

Once it has been determined that the record of the Jew is no better, then judgment is seen as universally warranted" (Harrison).

  • Comment on Rom 3:20

THEREFORE NO ONE WILL BE DECLARED RIGHTEOUS IN HIS SIGHT BY OBSERVING THE LAW: "Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight" (KJV). Citing Psalm 143:2: "Do not bring your servant into judgment, for no one living is righteous before you."

BY OBSERVING THE LAW: "The deeds of the law" (v 20). For the first time in Romans we encounter the expression "by works of law" (cf v 28) which has such prominence in Galatians (Gal 2:16; 3:2, 5, 10).

According to NET Notes, some recent scholars have understood the phrase "works of the law" to refer not to obedience to the Mosaic law generally, but specifically to portions of the law that pertain to things like circumcision and dietary laws which set the Jewish people apart from the other nations (e.g., J.D.G. Dunn, Word Biblical Commentary).

Other interpreters reject this narrow interpretation for a number of reasons, among which the most important are:

  • The second half of verse 20, "for through the law comes the knowledge of sin", is hard to explain if the phrase 'works of the law' is understood in a restricted sense.
  • The plural phrase "works of the law" would have to be understood in a different sense from the singular phrase "the work of the law" in Romans 2:15.
  • Similar phrases involving the law in Romans (Rom 2:13,14; 2:25-27; 7:25; 8:4; 13:8) which are naturally related to the phrase "works of the law" cannot be taken to refer to circumcision. In fact, in Romans 2:25 circumcision is explicitly contrasted with keeping the law.

Those interpreters who reject the 'narrow' interpretation of 'works of the law' understand the phrase to refer to obedience to the Mosaic law in general.

RATHER, THROUGH THE LAW WE BECOME CONSCIOUS OF SIN: "The law was added so that the trespass might increase" (Rom 5:20). Compare also Galatians 3:19-25. The practical result of working seriously with the law is to "become conscious of sin" (cf also Rom 7:7-11). How startling it is to contemplate the fact that the best revelation we have from God only deepens our awareness of inevitable failure — unless we also have Christ! The law of Moses itself loudly proclaims man's need for the gospel.

  • Comment on Rom 3:21-31

Paul has shown that all men, on account of their possession of the weakness of flesh, stand condemned on a basis of law before God. The logical follow-up questions: How can man ever be justified? On what basis is salvation made possible? Only at the "mercy seat", where a "sacrifice for atonement" can be found, in Christ Jesus. Salvation is dependent upon a clear understanding and a dedicated application of the principles contained in these verses.

These verses mark the notable transition in Paul's Letter to the Romans. In Romans 1:16,17 Paul first wrote of the "gospel", i.e., "the good news": it was, and is, the power of God for the salvation of all men. But it has taken him another two chapters, during which he carefully outlines the "bad news", before he is ready to explain how God has used His Son Jesus Christ to reveal the way in which that "good news power" is made available to all men.

Many a humorous story contains a line like this: 'Do you want the good news first, or the bad news?' Usually, in the telling of the story, the bad news, being told last, supersedes and negates the good news. But here, in Romans, it is the reverse. Paul seems to say, you must hear the 'bad news', and you must understand how exceedingly bad it really is. You are condemned under sin, with no hope at all; left to your own devices, you will surely perish without any remedy. Do you understand that? No matter how many more-or-less good deeds you do along the way, at the end of your life you will die without remedy. The 'bad news' must sink in first, before the 'good news' — the "gospel" — can have its proper effect.

So, if you are ever asked again, 'Do you want the good news first, or the bad news?', you should answer, 'Give me the bad news first — don't spare a thing. After that, I want to hear the good news!' Bad news, then good news: that's the Biblical order.

  • Comment on Rom 3:21

BUT NOW: Paul is stressing a very significant point in time, a turning point in his thesis: What went before (Rom 1:18 — 3:20) was the "bad news"; what follows is the "good news"!

He does something similar in Romans 8:1,2, using "now" to the same effect, when he says: "Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death." 'Before this time,' he seems to say, 'everything around us tended to sin and death, and we were under the power of the great King of the world, Sin! But now everything is different, in Christ!'

Again, in 2 Timothy 1:10, he makes the same point: "But it [i.e., grace in Christ Jesus] has now been revealed through the appearing of our Saviour, Christ Jesus, who has destroyed death and has brought life and immortality to light through the gospel".

A RIGHTEOUSNESS FROM GOD… HAS BEEN MADE KNOWN: Only God possesses inherent righteousness. If man is to possess righteousness (that is, to be declared justified, or righteous), it can only be by the special means made known (or "manifested": Greek "phaneroo") by God. There are only two ways this might be achieved:

  • by vindication, as being completely righteous in oneself — a method which could only be for Christ himself (John 8:46; 16:10; 1 Pet 2:22; Rom 1:4); and
  • by forgiveness of sins, acquittal, and reconciliation — which is the path open to everyone else: through the covering name of Christ (Isa 53:11; 1 Cor 1:30). This comes through faith: the acknowledging of sinfulness and the plea for forgiveness.

The following verses amplify this statement.

Robert Roberts, in "The Blood of Christ", paraphrases this verse: "God says now: 'If you will recognize your position, repent, and come under that man's wing, I will receive you back to favor and forgive you. My righteousness has been declared in him; I have crowned him with everlasting days. Because he loved righteousness and hated iniquity, and was obedient unto death, I have crowned him with life eternal. It is in him for you if you will submit, and believe in him, and put on his name, which is a confession that you have no name of your own that will stand. Obey his commandments, and I will receive you and forgive you for his sake, and you shall be my sons and daughters.' "

APART FROM LAW: Parenthetically, Paul says that the Law of Moses can do nothing to save any man. It cannot produce righteousness; it can only highlight sin (v 20).

TO WHICH THE LAW AND THE PROPHETS TESTIFY: In addition to its other possible meanings, "the law", when combined with "the prophets", may be a way of referring to the whole of the Old Testament Scriptures (cp Matt 5:17; 7:12; 22:40; Luke 16:16; 24:27, 44; Acts 13:15).

Referring to "the prophets" especially, Peter writes: "Concerning this salvation, the prophets, who spoke of the grace that was to come to you, searched intently and with the greatest care, trying to find out the time and circumstances to which the Spirit of Christ in them was pointing when he predicted the sufferings of Christ and the glories that would follow" (1 Pet 1:10,11). See also Acts 26:22,23; Micah 6:5-8; Luke 24:27, 44; John 5:46; and Hebrews 10:15-17.

This observation, about "the law and the prophets", as pertaining to the whole of the Old Testament, prepares the reader for the recital of God's dealings with the two most prominent Old Testament recipients of the Messianic promises, Abraham and David, as outlined in Romans 4.

  • Comment on Rom 3:22

THIS RIGHTEOUSNESS FROM GOD COMES THROUGH FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST TO ALL WHO BELIEVE: This "righteousness" is not "of God", but "from God". In other words, it is not just His righteousness, but it is the righteousness which He provides to others, through Jesus Christ His Son.

Faith in Jesus Christ, as the context makes plain, is nothing less than an explicit understanding of and faith in the principles of sacrifice exhibited in God's Anointed Son. It cannot refer to some simplistic acknowledgment that 'Jesus was a good man'. Given what is at stake, that is just not good enough!

"Faith in Christ", here and elsewhere, may sometimes mean "the faith of Christ", and so the KJV translates this phrase: "by faith of Jesus Christ". The NET Notes explains this:

A decision is difficult here. Though traditionally translated 'faith in Jesus Christ', an increasing number of New Testament scholars are arguing that 'pistis Cristou' and similar phrases in Paul (Rom 3:22, 26; Gal 2:16, 20; 3:22; Eph 3:12; Phil 3:9) involve a subjective genitive and mean "Christ's faith" or "Christ's faithfulness" [i.e., "the faith of Christ", not "faith in Christ"]… Noteworthy among the arguments for the subjective genitive view is that when "pistis" takes a personal genitive it is almost never an objective genitive.

In other words, it is not 'faith toward, or directed at, Christ', but rather 'the faith belonging (first of all, at least) to Christ'.

The NET commentary then cites a long string of New Testament verses that follow the same rule, i.e., that the subjective genitive predominates in this Greek usage: Matthew 9:2, 22, 29; Mark 2:5; 5:34; 10:52; Luke 5:20; 7:50; 8:25, 48; 17:19; 18:42; 22:32; Romans 1:8, 12; 3:3; 4:5, 12, 16; 1 Corinthians 2:5; 15:14, 17; 2 Corinthians 10:15; Philippians 2:17; Colossians 1:4; 2:5; 1 Thessalonians 1:8; 3:2, 5, 10; 2 Thessalonians 1:3; Titus 1:1; Philemon 1:6; 1 Peter 1:9, 21; and 2 Peter 1:5.

While the NET commentary states that "most commentaries on Romans and Galatians usually side with the objective view [i.e., 'faith in Christ']", it nevertheless adds that "the faith/faithfulness of Christ is not a denial of faith in Christ as a Pauline concept (for the idea is expressed in many of the same contexts, only with the verb 'pisteo' rather than the noun)."

Thus there is no doubt that Paul elsewhere teaches justification through the faith of the individual believer. But when he so teaches, we may assume that the object of such a faith (that is, Jesus Christ himself) is a reliable and worthy object, one who himself is absolutely faithful, one who will not disappoint our trust.

THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE: This little phrase explains that "all who believe" (v 22) are on equal footing before God. It continues into verse 23, explaining how this can be true.

  • Comment on Rom 3:23

FOR ALL HAVE SINNED: "All" being, of course, a means of including both

Jews and Gentiles under a collective condemnation.

AND FALL SHORT OF THE GLORY OF GOD: All mankind has failed to achieve the standard of God's righteousness (and hence has been separated from His glory). Our lives may be like arrows aimed at the target of God's "glory", but even with the best efforts of the 'archer' every person falls dismally short.


"In Jesus we are presented with the consummate fulfillment, the true man in God's image, purposed from creation (Gen 1:27) the ideal standard of life and light. But as Paul states in Romans 3:23, 'All have sinned and come short of the glory of God' (KJV). This is the exact translation of the Greek word for 'sin' which is 'hamartia' and means to miss the mark, to fall short. It is a common Greek word for an arrow failing to reach the target and is very similar in meaning to the Hebrew word for sin" (Sheila Harris, "The Joy of Salvation").

"Sin" here is not an inherited disposition but a failure to fulfill the potential for good that God has given us, by yielding to the allurements of our basically physical needs and instincts. We can compare the response of Adam and Eve who yielded to temptation to that of Jesus in the wilderness. He did not yield to the lure of that power, life and ministry that would bypass the cross but rather followed a life that would embrace the cross and lead to a much greater power, life and ministry.

But why has man been separated from God's "glory"? This ongoing separation is depicted in the restriction of the divine glory to the holy of holies in the tabernacle, and the denial of the right of access to the people except through the high priest once a year. God's glory is the majesty of His holy person, and involves His name and character and purpose. To be cut off from this fellowship is the great loss occasioned by sin.

  • Comment on Rom 3:24

AND ARE JUSTIFIED: "Declared righteous".

FREELY BY HIS GRACE: The Greek word for "freely" ("dorean") is translated "without a cause" in John 15:25. It also appears in Romans 3:24: "being justified freely by his grace". God's love toward man is as freely given, gratuitous, and unrelated to merit as was their hatred for His Son Jesus Christ.

God finds no reason, no basis, in the sinner for declaring him righteous. He must find the cause in Himself. This truth goes naturally with the observation that justification, or a declaration of the subject's "righteousness", is offered by God's grace.

THROUGH THE REDEMPTION THAT CAME BY CHRIST JESUS: "Redemption" is "apolutrosis" = to be bought away from. See Study, Redemption.

  • Comment on Rom 3:25

GOD PRESENTED HIM: "Some would object to the rendering 'presented' on the ground that a public exhibition of the person of Jesus has something almost theatrical about it, and that for this reason the alternative rendering 'purposed' (literally, 'set before himself') might be preferred. However, there are words in the passage that express manifestation: 'made known' (v 21) and 'demonstrate' (vv. 25,26); so the objection is unwarranted. Also it should be pointed out that the emphasis on faith (v 25) suggests that the real force in 'presented' is not so much the actual exhibition of Christ on the cross as in the proclamation of the gospel that makes his saving work central" (Harrison).

AS A SACRIFICE FOR ATONEMENT: The KJV uses "propitiation" to translate "hilasterion" in Romans 3:25, but "mercyseat" in Hebrews 9:5, where the same Greek word occurs. "Propitiation" is a word which is scarcely understood by most readers today. The NET uses "mercy seat" also (which was incidentally William Tyndale's translation also).

The NIV uses "a sacrifice of atonement", and explains further in the NIV footnote: "as the one who would turn aside his wrath, taking away sin". Taken together with the NIV text itself, this footnote gives that version one of the most complete, clear and accurate presentations of the Biblical concept of propitiation available in any translation.

The single Greek word "hilasterion" describes, generally, a place or thing whereby someone greater may be satisfied by someone lesser. More specifically, the word as used here seems to refer to the "mercy seat", i.e., the covering (Hebrew "kaphar") of the ark where the blood was sprinkled in the Old Testament ritual on the Day of Atonement. This term is used only one other time in the New Testament: In Hebrews 9:5, it is rendered "mercy seat" (KJV, NET) and "atonement cover" (NIV). There it describes the altar in the most holy place (the holy of holies). Paul is saying that God displayed Jesus as the "mercy seat", the 'place' where propitiation was accomplished.

The Septuagint uses this word "hilasterion" for the mercy seat in Leviticus 16:14 and Exodus 25:27. God has marked out His as-yet-unborn Son, centuries ahead of time, to be a "mercy seat", and He set the principle in operation in the tabernacle in Israel. There was found His "meeting place" with man (Exod 25:22), "above the mercy seat, between the cherubim". At the very heart of the tabernacle, the mercy seat represented the fusion of God and man, the "crossing point" between the two. In the real fulfillment of this typical "mercy seat", "God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ" (2 Cor 5:19).

" 'The mercy-seat is no longer kept in the sacred seclusion of the most holy place: it is brought out into the midst of the rough and tumble of the world and set up before the eyes of hostile, contemptuous, or indifferent crowds' (Manson). Indeed, Christ has become the meeting place of God and man where the mercy of God is available because of the sacrifice of the Son" (Everett F. Harrison, Expositor's Bible Commentary: Romans).

"[Christ] is the atoning sacrifice ['hilasmos': 'propitiation': KJV] for our sins, and not for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" ( 1 John 2:2).

"This is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice ['hilasmos': 'propitiation': KJV] for our sins" ( 1 John 4:10).

"Hilasmos" is the root word for "hilasterion"; it means to satisfy someone greater and more powerful, that is, to appease, reconcile or propitiate him. "Hilasterion" is the place or situation where this reconciliation can take place (Rom 3:25; Heb 9:5). At that place, also called the "mercy seat", we find the Lord Jesus Christ. He is our "Parakletos" ( 1 John 2:1; cf John 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7), the one who speaks on our behalf, as a legal representative but also as a friend, to make things right with his Father, and to turn away His potential wrath. In the NIV he is called the "Counselor"; in the RSV he is called the "Advocate", and in the KJV he is called either the "Advocate" and the "Comforter". In the Book of Hebrews he is generally called the High Priest and mediator (Greek "mesites": the man in the middle, the arbitrator).

Sheila Harris well summarizes this: "We know that at times we fail and God has provided for this as well, for we have a propitiator, 'hilasmos', one to plead our cause ( 1 John 2:2; 4:10), who graciously listens to our prayers at the 'hilasterion' [Rom 3:25; Heb 9:5], the 'mercy seat' (as Tyndale so brilliantly translated) where our Lord, alive and acceptant, receives us kindly. The whole of this wonderful progression into the very presence of God is made possible for us only by the offering of Jesus' life as a sacrifice which really means 'a making holy', lifted up to God, willingly and freely to be raised as a spiritual body, unlimited and unrestricted to give himself in spirit power to dwell within his people to make them truly a people consecrated, alive, responsive, and aware of his living presence" (The Joy of Salvation).

THROUGH FAITH IN HIS BLOOD: The NIV translation, like the KJV, suggests that the believer's faith is to be centered in the blood of Christ, and the sequence of terms favors this.

Here is the order of the first sentence in verse 25, with the corresponding Greek (not the precise Greek words, but the root words):

  • "God presented him ['theos protithemi hos']
  • as an atonement [one word: 'hilasterion'],
  • through faith ['dia pistis']
  • in his blood ['en autos haima']."

However, it has been pointed out that there is no example of Paul calling for faith to be focused upon a thing rather than a person.

Perhaps by putting a comma between "faith" and "in", we might understand that "in his blood" need not modify "faith", but instead could modify "the sacrifice" itself! Thus the new arrangement (which, we are told, is also allowable grammatically) could yield the following order:

  • "God presented him ['theos protithemi hos']
  • as an atonement ['hilasterion'],
  • in his blood ['en autos haima'],
  • through faith ['dia pistis']."

Thus, to paraphrase: 'God set forth Christ as an atonement, by his own shed blood, so that we might have faith in him (i.e., Christ, or even — through Christ — in God Himself).'

At this point, expositors may ask the question: 'Does "in (or by) his blood" refer to Jesus' actual sacrifice (shedding his blood) or to the place where his blood was shed (i.e., the cross, or the mercy seat)? In other words, does the phrase here describe Jesus as the sacrifice — or the altar?' The first possibility, as paraphrased just above, seems the more natural reading, but the immediate context (i.e., the "hilasterion", or mercy seat: see above) suggests the second possibility, which might be paraphrased this way: 'God set forth Christ as the mercy seat, the PLACE where redeeming blood was shed, so that we might have faith in him.'

Perhaps these are no more than minor variations upon the same theme, but all the same we can scarcely make a mistake when we seek to find the deeper meaning of God's Word — if we also allow for the possibility that we cannot be absolutely sure as to the best alternative.

HE DID THIS TO DEMONSTRATE HIS JUSTICE: To exhibit, or display publicly, His righteous character, for all mankind to see.

BECAUSE IN HIS FORBEARANCE HE HAD LEFT THE SINS COMMITTED BEFOREHAND UNPUNISHED: Literally, he had "passed over" those sins committed in earlier times: a reference to the Passover in Egypt. "For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance — now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant" (Heb 9:15).

  • Comment on Rom 3:26

HE DID IT TO DEMONSTRATE HIS JUSTICE AT THE PRESENT TIME, SO AS TO BE JUST AND THE ONE WHO JUSTIFIES THOSE WHO HAVE FAITH IN JESUS: Christ's obedient death declared that God was righteous in requiring the condemning of sin and the putting to death of the body of sin. God was seen to be righteous or just in taking Christ to the cross, and to be the justifier of those who are of the faith of Jesus and are united with him in his death to sin.

By willingly going to the cross, Jesus in effect said, 'My Father is right to require this from me.' Only an innocent, sinless man could declare God righteous in condemning sin in the flesh. None of us could have done it, for we deserve death and die for our own sins. But he didn't, so the issue was crystal clear: God is righteous in requiring that our "old man" be put to death!

AT THE PRESENT TIME: Not just for the past, i.e., for "sins committed beforehand" (v 25), but for sins now and from this point forward.

  • Comment on Rom 3:27

WHERE, THEN, IS BOASTING?: The conclusion to the implied question to the Jew in Romans 2:23, who boasts "in the Law". Compare 1 Corinthians 1:29-31 and Jeremiah 9:23,24: man cannot boast in his wisdom, his power, or his riches.

IT IS EXCLUDED. ON WHAT PRINCIPLE? ON THAT OF OBSERVING THE LAW? NO, BUT ON THAT OF FAITH: 'If salvation is not achieved by any works of the Law (v 20, notes), then there can be no pride, or boasting, in keeping that Law. And if salvation may be achieved only through faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ, then how can anyone boast who receives it solely as an undeserved gift?'

  • Comment on Rom 3:28

FOR WE MAINTAIN THAT A MAN IS JUSTIFIED BY FAITH: Whether Jew or Gentile (Rom 4:5, 16; 5:1,2; Gal 3:8-11).

APART FROM OBSERVING THE LAW: "The law is not based on faith; on the contrary, 'The man who does these things will live by them' " (Gal 3:12; citing Lev 18:5).

  • Comment on Rom 3:29

IS GOD THE GOD OF JEWS ONLY? IS HE NOT THE GOD OF GENTILES TOO? YES, OF GENTILES TOO: Thus Paul is qualifying the use of "man" in verse 28, by saying that "man" includes both Jews and Gentiles. Any man, whether Jew or Gentile, can only be saved by faith, apart from observing the Law.

  • Comment on Rom 3:30

SINCE THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD: The Greek is: 'But if indeed God is one…' If God is one, then He must have a single, unified principle by which He allows man to approach Him, and by which He may save man (cp Deut 6:4).

WHO WILL JUSTIFY THE CIRCUMCISED BY FAITH: The Jew would be justified "out of" (Greek "ek") faith, the faith that was already evident in the Old Testament (in lives of men of faith, like Abraham and David, among others).

AND THE UNCIRCUMCISED THROUGH THAT SAME FAITH: And the Gentile would be justified "through" (Greek "dia": by means of). Starting from outside the Law and the Prophets, and outside the faith which it taught, the Gentile needed to pass THROUGH that law/faith continuum on his way to righteousness. Compare Galatians 3:7-9.

  • Comment on Rom 3:31

DO WE, THEN, NULLIFY THE LAW BY THIS FAITH?: Paul now corrects the false accusation made against him in verse 8. "Nullify" = Greek "katargeo", to render inoperative.

ABSOLUTELY NOT!: Compare verses 4, 6, and note there.

INSTEAD WE UPHOLD THE LAW: The Law was holy, just and good (Rom 7:12), but it was introduced so that sin might become exceedingly sinful (Rom 7:13), and so that all the world might appear guilty before God (Rom 3:19,20). Christ was sent to "fulfill the law" (Matt 5:17), and to "fulfill all righteousness" (Matt 3:15). Thus the Law stood as a memorial to God's righteousness — to which man, by his own strength, could never attain. So it was only by the principle of justification by faith (Rom 1:17) that man could attain the righteousness of God.

The Law of Moses served its purpose, not in saving, but in leading sinful man to the source of salvation: God's all-embracing love, set forth in His Son.

Chapter 4

  • Comment on Rom 4:1

WHAT THEN SHALL WE SAY THAT ABRAHAM, OUR FOREFATHER, DISCOVERED IN THIS MATTER?: Abraham is not the "father" of faithless Jews (see John 8:33-41). He is, however, the "father" of faithful Gentiles (v 16)!

  • Comment on Rom 4:2

IF, IN FACT, ABRAHAM WAS JUSTIFIED BY WORKS: In other words, if Abraham had been pronounced righteous because of his perfect obedience…

HE HAD SOMETHING TO BOAST ABOUT — BUT NOT BEFORE GOD: …then he had something, i.e., within himself, in which to boast, or place trust and confidence (cf Rom 3:27).

  • Comment on Rom 4:3

WHAT DOES THE SCRIPTURE SAY? "ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS": This is cited from Genesis 15:6. To "believe" is to rely on, intelligently (cp Rom 1:16,17). Abraham was completely dependent upon God to fulfill His promises (vv. 16-22); out of his personal weakness, therefore, came faith (cp 2 Cor 12:10).

The nature of Abraham's faith was essentially the same as that of the New Testament believer despite the difference in time. (Abraham looked forward to something God would do, whereas the Christian looks back to what God has provided in Christ, as well as forward, to what God will yet do through Christ.) In each case, too, the object of faith is the same, implicit in the promises to Abraham, and explicit in the gospel. Abraham trusted in God's promise that pointed to Christ (John 8:56; Gal 3:16).

CREDITED: "Credited" is the term "logizomai", which occurs 11 times in this chapter (vv. 3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,22,23,24). In secular usage, it could refer to deliberations of some sort, and in commercial dealings (as virtually a technical term) to "reckoning" or "charging up a debt".

  • Comment on Rom 4:4

NOW WHEN A MAN WORKS, HIS WAGES ARE NOT CREDITED TO HIM AS A GIFT, BUT AS AN OBLIGATION: No amount of works, by themselves, can "earn" salvation (cp Rom 6:23). It is quite true to say that Abraham DID something. But what he DID, in its very nature, excluded any works as a basis whereby he might earn righteousness himself. The history of Abraham reveals a man walking by faith rather than sight, showing that he was guided and brought to his desired destination by an external agency (Heb 11:8). He was in no position to provide anything for himself!

For this verse the KJV has: "Now to him that worketh is the reward ['wages': NIV] not reckoned ['credited': NIV] of grace ['as a gift': NIV], but of debt ['as an obligation': NIV]." This translation obscures the point, i.e., that Paul is using the analogy of a regular worker earning his wages, not receiving them as a gift.

  • Comment on Rom 4:5

HOWEVER, TO THE MAN WHO DOES NOT WORK BUT TRUSTS GOD WHO JUSTIFIES THE WICKED: The word for "wicked", "asebes", is used generally of mankind being universally under the dominion of sin. This describes the condition of Abraham before his calling by God. Where faith is not exercised, man remains ungodly, and therefore exposed to the wrath of God (Rom 5:6).

Old Testament law required the judge to condemn the wicked and justify the righteous (Deut 25:1), but where God is both Judge and Saviour, the wicked have an opportunity denied to them in human reckoning: although pronounced "wicked", they can yet — through no merit of their own — also be "justified or declared "righteous"! The prophetic word anticipated this result through the work of the Servant (Isa 53:5,6,11). In saying that God justifies the ungodly, the text is not singling out Abraham as the sinner par excellence but rather is pointing to the type of man who is desperately in need of justification, which actually embraces men of every sort (cf Rom 5:6), including Abraham.

NOT… BUT: As is often the case, "not… but" should be taken as "not only… but also". It is certainly not enough to leave off all kinds of work and effort, and to trust in God alone!

HIS FAITH IS CREDITED AS RIGHTEOUSNESS: Whatever is "reckoned" (or counted) to a person, cannot logically have been his originally and naturally. Viewed from the divine viewpoint, Abraham was destitute of a personal righteousness. Because of Abraham's faith, and a recognition of his own helplessness, Abraham received a gift from God: something "credited" to his account!

  • Comment on Rom 4:6

Verses 6-8: Citing Psalm 32:1,2; for background, see also Psalm 51 and 2 Samuel 12:1-6). Blessing involves the forgiveness of sins, and has to do with eternal life and the inheritance of the promises to Abraham.

DAVID SAYS THE SAME THING WHEN HE SPEAKS OF THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE MAN TO WHOM GOD CREDITS RIGHTEOUSNESS APART FROM WORKS: David is selected for this example because he was guilty of a crime for which the Law provided no release or sacrifice (Psa 51:16).

In the case of Abraham, righteousness was credited to him, apart from works, on the basis of faith. Likewise, in the case of David, no good work is involved. Furthermore, as a matter of fact, sins of great magnitude have been committed. So the case of David demonstrates the far-reaching nature of justification to a much greater advantage.

Since David was actually already a justified man, known as the man after God's own heart, thus it may be seen that sin in the life of a believer does not cancel justification. God is able to forgive. His gifts are irrevocable (Rom 11:29). At the same time, God showed His displeasure regarding David's sin, severely chastening him until the sin had been fully confessed. Even afterward, his sins produced havoc in his family. David suffered the humiliation of the revolt led by Absalom. Yet God did not withdraw His favor and support.

THE BLESSEDNESS: Or "happiness". Notice how the Psalms begin with the "blessing" or "happiness" of the man who commits no sin (Psa 1), and then come — after a bit — to the "blessing" or "happiness" of the man whose sin is forgiven, or covered (Psa 32).

APART FROM WORKS: The KJV has "without works": Paul is not counseling man to AVOID doing good works, but rather stating that — no matter how many good works one might do — they would never be enough to EARN salvation.

  • Comment on Rom 4:7

"BLESSED ARE THEY WHOSE TRANSGRESSIONS ARE FORGIVEN, WHOSE SINS ARE COVERED": Forgiveness is granted after full confession is made. This results in peace of mind (John 14:27; Acts 10:36; Rom 3:17; 5:1; 8:6; 1 Cor 7:15; Phil 4:7), but not always freedom from mental conflict (Rom 16:20). The forgiveness of sins is not the same as condoning sins. If God condoned sins, it would create a serious discrepancy with His holiness, and a resulting confusion as to His own character — and God is not the author or creator of confusion ( 1 Cor 14:33).

  • Comment on Rom 4:8

"BLESSED IS THE MAN WHOSE SIN THE LORD WILL NEVER COUNT AGAINST HIM": Forgiveness of sins is the same as forgiveness of a debt, in other words, canceling that debt, or not reckoning it against the debtor. (The word for "never count" is the negative of "logizomai": see note, v 3).

  • Comment on Rom 4:9

IS THIS BLESSEDNESS ONLY FOR THE CIRCUMCISED, OR ALSO FOR THE UNCIRCUMCISED? WE HAVE BEEN SAYING THAT ABRAHAM'S FAITH WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS: In this context, "blessedness" signifies forgiveness of sins (vv. 6-8). So, in other words, was circumcision a prerequisite for the receiving of forgiveness of sins?

  • Comment on Rom 4:10

UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES WAS IT CREDITED? WAS IT AFTER HE WAS CIRCUMCISED, OR BEFORE? IT WAS NOT AFTER, BUT BEFORE!: At least 13 years before his circumcision (Gen 17:1,2,4,25). "We cannot doubt that circumcision was delayed in order to teach the believing Gentiles of future ages that they may claim Abraham as their father, and the righteousness of faith as their inheritance" (J.A. Beet). It could even be said that the Gentile has first claim on the patriarch, because Abraham was himself a Gentile when he was first justified.

  • Comment on Rom 4:11

AND HE RECEIVED THE SIGN OF CIRCUMCISION, A SEAL OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS THAT HE HAD BY FAITH WHILE HE WAS STILL UNCIRCUMCISED: "Seal" is Greek "sphragis": the impression of a seal, a distinctive mark, a token. The "seal" is an endorsement of something that already exists. An approval of a previous condition.

SO THEN, HE IS THE FATHER OF ALL WHO BELIEVE: Whether circumcised (Jew) or not (Gentile). Abraham's "children", or spiritual seed, are those who are energized by the same principles of life as he was (Luke 19:9; John 8:39).

BUT HAVE NOT BEEN CIRCUMCISED, IN ORDER THAT RIGHTEOUSNESS MIGHT BE CREDITED TO THEM: Circumcision is the endorsement of a previously existing faith, which is the more important factor (Gal 6:15). Therefore a mark in the flesh is irrelevant to one who is circumcised in heart and in mind (Rom 2:29), and has no confidence in the flesh (Phil 3:3, 11). Contrast Deuteronomy 10:16; 30:16 with Exodus 6:12, 30; Leviticus 26:41; Jeremiah 6:10; 9:26; and cp 1 Corinthians 7:18,19.

  • Comment on Rom 4:12

AND HE IS ALSO THE FATHER OF THE CIRCUMCISED: Abraham means "father of a great multitude", which includes both Jews and Gentiles (Gen 12:3; Gal 3:8,9).

WHO NOT ONLY ARE CIRCUMCISED WHO ALSO WALK IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF THE FAITH: Their deeds indicate the character of faith (James 2:14, 17). Ritual must be matched by performance (James 4:17).

FAITH: Faith here signifies trust and confidence in all that God has promised (vv. 20-25).

THAT OUR FATHER ABRAHAM HAD BEFORE HE WAS CIRCUMCISED: By Jewish reckoning, even their "father" Abraham was a "Gentile" at the time of his conversion through faith. Abraham lived in the land of promise 25 years before his circumcision (Gen 12:4; 17:1). His promised "fatherhood" (Gen 17:6) preceded his circumcision.

  • Comment on Rom 4:13

IT WAS NOT THROUGH THE LAW THAT ABRAHAM AND HIS OFFSPRING RECEIVED THE PROMISE: Abraham was "justified" approximately 400 years before the Law was given, through Moses. The Law only condemned man for his failure to obey it perfectly (Rom 3:20). Compare Galatians 3:17,18.

HIS OFFSPRING: The seed of Abraham, i.e., those who have the faith of their "father" Abraham, are also heirs with Christ (Gal 3:25-29).

THE PROMISE: The promise is collective and does not refer only to Genesis 12:7 ("To your descendants I will give this land"), but also to multiple aspects of the promise to Abraham: multiplied descendants (Gen 12:2), possession of the land (Gen 13:15–17), and his becoming the means of blessing to all people (Gen 12:13).

THAT HE WOULD BE HEIR OF THE WORLD: One to whom property has been assigned, but who has not yet actually received it. Compare Hebrews 1:2; James 2:5. Christ is heir:

  • of universal dominion (Gen 1:26, 28; Psa 8:4-8; Heb 2:6-8);
  • of the Land of promise, as the son of Abraham (Gen 22:16-18; Heb 2:16; Rom 4:13; Gal 3:29);
  • of the kingdom throne, as the son of David (Matt 1:1-6; Luke 1:30-33); and
  • of all things, as the Son of God (Heb 1:1,2; Acts 10:36).

THE WORLD: Greek "kosmos", the order or arrangement of things: in this case, the nations of the earth (Gen 17:4-6). The whole "world", not just Canaan, will be the inheritance of the righteous (Matt 5:5). Compare the "blessing of Abraham" (Gal 3:8,9).

BUT THROUGH THE RIGHTEOUSNESS THAT COMES BY FAITH: Faith implies trust in another, not in oneself. God accepts us as righteous on the basis of our trust in Him (i.e., being fully persuaded to rely upon Him) (see Rom 4:3; 3:21,22). The covenant was one of grace, not like a contract of today where each contractor receives equally as he is given. Compare Genesis 15:6; 17:2,3, where Abraham is prostrated as an expression of his inability to stand in the presence of God.

  • Comment on Rom 4:14-17

"If life is earned by keeping the law, neither promise nor faith enter in… By law comes knowledge of sin and consciousness of guilt and liability to punishment. Under law, sinning man comes under wrath. And man cannot keep the law; so law works wrath upon all. Therefore the apostle concludes, 'For this cause it is of faith, that it may be according to grace.' Because of the impossibility of it being by law, if the promise and the inheritance are received at all, it must be by grace, operative through faith. And so it is. And so the promise is secure to all the seed; secure alike to the believing Jew, the seed who lived under the law, and the believing Gentile. This is involved in the promise that Abraham was made the father of MANY nations. If inheritance were of law, he could only be the father of those under law. Since law could give no title, the promise then would not be 'sure' to any. But the purpose of God, who made the promise, is sure. Abraham is appointed the father of many nations by God; in the sight of God — 'before God' — he was such then. 'I have made thee a father', said God to him, when there was as yet no seed, and Abraham and Sarah were old. But God, who could, and did, quicken 'dead' but believing Abraham and Sarah, so that a child was born of her past age, called those things which then had no existence as though they already had come into being (v 17)" (John Carter).

  • Comment on Rom 4:14

FOR IF THOSE WHO LIVE BY LAW ARE HEIRS, FAITH HAS NO VALUE AND THE PROMISE IS WORTHLESS: Faith is useless (i.e., having no value) if the promise can be obtained by works of law. And if so, then the promises to Abraham are void (inoperative, or powerless). As soon as the inheritance of God's promises is made conditional upon perfect obedience, then the promises have been effectively nullified.

  • Comment on Rom 4:15

BECAUSE LAW BRINGS WRATH: In trying to be justified by obedience to Law, one must keep every detail of that Law. But human beings will always fail, and thus bring upon themselves divine wrath. However, faith calls forth divine love, which mercifully provides a covering for sins (Rom 3:19,20,27).

AND WHERE THERE IS NO LAW THERE IS NO TRANSGRESSION: "Transgression" is the Greek "parabasis", literally a stepping over, i.e., a violation. Always implies a breaking of law, especially the Law of Moses (cp Rom 2:23; Heb 2:2; 9:15). It is used of the prohibition in Eden (Rom 5:14; 1 Tim 2:14).

  • Comment on Rom 4:16

Verses 16 and 17 comprise one sentence in Greek, but this has been divided into two sentences due to the requirements of English.

THEREFORE, THE PROMISE COMES BY FAITH, SO THAT IT MAY BE BY GRACE: "Faith" expresses the believer's need, and "grace" expresses God's answer to that need! The fulfillment of the promise is not according to man's merit but according to the Lord's unmerited favor (Rom 6:23). Thus promise, faith, and grace are set in contrast to Law, works, and merit.

AND MAY BE GUARANTEED TO ALL ABRAHAM'S OFFSPRING — NOT ONLY TO THOSE WHO ARE OF THE LAW BUT ALSO TO THOSE WHO ARE OF THE FAITH OF ABRAHAM. HE IS THE FATHER OF US ALL: Abraham's children are composed of Gentiles as well as Jews; they are taken from many nations (Gen 17:5; Mal 3:16,17; Acts 15:14). Both Jews and Gentiles constitute the multitudinous seed of Christ (Gal 3:29).

  • Comment on Rom 4:17

AS IT IS WRITTEN: "I HAVE MADE YOU A FATHER OF MANY NATIONS": This quotation, from Genesis 17:5, forms a parenthesis in Paul's argument.

HE IS OUR FATHER IN THE SIGHT OF GOD, IN WHOM HE BELIEVED — THE GOD WHO GIVES LIFE TO THE DEAD: God gives life both to the spiritually dead (Eph 2:5) and to the physically dead ( 1 Cor 15:45). This relates also to the barrenness of Sarah (Gen 17:16,17). The prerogative and power for this belongs to Jehovah alone, for it is an act requiring almighty power (Deut 32:39; 1Sam 2:6; 2Kgs 5:7; Psa 68:20).

"The words 'He [i.e., Abraham] is our father' are not in the Greek text but are supplied to show that they resume Paul's argument from v 16b" (NET Notes).

AND CALLS THINGS THAT ARE NOT AS THOUGH THEY WERE: An unconditional promise of God has no doubt as to its fulfillment. It is so sure of being done that future things are spoken of as in the present and past tense (Luke 1:51-55; 20:36-38; 2 Tim 1:9,10). There is therefore no doubt that it will come to pass. The primary application of this principle was to Isaac.

"The word 'calls' in this case does not mean to describe or designate, but rather 'summon'; in other words, God 'calls [Isaac, in this case] into being.' It may be used in this sense for God's creative activity (see Isa 48:13, NEB). Isaac was real in the thought and purpose of God before he was begotten" (Harrison).

  • Comment on Rom 4:18

AGAINST ALL HOPE: Literally, "beyond hope", that is, where the laws or course of nature left no room for hope. After making the original promise (Gen 15:5), God waited until it was physically impossible for this couple to have children. Then He repeated His pledge (Gen 17:5). Abraham's act of faith was essentially the same as on the previous occasion, but meanwhile circumstances had made the fulfillment of the promise impossible apart from supernatural intervention. Abraham was shut out from all other avenues of hope, and when that fact was obvious, he was able to turn to God and rest his faith upon Him alone.

ABRAHAM IN HOPE BELIEVED AND SO BECAME THE FATHER OF MANY NATIONS: "Hope" is the Greek "elpis":

  • the happy anticipation of something good (Titus 1:2; 1 Pet 1:21);
  • the ground upon which hope is based (Acts 16:19; Col 1:27); and
  • the object upon which hope is fixed (1 Tim 1:1).

Compare Paul's use of "hope" in Romans 5:2,4,5; 8:20, 24; 12:12; 15:4, 13.

JUST AS IT WAS SAID TO HIM: Here the "hope" is defined: it is "what God said". The "hope" was in God, and there it might safely rest — no matter how unlikely, humanly speaking, the fulfillment seemed — for nothing is too difficult for Him to accomplish, if it be according to His will!

"SO SHALL YOUR OFFSPRING BE": Cited from Genesis 15:5: the object of the hope was the provision of a "seed" to Abraham.

  • Comment on Rom 4:19

WITHOUT WEAKENING IN HIS FAITH: Compare Romans 8:3; 2 Corinthians 13:3. Man has no strength or power of his own, and strength of faith is really a confession of weakness of physical or mental or moral abilities! In Abraham's case he lacked the ability to produce his own seed.

HE FACED THE FACT: "Most manuscripts… read 'he did not consider' [cp the KJV], but others… lack the 'not' [cp the NIV: 'he faced the fact']. The reading which includes the negative probably represents a scribal attempt to exalt the faith of Abraham by making it appear that his faith was so strong that he did not even consider the physical facts. But [commentators point out that] here Paul does not wish to imply that faith means closing one's eyes to reality, but that Abraham was so strong as to be undaunted by every consideration… Both on external and internal grounds, the reading without the negative particle is preferred" (NET Notes).

In short, it makes more sense, Biblically, to understand that Abraham fully recognized his apparently hopeless situation, naturally speaking, but even then believed that his God would perform what He had promised.

THAT HIS BODY WAS AS GOOD AS DEAD — SINCE HE WAS ABOUT A HUNDRED YEARS OLD — AND THAT SARAH'S WOMB WAS ALSO DEAD: Abraham's impotence was due to his old age (100 years), but Sarah had never been able to bear children, even in her youth.

"Then Moses summoned Joshua and said to him in the presence of all Israel, 'Be strong and courageous, for you must go with this people into the land that the Lord swore to their forefathers to give them, and you must divide it among them as their inheritance. The Lord himself goes before you and will be with you; he will never leave you nor forsake you. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged' " (Deut 31:7,8).

"No temptation has seized you except what is common to man. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can stand up under it" ( 1 Cor 10:13).

  • Comment on Rom 4:20

YET HE DID NOT WAVER: Compare Matthew 21:21; Mark 11:23.

THROUGH UNBELIEF: If Abraham had disbelieved, he would have rejected not so much Yahweh's promise, as Yahweh Himself, and His ability to direct history (cp 1Sam 8:1,3-9).

REGARDING THE PROMISE OF GOD: Which was irrevocable (Rom 11:29). The fact that God had promised it was its own assurance.

BUT WAS STRENGTHENED IN HIS FAITH: Not so much "strong in faith", but strengthened to hold on to his faith — a faith which he held even in his own weakness!

"But he said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.' Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me. That is why, for Christ's sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong" (2 Cor 12:9,10).

"He is not weak in dealing with you, but is powerful among you. For to be sure, he was crucified in weakness, yet he lives by God's power. Likewise, we are weak in him, yet by God's power we will live with him to serve you. Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test yourselves. Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you — unless, of course, you fail the test? And I trust that you will discover that we have not failed the test" (2 Cor 13:3-6).

AND GAVE GLORY TO GOD: Compare Romans 1:21, 23. The credit for what happened to Abraham belonged only to God, and human boasting was excluded.

  • Comment on Rom 4:21

BEING FULLY PERSUADED THAT GOD HAD POWER TO DO WHAT HE HAD PROMISED: "Being fully persuaded" is the Greek "plerophoreo" = to carry out fully (in evidence), i.e., completely assure (or convince), entirely accomplish (Strong). "That spontaneity and liberality of soul which, unhindered by obstacles, grasps the promises of God and His ability to perform them" (Vine).

  • Comment on Rom 4:22

THIS IS WHY "IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS": And so Paul returns to the passage he had originally quoted (Gen 15:6) in verse 3.

CREDITED: Or "reckoned" (vv. 3, 6, 8, 11). To put something to one's account, either in His favor or concerning something for which he will be answerable for. See 2 Corinthians 5:19; Galatians 3:6; James 2:23.

  • Comment on Rom 4:23

THE WORDS "IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM" WERE WRITTEN NOT FOR HIM ALONE: The Old Testament Scriptures are not merely a record of facts, but they are designed for the guidance of all believers: "For everything that was written in the past was written to teach us, so that through endurance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope" (Rom 15:4). Abraham's life is recorded as an example of the state of mind expected in his spiritual offspring.

  • Comment on Rom 4:24

Righteousness is available to any and all, on the basis of their faith in God.

BUT ALSO FOR US, TO WHOM GOD WILL CREDIT RIGHTEOUSNESS — FOR US WHO BELIEVE IN HIM WHO RAISED JESUS OUR LORD FROM THE DEAD: Our belief in resurrection is the same as Abraham's faith in Isaac's birth, which was "life from the dead" (the dead body of Abraham, and the dead womb of Sarah). Abraham further demonstrated this same faith in making the decision to offer that same son Isaac as a sacrifice (Gen 22; James 2:21), because he believed that God would raise him from the dead (Heb 11:19). The risen Christ is a confirmation of what Abraham hoped to see (v 17). As we have a partial fulfillment of the promise (Rom 15:8), our faith should be even stronger than his. Christ's resurrection:

  • demonstrates the Lord's almighty power (1 Pet 1:21; Eph 1:19,20), and
  • is the cornerstone of gospel truth ( 1 Cor 15:4,12-18).
  • Comment on Rom 4:25

HE WAS DELIVERED OVER TO DEATH: "Deliver" is the Greek "paradidomi", to hand over or deliver up.

The same verb is also used in Romans 1:24, 26, 28 to describe God giving people over to sin. But it is also used frequently in the gospels to describe Jesus being handed over (or delivered up, betrayed) by sinful men for crucifixion (cf, e.g., Matt 26:21; 27:4; Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:33; 15:15; Luke 20:20; 22:24; 24:7). It is probable that Paul has both ideas in mind: Jesus was handed over by sinners, but even this betrayal was directed by the Father for our sake (because of our transgressions) (generally, cp Rom 8:32).

FOR OUR SINS: This is the meaning of Romans 3:9-23.

AND WAS RAISED TO LIFE: "Egeiro" means to excite, arouse, or waken, restore to health. Christ was "rebuilt" on an eternal basis. His resurrection to eternal life is proof of the efficacy of his sacrifice. It is with this resurrected Lord that we must identify ourselves (Rom 6:4,5).

FOR OUR JUSTIFICATION: The basis of our justification has been laid in the death of Christ; all that remained was the necessity on God's part to raise him from the dead to effect our justification. "Beyond question, the statement owes much to Isaiah 53, where in the Septuagint the Servant is pictured as delivered up on account of the sins of the many. Justification appears in the Hebrew text of that chapter (v 11). Moreover, the resurrection, though not stated in so many words, is implied in verses 10, 12" (Harrison).

Chapter 5

"It is possible… to establish that Paul wrote the first few verses of Romans 5 just after he had pondered Psalms 25 and 26 in the course of his daily readings. At no point is there any direct quote from these Psalms, but one key word after another is traceable in the Greek of the Septuagint text: 'rejoice… hope… stand… glory… tribulation… patience… ashamed… without strength… ungodly… truth' " (Whittaker, Bible Studies). Comparative study along these lines would repay the effort.

  • Comment on Rom 5:1

THEREFORE: A logical deduction from Romans 4, where Paul has shown that justification came not from works (vv. 1-8), nor ordinances (vv. 9-12), nor by obedience to the Law (vv. 13-17), but by faith (vv. 18-25). Now we see the benefits of this.

SINCE WE HAVE BEEN JUSTIFIED THROUGH FAITH: The KJV has "by faith". But the preposition is "ek"; it should read "out of faith". It is not faith in the abstract that saves us, but justification (God's declaration of the believer's righteousness) springs out of a well-grounded faith.


What saves us?

  • Grace (Eph 2:8,9).
  • Hope (Rom 8:24).
  • Belief (Mark 16:15).
  • Baptism (1 Pet 3:21).
  • The gospel, and its memory ( 1 Cor 15:1,2).
  • The blood of Christ ( 1 John 1:7).
  • Faith (Rom 5:1).
  • Works (James 2:24).
  • Ourselves (Acts 2:40).
  • Endurance (Matt 10:22).

"The question as to which single characteristic saves the man is an abstraction. An illustration is helpful. A man who has fallen into the river screams for help. A man on the bank runs with a rope and throws it to the man in the river. He catches hold and is pulled to safety. What saved him? Was it his scream? Was it the rope? Was it the man on the bank? Did he save himself? Or was it all of these working together?" (Ron Abel, Wrested Scriptures).


WE HAVE PEACE WITH GOD THROUGH OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST: "A number of important [textual] witnesses have the subjunctive 'let us have' instead of 'we have'… Nevertheless, the indicative ['we have'] is probably correct… The variant may have been produced via an error of hearing (since omicron and omega were pronounced alike in ancient Greek). This, of course, does not indicate which reading was original — just that an error of hearing may have produced one of them… The indicative ['we have'] fits well with the overall argument of the book to this point. Up until now, Paul has been establishing the 'indicatives of the faith'… Paul presupposes that the audience has peace with God (via reconciliation) in Romans 5:10. This seems to assume the indicative in verse 1… As C.E.B. Cranfield notes, 'it would surely be strange for Paul, in such a carefully argued writing as this, to exhort his readers to enjoy or to guard a peace which he has not yet explicitly shown to be possessed by them' (International Critical Commentary: Romans)… Thus, although the external evidence is stronger in support of the subjunctive ['let us have'], the internal evidence points to the indicative ['we have']. Although a decision is difficult, ['we have'] appears to be the authentic reading" (NET Notes).

Peace is the result of righteousness, and not — as today's world tries to attain it — on the basis of unrighteousness (cp Luke 2:14; John 14:27; Eph 2:14; Phil 4:6,7; Psa 85:8).

Peace: made (Col 1:20), preached (Eph 2:17), enjoyed (Rom 5:1), filling hearts (Rom 15:13), given (John 14:27), keeping (Phil 4:7), and ruling (Col 3:15).

  • Comment on Rom 5:2

THROUGH WHOM: Once again, the KJV has "by", but the Greek has "dia": THROUGH whom… continuing the thought of Romans 3:24.

WE HAVE GAINED ACCESS BY FAITH INTO THIS GRACE INTO WHICH WE NOW STAND: "Access" is the Greek "prosagoge": a bringing in or an introduction. This suggests the introduction of a subject into the presence of the sovereign, or worshiper to the object of worship. Elsewhere the word is found only in Ephesians 2:18; 3:12. Of ourselves, we have no right to enter the presence of God, but Christ has introduced us there (1 Pet 3:18). By contrast, those who entered into the presence of the monarch without express permission might expect death (Esth 4:11). But, in Christ, the pure in heart will see God (Matt 5:8)!

"He came and preached peace to you who were far away and peace to those who were near. For through him we both have access [same word, 'prosagoge'] to the Father by one Spirit" (Eph 2:17,18).

AND REJOICE: More literally, "boast" or "glory" (Greek "kauchaomai"). Used in Romans 2:17, 23; 5:3, 11; 12:12, 15; 15:10.

IN THE HOPE: Literally, "epi": on the basis of… hope. Standing upon hope as though it were a foundation, and indeed it is — the strongest possible foundation.

OF THE GLORY OF GOD: In our present state we have no hope (Psa 90:10). But Christ will manifest the Lord's majesty in the earth and He will thus be glorified (Mic 5:4). We can do the same now (Rom 8:17,18). The "trial of our faith" is necessary now in order that we "might be found unto glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ" (1 Pet 1:7). The Glory of the Lord is seen in His Name (Exod 34); and we must manifest that Name, i.e., specifically that character and purpose (Rev 14:1).

  • Comment on Rom 5:3

However, peace with God (v 1) does not necessarily bring peace with man. The actual conditions of life, especially for believers in the midst of a hostile society, are not easy or pleasant, but the knowledge of acceptance with God, of grace constantly supplied, and the prospect of future glory enable believers to rejoice, and find strength, even in the face of sufferings.

NOT ONLY SO, BUT WE ALSO REJOICE IN OUR SUFFERINGS: See Study, Rejoice in tribulations.

BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT…: It is not the suffering per se in which Paul rejoices, but in the knowledge that the suffering is but the prelude, eventually, to a fuller outpouring of God's love (v 5)!

SUFFERING PRODUCES PERSEVERANCE: "The human mind is naturally given to shallowness and folly and the infantile, characterless pursuit of pleasure and excitement. Very few ever get beyond this stunted stage. Tribulation, if we are rightly exercised by it, forces us to come face to face with the sober realities of life, and intelligently adjust our purposes and characters to them. This is the teaching of the Scriptures, and the wholesome experience of any with any sense and maturity. Some run away crying, vainly seeking solace in animal emptiness, and gain nothing from their sorrows. This is tragic" (Growcott).

"So God in his wisdom allows trouble to come our way for the express reason of teaching us patience. Again we can see this in the life of a little child. If the child gets everything it wants exactly when it wants it, then it has no patience at all and soon becomes miserable when going out into the cruel world, where mommy and daddy are not there to supply every request. Parents are wise to teach their children patience by sometimes making them wait, and no doubt from the viewpoint of the child this waiting is a form of tribulation" (Bob Lloyd).

SUFFERING: "Thlipsis": pressure, compression. The purpose of tribulation in a believer's life is explained in Rom 8:35; 12:12; Matt 13:21; John 16:33; Acts 14:22; 2 Cor 1:4; 7:4-7; Heb 12:8; 1 Thes 3:1-4. Consider the living example of Paul in 2 Cor 11:24-31.

PERSEVERANCE: "Patience" (KJV). Greek "hupomeno" = to bear, or remain, under (e.g., a burden or test). See Romans 2:7; Hebrews 12:1; James 5:11; Job 23:10; 42:11.


"Perseverance" is, quite simply, developing the ability to wait. If I can be sure, when the time finally comes for the Great High Priest to return from the Most Holy Place bringing the final blessing, that I'll still be here, patiently waiting, rejoicing in the tribulations which I endure, having learned real patience, enough for a lifetime, of broken hearts and broken dreams… if I can be sure of that, then I know — as surely as I know anything — that, for us who are still waiting, 'We will be saved' will become, in that instant, 'We are saved!'

But before me stretches what is left of a life which I know, just as surely, will continue to have hurt feelings, resentments, disappointments, bitter experiences, ailments and illnesses, and the gradual and insidious decline of all my human powers.

Surely, in what time remains, I will continue to fall short time and again of what I would like to be, but can't quite be, and to ask forgiveness for the 490th time for the same sins, of forgiving others for the same number of times. Can I bear what lies ahead without throwing up my hands and walking away from the door of the temple, where I wait?

But if I turn and go away, I will be going out into the howling waste of a wilderness filled with subtle snakes and stinging scorpions — where there is no hope and no life and no love… the wilderness where Judas went, and Cain, and Saul, and a million others — who could not truly believe that the High Priest was coming to bring them the last great blessing.

God give me strength enough to wait… as long as it takes. For I now know that "faith" is not some life-changing mystical insight into eternal things, but a dogged determination to hold on in my spirit to what I know in my mind to be true — no matter how long and how difficult it seems, and no matter how distracting are so many concerns and people around me.

Should I care what that God-given strength is called, whether it be His providence, His care, His Scriptural instruction, or even His Holy Spirit? Should I try to figure out how that strength comes to me, and is assimilated into my spirit? Or should I merely be humbly grateful when it is there, miraculously but inexplicably?

"I wait for the Lord, my soul waits, and in his word I put my hope. My soul waits for the Lord more than watchmen wait for the morning, more than watchmen wait for the morning" (Psa 130:5,6).


Our heavenly Father sends us frequent troubles to try our faith. If our faith is worth anything, it will stand the test. Gilt [i.e., a substance that only looks like gold] is afraid of fire, but gold is not [1 Pet 1:7]: the paste gem [i.e., the costume jewelry] dreads to be touched by the diamond, but the true jewel fears no test. It is a poor faith which can only trust God when friends are true, the body full of health, and the business profitable; but that is true faith which holds by the Lord's faithfulness when friends are gone, when the body is sick, when spirits are depressed, and the light of our Father's countenance is hidden. A faith which can say, in the direst trouble, "Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him" [Job 13:15], is heaven-born faith. The Lord afflicts His servants to glorify Himself, for He is greatly glorified in the graces of His people, which are His own handiwork. When "tribulation worketh patience; and patience, experience; and experience, hope" [Rom 5:3,4], the Lord is honored by these growing virtues. We should never know the music of the harp if the strings were left untouched; nor enjoy the juice of the grape if it were not trodden in the winepress; nor discover the sweet perfume of cinnamon if it were not pressed and beaten; nor feel the warmth of fire if the coals were not utterly consumed. The wisdom and power of the great Workman are discovered by the trials through which His vessels of mercy are permitted to pass. Present afflictions tend also to heighten future joy. There must be shades in the picture to bring out the beauty of the lights.

Charles H. Spurgeon


Paul wrote: "We glory in tribulations also" (Rom 5:3). is this genuinely possible? Only by attaining unto the state of mind manifested by the apostle. He bore with tribulation because he saw the divine purpose in it. For one thing, he declared, it "worketh patience", or endurance. It is useless fretting against what we cannot alter, and therefore a courageous man will bear with it, and a faithful man will see beyond it. Once a trial has been successfully surmounted it brings "experience" (Rom 5:4). The Greek word, "dokimen", signifies full proof by trial. The metaphor is taken from the refining of metal, in which there is purification by fire without any deterioration or loss of worth. If in tribulation we seek God's help, and endure the unpleasant experience moment by moment in the realization that it cannot last for ever, we will ultimately emerge from it with the knowledge that we did not rest on God's help in vain, and that we manifested the strength to endure.

This will lead to hope. Hope in what? In the knowledge that He who sustained us in the past will do so in the future even to the setting up of the Kingdom; and in the realization that as we emerged successfully from one trial so we can from the next, leading to a steady growth of endurance, until the time come when all such experiences will cease. Thus "hope maketh not ashamed", for we shall triumph in spite of trouble, and will respond to the "love of God" that will be revealed in our hearts. Let us then develop the mind of Paul in the face of trouble. Let us view it as a time of testing, in which we can manifest that faith without which "we cannot please God" (Heb 11:6), and a period of opportunity in which we are able to demonstrate our unswerving loyalty to Him in face of a challenge. When we do this, we truly "fellowship the sufferings of Christ", and will reveal an attitude pleasing unto the Father. However, let us be sure that our tribulations are not the result of our own folly: "For what glory is it if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? But if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God" (1 Pet 2:20).

H.P. Mansfield

  • Comment on Rom 5:4

CHARACTER: Supplying the ellipsis, "perseverance" produces "character" (or "experience", KJV). The Greek word is "dokimen", meaning: full proof by trial. See also Philippians 2:22; 2 Corinthians 2:9. Not the act of going through the trial, but the result of having been tested and refined. See 2 Corinthians 8:2.

HOPE: With the ellipsis again, "And character (produces) hope." Hope is the expectation that God will do in the future what He has done in the past. This expectation is well-informed, because it relies on previous knowledge leading to established faith. As the Lord has sustained us in the past, so He will continue in the future in preserving us to His kingdom.

  • Comment on Rom 5:5

AND HOPE DOES NOT DISAPPOINT US: Compare Romans 4:18: "Against all hope, Abraham in hope believed." Hope developed out of suffering and trials produces a frame of mind which allows one to go on confidently through life, freed from illusion and despair.

BECAUSE GOD HAS POURED OUT HIS LOVE INTO OUR HEARTS: The KJV has "is shed abroad", but the Greek is "ekcheo" (to be poured out), and this translation is supported by most versions. Possibly this Greek word is an allusion to the Holy Spirit being poured upon the believers at Pentecost: notice that "disappoint" is used in the Septuagint of Joel 2:26,27 ("Never again will my people be ashamed, or disappointed"), which pertains to Acts 2. The verb speaks of the inexhaustible abundance of the supply, being reminiscent of the bountiful provision for the thirsty children of Israel in the wilderness (Num 20:8, 11). This is particularly impressive in view of Paul's identification of the rock as being prophetic of Jesus Christ ( 1 Cor 10:4).

HIS LOVE: Human love may bring disappointment and frustration, but God's love for us does not.

The phrase "he agape tou theou" ('the love of God') could be interpreted as either an objective genitive ('our love for God'), a subjective genitive ('God's love for us'), or both. The immediate context, which discusses what God has done for believers, favors the subjective genitive ('God's love for us'), but the fact that this love is poured out within the hearts of believers implies that it may be the source for believers' 'love for God'. In other words, God's love for us helps to bring about our love for Him: "We love [Him] because He first loved us" ( 1 John 4:19).

BY THE HOLY SPIRIT: Through the Holy Spirit, that is, through the revelation of the written word — or other "Spirit" revelation. Although Spirit gifts were literally given to some at baptism (John 7:39; Acts 10:45), not all received them (Acts 8:18-20). Here, it refers to the effect the Truth has on the believer, as a power in his life (John 6:63; Eph 6:17; 1 John 5:6; 1 Cor 2:9-16).

WHOM HE HAS GIVEN US: The KJV has "which is given unto us". The impersonal "which" serves to remind us that the Holy Spirit is not an independent, conscious Being separate from Almighty God, but is rather the power that proceeds from Him.

However, the personal "whom" is not altogether out of place, since the power of the Holy Spirit is directed by God Himself, who is surely personal and conscious. Moreover, it may also be directed by Jesus Christ himself, and implemented by angels, who possess their own intelligence.

  • Comment on Rom 5:6

YOU SEE, AT JUST THE RIGHT TIME: "But when the time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under law, to redeem those under law, that we might receive the full rights of sons" (Gal 4:4,5). Since the argument of Romans has included the purpose of the Law as bringing clear knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20) and as working wrath (Rom 4:15), the connection with Galatians is fairly close. The Law had operated for centuries and had served to expose the weakness and inability of man to measure up to the divine standard of righteousness. No further testing was needed. It was the right time.

WHEN WE WERE STILL POWERLESS: That is, we were powerless ("without strength": KJV) to obtain justification by works, as has been described in Romans 3:19 — 4:25. The Law is unable to provide justification (Gal 4:9; Heb 7:18).

CHRIST DIED FOR THE UNGODLY: "For" is the Greek "huper": on behalf of, for the benefit of. Not the Greek "anti", which means "instead of". Compare Romans 8:32; 14:15.

THE UNGODLY: Omit "the". Mankind in general, who are without hope (see Rom 4:5). "Asebes" = one who has no reverence for divine things. Does Paul have himself in mind here (Phil 3:6)?

In this section, we are told that Christ died for the "ungodly" (here, v 6), the "sinners" (v 8), and "God's enemies" (v 10).

  • Comment on Rom 5:7

This verse forms something of a parenthetical comment in Paul's argument.

VERY RARELY WILL ANYONE DIE FOR A RIGHTEOUS MAN: "Very rarely" suggests something accomplished with labor and pains, hence with difficulty, i.e., barely, or hardly. See its use in Acts 14:18 and 1 Peter 4:18.

A RIGHTEOUS MAN: Such a man — if he existed! — would be in no need of a sacrifice (see Rom 3:26).

Or a man who thinks himself to be "righteous" (cp Matt 9:13; Mark 2:17; Luke 5:32) may have a very hard time finding a "redeemer".

Thus, Christ died for the "ungodly" (v 6), for "sinners" (v 8), and even for the "good man" (v 7) who nevertheless knew himself to be less than truly righteous. But for the (man who thinks himself truly) "righteous", there is — in his mind, at least — no need for anyone to die on his behalf.

THOUGH FOR A GOOD MAN: Greek "agathos": not "good" in the absolute sense, of being totally without sin, but rather one who habitually acts beneficially towards others, devoting himself to their welfare.

SOMEONE MIGHT POSSIBLY DARE TO DIE: If it would do any good! But, in fact, while some may act righteously on a more or less consistent basis, there are none who are truly and actually "good" in the complete sense (Matt 19:17; Mark 10:18; Luke 18:19)!

  • Comment on Rom 5:8

BUT GOD DEMONSTRATES HIS OWN LOVE FOR US IN THIS: WHILE WE WERE STILL SINNERS, CHRIST DIED FOR US: God's love for all mankind, regardless of merit, is "commended" (KJV) to us as our example: "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (Matt 5:44-48).

SINNERS: Greek "hamartolos" — literally, those who miss the mark; hence, sinners who come short of their potential for doing the will of God.

CHRIST DIED FOR US: "For" is "huper" again: "on behalf of".

Christ died for men who were neither "righteous" nor "good" (v 7)! "The contrast is between the tremendous worth of the life laid down and the unworthiness of those who stand to benefit from it. Back of the death of Christ for sinners is the love of God (v 8): God loved; Christ died. No attempt is made to deal with the Saviour's reaction or motivation. Paul leaves much to Christian awareness of the intimate bond between Father and Son, the whole truth about God being in Christ (2 Cor 5:19) and Christ being motivated by love for the lost (John 15:12,13). What he puts in the foreground is the love of God, and this Paul underscores by designating it as 'his [God's] own love.' It is distinctive, unexpected, unheard of (cf John 3:16)" (Harrison).

  • Comment on Rom 5:9

SINCE WE HAVE NOW BEEN JUSTIFIED BY HIS BLOOD, HOW MUCH MORE SHALL WE BE SAVED FROM GOD'S WRATH THROUGH HIM!: The greatest work to provide for our salvation has already been finished: By God's own judicial decree, we have been "declared righteous" through the blood, or the death, of His only-begotten Son! The considerably lesser work — our salvation from the wrath of God (Rom 2:5-8) — will be easy by comparison!

Paul's statement is somewhat analogous to the actions of Jesus as described in Matthew 9:1-8: There Jesus answers the charges of the "teachers of the law", directed against his own actions, by asking them a question, "Which is easier: to say, 'Your sins are forgiven,' or to say, 'Get up and walk'?" (v 5). Obviously the easier thing to say is: 'Your sins are forgiven', because there is no outward manifestation that one's sins have actually been forgiven. And by far the more difficult thing to do is actually to perform a miracle of healing — because all eyewitnesses will know within a moment whether the person speaking the words had the power to heal. So, to illustrate his point, Jesus now turns to the paralytic, while addressing his critics: "But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins… [I must say this!]… Get up, take your mat and go home" (v 6). For Jesus, of course, the easier thing to do was to heal the paralytic. And the most difficult thing to do was to forgive sins. In the most meaningful sense, this power to forgive sins could not be fully confirmed until he himself had died for the paralytic, and for all others who would have faith in him. The lesser good works (if miraculous healings could be so called) were his means of demonstrating that he also had the power (and it would be confirmed later, by his last sacrifice) to perform the immensely greater good work of forgiving sins, and raising the faithful from the dead to eternal life. "Justified by his blood" indeed!

By our nature, or birth, we have all been the children, or objects, of wrath (Eph 2:3; Col 2:13). But through Christ we have been saved by God's grace (Eph 2:4,5).

BY HIS BLOOD: The blood of Christ, poured out in confirmation of the covenants made with the fathers of Israel (Gen 15; Rom 15:8). This may be considered 'God's blood' only because it is the blood of His only-begotten Son!

For general background, also compare 1 Corinthians 6:19,20; 7:22,23; 1 Peter 1:18-20; 2 Peter 2:1; Revelation 5:9.

GOD'S WRATH: To be poured out on the Gentiles (1 Thes 1:10; 5:9,10).

  • Comment on Rom 5:10

FOR IF, WHEN WE WERE GOD'S ENEMIES, WE WERE RECONCILED TO HIM THROUGH THE DEATH OF HIS SON: "Enemies" is Greek "echthros" = to hate; those who have "enmity" toward God (Rom 8:7). Note the list again:

  • "ungodly" (v 6),
  • "sinners" (v 8), and now
  • "enemies" (v 10).

This list is fully explained in Colossians 1:21-23: "Once you were alienated from God and were enemies in your minds because of your evil behavior. But now he has reconciled you by Christ's physical body through death to present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation — if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel."

HOW MUCH MORE: Paul reasons from the greater to the lesser. If God loved us when we were enemies, now that He has made provision for us at infinite cost, "how much more" will He go on to see us through to the final goal of our salvation. If God showed us His love when we were ungodly sinners, "how much more" can we expect now that we are His sons and daughters?

HAVING BEEN RECONCILED: Greek "katallasso": to change or exchange, especially from enmity to friendship. For reconciliation, see 2 Corinthians 5:19; Ephesians 2:16; Colossians 1:21.

SHALL WE BE SAVED THROUGH HIS LIFE: The efficacy of Christ's work continues because he lives. The living Christ provides:

  • the ability to intercede on our behalf (Heb 7:24,25);
  • strength for his servants (Phil 4:13);
  • the light of life shed abroad (John 8:12); and
  • an elevation to sonship (John 1:12).

Now "Christ in us" (working in these ways) becomes the energizing power of our lives (Gal 2:20; Col 3:4; 2 Cor 4:10,11).

  • Comment on Rom 5:11

NOT ONLY IS THIS SO, BUT WE ALSO REJOICE IN GOD THROUGH OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, THROUGH WHOM WE HAVE NOW RECEIVED RECONCILIATION: Paul not only states that we have been reconciled (v 10) but that we have RECEIVED the reconciliation (v 11). He avoids saying that we have done anything to earn such reconciliation — for we have not. God provided it through the death of his Son. The matter is made even clearer, if anything, in the companion statement that God has reconciled us "to himself" (2 Cor 5:18). The appropriate response of the saved community is exultation (vv. 2,3). We may even "boast", never in what we have done for ourselves, but in what God has done in Christ for us.

  • Comment on Rom 5:12

THEREFORE, JUST AS SIN ENTERED THE WORLD THROUGH ONE MAN: "Except for two non-theological references (Luke 3:38; Jude 1:14), every mention of Adam in the New Testament comes from the pen of Paul. In 1 Timothy 2:14 he makes the point that Adam, unlike Eve, was not deceived, but sinned deliberately. In 1 Corinthians 15, as in the Romans passage, he institutes a comparison between the first and the last Adam, but confines the treatment to the issue of death and resurrection, even though sin is dealt with somewhat incidentally (vv. 17, 56), whereas in Romans 5 both sin and death are named immediately and are woven into the texture of the argument throughout. In the earlier letter Paul makes the significant statement, 'For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive' ( 1 Cor 15:22), in line with Romans 5:12. Paul has already referred to the inevitable connection between sin and death in the only previous mention of death in Romans (Rom 1:32) exclusive of the death of Christ (Rom 5:10). But here in verse 12 he pictures sin and death as entering the world through one man, with the result that death permeated the whole of mankind. It was the opening in the dike that led to the inundation, the poison that entered at one point and penetrated every unit of man's corporate life" (Harrison, Expositor's Bible Commentary).

AND DEATH THROUGH SIN, AND IN THIS WAY DEATH CAME TO ALL MEN, BECAUSE ALL SINNED: "Because" (NIV) is "epi hos".

The phrase has been translated variously, i.e.,

  • as a relative clause: 'Death spread to all people who were in Adam when he sinned.' This is the Diaglott's "in which (whom) all sinned" (cp KJV mg);
  • as a resultant clause: 'The effect of Adam's personal sin is that all his descendants have sinned (i.e., once they have reached the age of choice). This is the KJV's "For that all have sinned"; or
  • as a causal phrase: 'Death spread to all mankind because all have sinned.' This is the NIV's "Because all sinned" (cp RSV and NET).

All men were involved in Adam's sin. They were summed up and included in him as the head and representative of the race. They were not 'guilty' in a legal sense, but the effects of Adam's personal sin have been felt by all his descendants ever since. And when they individually commit sin, as they surely will, given enough time, then they come under judgment in their own situation, with or without Adam.

How is God justified in implanting corruption in the physical body of a child before it has even had the opportunity to sin? For two reasons:

  • In His foreknowledge, God provided a natural condemnation for Adam's posterity, since He knew that all would sin (Rom 3:23).
  • Because of Adam, all people now possess the inherited capacity for lust that leads to sin. This flesh itself — being "sinful flesh", flesh prone to sin — bears its own condemnation on the surface (Rom 8:3; Gal 5:24).

John Carter comments on this:

"The explanation of Scripture is that the race as a whole is involved in the ruin brought about by the first head [i.e., Adam]; that a new head… a last Adam [i.e., Christ], has been raised up who has broken the entail [i.e., the inheritance of death from Adam]… that as men suffer the consequences of the first Adam's sin, they may share the last Adam's work of righteousness.

"A possible objection may be raised that it does not seem right that men should suffer the consequences of another man's wrongdoing. But leaving the Bible for a moment, is this not at any rate a fact in life? By heredity, the effects of evil lives are borne by generations who did not share in the wrong" (Paul's Letter to the Romans).

R.K. Harrison also writes:

"That we could have sinned in Adam may seem strange and unnatural to the mind of Western man. Nevertheless, it is congenial to Biblical teaching on the solidarity of mankind. When Adam sinned, the race sinned because the race was in him. To put it boldly, Adam was the race. What he did, his descendants, who were still in him, did also [or, perhaps, are "reckoned" as having done!]. This principle is utilized in Heb 7:9,10, 'One might even say that Levi, who collects the tenth, paid the tenth through Abraham, because when Melchizedek met Abraham, Levi was still in the body of his ancestor.'

"If one is still troubled by the seeming injustice of being born with a sinful nature because of what the father of the race did and being held accountable for [or perhaps, 'bearing the burden of'] the sins that result from that disability, he should weigh carefully the significance of reconciliation as stated by Paul: '…that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men's sins against them' (2 Cor 5:19). The sins committed, that owe their original impetus to the sin of the first man, are not reckoned against those who have committed them provided they put their trust in Christ crucified and risen. God takes their sins and gives them His righteousness. Would we not agree that this is more than a fair exchange?"

  • Comment on Rom 5:13

FOR BEFORE THE LAW WAS GIVEN, SIN WAS IN THE WORLD: This cannot be the law of Eden (Gen 2:17), since there was no sin in the world before that. It must be referring, therefore, to the Law of Moses (as in v 14).

BUT SIN IS NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN THERE IS NO LAW: Sin is not "reckoned" (RSV), or imputed" (KJV), to the SINNER! Where there is no law, the sinner does not recognize his sin.

  • Comment on Rom 5:14

NEVERTHELESS, DEATH REIGNED FROM THE TIME OF ADAM TO THE TIME OF MOSES: "Death" is personified here as a king — in a manner very similar to Romans 6, where "Sin" reigns as king throughout!

EVEN OVER THOSE WHO DID NOT SIN BY BREAKING A COMMANDMENT, AS DID ADAM: Or, as KJV, "them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression". "Similitude" is the Greek "homoioma": see Study, Homoioma.

Adam deliberately rejected a direct commandment from God. After Moses, Israel did the same. But from Adam to Moses, other men sinned too — even though there was no specific revelation to them. In short, death reigns upon all men, even those not responsible by specific and precise knowledge of God's law.

ADAM, WHO WAS A PATTERN OF THE ONE TO COME: Adam was a "type", or pattern, or mold, of the one who was to come: that is, the second, or last, Adam ( 1 Cor 15:45). How so? "The resemblance, on account of which Adam is regarded as the type of Christ, consists in this, that Adam communicated to those whom he represented what belonged to him, and that Christ also communicated to those whom he represented what belonged to him" (Robert Haldane). In other words, what each did involved others.

The contrast of the two federal heads:

The heads: Adam Christ The action: One act of trespass One act of perfect obedience The kind of action: The great initial breach of God's law The victory of the "Word of God" over the weakness of the flesh The persons affected by the action: All mankind All mankind (who are in Christ) The immediate effect of the action: Coming in of many transgressions Coming in of grace and clearing away of transgressions The ultimate effect of the action: Death Life

  • Comment on Rom 5:15

BUT THE GIFT IS NOT LIKE THE TRESPASS. FOR IF THE MANY DIED BY THE TRESPASS OF ONE MAN, HOW MUCH MORE DID GOD'S GRACE AND THE GIFT THAT CAME BY THE GRACE OF THE ONE MAN, JESUS CHRIST, OVERFLOW: "Overflow" is "perisseia": "an exceeding measure overflowing" (Vine). In "the one" Christ, "the many" people receive abundance infinitely greater than that which Adam, another "one", had lost, for truly the wages of sin is death but the GIFT of God is eternal life (Rom 6:23).

"In him the tribes of Adam boast More blessings than their father lost!"

TO THE MANY: The expression goes back to Isaiah 53:11,12: "After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light of life; and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify MANY, and he will bear their iniquities. Therefore I will give him a portion among the great, and he will divide the spoils with the strong, because he poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors. For he bore the sin of MANY, and made intercession for the transgressors."

This underlies our Lord's use of "many" in Mark 10:45: "For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many."

  • Comment on Rom 5:16

AGAIN, THE GIFT OF GOD IS NOT LIKE THE RESULT OF THE ONE MAN'S SIN: To paraphrase, 'It is not as though Adam (the one man who sinned) is God's great gift to us.' No, not in the least! The implication is altogether different: 'No, of course not! God's great gift to us is His perfectly righteous Son — providing the basis by which we, who sin, may be declared perfectly righteous in him!'

THE JUDGMENT FOLLOWED ONE SIN AND BROUGHT CONDEMNATION: IF God's "gift" to us were only the first Adam, then that "gift" has been giving ever since! But the only thing that it gives is the condemnation of death.

BUT THE GIFT FOLLOWED MANY TRESPASSES AND BROUGHT JUSTIFICATION: Under Adam, all flesh was to die, even if not directly responsible for sin against God's Law ( 1 Cor 15:21,22). In Adam, therefore, was physical condemnation: a position that HE brought into existence. In Christ, however, was moral regeneration — a position that the Lord GOD brought into existence through grace in Christ Jesus (v 17). One is the antithesis of the other.

In Adam's case, a single sin was involved, and that was sufficient to bring condemnation, but in the work of one man Christ, with a single and unique sinless life, God made a provision sufficient for the many acts of sin that have resulted in the lives of Adam's descendants.

TRESPASSES: The same word occurs in verses 15, 17, 18 and 20.

  • Comment on Rom 5:17

FOR IF, BY THE TRESPASS OF THE ONE MAN, DEATH REIGNED THROUGH THAT ONE MAN: One sin brought about a sentence that condemned Adam AND his posterity (cp v 14).

HOW MUCH MORE WILL THOSE WHO RECEIVE GOD'S ABUNDANT PROVISION OF GRACE AND OF THE GIFT OF RIGHTEOUSNESS REIGN IN LIFE THROUGH THE ONE MAN, JESUS CHRIST: In Christ not only is the hold of death, established by Adam's sin, effectively broken, but because of Christ's redeeming work the believer is able to look forward to reigning in life through Christ. This, of course, implies participation in the resurrection. Believers will have a share in the Lord's kingdom and glory.

REIGN IN LIFE THROUGH THE ONE MAN, JESUS CHRIST: Reigning as "kings and priests" who through Christ have conquered death (Rev 5:9,10; 1 Cor 15:25,26,54,55).

  • Comment on Rom 5:18

"Even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life" (KJV). See Study, Wesley and the Free Cheese.

CONSEQUENTLY: "There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: 'consequently therefore', emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing" (NET Notes).

"There are no verbs in the Greek text of verse 18, forcing translators to supply phrases like 'came through one transgression', 'resulted from one transgression', etc" (NET Notes). The NIV uses, twice, the simplest possible verb, "was".

JUST AS THE RESULT OF ONE TRESPASS WAS CONDEMNATION FOR ALL MEN: Adam's sin (Gen 2:17) is labeled "trespass", indicating that it was deliberate (cf "breaking a command" in v 14). The basic meaning of the word rendered "trespass" is to convey the idea of falling aside or going astray. "It refers directly to the disruption of man's relation to God through his fault" (NIDNTT).

SO ALSO THE RESULT OF ONE ACT OF RIGHTEOUSNESS WAS JUSTIFICATION THAT BRINGS LIFE FOR ALL MEN: The one righteous act refers to Jesus' death on the cross. It is true of course that the death of Christ, alone, would have meant nothing without the absolute dedication and the righteous life that preceded it. But here Paul's focus is all on the one supreme culminating act of Christ's life — so as to contrast more perfectly with the one act of sin in Adam's life from which all condemnation sprang.

  • Comment on Rom 5:19

FOR JUST AS THROUGH THE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ONE MAN THE MANY WERE MADE SINNERS: "Kathistemi": made, or constituted. The many were born into a constitution of sin and death; they were made subjects of "King Sin". This death-stricken state into which man is born is not his fault but his misfortune, not a crime but a calamity. Man is "sold under sin" (Rom 7:14), like a helpless slave, who cannot determine or change his own fate.

SO ALSO THROUGH THE OBEDIENCE OF THE ONE MAN: Christ became obedient unto death (Phil 2:8).

THE MANY WILL BE MADE RIGHTEOUS: Again, "made" means "constituted". Not righteous intrinsically, nor righteous by one's own efforts. But placed under a "constitution" (a situation or circumstance) of grace and righteousness — to be found only in Christ! Adam and Eve were created in what might be called a 'very good' state, but disobeyed God's command and introduced sin into the world. Death followed for them, and for all their posterity because, as they have opportunity, they all sin. We are made sinners by having a nature so biased toward evil that we are inevitable sinners. By uniting with Christ and letting him live in us we are made righteous.

  • Comment on Rom 5:20

THE LAW WAS ADDED: Literally, the Law was "slipped in".

SO THAT THE TRESPASS MIGHT INCREASE: That is, "so that through the commandment sin might become utterly sinful" (Rom 7:13). The entrance of the law was intended to magnify the presence of sin in the mind of the sinner, so that he might be caused to exclaim: "What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death?" (Rom 7:24).

"The apostle is not maintaining that the purpose of the giving of the law is exclusively 'that the trespass might increase', because he makes room for the law as a revelation of the will of God and therefore a positive benefit (Rom 7:12). The law also serves to restrain evil in the world (implied in Rom 6:15; stated in 1 Tim 1:9-11). Paul says the law 'was added'. Similar language is used in Galatians 3:19, where the law is regarded as something temporary, designed to disclose the transgression aspect of sin and prepare the way for the coming of Christ by demonstrating the dire need for his saving work. This function of the law — e.g., to increase transgression — was not recognized in rabbinic Judaism. From the Sermon on the Mount, however, it appears that Jesus sought to apply the law in just this way, to awaken a sense of sin in those who fancied they were keeping the law tolerably well but had underestimated its searching demands and the sinfulness of their own hearts" (Harrison, Expositor's Bible Commentary).

BUT WHERE SIN INCREASED, GRACE INCREASED ALL THE MORE: Divine grace and forgiveness may now be manifested, and overflow, in far greater abundance than the sin itself (cf Rom 3:19,20). The apostle becomes almost ecstatic as he revels in the superlative excellence of the divine overruling that makes sin serve a gracious purpose. In only one other passage does he use this verb ("hyperperisseuo"), which expresses "super-increase" (like a spring overflowing abundantly). In Romans 5:20, the subject is "sin"; there it is "grace" that overflows, thus to overwhelm sin. In 2 Corinthians 7:4, Paul's subject is "trouble". But where trouble increases, so there also "joy" overflows abundantly: "in all our troubles my joy knows no bounds" (2 Cor 7:4).

"Thy goodness, Lord, our souls confess, Thy mercy we adore, A spring whose blessings never fail, A sea without a shore."

Is there a better brief statement of what it means to live one's life in Christ? 'Be certain: where there is much sin, there will be much more grace, overflowing, to cover all your needs. And, then, where there is much trouble, for trouble will certainly come in this life, then… rest assured that there will even more joy!'

  • Comment on Rom 5:21

Examples of personification: riches (Matt 6:24); sin (John 8:34; Rom 5:21; 6:16); spirit (John 16:13); wisdom (Prov 3:13-15; 9:1); Israel (Jer 31:4, 18); people of Christ (Eph 4:4, 13; 5:23; Rev 19:7; 1 Cor 12:27; 2 Cor 11:2; Col 1:18, 24).

SO THAT, JUST AS SIN REIGNED IN DEATH, SO ALSO GRACE MIGHT REIGN THROUGH RIGHTEOUSNESS TO BRING ETERNAL LIFE THROUGH JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD: "With great effect Paul brings the leading concepts of the passage together in the final statement. 'Sin reigned in death' picks up verses 12, 14; 'grace' looks back to verses 15, 17; 'reign' reflects verses 14, 17; 'righteousness' harks back to verse 17 as well as to Romans 1:17 and many other passages; 'eternal life' completes and crowns the allusion to 'life' in verses 17,18. Sin and death are virtually personified throughout. Sin poses as absolute monarch, reigning through death as its vicar [priest, or representative], but in the end it is exposed as a pretender and is obliged to yield the palm [to relinquish the honor] to another whose reign is wholly absolute and totally different, being as much a blessing as the other is a curse.

"The treatment of sin, death and salvation in terms of righteousness is crucial to our understanding of our relation to God. It loudly proclaims that no sinner, whether a mystic aspiring to direct contact with God or a legalist counting on his good works to approve him in God's sight, is able in his own way to find acceptance with God. Because another man, Adam, has intervened between him and the Creator, still another, even Jesus Christ, must be the medium of his return, as a sinner to a righteous God. The claim of Jesus of Nazareth resounds through the passage: 'I am the way — and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me' (John 14:6)" (Harrison).

Chapter 6

Paul makes essentially the same argument when he begins to talk about baptism in Romans 6 as he made when discussing circumcision in Romans 2:28 — 3:2. Like circumcision, baptism is an outward act, and an act of cleansing. And like circumcision, baptism means very little unless it affects how the recipient speaks, thinks, and lives his life on a daily basis.

Just like it is not enough merely to have been circumcised in the flesh, so it is not enough merely to have been dunked under the water. There must be a corresponding change in the way the new believer lives.

Romans 6 is not really the "baptism chapter", as it is often called; instead, it is the "after-baptism chapter". What do you do AFTER you are baptized? You may be baptized for the forgiveness of your sins, but if you don't live your life as a new life in Christ, then that initial baptism becomes nothing more than a quick bath, followed by a lifetime of getting dirty all over again.

The ritual of circumcision cut off a small portion of flesh, representing the natural man. Baptism does the same, only more so. It crucifies, or puts to death, the "old self" (the "old man", or the "body of sin"). The whole body of sin, not just a little piece of sinful flesh, is to be circumcised, cut off, crucified, put to death, and buried. The result is that the believer must no longer be the slave of sin. (In this chapter, Romans 6, Paul is treating "sin" the concept as sin personified: "King Sin", who rules over the whole world, including — to an extent — even those who have sought to put him to death!)

Men and women are justified by faith. This is the "good news", the preeminent message of the Letter to the Romans. But underlying this one great message is the continual warning: 'If you've been saved in Christ, if your sins are forgiven, then never forget: You owe a debt to the Father and the Son who saved you from a useless life ending in death. That debt or obligation is to live your life as best you can, following Christ's example — showing by your life what it means to be redeemed in Jesus Christ.'

See Study, Baptism: At a Baptism.

  • Comment on Rom 6:1

WHAT SHALL WE SAY, THEN: "What shall we conclude?" Compare the usages of this expression, in Romans 3:5; 4:1; 6:1; 7:7; 8:31; 9:14, 30.

SHALL WE GO ON SINNING SO THAT GRACE MAY INCREASE?: See here how Paul returns to the point of Romans 3:8, where he quoted his critics: "Let us do evil that good may result?" Paul condemns this sort of reasoning there, as he does here. In the first instance (Rom 3:8), he was referring to those Jews who felt that, having been circumcised and thus initiated into God's covenant people, they would ever after be superior in standing to all Gentiles, no matter how they lived. And here in Romans 6 the apostle condemns the same sort of reasoning, when used by baptized believers in Christ (whether Jews or Gentiles) who felt that mere baptism had elevated them to a position of superiority from which they could scarcely if ever fall, no matter how they lived subsequently.

This question, "Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase?", is the logical rejoinder to what Paul has just written, in Romans 5:20: "Where sin increased, grace increased all the more." Now Paul must answer this logical but misguided question, and he does so effectively answered in verses 2-14. His answer may be summarized: "No! because 'dead men' don't sin!" The significance of baptism (a death and a burial, as well as a resurrection) shows that continuing in sin is ruled out. The 'man of Sin' died in the waters of baptism!

Augustine said that the doctrine of justification led to the maxim, 'Love God and do whatever you please.' Because we have misunderstood one of the gospel's most basic themes, Augustine's statement looks to many like a license to indulge one's sinful nature, but in reality it touches upon the motivation the Christian has for his actions. The person who has been justified by God's grace has a new, higher, and nobler motivation for holiness than the shallow, hypocritical self-righteousness or fear that seems to motivate so many religious people today. The person who has truly been justified is truly PLEASED to do the Father's will!

GO ON SINNING: "Continue" (KJV), or "abide" in THE sin. The Greek "epimeno" signifies to abide in something, as in a house (cp Acts 10:48; Phil 1:24), thus alluding to the "domain" or "kingdom" of the personified Power of Sin (Rom 5:21 — 6:23).

SO THAT GRACE MAY INCREASE: The philosophy of some in the first century (sometimes called the Antinomians, or those who were against law) was that sins are automatically discharged by the operation of divine grace. Today, the theory of 'substitution' perpetuates the same wrong idea. But sins are in no way automatically forgiven; there must be a change in the mind and life of the believer, a change which will render the whole idea of sin repugnant.

Grace not only saves us from past sins, but it provides the motivation and the impetus to begin and continue a new life, forsaking the sins of the past. No one of us can maintain such a new life perfectly, but grace also provides the means by which, from time to time, as we have need, we may be renewed in our ongoing spiritual life. The old words of "Amazing Grace" are true:

"Through many dangers, toils and snares I have already come; 'Tis Grace that brought me safe thus far and Grace will lead me home."

  • Comment on Rom 6:2

BY NO MEANS: The KJV has "God forbid!", although the name of God does not appear. The Greek phrase is a very powerful exclamation: "Let it not be!" See the Appendix, "God forbid!"

Paul has already repudiated a similar suggestion in a somewhat different context (Rom 3:8). It is probable that in the past, as Paul taught the concept of justification, opponents raised objections of this sort from time to time. Perhaps they did so because they feared that his teaching opened the door to libertinism (a philosophy that espouses every form of self-indulgence) by encouraging indifference to the ethical demands of the law. If so, his answer is not something recently developed, but rather forged out in years of reflection under divine guidance.

WE DIED TO SIN: He does not say that sin is dead to the believer (but that the believer is dead to sin). As we shall see, Romans 7 plainly refutes the notion that the believer will never sin again! What Paul presents here is not the impossibility of committing a single sin, but the impossibility of a true believer continuing in a LIFE dominated by sin. S

HOW CAN WE LIVE IN IT ANY LONGER?: The word translated "live" here (KJV as well as NIV) means to set up a home and dwell. Again, as in verse 1, Paul is emphasizing the point: "Sin" is not just a single act, or even several acts — rather, it is a dominion where a man or woman might choose to live! The believer can be assured of sins forgiven, if sincerely recognized and repented of. But the believer can never, in this life, reach a place where he or she can be assured of never committing a single sinful act. However, Paul also emphasizes that he or she must never choose to dwell or settle in a place where "King Sin" rules, and where sinning makes no difference! To do so is to deliberately choose to give up in the inevitable struggle against sin, to surrender and succumb to the "king" from whom the believer had been freed. It is the surest way to a spiritual death.

Under normal conditions, we all live in the place (sinful nature) where sin is committed (see Rom 8:3), but in Christ we can make that same place the 'beachhead' of an invading force, from which the sphere of righteousness can be gradually extended (see Rom 2:14,15; 8:13; 1 Pet 2:24). In the normal state, we are dead in trespasses and sins (Eph 2:15; Col 2:13; 1 Tim 5:6), but in Christ we are called to be conformable unto his death (Phil 3:10), by:

  • crucifying the lusts of the flesh that war against the demands of the Truth (Gal 5:24; Rom 8:13; Col 3:5; Gal 2:19-21), and
  • living unto Christ (Col 3:3; 2:20; 2 Tim 2:11).

In like manner, we may be spoken of as "citizens of heaven" (Phil 3:20), even while living in this world!

We need to be continually reminded that it is not our good deeds or our Bible knowledge that will save us. It is not a matter of performing sufficient good works in our life to earn us a place in God's kingdom. Nor can we perform enough good works to compensate for the bad things that we do. God requires that we confess our sins and accept His grace, available only through Christ. Rather than trying to earn salvation by our works, we should be motivated to do good works by gratitude to God for His grace toward us.

When we realize that our works cannot save us, we may be tempted to stop doing good and start doing whatever we feel like. The apostle Paul warned first-century believers against being tempted to sin more to receive more grace. He asked, "What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? By no means!" (vv. 1,2a). God will not let us take His grace for granted. If we do, then we are in effect taking God for granted!

  • Comment on Rom 6:3

OR DON'T YOU KNOW THAT ALL OF US WHO WERE BAPTIZED INTO CHRIST JESUS WERE BAPTIZED INTO HIS DEATH?: The Greek "baptizo" signifies to be dipped, as a garment which is to be dyed, or a vessel to be submerged in water (Vine). Very clearly this points to total immersion or submersion of an object in a liquid.

BAPTIZED INTO HIS DEATH: The metaphor of baptism is clearly used in a relational sense elsewhere, as in the case of the Israelites baptized into Moses by reason of the crossing of the Red Sea ( 1 Cor 10:2). They became united to him as never before, recognizing his leadership and their dependence on him. Union with Christ means union with him in his death. It is significant that although Jesus emphasized discipleship throughout his ministry, he did not speak of union with himself till he was on the verge of going to the cross (John 14-16).

Thus those who are baptized "into his death" become partakers of that death, both as to its general purpose (the denial of sin's power) and its specific intent (the basis for the forgiveness of sins). The death of Christ was the final "sealing" of the life of self-sacrifice and repudiation of the flesh that he had lived out for 33 years. His literal death upon the cross was the final victory ("It is finished": John 19:30). Our "death" in baptism is our physical demonstration of what we intend to do, following the same principle that we see in Christ's death, for the rest of our lives, until the final victory is won in us as well ( 1 Cor 15:55). We must figuratively "crucify the lusts and passions of the flesh" (Gal 5:24; Heb 9:22), showing that we have left them behind in the "grave" of baptism.


"Baptism being the institution that affords scope for the obedience of faith, and obedience to the faith, can only be Scripturally and rightly observed by a true believer — a believer of 'the truth as it is in Jesus'. The religious use of water is of no efficacy to any other kind of subject. No invention can supply the lack of an intelligent belief of the gospel of the kingdom in the person to be baptized. He must be 'dead to sin', that he may be 'baptized into Christ's death', who 'died for sin once'; for it is only the dead, in this sense, who are released or freed from sin (Rom 6:1,3,7,10, etc).

"The quantity of water is not sufficient if the subject cannot be buried therein. In whatever place there are persons 'ordained for eternal life', sufficient water will always be found. The quantity required is indicated by the word immersion, which is the English synonym for the Greek word 'baptisma'. 'We are buried with Christ,' says Paul, 'through the baptism into the death' of Christ. The action of baptism is, therefore, a burial in water as a sign of burial with Christ; which signified burial no one can be the subject of who does not believe 'the things of the name of Jesus Christ'. The phrase used by Christ, in his conversation with Nicodemus, indicates the quantity of water, and the action inseparable from baptism — 'Except a man be born of water and spirit he cannot enter the kingdom of God.' To be born of anything is to emerge from that thing in which the subject of birth had been previously concealed. Hence, no one can be 'born of water' unless he had been covered with, or put out of sight, in water. The action of baptism is, therefore, clearly a burying in water, or immersion, and an emergence from it. This is a sign based upon the burial of Christ crucified for our offences, and his resurrection for our justification (Rom 4:25); and signifies that the subject, having Christ in him by faith (Eph 3:17), is crucified, dead, buried and risen together with him, to walk in newness of life" (John Thomas, Eureka, vol. 3).

  • Comment on Rom 6:4

See Study, Christ's resurrection, reality.

WE WERE THEREFORE BURIED WITH HIM THROUGH BAPTISM INTO DEATH: "Buried with him" is literally "buried together with him". Burial is the "seal" of death; there can be no burial unless there is a death! The importance of burial is that it attests the reality of death ( 1 Cor 15:3,4). It expresses with finality the end of the old life governed by relationship with Adam. It also expresses the impossibility of a new life apart from divine action.

Since, in the absolute sense, Christ's death was the only perfect "death" to sin, we MUST die and be buried "together with him" to have any part in what he has won! We cannot win it for ourselves! It may be truly said that God will save only ONE man — but that man will be a multitudinous man! Our baptism, then, saves us — but only by our identification with the "baptism" of Christ (Mark 10:38) — in which is comprehended his life, death to sin, burial, and resurrection to a new life. Our real life, therefore, is buried, or "hidden", with Christ (Col 3:3).

IN ORDER THAT, JUST AS CHRIST WAS RAISED FROM THE DEAD THROUGH THE GLORY OF THE FATHER, WE TOO MAY LIVE A NEW LIFE: "But God raised him from the dead, freeing him from the agony of death, because it was impossible for death to keep its hold on him. David said about him: 'I saw the Lord always before me. Because he is at my right hand, I will not be shaken. Therefore my heart is glad and my tongue rejoices; my body also will live in hope, because you will not abandon me to the grave, nor will you let your Holy One see decay' " (Acts 2:24-27; cp Psa 16:8-11). Christ was cursed by the Law (Gal 3:13) and he thus became dead to that Law, putting to death also the lusts and affections of the flesh within himself (Gal 5:24). The Law therefore had no hold over him, having been discharged, and Jehovah was therefore just and righteous in "raising" His Holy One from the dust, through His omnipotent creational power, to become His firstborn from among the dead, the beginning of His new creation (cp Col 1:15-18).

THROUGH THE GLORY OF THE FATHER: Why should the resurrection of Christ be described as accomplished "through the glory of the Father"? It is because "glory" here has the meaning of power, as in the resurrection of Lazarus (John 11:40).

The righteousness, or the glory of the Father, which was the power of salvation (Rom 1:16,17), was manifested (Rom 3:25) in His Son, and especially in his death to sin and his resurrection to glorified immortal life. Thus all initiative and prerogative rested with the Father, and by HIS power was Jesus brought forth to become the "firstborn" (cp 1 Cor 6:14; 2 Cor 13:4; Eph 1:20; Col 2:12). Yahweh is glorified when victory over sin and death is achieved ( 1 Cor 15:55-57).

WE TOO MAY LIVE A NEW LIFE: The expression "to live a new life" is literally (as the KJV) "to WALK in newness of life", the walk being the evidence of the new type of life granted to the child of God.

Our newness of life is therefore paralleled with Christ's resurrection, as our baptism is with his death. We commence with Christ the life of a new creation (2 Cor 5:17), starting off as "new-born babes" (1 Pet 2:2).

"Newness of life supposes newness of heart. Walking in Scripture stands for the course and character of one's life, which must be new. Walk by new rules, towards new ends, from new principles. Make new choices of direction. Choose new paths to walk in, new leaders to walk after, new companions to walk with. 'Old things should pass away, and all things become new.' Such a person is something he formerly was not, does things he did not. And this newness is to be alive to God through Christ. To converse with God, to have a regard for Him, a delight in Him, a concern for Him: This is to be alive to God. The love of God reigning in the heart is the life of the soul towards God. Christ is our spiritual life; there is no living to God but through him — through Christ as the Author and Maintainer of this life; through Christ as the Head from whom we receive vital influence; through Christ as the Root by which we derive sap and nourishment, and so live. In living to God, Christ is all in all" (Matthew Henry).

  • Comment on Rom 6:5

IF WE HAVE BEEN UNITED WITH HIM: Greek "symphuto" = literally, "fused together", the idea being of growing together, as perhaps two plants, or two trees, planted together, and intertwining with one another as they grow. (For a like example, but with a very different kind of result, see the parable of the wheat and the tares: Matt 13:24-30,36-43.) The word may also suggest the grafting of one branch into a different kind of tree — as in Romans 11:17, etc: the believer has been "grafted into" Christ.

LIKE THIS IN HIS DEATH: Or, "in the likeness of his death". "Likeness" = Greek "homoioma": see Study, Homoioma.

"For if we have been united with him in a death like his ['tou homoiomati tou thanatou autou'], we shall certainly be united in a resurrection like his" (RSV). The question is: how does the believer "die" with Christ in being baptized? Obviously, not literally. So, is it a moral and spiritual "death" — a death to an old way of life (Eph 4:22-24)? Yes, of course. Is it — ALSO — some kind of "legal" death… a crossing over from a "state" of death to a "state" of life? This is what John Thomas in Elpis Israel called the two "constitutions": one of "sin" and the other of "righteousness" — a change of status in the sight of God.

WE WILL CERTAINLY ALSO BE UNITED WITH HIM IN HIS RESURRECTION: This could be true in two aspects:

  • rising up now, from the waters of baptism, to walk in a new life (as in v 4; cp Eph 2:6; Col 2:12; 3:1), and a new relationship with God; and
  • the future, literal resurrection to be made into his "likeness", when he returns to this earth (as in 1 Cor 15).

Although the context in Romans 6 seems to be stressing the first, the one phase ought not to be separated from the other. They naturally flow from the present to the future reality: IF we walk in a "new life" now, then we will walk in a "new (eternal) life" THEN!

  • Comment on Rom 6:6

FOR WE KNOW THAT…: The Greek phrase beginning verse 6 is: 'knowing this, so that…' Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, some versions, such as the NIV, RSV and NET, simplify the translation by beginning a new sentence here.

It might be asked: if they all did know, then why did Paul need to remind them? Because academic knowledge, tucked into the back of our minds, may fail to find any practical application in our lives.

OUR OLD SELF WAS CRUCIFIED WITH HIM: There is a great difference between realizing that "Christ was crucified for me", and realizing that "I am crucified with Christ." The one aspect brings us deliverance from sin's condemnation, the other from sin's power. Recognizing that we "have been crucified with Christ" (Gal 2:20), we should, as Paul admonished in Rom 6:11, consider ourselves "to be dead indeed to sin". We still have sinful tendencies within, but having died to them, sin no longer has dominion over us. We die to our selfish desires and pursuits. But believers must also think of themselves as "alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord" (Rom 6:11). We should do those things that please Him.

In some sense, then, the old man has been crucified. In another sense he may still claim attention. Since "man" has been used to mean Adam (Rom 5:12, 17, 19), it is possible that what has been crucified with Christ is our place in Adam, our position in the old creation, which is under the dominion of sin and death. For the Christian, the old is gone; he belongs to the new creation order (2 Cor 5:17). Yet the old order seeks to dominate the believer, as Ephesians 4:22 implies and experience confirms. Though the seeming inconsistency between that passage and this is not easy to resolve, it may be that in his letter to the Ephesians Paul, while presupposing the supplanting of the old Adam, wants to exhort his readers to refuse to live in terms of the old man and instead to live deliberately and consciously in the reality of the new creation.

It is necessary to distinguish between the old creation — namely, our inheritance from Adam — and our old nature, or the flesh. The latter still persists in the life of the redeemed and can fall victim to the operation of sin unless countered by the powerful influence of the new life in Christ.

OUR OLD SELF: Or "old man" (cp Eph 4:22; Col 3:9; Gal 5:24; 2 Cor 5:14). See Study, Old Man and New Man.

SO THE BODY OF SIN: The physical body, which is prone to sin — as was that of Jesus Christ himself (Rom 8:3; 2 Cor 5:21). Or, more especially, the word "soma" may signify a "slave" — in the sense that a slave was considered to have no rights of its own, but to be a mere "body" to be bought and sold. In Christ, the believer has been freed from his "slavery" to King Sin — he is no longer a "body" or a "slave" at all!

MIGHT BE DONE AWAY WITH: Or "rendered powerless" (NIV mg). Greek "katargeo" = to make inactive. We are not called upon literally to destroy this body, but to render its ungodly lusts inoperative. It is not as though we do not feel any pull toward those previous desires. It is rather that we seek always to put those desires behind us, in our past but not in our present or future — and to remind ourselves that, no matter what we may feel at any moment, those desires should and must have no lasting control over our lives now!

THAT WE SHOULD NO LONGER BE SLAVES TO SIN: That we should no longer be in servitude to "King Sin". How can one habitually serve a DEAD "master" — that is, IF he is really dead?

Years ago when slavery was officially abolished in Jamaica, some of the slaves in the remote areas did not know of their freedom. Years after their release had been announced they still continued to serve their masters, oblivious to the fact that they were legally free. Their owners kept the news from the slaves as long as possible, hoping to extract every ounce of work from their captives. The slaves would not have had to put up with their drudgery — except for their ignorance of the facts.

  • Comment on Rom 6:7

Verse 7 is a parenthetical comment in Paul's continuing argument.

BECAUSE ANYONE WHO HAS DIED HAS BEEN FREED FROM SIN: Two things are happening here: the sinner is now DEAD to his sin, AND the "sin" ("King Sin", the old master) has been put to death also! The redeemed sinner has been raised up from the dead to live a new life, but "King Sin" has been buried with no hope of a new life.

In Christ, Law, sin and death have no longer any claims over the individual; he is no longer a "debtor" to them (Rom 8:12).

  • Comment on Rom 6:8

NOW IF WE DIED WITH CHRIST: Literally, "dead together with Christ", referring to the old man of the flesh (Col 3:3; Rom 6:11).

WE BELIEVE THAT WE WILL ALSO LIVE WITH HIM: "Eternal life" must be lived, NOW, in "newness of life" (v 4), if it is to be lived in the future, in a new and glorified body: "When Christ, who is your life, appears, then you also will appear with him in glory" (Col 3:4).

  • Comment on Rom 6:9

Once again, the Greek text continues the same sentence, "…knowing that…" This is evidenced in the KJV, but modern versions usually start another new sentence here, for the sake of clarity.

FOR WE KNOW THAT SINCE CHRIST WAS RAISED FROM THE DEAD, HE CANNOT DIE AGAIN; DEATH NO LONGER HAS MASTERY OVER HIM: A cardinal principal of the atonement: Christ was justified from all power of sin and death, and therefore "Death" has no more claim upon him. It was important for Paul to emphasize this truth, for the believer must have full confidence that the captain of his salvation will never again come under the power of sin and death. If he lacks that assurance, the teaching about union with Christ will be of little help to him.

HE CANNOT DIE AGAIN: "I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades" (Rev 1:18).

  • Comment on Rom 6:10

THE DEATH HE DIED, HE DIED TO SIN: Though bearing a sinful nature (Rom 8:3), he never committed sin, and thus he condemned "sin" "in the flesh" — that is, in his own flesh.

ONCE FOR ALL: The KJV has, simply, "once", but the Greek ("ephapax") means, literally and emphatically, "once for all"! Once, being all that is required, and having perpetual validity. Unlike the High Priest who on the Day of Atonement offered up every year two sacrifices — one for himself and one for the people he represented — Christ made ONE sacrifice when he offered up himself ONCE (Heb 7:27). That offering was both for himself AND for all mankind, of whom he was the representative. It was also once for all time; it need not be repeated next week or next year! "And by that will, we have been made holy through the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all" (Heb 10:10; cp Heb 9:12, 26).

BUT THE LIFE HE LIVES, HE LIVES TO GOD: This contrasts with "died to sin". Having gained the victory over the power of King Sin in his resurrection, "by the glory of the Father", Christ now lives eternally in the service of his Father "as a priest FOREVER after the order of Melchizedek" (Heb 7:21-24).

  • Comment on Rom 6:11

IN THE SAME WAY, COUNT YOURSELVES: "Reckon" or "consider": the same word used often in Romans 4. Compare the KJV: "Likewise reckon ye also yourselves…" The repetition of words reminds us of Hebrews 2:14: "He also himself likewise…" What Christ did in his body, for himself, becomes the pattern for what we — also, likewise — seek to do: consider ourselves to be sacrifices!

DEAD TO SIN BUT ALIVE TO GOD: In the same way that Christ "lives to God" (v 10), we must also live, being "brought from death to life" (v 13). God assumes total sovereignty over the believer, who has been "bought with a price" ( 1 Cor 6:20).

IN CHRIST JESUS: Christ, the "head" (Col 1:18), is the medium by which we live to God: "I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me" (Gal 2:20; cp Phil 1:11).

  • Comment on Rom 6:12

THEREFORE DO NOT LET SIN REIGN IN YOUR MORTAL BODY: Paul continues the allegory of Romans 5: the two federal heads. 'Do not let "Adam", or "King Sin", exercise kingly power (Greek "basileuo") dominion in your natural body.' "Since you died with Christ to the basic principles of this world, why, as though you still belonged to it, do you submit to its rules?" (Col 2:20).

SO THAT YOU OBEY: The word has as its root idea "listening" or "heeding". If the body is kept mortified, it will have no ear for the subtle suggestions of evil.

ITS EVIL DESIRES: Compare Galatians 5:24; Romans 7:5; Galatians 5:16; Romans 8:13; 13:14; Ephesians 2:3; 4:22; 1 Peter 1:14.

  • Comment on Rom 6:13

DO NOT OFFER: The word "offer" or "yield" (KJV) (Greek "paristemi") means to place near for one's service (as a soldier) — 'reporting for duty!' — or to present oneself to assist (as to a king) — 'at your service!' The same word occurs in Matthew 26:53: "Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and he will at once 'put at my disposal' more than twelve legions of angels?"

THE PARTS OF YOUR BODY TO SIN: Literally, "members" (Greek "melos"), or "limbs", but by extension any part of the body, including its faculties, that is capable of performing an action.

AS INSTRUMENTS OF WICKEDNESS: Greek "hoplon" signifies arms or weapons — continuing the allegory of the "soldier" (cf Rom 13:12; 2 Cor 6:7). 'Do not enlist in King Sin's army!'

BUT RATHER OFFER YOURSELVES TO GOD, AS THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN BROUGHT FROM DEATH TO LIFE; AND OFFER THE PARTS OF YOUR BODY TO HIM AS INSTRUMENTS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS: It is wrong to belong to the "army" of King Sin. But it is of course right and proper to enlist in God's spiritual "army" (Eph 6:13-17).

  • Comment on Rom 6:14

FOR SIN SHALL NOT BE YOUR MASTER: "Shall not have dominion over you" (KJV). Or "shall not lord it over you" (cp v 12; 1 Cor 15:55-57).

BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT UNDER LAW, BUT UNDER GRACE: See Romans 5:20,21, notes (cp also Rom 6:15; 7:4; Gal 3:23). Divine grace, which is empowered by mercy, gains the victory over condemnation — which is energized by Law — the strength of King Sin.

Why should law be injected here? Surely because under law sin increases (Rom 5:20; cf 1 Cor 15:56). The inference is that law lords it over its subjects. It condemns and brings them into virtual slavery. It faces them with their guilt and uses that guilt as a manacle to keep them in helpless subjection. But under grace there is liberty to live in accord with a higher principle — the resurrection life of the Lord himself.

UNDER GRACE: "It is worthy of attention that Christians are said to be UNDER grace. Usually grace indicates a principle of divine operation, a moving out in kindness and love to lift the sinful and unworthy to God. Occasionally it is used of the sphere of the believer's life of privilege (Rom 5:2). But here in Romans 6:14 it appears as a disciplinary power, in line with the apostle's effort to show that grace is not license (Rom 6:1-14). Somewhat parallel is the word of Jesus to the weary and burdened, promising rest, but followed up with mention of his yoke (Matt 11:28-30). Related also is Paul's reminder that God's grace has appeared for the salvation of all, training us to live sober, upright, and godly lives (see Titus 2:11,12)" (Harrison).

  • Comment on Rom 6:15

WHAT THEN?: That is, 'What do we now conclude?'

SHALL WE SIN BECAUSE WE ARE NOT UNDER LAW BUT UNDER GRACE?: The first question, in verse 1, related to the general dominion and constitution of "Sin" — where the believer should NOT live or reside! This question, in verse 15, goes even further: no only should the believer not RESIDE where "Sin" rules, but neither should he even contemplate the SINGLE ACT of sin!

This question is answered in verses 16-23, which may be summarized: 'No! because we have changed allegiances: we no longer serve the old King Sin'; now we serve the new king — Christ and righteousness!'

BY NO MEANS: "God forbid" (KJV) or "Let it not be!" Very emphatic (see note, v 2).

  • Comment on Rom 6:16

Other examples of personification: riches (Matt 6:24); sin (John 8:34; Rom 5:21; 6:16); spirit (John 16:13); wisdom (Prov 3:13-15; 9:1); Israel (Jer 31:4, 18); people of Christ (Eph 4:4, 13; 5:23; Rev 19:7; 1 Cor 12:27; 2 Cor 11:2; Col 1:18, 24).

DON'T YOU KNOW THAT WHEN YOU OFFER YOURSELVES TO SOMEONE TO OBEY HIM AS SLAVES, YOU ARE SLAVES TO THE ONE WHOM YOU OBEY — WHETHER YOU ARE SLAVES TO SIN, WHICH LEADS TO DEATH, OR TO OBEDIENCE, WHICH LEADS TO RIGHTEOUSNESS?: Of course they knew. But Paul is appealing to his readers to examine a deep ethical truth as a rule for life with which they were not unfamiliar (cf expressions in Rom 6:3; 7:1; 1 Cor 3:16; 6:2,3,9,15,16,19). Simply put, it is one thing to know in principle but quite another to put into practice.

SLAVES: Greek "doulos" mean, literally, slaves (see Rom 1:1, notes). This kind of servitude gave the master an absolute right over his slave, who was, strictly speaking, his property (cp Luke 17:9; John 8:34; 15:15).

YOU ARE SLAVES TO SIN, WHICH LEADS TO DEATH: Anticipating verse 23. Compare also John 8:34: "I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin."

OR TO OBEDIENCE, WHICH LEADS TO RIGHTEOUSNESS: Whereas "sin" will automatically lead to "death" (as above), "obedience" will not automatically lead to "life", since no man, except Christ, can be or has been perfectly obedient. But "obedience" WILL lead to an imputed righteousness, for those who in faith follow Christ.

  • Comment on Rom 6:17

BUT THANKS BE TO GOD THAT, THOUGH YOU USED TO BE SLAVES TO SIN: You were once "bond-servants" under the dominion of "King Sin"…

YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY OBEYED: "From the heart (cp Rom 10:10) you have obeyed." The "heart" here indicates the inward understanding (Rom 1:21; Matt 13:15), conscience (Acts 2:37), perception (Eph 4:18), reasoning (Mark 2:6), and faith (Mark 11:23; Heb 3:12).

THE FORM OF DOCTRINE: "Form" is "tupos", a pattern or mold: "a cast or frame into which molten material is poured so as to take its shape" (Vine). Bible "doctrine" or "teaching" is not an intellectual exercise; it is a means for the practical molding of character.

TO WHICH YOU WERE ENTRUSTED: The RV and the RSV are similar. The KJV has "which was delivered you". Generally, both possibilities are quite true:

  • the "doctrine", or "teaching", was delivered to believers (or they were entrusted with it); and
  • the believers were delivered to the doctrine (or it was entrusted with them).

But which is the correct rendering here?

The KJV, says the Expositor's Bible Commentary, is a "mistranslation", and the NIV is the correct statement — even though the expected order is reversed. In other words, it would be more natural to think of teachings being committed or given to believers (as the KJV puts it), rather than believers being committed or given to the teaching. However, in this case the word "entrusted" (Greek "paradidoemi") is in the passive tense: thus, as the correctness of the NIV, "to which you were entrusted" instead of "which was entrusted to you".

Likewise, James R. Edwards supports this point. He states that the NIV translation "appears rather backward. Would it not be more correct to speak of handing over doctrines to hearers than hearers to doctrines?" (New International Bible Commentary, NIBC). But it continues by explaining: "In defense of the wording Barrett notes that 'Christians are not [like the rabbis] masters of a tradition; but are themselves created by the word of God, and remain in subjection to it' (see also 2 Cor 2:9; Gal 1:6). Käsemann is more specific, seeing the form of teaching not as the gospel in general, but as an early baptismal creed to which believers were entrusted at their baptism."

In addition, early believers were probably entrusted to the outline of moral and ethical teachings that was standard, referred to today as the Didache (see Study, The Didache).

  • Comment on Rom 6:18

YOU HAVE BEEN SET FREE FROM SIN AND HAVE BECOME SLAVES TO RIGHTEOUSNESS: Paul begins to develop what we may call the "marketplace" or "agora" metaphor.

In the previous verse and this one, "sin" is personified: "Sin" becomes the great ruler to whom all the world gives allegiance — a slave-owner who owns all men. "I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin" (Rom 7:14). In this metaphor Paul is recalling the words of Jesus: "Everyone who sins is a slave to sin" (John 8:34).

The figure of speech may be heightened as we imagine an eastern "agora" or bazaar — this marketplace was the meeting place of the ancient world; it was the center of commerce, entertainment, and social intercourse; it was the source of news and opinions. And always there was the slave-market, with its auction block. Approach that site in our minds, and the brutality, the callousness, and the fear wash over us. We imagine the smells and the sounds with revulsion — and our memories are stirred in like manner as when we see the old newsreels of Auschwitz, for our modern times have also seen their own particularly ugly forms of slavery.

Here, at the auction block, we see women destined to be slaves to the basest passions of men. And men, doomed to lifelong drudgery to satisfy the greed of their fellow men. Here are wasted, broken lives, dashed hopes, families soon to be torn apart forever.

The slave-market is an ugly parable of our world, where people are fleshly, carnal, unspiritual, and bought and sold as slaves to sin. Everyone who sins is a slave to sin. I sin; therefore I am a slave!

Into this scene comes a man who is obviously apart from others. Striding up to me, he speaks forcefully: 'I have bought you; come, follow me.' There are no chains, no threats, no blows — just a simple command. And I follow him.

Right behind him, I walk through the milling and clamorous crowds, and then through the winding streets of the city, until we come to a beautiful house. 'Here is where I live,' my new master tells me. 'And here is your room.' It is lovely and wonderfully furnished. Never have I seen such a luxurious dwelling, and this will be my home!

The master excuses himself, but soon he is back. He has brought water, and he kneels to wash MY feet! I should be washing his feet! And he has brought me a new expensive garment. I can throw away my slave's rags; I won't need them any more. With healing oil he soothes the cruel wounds inflicted by my previous owner; and I know that they will never hurt again.

'Now you are as I am,' he says; 'you are no longer a slave. This is my Father's house, and you are one of His sons!'

A lifetime of fear and hate is washed away, miraculously, and in its place is the cry of a heart set free: "Because you are sons, God sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, the Spirit who calls out, 'Abba, Father.' So you are no longer a slave, but a son; and since you are a son, God has made you also an heir" (Gal 4:6,7).

Redemption from the slave-market was a concept that would particularly appeal to Paul's converts, many of whom had been slaves themselves (Titus 2:9,10). They might not be able to hope for redemption from their mortal bondage, but they could rejoice in being redeemed from sin: "He who was a slave when he was called by the Lord is the Lord's freedman" ( 1 Cor 7:22). And they could live accordingly. In their hearts and minds they were already free from the worst slave-master. And soon their bodies would follow, and they would be truly and absolutely free!

"Redemption is release for a ransom. All who become God's servants are therefore released from a former lord by purchase. The purchaser is Jehovah; and the price, or ransom, paid is the precious blood of the flesh through which the Anointing Spirit was manifested. It is therefore styled, 'the precious blood of Christ'… He laid down his life to purchase their release from the bondage of Sin and Death… He gave his life for the purchase of life for his brethren" (Eureka 1:20, 364).

  • Comment on Rom 6:19

We may think of verse 19 as another parenthetical comment in Paul's argument.

I PUT THIS IN HUMAN TERMS: Compare Rom 3:5; Gal 3:15. It appears that Paul is restating his case in the simplest possible terms, and departing from the analogy of the previous verses.

BECAUSE YOU ARE WEAK IN YOUR NATURAL SELVES: "Because of your natural limitations" (NRSV). Compare Rom 15:1; 1 Cor 2:14; 3:3.

JUST AS YOU USED TO OFFER THE PARTS OF YOUR BODY IN SLAVERY TO IMPURITY AND TO EVER-INCREASING WICKEDNESS: There is a development here: "impurity" is a general unclean moral condition; this leads to the practice of sin… which in turns leads on, to more and more sinning. An ever-descending spiral — unless its power is broken.

SO NOW OFFER THEM IN SLAVERY TO RIGHTEOUSNESS LEADING TO HOLINESS: And, by contrast, here is the ever-ascending spiral: "righteousness" is the state in which the believer is placed through the redeeming work of the Lord Jesus Christ; this leads to a desire on the part of the one redeemed to serve his new master — so that, step by step, he develops, with the help of Christ, an ever-increasing holiness or sanctification.

  • Comment on Rom 6:20

WHEN YOU WERE SLAVES TO SIN, YOU WERE FREE FROM THE CONTROL OF RIGHTEOUSNESS: This thought is continued in the following verse…

  • Comment on Rom 6:21

WHAT BENEFIT DID YOU REAP AT THAT TIME FROM THE THINGS YOU ARE NOW ASHAMED OF?: The "unfruitful" works of "darkness" (Eph 5:11). The pleasures of sin "for (only) a season" (Heb 11:25). "Such were some of you" ( 1 Cor 6:11). There is absolutely "no harvest" (Greek "no fruit") from this direction — in contrast to verse 22: "the benefit you REAP"!

THOSE THINGS RESULT IN DEATH!: Their "end" (Greek "telos": the final issue, or the end of a process) is death.

  • Comment on Rom 6:22

BUT NOW THAT YOU HAVE BEEN SET FREE FROM SIN AND HAVE BECOME SLAVES TO GOD, THE BENEFIT YOU REAP LEADS TO HOLINESS, AND THE RESULT IS ETERNAL LIFE: There is an absolute finality, a cutting off, expressed here: 'You have been set free. Look back on your past life; those things are behind you forever now. That life now has no claim on you; it gave you nothing!' And then there is the wonder of a new life begun: 'Go forward. A new world awaits you!'

This is the New Testament equivalent of the picture in Exodus, when the former slaves of Egypt stand on the far side of the Red Sea, looking back at the land of their captivity, and are then urged to turn their backs on that land forever and go forward toward God's Land of Promise.

For "holiness" see Exodus 28:36 (cp Psa 92:13,14; Gal 5:22-25; Eph 5:8-11; Phil 1:11).

  • Comment on Rom 6:23

In a fitting conclusion, Paul describes:

  • God (and His mastery) over against sin,
  • gift over against wages, and
  • eternal life over against death.

He crowns it all with the acknowledgment that the mediation of Christ Jesus our Lord accounts for the shift from the one camp to the other.

FOR THE WAGES OF SIN IS DEATH: The Greek word for "wages" here is "opsonion", meaning the soldier's wages, the provision for his living expenses. The NET translates "pay-off". In this case "King Sin" turns out to be a wretched paymaster, promising life but meting out death. Also, since in practice wages are paid not in a lump sum but regularly and periodically, death is not to be regarded merely as the final payment, but as that which already casts its dark shadow over life, a portent of the deeper darkness to come. Finally "opsonia" being a legal term, in contrast to "gift" (Greek "charisma"), there is here a further pitting of law over against grace. Man has "rights" only in relation to sin, and that is the "right" to die as a consequence. But when he throws himself on God without any claim of "rights", he may receive salvation!

BUT THE GIFT OF GOD IS ETERNAL LIFE: A gift is contrasted with wages. Wages may be "earned", but a gift cannot be earned, for it rests entirely on the unmerited favor of the benefactor. Eternal life will be the great, unearned gift from the King of Grace: "Do not be afraid, little flock, for your Father has been pleased to give you the kingdom" (Luke 12:32).

IN CHRIST JESUS OUR LORD: Christ is God's mercy seat (Rom 3:25), the only meeting place between God and man. "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6; cp 2 Cor 5:19; 1 Tim 2:4,5).

Sin is represented as a king, a mighty monarch, a tyrannical prince; sinners are his subjects and vassals, his servants and soldiers, who fight under him, and for him, and all the wages they must expect from him is death. The word "wages" means "the hire of armies", or the wages of soldiers for a whole year, so that it denotes wages that are due, and paid after a campaign is ended, and the service is over; and suggests, that when men have been all their days in the service of sin, and have fought under the banners of it, the wages they will earn, and the just reward, and correct payment that will be given them, will be death. King Sin has never been known to default on a payment yet.

On the other hand, the "free gift" of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Both the wages and the gift are eternal — but the "gift" of God is just that — it cannot be earned — it can only be accepted by living through the very one who by his righteous life overcame and did away with King Sin!